Is that true? I would love to have Root Double physical, I backed a lot of money on the ks.
how would that work when they firmly adamant on "it can't fit on the Vita cart"
Even if it can technically fit on 4gb cart, can it really fit? Like how you have any SD Card but there is already some space taken up even if there is nothing in it yet? I imagine Vita cart to have something similar.
That's REALLY unfortunate. I'm still waiting around for Phantom Breaker, and I'll pay what it takes, but this practice will end my consideration for some of the smaller releases that might experience this tax.
Where did they say that???
I'm not a fan of Switch releases being more expensive than other releases, so I'm glad that Limited Run Games isn't doing that for Switch releases. I'd be unhappy if their Switch games cost more than a PS4 version. This higher pricing is very frustrating for most Switch users, we want less of this, not more.
The Japanese version definitely couldn't, it was 200MB larger. I'm still not solidly convinced the NA version can fit but it's pretty darn close if not
I can understand were you are coming from, but price parity is the best way forward on this. Switch version being pricier is going to create a large amount of hate. LRG should sell all versions at the same price.
But then they would be screwing people buying a ps4 version.
I'd argue it would be more unfair for Switch stuff to cost more. I really want price parity. LRG maintained price parity with Vita and PS4 games, despite admitting that the Vita games were more costly to produce. I am glad they are maintaining price parity for Switch games. It would really put me off buying Switch games that cost more than their counterparts on other systems.
Not all games on the Switch cost more than on other platforms, some publishers do it, some don't. It is most certainly not an "expectation". It upsets people, and it would drive away potential customers from Limited Run Games.
I don´t think it would be unfair. If producing/distrbuting a Switch game is more expensive, then it's logic that said game will sold for a higher price. I think that raising the price of a ps4 game just so people won't complain is even more unfair.
So if that's the case...why are Vita games priced the same as PS4 games? They do cost more to make (LRG has mentioned this), and yet they are priced the same. If I understand what you are saying, you would like Vita games to be priced higher since they cost more to make.
Perhaps Vita games aren't as expensive as Switch games??? I don't want to speculate about something I have no clue about. I'm just saying that they shouldn't raise the prices just to appease Switch owners.
I'm not saying Vita games cost as much as Switch games. But, how would you feel if Limited Run Games announced that, in the future, Vita games would be priced higher than PS4 games? You probably wouldn't like that would you?
