Yeah, the video I watched very clearly told me they were Not The Avengers.
This is a really bad take and really short sighted. Even ignoring that as many people in this thread have pointed out, copyright never stopped porn existing or being created in the droves; you do realize how much of that original stuff your talking about wouldn't exist or would have to be heavily altered if their was no public domain right? Like so much of fantasy just as an example wouldn't exist because of how much those works borrow, adapt or are inspired by others, many centuries old. Same with Sci-Fi, Horror, Romance etc. And that's literature and moves, you'd be surprised how much common music and iconography wouldn't be allowed to use if their was no public domain, if we allowed corporations to just own everything indefinitelyThat is why i never put much hay in the anti copyright movement "we can get new and original takes on stuff". People that can do new and original takes are doing them without the need for an existing ip.
is it lazy dev rhetoric to call this lazy? because this idea is so lame and seems like asset swap
sure but anything that releases with the next year or two should get automatic side eyeFor those saying that people need to come up with original stories instead of using public domain concepts, there's a lot of power in using characters and concepts that people already know that aren't owned by some corporation. Using Sherlock Holmes in your story can instantly create familiarity and evoke emotions. People react more to a named Lovecraft creature showing up than something that just evokes it. Just because the people have been denied this power for more recent things for ages doesn't mean it's morally superior to not use it.
In any case, bad things are still bad and the boomer shooter looks more promising as a use of Public Domain Mickey; though I expect Mouse will leave the player character unnamed.
This is a really bad take and really short sighted. Even ignoring that as many people in this thread have pointed out, copyright never stopped porn existing or being created in the droves; you do realize how much of that original stuff your talking about wouldn't exist or would have to be heavily altered if their was no public domain right? Like so much of fantasy just as an example wouldn't exist because of how much those works borrow, adapt or are inspired by others, many centuries old. Same with Sci-Fi, Horror, Romance etc. And that's literature and moves, you'd be surprised how much common music and iconography wouldn't be allowed to use if their was no public domain, if we allowed corporations to just own everything indefinitely
Like Disney itself heavily abuses the public domain to make billions only to then use it's power to make sure others can't with "there" work (just look at the opening credits of early Disney movies and see how many of them have Charles Perrault's name, which many of his works themselves wouldn't exist if their was no public domain) then bully and exploit smaller creators. Same with DC comics, look up the shit they pulled with Fawcett Publications for example; same with Universal with it's Classic horror movies of the 30s-50s. And that's not even getting into These corporations horde original IPs while screwing over the actual creators of it or just copyright trolling in general. The Public Domain, even in its neutered form as it is now at least makes sure these works eventually see the light of day.
Because the actual important part of the public domain, not the idea people can make new shit, but that these works have the chance to be preserved, restored and is accessible to people, many works such as Nosferatu (and work that nearly didn't exist today), It's a Wonderful Life and Night of the Living Dead wouldn't be as remembered as fondly as they are without it. Very little actually gets re-released by corps, so much of it never sees the light again until it enters the public domain.
As as gaming fan, you should damn well know how we shouldn't be trusting corporations in preserving media given how much of gaming history has been lost due to lack of care and incompetence. For every Nintendo (which issue isn't preservation, just public access) which preserves vastly, you get a Konami or a Square Enix who have lost the source code for so many games, The Legend of Mana only be spared that fate thanks to Nintendo. How much of gaming's earliest games like the first fighting game are lost because the corps just did not care.
But hey, none of that matters because some edgelord made a shit game or movie no one will remember in 10 years, not like that happens with everything from Santa, Fairytales and Dracula anyway and no one cares, suddenly it's Mickey and were demanding corperations have more control which... Wouldn't actually change much since this shit would exist regardless just unofficially And officially as we've seen with Scooby Doo, Looney Tunes, Transformers etc but It's different when the the corps do it because... Because nothing I guess.
Copyright as is broken, not been updated for a digital age and giving corporations too much power and needs to be changed. The public domain is one of the few things that gives us some power over corps and need more power not less along with others thing like unions and pushing for better laws against not just copyright, but trademark and patent abuse as well.
Streamers.So lame, no offense to the developers. But who is this stuff even for?
Perfectly put 👏This is a really bad take and really short sighted. Even ignoring that as many people in this thread have pointed out, copyright never stopped porn existing or being created in the droves; you do realize how much of that original stuff your talking about wouldn't exist or would have to be heavily altered if their was no public domain right? Like so much of fantasy just as an example wouldn't exist because of how much those works borrow, adapt or are inspired by others, many centuries old. Same with Sci-Fi, Horror, Romance etc. And that's literature and moves, you'd be surprised how much common music and iconography wouldn't be allowed to use if their was no public domain, if we allowed corporations to just own everything indefinitely
Like Disney itself heavily abuses the public domain to make billions only to then use it's power to make sure others can't with "there" work (just look at the opening credits of early Disney movies and see how many of them have Charles Perrault's name, which many of his works themselves wouldn't exist if their was no public domain) then bully and exploit smaller creators. Same with DC comics, look up the shit they pulled with Fawcett Publications for example; same with Universal with it's Classic horror movies of the 30s-50s. And that's not even getting into These corporations horde original IPs while screwing over the actual creators of it or just copyright trolling in general. The Public Domain, even in its neutered form as it is now at least makes sure these works eventually see the light of day.
Because the actual important part of the public domain, not the idea people can make new shit, but that these works have the chance to be preserved, restored and is accessible to people, many works such as Nosferatu (and work that nearly didn't exist today), It's a Wonderful Life and Night of the Living Dead wouldn't be as remembered as fondly as they are without it. Very little actually gets re-released by corps, so much of it never sees the light again until it enters the public domain.
As as gaming fan, you should damn well know how we shouldn't be trusting corporations in preserving media given how much of gaming history has been lost due to lack of care and incompetence. For every Nintendo (which issue isn't preservation, just public access) which preserves vastly, you get a Konami or a Square Enix who have lost the source code for so many games, The Legend of Mana only be spared that fate thanks to Nintendo. How much of gaming's earliest games like the first fighting game are lost because the corps just did not care.
But hey, none of that matters because some edgelord made a shit game or movie no one will remember in 10 years, not like that happens with everything from Santa, Fairytales and Dracula anyway and no one cares, suddenly it's Mickey and were demanding corperations have more control which... Wouldn't actually change much since this shit would exist regardless just unofficially And officially as we've seen with Scooby Doo, Looney Tunes, Transformers etc but It's different when the the corps do it because... Because nothing I guess.
Copyright as is broken, not been updated for a digital age and giving corporations too much power and needs to be changed. The public domain is one of the few things that gives us some power over corps and need more power not less along with others thing like unions and pushing for better laws against not just copyright, but trademark and patent abuse as well.
JfcSomeone took a look on the discord and it was about what you expect
![]()
![]()
This is a really bad take and really short sighted. Even ignoring that as many people in this thread have pointed out, copyright never stopped porn existing or being created in the droves; you do realize how much of that original stuff your talking about wouldn't exist or would have to be heavily altered if their was no public domain right? Like so much of fantasy just as an example wouldn't exist because of how much those works borrow, adapt or are inspired by others, many centuries old. Same with Sci-Fi, Horror, Romance etc. And that's literature and moves, you'd be surprised how much common music and iconography wouldn't be allowed to use if their was no public domain, if we allowed corporations to just own everything indefinitely
Like Disney itself heavily abuses the public domain to make billions only to then use it's power to make sure others can't with "there" work (just look at the opening credits of early Disney movies and see how many of them have Charles Perrault's name, which many of his works themselves wouldn't exist if their was no public domain) then bully and exploit smaller creators. Same with DC comics, look up the shit they pulled with Fawcett Publications for example; same with Universal with it's Classic horror movies of the 30s-50s. And that's not even getting into These corporations horde original IPs while screwing over the actual creators of it or just copyright trolling in general. The Public Domain, even in its neutered form as it is now at least makes sure these works eventually see the light of day.
Because the actual important part of the public domain, not the idea people can make new shit, but that these works have the chance to be preserved, restored and is accessible to people, many works such as Nosferatu (and work that nearly didn't exist today), It's a Wonderful Life and Night of the Living Dead wouldn't be as remembered as fondly as they are without it. Very little actually gets re-released by corps, so much of it never sees the light again until it enters the public domain.
As as gaming fan, you should damn well know how we shouldn't be trusting corporations in preserving media given how much of gaming history has been lost due to lack of care and incompetence. For every Nintendo (which issue isn't preservation, just public access) which preserves vastly, you get a Konami or a Square Enix who have lost the source code for so many games, The Legend of Mana only be spared that fate thanks to Nintendo. How much of gaming's earliest games like the first fighting game are lost because the corps just did not care.
But hey, none of that matters because some edgelord made a shit game or movie no one will remember in 10 years, not like that happens with everything from Santa, Fairytales and Dracula anyway and no one cares, suddenly it's Mickey and were demanding corperations have more control which... Wouldn't actually change much since this shit would exist regardless just unofficially And officially as we've seen with Scooby Doo, Looney Tunes, Transformers etc but It's different when the the corps do it because... Because nothing I guess.
Copyright as is broken, not been updated for a digital age and giving corporations too much power and needs to be changed. The public domain is one of the few things that gives us some power over corps and need more power not less along with others thing like unions and pushing for better laws against not just copyright, but trademark and patent abuse as well.
I imagine it's such a slippery slope to create something that doesn't inadvertently use copyrighted material that it isn't worth it at this point. Once more works become available to the public is when I imagine we will see more creative and interesting projects using Mickey.Surprised Cuphead wasn't the first game to make use of this being in the public domain. Hope we get an update.
I think it's still free, but you can read through my law professor's great book on intellectual property/ public domain here. I think the above is a pretty good write-up, but also would like to point out that taxpayers bear a financial burden for defending short-term monopolies through copyright/trademark which is usually fine (given the tradeoff of encouraging creation of IP) but we don't have any obligation to do so in perpetuity.This is a really bad take and really short sighted. Even ignoring that as many people in this thread have pointed out, copyright never stopped porn existing or being created in the droves; you do realize how much of that original stuff your talking about wouldn't exist or would have to be heavily altered if their was no public domain right? Like so much of fantasy just as an example wouldn't exist because of how much those works borrow, adapt or are inspired by others, many centuries old. Same with Sci-Fi, Horror, Romance etc. And that's literature and moves, you'd be surprised how much common music and iconography wouldn't be allowed to use if their was no public domain, if we allowed corporations to just own everything indefinitely
Like Disney itself heavily abuses the public domain to make billions only to then use it's power to make sure others can't with "there" work (just look at the opening credits of early Disney movies and see how many of them have Charles Perrault's name, which many of his works themselves wouldn't exist if their was no public domain) then bully and exploit smaller creators. Same with DC comics, look up the shit they pulled with Fawcett Publications for example; same with Universal with it's Classic horror movies of the 30s-50s. And that's not even getting into These corporations horde original IPs while screwing over the actual creators of it or just copyright trolling in general. The Public Domain, even in its neutered form as it is now at least makes sure these works eventually see the light of day.
Because the actual important part of the public domain, not the idea people can make new shit, but that these works have the chance to be preserved, restored and is accessible to people, many works such as Nosferatu (and work that nearly didn't exist today), It's a Wonderful Life and Night of the Living Dead wouldn't be as remembered as fondly as they are without it. Very little actually gets re-released by corps, so much of it never sees the light again until it enters the public domain.
As as gaming fan, you should damn well know how we shouldn't be trusting corporations in preserving media given how much of gaming history has been lost due to lack of care and incompetence. For every Nintendo (which issue isn't preservation, just public access) which preserves vastly, you get a Konami or a Square Enix who have lost the source code for so many games, The Legend of Mana only be spared that fate thanks to Nintendo. How much of gaming's earliest games like the first fighting game are lost because the corps just did not care.
But hey, none of that matters because some edgelord made a shit game or movie no one will remember in 10 years, not like that happens with everything from Santa, Fairytales and Dracula anyway and no one cares, suddenly it's Mickey and were demanding corperations have more control which... Wouldn't actually change much since this shit would exist regardless just unofficially And officially as we've seen with Scooby Doo, Looney Tunes, Transformers etc but It's different when the the corps do it because... Because nothing I guess.
Copyright as is broken, not been updated for a digital age and giving corporations too much power and needs to be changed. The public domain is one of the few things that gives us some power over corps and need more power not less along with others thing like unions and pushing for better laws against not just copyright, but trademark and patent abuse as well.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I'm not big on coincidence chains either...
View: https://x.com/MagitekDad/status/1742196163258745280?s=20
So we have:
- A game about a rat invasion (anyone who's read Art Spiegelman's Maus should already know where this is headed);
- Where one plays as exterminators using gas masks, who coincidentally use poison gas as their weapon;
- On a game titled "Infestation 88" (which, as another user pointed out, has 14 characters, besides the obvious 88 dog-whistle);
- Which also happens to supposedly reference the StG 44 German WWII assault rifle;
- And if you want to add my original dog-whistly speculation, it wouldn't be a stretch to be suspicious of that "SS" at this point.
We either hit the motherload of coincidences here, or there's something majorly fucked up going on.
All while the game's announcement gets spread around everywhere by the likes of IGN, Eurogamer and Destructoid, who I won't blame for not noticing, since I also didn't make the association at first glance.
Nah, I ain't touching that shit with a 10-mile pole.
They wouldn't win with that argument. Copyright is an exclusive right to create and distribute copies within a timeframe. It's based on release date, both of the original work and what it protects.I wonder if Disney could sue with the pretense that this was in the works before today
No, absolutely not. Copyright cannot be unilaterally extended under any conditions. The only way it gets increased is if a government does it.Can't Disney theoretically have extended the copyright on Mickey due to using Steamboat Willie as its opening title card since 2007 for their in house films or something? Swore I read that once
I had to think for a bit to be sure that I understood this question and had interpreted it correctly. I think you're looking at this the wrong way. The ability for people to use Mickey Mouse, now that he's in the public domain, isn't contingent on some allowable level of iteration or variation. People can do essentially whatever they want, as long as it doesn't infringe on the very specific ways Disney creatively evolved and changed the character over the years.So how far can people stretch the design of this specific Mickey before it's not considered within what's now allowed in public domain? Like to me the Mickey picture in the OP is already pretty far off
EDIT: Dev Response to Name & Discord Members
![]()
View: https://youtu.be/Qe85jZhSflk?si=BrWt7le0ok4YVXNl
View: https://twitter.com/Wario64/status/1741854132737339778?t=TwOcd6HLDo1UHEQX4iWbCw&s=19
People really be wanting horror I guess.
Anyways check THIS awesome game out instead!
View: https://youtu.be/BZAVznVPMh8?si=9xIjvQQ829C3yDP9
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I'm not big on coincidence chains either...
View: https://x.com/MagitekDad/status/1742196163258745280?s=20
So we have:
- A game about a rat invasion (anyone who's read Art Spiegelman's Maus should already know where this is headed);
- Where one plays as exterminators using gas masks, who coincidentally use poison gas as their weapon;
- On a game titled "Infestation 88" (which, as another user pointed out, has 14 characters, besides the obvious 88 dog-whistle);
- Which also happens to supposedly reference the StG 44 German WWII assault rifle;
- And if you want to add my original dog-whistly speculation, it wouldn't be a stretch to be suspicious of that "SS" at this point.
We either hit the motherload of coincidences here, or there's something majorly fucked up going on.
All while the game's announcement gets spread around everywhere by the likes of IGN, Eurogamer and Destructoid, who I won't blame for not noticing, since I also didn't make the association at first glance.
Nah, I ain't touching that shit with a 10-mile pole.
Lol yeah I was gonna say I can believe the "88" being an unfortunate mistake but not with all of this on top. Fuck that.
Are these the developers or just the fans?Someone took a look on the discord and it was about what you expect
![]()
![]()
It can't get more transparent than thisYeah way too many "coincidences" here. I didn't really think about it at first but in hindsight, a game about seeking to gas an "infestation of rats" lead by the mascot of Disney has a pretty obvious double meaning.
I also saw this:
![]()
Interesting that they've apparently been making games since 2010 despite this being their first release. Gee, I wonder how many years it's been since then.
Nah lolI wonder if Disney could sue with the pretense that this was in the works before today
That's Fourt- OH COME ON.Yeah way too many "coincidences" here. I didn't really think about it at first but in hindsight, a game about seeking to gas an "infestation of rats" lead by the mascot of Disney has a pretty obvious double meaning.
I also saw this:
![]()
Interesting that they've apparently been making games since 2010 despite this being their first release. Gee, I wonder how many years it's been since then.
TIL, I did not know 14 was a Nazi number. Excuse my ignorance, but what does the logo signify? Is it the hood that's bad? Or the anvil, or both?Yeah way too many "coincidences" here. I didn't really think about it at first but in hindsight, a game about seeking to gas an "infestation of rats" lead by the mascot of Disney has a pretty obvious double meaning.
I also saw this:
![]()
Interesting that they've apparently been making games since 2010 despite this being their first release. Gee, I wonder how many years it's been since then.
Not sure if I'm dumb or naive, what does this mean?
The 14 words is a huge thing in the modern nazi world.
Look up 14 88TIL, I did not know 14 was a Nazi number. Excuse my ignorance, but what does the logo signify? Is it the hood that's bad? Or the anvil, or both?
I found that, that's how I found out about 14. Does that have something to do with the anvil? Or is the logo not the issue?
Huh. Unfortunately I've learned today.
I found that, that's how I found out about 14. Does that have something to do with the anvil? Or is the logo not the issue?
That's not saying they've been making games at this studio since 2010, but that their team is made up of people who've been in the industry making horror games since 2010.Yeah way too many "coincidences" here. I didn't really think about it at first but in hindsight, a game about seeking to gas an "infestation of rats" lead by the mascot of Disney has a pretty obvious double meaning.
I also saw this:
![]()
Interesting that they've apparently been making games since 2010 despite this being their first release. Gee, I wonder how many years it's been since then.
Surprised Cuphead wasn't the first game to make use of this being in the public domain. Hope we get an update.