Bluntly, this post suggests to me that you have very little appreciation of reality. That is to say, I believe this is a pretty bad post, but I want you to appreciate that the reason that I think it's bad is because it's full of generic claims with little substance that is leveraging the lack of understanding of the actual situation so that you can just fabricate a situation whole cloth that allows you to present yourself as intellectually superior to all parties. You're not assessing the situation and drawing a conclusion from it because doing that would require you to make at least some effort to understand the situation.
You yourself point out how there's no actual evidence of Sweet Baby Inc causing any of the issues in this game, and while you speak about the "logical assumption", it doesn't occur to you to consider that if there's no evidence of those issues,
maybe those aren't the issues leading to them being targeted. That is to say, that while their effects on the games aren't clearly known, their mission statement of assisting in adding diversity to games is, and so makes them a target to people acting specifically against diversity. You only spent a single sentence in this giant post grazing by the thing that Sweet Baby Inc is entirely about.
You tell us that the free market will sort this out and that this isn't against the Steam rules, but don't take a moment to consider that Steam already has known issues that laissez-faire capitalism has done nothing to solve.
Steam's community has historically been recognized for taking a weak stance against things like Nazism, which is enabled specifically because it's based in America, where the government is unable to prosecute hate speech due to it repeatedly being considered a valid form of speech, and thus Valve is under no pressure to remove it in order to keep their business operational. You say that people complaining won't do much, but how is the market doing anything more here aside from telling people who oppose diversity that their money is worth as much as anyone else's and they should also be catered to?
I'm not even going to bother repeating myself on your
don't feed the trolls-style argument because you've provided nothing to make that any more substantial than the concerns raised before.
