Easy, Normal or Hard?
- Thread starter Ex-Psych
- Start date
Pretty much always Normal, since thats what the game is designed around. Unless the game tells me otherwise, like Halo.
Depends on the game. I played through FE awakening and UMVC3 on hard, but would never play doom 2016 on hard difficulty because I dont play FPSs that often.
Completely depends on the game. When Prime 4 comes out, I'm playing that on hard from the start if it's there, unless it's like completely new controls from the trilogy.
second highest always
Got four difficulties? Then N.3 is probably my jam (Heroic in Halo, for example)
Got four difficulties? Then N.3 is probably my jam (Heroic in Halo, for example)
Hard if I think I can handle it, which I generally can other than for shooters which I suck at. The exception is games that I know I'll play multiple times and just want to enjoy the experience the first time, which is what I'll do with KH3, normal and then critical.
Hard all the time. I like the challenge, it prolongs the game for me, I really have to learn the nuances of the game to succeed, and that sweet, sweet achievement/trophy!
Hard mode when I had more time. Now, mostly normal. However I always do Proud in KH first and that won't change
I'll go hard by default as I play every game with the assumption I will only ever play it this once and some games like DOOM become different much lesser games when the difficulty option is too easy.
But on the flip side other games like Wolfenstein became a chore at higher difficulty.
A harder difficulty coming out after release, such as with BOTW, is very annoying.
But on the flip side other games like Wolfenstein became a chore at higher difficulty.
A harder difficulty coming out after release, such as with BOTW, is very annoying.
I don't know, depends on the genre and time I guess.
For older games like Resident Evil I always play on normal cause that's just perfectly challenging for me, but for newer games I almost always choose hard.
For older games like Resident Evil I always play on normal cause that's just perfectly challenging for me, but for newer games I almost always choose hard.
HALO 1 on legendary taught me how much difficulty could really elevate a game. I wouldn't call myself particularly skilled, but something is really off when I can just breeze through a game. I like a little more challenge, so I'd always go at least one above normal.
Also this. Growing up on those games just makes today's stuff a lot easier on default settings.
Also this. Growing up on those games just makes today's stuff a lot easier on default settings.
Hard on my first playthrough. Whatever's a step above that for my second go-around, if I really want that Platinum/1000G.
I can pretty reliably get Call of Duty and Halo games cleared on the highest difficulty, but I'd rather go through nice and easy on Hardened first, before I repeatedly throw myself at the enemy until I hit the next checkpoint on Veteran. Same goes for action games. I set fighters to easy, though; I'm a little baby who can't get combos right, in spite of understanding things like frame links and canceling into specials.
I can pretty reliably get Call of Duty and Halo games cleared on the highest difficulty, but I'd rather go through nice and easy on Hardened first, before I repeatedly throw myself at the enemy until I hit the next checkpoint on Veteran. Same goes for action games. I set fighters to easy, though; I'm a little baby who can't get combos right, in spite of understanding things like frame links and canceling into specials.
Easy on games I'm not that excited to play or I am not good at. (Fighting games, Horror, Strategy)
Normal on games on the ones I'm excited to play.
Hard on games I already played and I'm excited to give it another go.
Normal on games on the ones I'm excited to play.
Hard on games I already played and I'm excited to give it another go.
These days, I'm not sure. Either Normal or Easy. I think it depends on the genre, what defines my interest in the game, if the game has systems that allow bad players to overcome skill barriers (e.g. leveling up/grinding), how frequent/punishing deaths are, and my baseline skill. I'm sure there's a pattern to which games I jump into on Easy versus which ones I stay on Normal, but I'm not conscious of it at the moment.
I go for the developer recommended difficulty first run. So it depends on what the game is balanced around. For example Halo is balanced around Heroic and Gears on Hardcore. God of War 4 was balanced around Give me a Challenege I'd say. Give me God of War was mostly bullshit.
I hate difficulty options in games. Developers should balance the game how they want and if I don't like it that's fine.
Giving me the blind choice at the start when I don't have any real idea what the developer considers as "easy" or "hard" always frustrates me. If games really want to have options then they should just start you on a default difficulty and between missions ask if you want it to be easier or harder.
Having said that, I usually go for the hardest or second hardest depending on how they word it.
Giving me the blind choice at the start when I don't have any real idea what the developer considers as "easy" or "hard" always frustrates me. If games really want to have options then they should just start you on a default difficulty and between missions ask if you want it to be easier or harder.
Having said that, I usually go for the hardest or second hardest depending on how they word it.
I'd say normal but I expect most games' normal mode to be pretty easy these days..
But usually I do a google check before I start.
For example, I just started yakuza zero. People seem to agree that normal mode isn't very challenging. I started on normal, but you can switch at any time, no problem, so I switched to hard. It seems doable.
I don't want a nightmarish difficulty.. I guess if I really like the game I'll consider it, otherwise, I just want to be challenged to pay attention so that I have to actually get something out of the game in order to play it. I don't want to be bored.. If I wanted such a passive experience it wouldn't be playing video games.
But usually I do a google check before I start.
For example, I just started yakuza zero. People seem to agree that normal mode isn't very challenging. I started on normal, but you can switch at any time, no problem, so I switched to hard. It seems doable.
I don't want a nightmarish difficulty.. I guess if I really like the game I'll consider it, otherwise, I just want to be challenged to pay attention so that I have to actually get something out of the game in order to play it. I don't want to be bored.. If I wanted such a passive experience it wouldn't be playing video games.
Fire Emblem: Hardest difficulty (except bonus difficulties such as lunatic Plus or Reverse).
Everything else: Just hard.
Everything else: Just hard.
Last edited:
Usually whatever's default since I figure that's where it's been balanced unless the developers or game itself tells me otherwise. Unless it's a game with scores or ranking like Bayonetta or DMC or Housemarque arcade titles, then I start on easy and work my way up to the highest difficulty.
Normal most of the time. Easy for grindy RPGs or games I find too hard and that I'm there mostly for the story anyway. Pretty much never harder settings.
Most games I go with hard, unless I've heard it's a more difficult game. Like with Divinity OS2 I went with Classic (normal) and that's perfect for me. When it comes to somerhing like TLOU or KH though, I start with hard.
