I mean, owning a 5% won't make them choose their business decisions.Doesn't Sony own some sort of stake in Devolver? Or is it so small it's basically useless?
They bought 5 percent when devolver went publicDoesn't Sony own some sort of stake in Devolver? Or is it so small it's basically useless?
Carrion was on Game Pass, right? I think I remember that being a thing. I can't imagine MS throwing that much money their way for a game like that. Neat as it was.The subscription revenue being down after refusing subscription deals isn't news.
The interesting info here is that Devolver refused these deals cause they felt the offers undervalued their games. Considering that MS was thinking BG3 on gamepass was worth paying $5 million for, I'd guess Devolver's games would be marked far lower.
What do you have there? Newest game from Devolver? Eh, $20 is the best we can do.
I would imagine if they got a good offer one of the PS/Xbox platforms would've got priority.That bullet seems to be referring to the 4 titles released in 1H23? And none of those released outside of PC and Switch or mobile? They clearly took Netflix sub money for Terra Nil.
It's unfortunately not too surprising that they undervalue the games in a subscription deal. I'm willing to bet they view most indie games as cheap subscription fodder.
Probably. I'm not sure how much Sludge Life 2, Terra Nil or Bleak Sword DX would have been offered..I would imagine if they got a good offer one of the PS/Xbox platforms would've got priority.
Netflix probably offering more money than Sony and MS tbf, which seems to be DD's problem more so than the actual services. Netflix are trying to break in to the industry whereas Sony and MS probably aren't throwing lots around for the smaller stuff anymore.
My initial reaction is "good" because not everything should be on these subscription services. It might be good to start pushing back against that because of what we're seeing with rising prices with video/media subscription services while getting less and less for it.
At least at Steam most of their games don't have trouble selling. MS and Sony should just offer moreIt's a gamble either way. I commend them on their stance, but there are just too many good games readily available for many people to pay theirs any mind. Unless they launch something that can capture the zeitgeist, I'm afraid they'll just end up with more underperforming games than not. Too many of those and it's layoffs or closures, the worst possible outcomes.
This incredible"The expert just said its worth $50,000 but its just not a very popular genre. Its going to just be sitting around my eshop collecting dust. The best I can do is $10,000."
Yeah, unfortunately. I know a lot of people make fun of people here for asking how Game Pass is sustainable but it's really a fair question when streaming services across the board have made people ask the same questions. Subscription providers need content but they also undervalue the content they're providing, so it's tough.That's always part of the point with these services: devalue art and entertainment to where essentially most of it is worthless and then reshape the market around that. Devolver may be an outlier now, but more stories like this will come. It probably won't be a total 1:1 to how streaming and subs destroyed other mediums, but it'll be similar. That's part of the design
Yikes, that seems to say they lost close to $100 million over the last year?
I have been concerned that subscription services will lead to games being devalued, much as has happened with spotify. I think it's a little less likely because it's not like everything is on gampass like is the case for streaming music service.
And its not an unfounded concern either, the movir and music industry is suffering from subscription services not being the golden goose they want. How is gaming any different reallyYeah, unfortunately. I know a lot of people make fun of people here for asking how Game Pass is sustainable but it's really a fair question when streaming services across the board have made people ask the same questions. Subscription providers need content but they also undervalue the content they're providing, so it's tough.
Devolver used to be happy wirh what they were getting too. MS has cut back. You can't keep quoting people who were happy about the old payments when talking about the present.We've read many positive comments from those studios that they have seen fair compensation.
Not right now, but it's only a matter of time before that shift changes. Rising prices, less ways to save, cutting out bulk purchases, etc.I don't think folks are getting less and less for Gamepass though so I'm not sure how that makes sense.
There is scenario where Sony might scale back on Extra but MS is all-or-die on Game Pass, demise of Game Pass (whatever that would be) means MS completely failed in the gaming industry.Won't weep for the demise of sub services.
Hopefully, like online passes of 2010-2013 it is merely a passing phase.
Not right now, but it's only a matter of time before that shift changes. Rising prices, less ways to save, cutting out bulk purchases, etc.
These arguments never make any sense. Because they're never unique to subscription services.Not right now, but it's only a matter of time before that shift changes. Rising prices, less ways to save, cutting out bulk purchases, etc.