It's the sort of thing that pops up when there is a criminal that happens to be trans in the news: dead-naming and saying that people like that don't deserve to be treated as their preferred gender, etc. Naturally the individual is typically unlikeable because they have committed some crime, but does that make it any less bad?
Even without the crime aspect, my mother-in-law (UK) has a trans niece that she will refuse to acknowledge as female because of a drug addiction and some other stuff she doesn't like. She literally stifles a laugh every time she has to say the niece's actual name, but usually just dead-names her instead when talking about her.
Is it a dog whistle hiding behind justified anger at someone? How do you argue the gender aspect of the situation without getting labelled "pro-crime" or something like that?
Even without the crime aspect, my mother-in-law (UK) has a trans niece that she will refuse to acknowledge as female because of a drug addiction and some other stuff she doesn't like. She literally stifles a laugh every time she has to say the niece's actual name, but usually just dead-names her instead when talking about her.
Is it a dog whistle hiding behind justified anger at someone? How do you argue the gender aspect of the situation without getting labelled "pro-crime" or something like that?