Nope you're absolutely right.
Definitely not just you.
A bit?
Every time I see a post of his, it seems his art has somehow gotten even worse. Look at those eyes.
I thought he was doing weird religious cartoons for pre schoolers
Money obviously.
Not just you, I instantly thought of this.
He is doing both.I thought he was doing weird religious cartoons for pre schoolers
lmao honestly!!
!EDIT: Wait, the topic says "more". What else did this bum plagiarize???
Is the original artist the creator of Mikasa? If not they're no better.
Fanart isn't plagiarism. Blatantly copying someone's fanart is plagiarism.Is the original artist the creator of Mikasa? If not they're no better. Butch clearly referenced that photo but just made a shitty version of a licensed character not owned by either of them
It's so bad. Is this guy meant to be a professional? 😂
Is the original artist the creator of Mikasa? If not they're no better. Butch clearly referenced that photo but just made a shitty version of a licensed character not owned by either of them
So the answer is no, it's just fanart. The are making money off of a property that they didn't create
What the hell are you even sayingIs the original artist the creator of Mikasa? If not they're no better. Butch clearly referenced that photo but just made a shitty version of a licensed character not owned by either of them
I still fail to understand how this even happened in the digital age.
Do you... not know what fanart is?So the answer is no, it's just fanart. The are making money off of a property that they didn't create
The artist he plagiarized doesn't sell their piece per the tweet above.So the answer is no, it's just fanart. The are making money off of a property that they didn't create
So the answer is no, it's just fanart. The are making money off of a property that they didn't create
Do you own the Pokemon IP? Your avatar is mewtwo, pretty sure it's not official art either.Is the original artist the creator of Mikasa? If not they're no better. Butch clearly referenced that photo but just made a shitty version of a licensed character not owned by either of them
The artist he plagiarized doesn't sell their piece per the tweet above.
Does everyone in this thread think fanart is not a copyright issue? It's not like artist is even stylizing their work to interpret Mikasa differently.
Does everyone in this thread think fanart is not a copyright issue? It's not like artist is even stylizing their work to interpret Mikasa differently.
To me this is just a weird grey area of who cares, it's fanart.
"Good artist borrow, great artist steal"
Person A made fan art. Butch stole Person A's fan art by copying it, then selling it. Person A is innocent. Butch is a prick.So the answer is no, it's just fanart. The are making money off of a property that they didn't create