Uzzy

Gabe’s little helper
Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,503
Hull, UK

The Cass Review, which recently completed it's work a few months ago, was commissioned by NHS England to look at the existing services being offered for children with gender dysphoria. What it really did was put forward a number of recommendations which deny trans children the ability to delay puberty, and risks suspending their ability to transition. This was sadly adopted by the then Conservative Government as a reason to launch an emergency ban of puberty blockers for trans kids, something that was recently found to be legal, with the current Labour Government looking to make such a ban permanent.

The review itself was widely attacked by medical experts and organisations around the world for a variety of reasons, you can find out more here. What's important with this move from the BMA is that they're the UK organisation for doctors, representing 151,000 of them, and one of the biggest medical organisations in Britain. They're well respected experts and have the firepower to be listened to.

Here, the BMA's council passed the following motion unanimously.

'This meeting recognises that the provision of gender identity services in the United Kingdom is inadequate, and that transgender people should be treated with compassion and respect for their bodily autonomy. Following the publication of the Cass Review on Gender Identity Services for children and young people, this meeting is concerned about its impact on transgender healthcare provision because of its unsubstantiated recommendations driven by unexplained study protocol deviations, ambiguous eligibility criteria, and exclusion of trans-affirming evidence. Therefore, this meeting calls on the BMA to:
i. Publicly critique the Cass Review;
ii. Lobby and work with other relevant organisations and stakeholders to oppose the implementation of the recommendations made by the Cass Review;
iii. Lobby the Government and NHS in all four nations to ensure continuity in provision of transgender healthcare for patients younger than 18 years old;
iv. Lobby the Government and NHS in all four nations to ensure continuity in provision of transgender healthcare for patients aged 18 or older;
v. Publicly state support for transgender people, particularly transgender youth, and provision of prompt access to gender identity services and treatment at all ages;
vi. Condemn the increasing political transphobia which is ostracising transgender people and discriminating against them by blocking their access to healthcare'.

And are now going to be evaluating the Cass Review itself, and asking for a halt in implementing it's recommendations until they've completed their own evaluation.

The BMA is calling for a pause to the implementation of the Cass Review's recommendations whilst the task and finish group carries out its work. It is expected to be completed towards the end of this year. In the meantime, the BMA believes transgender and gender-diverse patients should continue to receive specialist healthcare, regardless of their age.

The BMA has been critical of proposals to ban the prescribing of puberty blockers to children and young people with gender dysphoria, calling instead for more research to help form a solid evidence base for children's care – not just in gender dysphoria but more widely in paediatric treatments. The Association believes clinicians, patients and families should make decisions about treatment on the best available evidence, not politicians.

Professor Banfield, the Chair of the BMA Council, said this:

"It is vitally important we take time and care to get this work right. This is a highly specialised area of healthcare for children and young adults with complex needs, and as doctors we want to be sure they get the most appropriate care and the support they need. The task and finish group will make recommendations to improve the healthcare system that has, for too long, failed transgender patients. It will work with patients to ensure the evaluation invokes the old adage in medicine of 'no decision about me without me'. It is time that we truly listen to this group of important, valued, and unfortunately often victimised people and, together, build a system in which they are finally provided with the care they deserve."
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
34,117
It's really welcome and hopeful news, the last part from Professor Banfield is touching too. It's good to see them speak out.
 

hamghost

Member
Sep 1, 2019
289
This is really heartening, hopefully it can lead to some reversal of the anti-trans momentum happening here.
 

Humidex

Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,837
Good. Streeting and the recent court decision should be pushed back in every way possible.
 

Sheev

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
2,361
UK
Crossing all my fingers. Nice to see groups and people that actually seem to have some semblance of empathy.
 

Calabi

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,635
This is good news and could expose Wes Streeting and labour to be terf aholes, if they just implement the ban.
 

Daphne

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
4,047
Their words here are simply good sense and decency; reading them makes me tear up because neither has been common for a long time. It's good to have mature, caring and decent professionals speak out here. Politicians should be shamed by this, for their contrasted cravenness and willful infliction of harm. I can't be too hopeful for that, but hopefully they at least listen and take the opportunity to change course.
 

myojinsoga

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,172
Even as a cis man, the mix of compassion and sanity in these words reads like an absolute balm. I'm so fucking glad to read them.
 

Kasumin

Member
Nov 19, 2017
2,156
The Cass Review pisses me off so much. It's just a ton of bullshit to push a political agenda.

The thing is, a good report could actually provide useful and interesting information. For example, I've read that trans patients express much lower levels of regret after gender-affirming surgery than any other group with any kind of surgery. If resources were devoted to learning from this group, maybe from a psychological perspective, we could even help cis people who get surgery. But noooo, being total bigots is more important.

I'm so glad this group is stepping in. As someone who does research, I think the Cass Review is a total disgrace. It's the opposite of research. It's meant to misinform for political reasons. I want to learn and being denied that is ridiculous.
 

Rodelero

Member
Oct 27, 2017
12,763
This is to my mind the first significant UK institution/authority wiling to speak out against The Cass Review. From the moment it was published both political parties, and every mainstream media organisation, has been treating the review as if it was the infallible word of God. Even those parties, groups and individuals who are supportive of trans people have generally avoided criticising the review itself.

There has been a dangerous lack of basic diligence in how the review has been received. The review itself is nearly four hundred pages long and makes an enormous number of citations to resources that are often lengthy and complex. It is absolutely outrageous that the then government, the then opposition and the media gave the review a full embrace on the day it was published. It was always going to take a significant amount of time for experts to properly assess, and those in power should have waited for those assessments to happen rather than barreling ahead with implementing every recommendation of a review that is not just fallible but now appears to be seriously flawed.

Something, at some point, is going to force the media (the outlets that care about their reputation) to start treating The Cass Review something that is up for debate. That's not the end goal by any means but it's a necessary step if the review is to be discredited. I thought it might take years to get to that point, but the BMA's move surely brings it forward.
 

Kagari

潜在能力解放
Member
Oct 24, 2017
4,820
This is great news, hopefully. Thanks to certain billionaires, there's been a lot of parroting around of the Cass Report being some ultimate authority, and challenges from overseas don't seem to deter them. Maybe they'll change their tune if it's coming from the UK.
 

Koukalaka

Member
Oct 28, 2017
9,769
Scotland
Can't wait for "we're just following the evidence/recommendations by experts" people to suddenly argue that the BMA shouldn't be involved for some reason.
 

Grue

Member
Sep 7, 2018
5,953
I think there are reasons for hope here.

1. The BMA is an interesting organisation because whilst they are willing to publicly clash with Government decisions, they are also old enough to be somewhat perceived as part of the establishment.

2. The BMA is both a union, as well as having obvious close ties to the health service - two things the new Labour regime is ideologically aligned to.

3. We're fresh out of the election cycle. No need to pander. In fact, first year is when you get anything you might think is unpopular out of the way, and feel emboldened to embrace polarizing positions.
Certainly not the end of the road but assuming the BMA review arrives at different conclusions than the Cass report, this will be one that can be disagreed with by the usual mob -- but not ignored entirely.

Edit: Uzzy that's a really good overview for anyone new by the way, great first post.
 
Last edited:

ImaPlayThis

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,658
I honestly don't think this will change anything, on the political level the pendulum has swung and transphobia is the MO. Both Wes Streeting and Keir Starmer have made their bigotries crystal clear, as well as a huge swathe of other politicians too. Hope to be proven wrong though
 

Yabberwocky

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,536
The Cass Review is absolutely appalling, I really hope good things come out of the BMA evaluating it.