It's gonna crush $1 billion, no sweat.
And it's the best Marvel movie ... how's that for a driveby snipet? ;)
And it's the best Marvel movie ... how's that for a driveby snipet? ;)
There is an OT for the film, this is not a thread for drive-by shitposts on the films perceived quality.
No. It's a Marvel Studios film distributed by Universal. The same way Iron Man, Iron Man 2, Thor, and Captain America: The First Avenger were Marvel Studios films distributed by Paramount. The difference is that Disney bought back distribution rights from Paramount, but not from Universal.I'm not certain as to what the exact situation is now, but in 2017 it was basically what you just outlined.
At D23 in 2017, Mark Ruffalo said, "A standalone Hulk movie will never happen. Universal has the rights, and for some reason, they don't know how to play well with Marvel. And they don't want to make money."
Given that Marvel Studios did have Downey cameo in the Hulk movie and later put William Hurt in Civil War (implying that the events of the movie did happen in the MCU), I would imagine there have been discussions with Universal that have gone at least somewhat positively.
A similar situation seems to be happening over at Sony Pictures, where they're stating that their Venom movie is in Tom Holland's Spider-Man universe, which implies it is connected to the MCU. Marvel's been a little weird with their various tie-ins and studio collaborations over the last couple of years.
And it has nothing to do with the whole black-white race debate around it. Nothing at ALL.
By that logic, Iron Man shouldn't be on the chart either, or Homecoming.
Incredible Hulk is a movie in the MCU.
Jesus.I am sure no one would react if I just wrote "I loved the film", because it seems that only one opinion is accepted. Peace out.
Peace Out...Would anyone react to my posts and criticize me if I wrote that I loved the movie?
Usually if you go against the grain of popular opinion you are going to be asked why more so than if you agree. Finding this to be surprising is in fact a little naive.Would anyone react to my posts and criticize me if I wrote that I loved the movie?
It should be pointed out as this movie is super sensitive for some. When I said I didn't like it to a friend yesterday he called me a racist and spit in my face.
Peace out.
Marvel doesn't even have the rights to Spider-Man, Sony has it 100%, yet you included Homecoming on your chart.
Usually if you go against the grain of popular opinion you are going to be asked why more so than if you agree. Finding this to be surprising is in fact a little naive.
Was this egregious assault perpetrated by a black youth?It should be pointed out as this movie is super sensitive for some. When I said I didn't like it to a friend yesterday he called me a racist and spit in my face.
Peace out.
If we wanted to read some other people's comments on another site for another community, we would be posting int that community instead.You are all right. No need for drama. Again, read the reviews on imdb that have been the most helpful for millions of people and most users visiting the site to understand where I am coming from.
You're so full of shit.It should be pointed out as this movie is super sensitive for some. When I said I didn't like it to a friend yesterday he called me a racist and spit in my face.
My guy, literally the only reason one posts "man this shit sucks ass" in a thread that's not even about the film itself, but it's financial performance is to get a rise out of people and create a controversy where there isn't one. Thereby dominating the thread and making it about themselves. Your subsequent posts showcase this.I am sure no one would react if I just wrote "I loved the film", because it seems that only one opinion is accepted. Peace out.
Damn he got he said he didn't like it and got called a troll and banned in his face! What a pity!
Peace out.
It was a bad sentence with extra words in the wrong places is what it is. As far as sarcasm goes, why don't we ask his "friend" who "spat in his face"! :D
I can only speak for myself but before IM's first movie I thought the character was a robot. His appearance in MvC2 was the extent of my knowledge of the character. As far as I'm concerned IM was indeed a C-tier superhero. Incredible what one good movie can create.
And as for Black Panther? At least I'd heard of IM before the MCU. BP wasn't even on my radar.
Great overseas Box-Office even though it's a bit lower than usual Marvel output. It'll be interesting to see how well BP will perform in China.
I'm 90% sure that Japanese numbers won't be high, they aren't crazy about superhero movies in general. China, well, I guess the brand recognition will be enough to carry BP through the first weekend, everything else will depend on how chinese public will met the movie.No China (or Japan, I think?) numbers yet. I'm sure this movie will outperform a lot of the other Marvel flicks once releases in those territories happen.
There are only 4 MCU films above Black Panther's worldwide numbers now. It should pretty easily overtake Civil War, and probably Iron Man 3, but the two Avengers are likely out of reach. I expect it to pull in over 100 million in China and about 10 million in Japan. I expect domestic box office to be able to pull another 100 million by even the lowest estimates. It'll probably finish up with 1.2-1.3 billion, but both Avengers are at 1.4 billion and 1.5 billion. A little out of reach I think.Yeah, that's the real caveat here. No China (or Japan, I think?) numbers yet. I'm sure this movie will outperform a lot of the other Marvel flicks once releases in those territories happen.
There are only 4 MCU films above Black Panther's worldwide numbers now. It should pretty easily overtake Civil War, and probably Iron Man 3, but the two Avengers are likely out of reach. I expect it to pull in over 100 million in China and about 10 million in Japan. I expect domestic box office to be able to pull another 100 million by even the lowest estimates. It'll probably finish up with 1.2-1.3 billion, but both Avengers are at 1.4 billion and 1.5 billion. A little out of reach I think.
There are only 4 MCU films above Black Panther's worldwide numbers now. It should pretty easily overtake Civil War, and probably Iron Man 3, but the two Avengers are likely out of reach. I expect it to pull in over 100 million in China and about 10 million in Japan. I expect domestic box office to be able to pull another 100 million by even the lowest estimates. It'll probably finish up with 1.2-1.3 billion, but both Avengers are at 1.4 billion and 1.5 billion. A little out of reach I think.
I was fairly into comics in the 90's (in Sweden) and only Hulk, Spider-Man and X-Men were a thing. F4 had been around too. First time I ever saw Iron Man was in the XO Manowar game. Capcom's Marvel Super Heroes was a complete mystery to me (Cap who? Thanos what? Blackheart who? Shuma Gorath WTF?). I didn't start even reading up on characters until Marvel vs Capcom, and Tony wasn't in that and Thor was an assist character who also missed MvC2. I also had never come into contact with Ant-Man, Guardians, Black Panther, Captain Marvel or Strange before they started making waves in the MCU.
In terms of mainstream knowledge, I'm pretty sure Egghead was better known than Doctor Strange.
One of the best MCU movies, no depression, only joy.
That is top tier Marvel
So is Black Panthers smaller total in non US markets due to it not opening yet in any major markets or the much feared "international audiences don't turn out for black films" trope that was bandied about? I'm really interested to see if that held up.
Ahh that makes sense. Good to know. What a feel good story this films run is :)Black Panther's final foreign numbers will look like Thor 3 The Ragnarok and Spider-man 6 The Homecoming. That will put it above GotG2 and Dr Strange, and under Civil War. That reason it looks so unbalanced is because the film is insanely successful in America. Its over 500 million now and has beaten every MCU film except Avengers 1.
As an anecdote, here in Madrid the cinema was packed, not a free seat. Great movie too, I was very sceptic based on previous Marvel films and on American views on Africa as a continent, but not only it adresses that second concern, it explores the politics of aid, borders, refugee acceptance...very smartly and from a fresh perspective. Wish it would flesh it out a bit more, but it was a great film. To those who don't like Marvel, this is nothing like other Marvel films. And of course, it's great that there finally is non Euro-centric sci-fi out there.So is Black Panthers smaller total in non US markets due to it not opening yet in any major markets or the much feared "international audiences don't turn out for black films" trope that was bandied about? I'm really interested to see if that held up.
I'm torn about this.
1- I think the film DOES deserves the success because of the positive effect it's had on the black community.
2- I think the film DOESN'T deserve it's success based on its inherent quality as a movie.
I'm glad this movie exists. I'm happy for the people it's empowered. I think it has great themes. I just don't think it's a good movie based on my usual metrics.