Can't dismiss the information as being false. Tesla even claims that he falsely said the damaged parts were put into vehicles when they claim they were not used. Then the article has Business Insider asking Tesla about it and they pretty much say "They weren't but if they were they would have been removed" which isn't the same as saying they never were.
Likewise Tesla also says he overstated how much scrap they're wasting and the value of it, but in the article you have them saying it's common to be wasting the large quantities of scrap they're burning through and an outside analyst concerned at the cost of it all.
Likewise Tesla also says he overstated how much scrap they're wasting and the value of it, but in the article you have them saying it's common to be wasting the large quantities of scrap they're burning through and an outside analyst concerned at the cost of it all.