• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

The Albatross

Member
Oct 25, 2017
39,212
Because parking can be a bitch sometimes. Not making an excuse but alot of residential areas there is like no spot to park on streets sometimes without being in front of a hydrant.

The reason that spot is "available" is because it is illegal to park in front of a hydrant, in almost every city in America, it's illegal to park within 10-15 feet of a fire hydrant.
 

Forearm_Star

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,523
lol

Are folks really coming in saying these people probably had a legit emergency in defense to firefighters fucking their cars up for... a legit emergency
 

Brannon

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
1,586
And of course, they COULD move your car with their truck, but now you have to pay for the ticket, the damage to your car's bumper, transmission and brakes, and the damage to the firetruck.

Firetruck bumpers are very expensive *shifty eyes*
 

Rmagnus

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,923
Because a bunch of people in this thread of cheering that justice was served.

Why are you so angry? I explicitly said breaking the car windows if fine if it's necessary but is incredibly lame if it's extra punishment.

I am sorry for your windows boo, I know people call fire fighters for shit and giggles and not during an emergency when a house is literally on fire.
 

Deleted member 18347

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,572
Lmfao I thought the idea is to reduce weight so the fire fighters can be quicker and more efficient. Learn something new everyday
Just saying. What if there was an immovable object in front of the hydrant, maybe a heavy container or something. It would be a faster way to circumvent the problem than wasting precious time trying to push it out the way.
 

Rmagnus

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,923
Just saying. What if there was an immovable object in front of the hydrant, maybe a heavy container or something. It would be a faster way to circumvent the problem than wasting precious time trying to push it out the way.

I assume punching a hole through it would be faster than more efficient than carrying metal pipes every time they have to go out and that's another additional set of equipment they need to take care of.make their lives easier not harder boo
 

Megasoum

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,629
I remember seeing a picture like that years ago (can't find it right now) where not only did they put the hose through the car but they had to use a coupler halfway through the car and it wasn't 100% water tight so there was water dripping into the car lol
 

Guarenz

Member
Oct 27, 2017
45
Guam
Yeah the hose is not flexible enough to go over or under a car. No idea what pressure the water pump uses, but the hoses become hard as a rock when pressurized.
 

PKrockin

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,260
how about we don't park in front of fire hydrants so firefighters don't have to first fuck around with some asshole's Civic before they can attempt to save grandma and the neighboring buildings from burning to the ground
 

Deleted member 18347

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,572
Easy solution is to not park in front of a fucking fire hydrant
Tell that to the people who live in this neighborhood

8CAbIGc.jpg
 

Felt

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
3,210
In all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.

If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.
 

Vaelic

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,048
Based on the photo it seems like they just could have gone up and over the trunk of the car. Kind of shitty if they broke the windows to "teach them a lesson."

EDIT: I'm not saying it was okay for the person to park in front of the hydrant, I just don't think the firefighters should have broken the windows unless they had to, and I don't know enough about how this shit works to say if that was possible in this case. If this was the best option then A+ job.
Wrong wrong wrong
 

Megasoum

Member
Oct 25, 2017
22,629
In all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.

If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.
There's enough presure in the hose to raise the car, they are basically rock solid pipes when under pressure.

Also, like other people have said in here, the judge would laugh you out of the courtroom.
 

Genryu

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
957
In all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.

If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.

Sue the city over something you did illegally. That's a bold strategy, Cotton.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,257
NYC
The firAmericans fighters did what they had to do and they can't afford to waste time.
It I also wonder if there isn't a better option than a fire hydrant? Maybe some exclus Ve pipes under the sidewalk that are easily accessible to the fire dept. and can be easily hooked up to the hose?
 

joecanada

Member
Oct 28, 2017
3,651
Canada
In all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.

If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.
Lol you'd lose badly . Literally not one argument you can make supersedes what the firefighters were doing there. And even if they were rescuing a cat you are still breaking the law
Judge would double your fine for fun
 

Rmagnus

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,923
In all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.

If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.

Oh my car is more important than saving lives of people trapped in a burning building. I am sure everyone is proud of you boo
 

Felt

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
3,210
There's enough presure in the hose to raise the car, they are basically rock solid pipes when under pressure.

Also, like other people have said in here, the judge would laugh you out of the courtroom.

That's reasonable, is it not less damage than physically breaking windows?

Sue the city over something you did illegally. That's a bold strategy, Cotton.

Lol you'd lose badly . Literally not one argument you can make supersedes what the firefighters were doing there. And even if they were rescuing a cat you are still breaking the law
Judge would double your fine for fun

That's naive don't you guys think? You don't think a lawyer can dismiss that aspect of it (parking illegally) to claim damages by the city that's not protected by the law?

It's like the thief that sued the homeowner for getting hurt during a burglary.
 

joecanada

Member
Oct 28, 2017
3,651
Canada
That's reasonable, is it not less damage than physically breaking windows?





That's naive don't you guys think? You don't think a lawyer can dismiss that aspect of it (parking illegally) to claim damages by the city that's not protected by the law?

It's like the thief that sued the homeowner for getting hurt during a burglary.

This shit happens pretty much yearly in a city. Ask any firefighter and they'll tell you of a car they had to fuck up to run hose. You would have to prove negligence to prove what they did wasnt nrcessary while avoiding a countersuit for public endangerment among multiple bylaw infractions.
And to top it off many states have statutes protecting emergency personnel in the line of duty and they would have a team of city lawyers.
Still sound good ?
 

take_marsh

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,332
That's reasonable, is it not less damage than physically breaking windows?

That's naive don't you guys think? You don't think a lawyer can dismiss that aspect of it (parking illegally) to claim damages by the city that's not protected by the law?

I'd love to hear that court case, for sure.

It's like the thief that sued the homeowner for getting hurt during a burglary.

Did they win though? I'm pretty sure the burglar being successful in their lawsuit is a myth.
 

Jon Carter

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
5,746
If the car belonged to the people whose house was on fire, it will have been one fucking asshole of a day for them.
 

Akira86

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,612
only park in front of a hydrant if you'll be out in 5 minutes or less. no fire is going to start during that short period of time. but even one minute over and you're playing with fate.
 

Bebop242

Member
Oct 28, 2017
395
only park in front of a hydrant if you'll be out in 5 minutes or less. no fire is going to start during that short period of time. but even one minute over and you're playing with fate.

You are "playing with fate" the second you park that car in front of the hydrant. How hard is it to follow the law?
 

The Adder

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,301
Would breaking one window and opening both doors not be better for the hose? This has nothing to do with trying to spare any damage to the car of the jackass who parked in front of the hydrant, I'm just honestly wondering if that wouldn't be a more direct path.
 

lenovox1

Member
Oct 26, 2017
8,995
That's naive don't you guys think? You don't think a lawyer can dismiss that aspect of it (parking illegally) to claim damages by the city that's not protected by the law?

It's like the thief that sued the homeowner for getting hurt during a burglary.

No.

Law enforcement and emergency personnel are nearly always granted idemnity to a deadly extreme. They are not responsible for what happens to anyone or anything during an emergency situation.

If you could sue for damage to your car, the person whose house they saved could sue for the water damage to their home. Get it?

You have no physics background. You are not aware of proper training. And you broke the law. You would be cooked.
 

Van Bur3n

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
26,089
User Warned: Derogatory Language
I hope the mongoloid who parked there enjoys paying for that.
 

lenovox1

Member
Oct 26, 2017
8,995
Would breaking one window and opening both doors not be better for the hose? This has nothing to do with trying to spare any damage to the car of the jackass who parked in front of the hydrant, I'm just honestly wondering if that wouldn't be a more direct path.

Depending on how the car is parked, the hydrant may block the door from opening. Regardless, it is probably much faster to use a hammer or axe to blow out two windows than it is to blow out one window and fiddle with someone's automatic door locks.
 

MrKlaw

Member
Oct 25, 2017
33,235
Curious how these are laid out, as we don't have them in the UK. If there are parking spaces nearby, wouldn't you arrange the spaces so there is a small gap for the hydrant? So something like |...|.|...| ?

Not defense force (no defense against blocking emergency service access), just curious