Look at the angle the hose would have to be at in order to do that.Hilarious. But why is this standard procedure over just putting the hose over the car? Because of the high water flow?
Because parking can be a bitch sometimes. Not making an excuse but alot of residential areas there is like no spot to park on streets sometimes without being in front of a hydrant.
Easy solution would be to carry bent metal joints to redirect the water flow, no?Look at the angle the hose would have to be at in order to do that.
It's already angled higher than it should be.
Because a bunch of people in this thread of cheering that justice was served.
Why are you so angry? I explicitly said breaking the car windows if fine if it's necessary but is incredibly lame if it's extra punishment.
Easy solution would be to carry bent metal joints to redirect the water flow, no?
Just saying. What if there was an immovable object in front of the hydrant, maybe a heavy container or something. It would be a faster way to circumvent the problem than wasting precious time trying to push it out the way.Lmfao I thought the idea is to reduce weight so the fire fighters can be quicker and more efficient. Learn something new everyday
Just saying. What if there was an immovable object in front of the hydrant, maybe a heavy container or something. It would be a faster way to circumvent the problem than wasting precious time trying to push it out the way.
Easy solution is to not park in front of a fucking fire hydrantEasy solution would be to carry bent metal joints to redirect the water flow, no?
Tell that to the people who live in this neighborhoodEasy solution is to not park in front of a fucking fire hydrant
Unfortunately, the each and every time water flow has to change direction, it loses pressure. So, the most direct path from the hydrant would still be optimal.Easy solution would be to carry bent metal joints to redirect the water flow, no?
At least everyone can save their game.
Wrong wrong wrongBased on the photo it seems like they just could have gone up and over the trunk of the car. Kind of shitty if they broke the windows to "teach them a lesson."
EDIT: I'm not saying it was okay for the person to park in front of the hydrant, I just don't think the firefighters should have broken the windows unless they had to, and I don't know enough about how this shit works to say if that was possible in this case. If this was the best option then A+ job.
There's enough presure in the hose to raise the car, they are basically rock solid pipes when under pressure.In all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.
If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.
In all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.
If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.
Lol you'd lose badly . Literally not one argument you can make supersedes what the firefighters were doing there. And even if they were rescuing a cat you are still breaking the lawIn all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.
If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.
In all the examples posted, it seems clear to me that they should run the hose under the car. It would cause the same (if not better) angle for the hose to go under versus through the window.
If it were my car, I'd be suing the city. I wouldn't park in front of a fire hydrant on purpose, and I wouldn't expect anyone to break my window for it.
There's enough presure in the hose to raise the car, they are basically rock solid pipes when under pressure.
Also, like other people have said in here, the judge would laugh you out of the courtroom.
Sue the city over something you did illegally. That's a bold strategy, Cotton.
Lol you'd lose badly . Literally not one argument you can make supersedes what the firefighters were doing there. And even if they were rescuing a cat you are still breaking the law
Judge would double your fine for fun
Oh my car is more important than saving lives of people trapped in a burning building. I am sure everyone is proud of you boo
That's reasonable, is it not less damage than physically breaking windows?
That's naive don't you guys think? You don't think a lawyer can dismiss that aspect of it (parking illegally) to claim damages by the city that's not protected by the law?
It's like the thief that sued the homeowner for getting hurt during a burglary.
That's reasonable, is it not less damage than physically breaking windows?
That's naive don't you guys think? You don't think a lawyer can dismiss that aspect of it (parking illegally) to claim damages by the city that's not protected by the law?
It's like the thief that sued the homeowner for getting hurt during a burglary.
I like how you quote the part of my post that says my car is more important than peoples' lives, oh wait.
only park in front of a hydrant if you'll be out in 5 minutes or less. no fire is going to start during that short period of time. but even one minute over and you're playing with fate.
sometimes the only parking space is in front of a hydrant. Five minutes isn't going to kill anyone. Lighten up.You are "playing with fate" the second you park that car in front of the hydrant. How hard is it to follow the law?
sometimes the only parking space is in front of a hydrant. Five minutes isn't going to kill anyone. Lighten up.
It is if your car fits in the car hole. check for fires. If you do not see smoke. Park the car. But don't take longer than 5 minutes.If the only parking space is next to a hydrant that means there are no parking spaces because it isn't a parking space.
It is if your car fits in the car hole. check for fires. If you do not see smoke. Park the car. But don't take longer than 5 minutes.
5.
minutes.
In just two minutes, a fire can become life-threatening. In five minutes, a residence can be engulfed in flames.
The fire department will never get there before you moved your car if you stick to the five-minute-principle. I guarantee it.
The fire department will never get there before you moved your car if you stick to the five-minute-principle. I guarantee it.
Leave a baby or a dog in the car to distract while you act. 2 minutes or less. Like buying gum or something, but it has to be at the counter of the store already.What's your time limit for handicapped spaces if someone isn't handicapped?
That's naive don't you guys think? You don't think a lawyer can dismiss that aspect of it (parking illegally) to claim damages by the city that's not protected by the law?
It's like the thief that sued the homeowner for getting hurt during a burglary.
Would breaking one window and opening both doors not be better for the hose? This has nothing to do with trying to spare any damage to the car of the jackass who parked in front of the hydrant, I'm just honestly wondering if that wouldn't be a more direct path.