• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Oct 26, 2017
86
A lot of you are really mean.

I can see both sides.

It's complicated.

He didn't call them by their birth name, he called them by their last name. Surely that person with the preferred name still has the same last name. If a student doesn't like to be called by their first name, I am sure you can still call them by their last name, just like anyone you'd speak to when calling customer service over the phone or gettoge any kind of service in person, people tend to call you by your last name.

I get that they wanted to be called by their preferred name but I also understand how he avoided this by calling them by their last name and remaining in neutral grounds.

Calling someone by something other than their name when that is what they like to be called is not neutral.

"Wahhhh my feelings"
 

Einchy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
42,659
A lot of you are really mean.

I can see both sides.

It's complicated.

He didn't call them by their birth name, he called them by their last name. Surely that person with the preferred name still has the same last name. If a student doesn't like to be called by their first name, I am sure you can still call them by their last name, just like anyone you'd speak to when calling customer service over the phone or gettoge any kind of service in person, people tend to call you by your last name.

I get that they wanted to be called by their preferred name but I also understand how he avoided this by calling them by their last name and remaining in neutral grounds.
No, the teacher is mean and hateful and it's not complicated.
 

rjinaz

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
28,394
Phoenix
A lot of you are really mean.

I can see both sides.

It's complicated.

He didn't call them by their birth name, he called them by their last name. Surely that person with the preferred name still has the same last name. If a student doesn't like to be called by their first name, I am sure you can still call them by their last name, just like anyone you'd speak to when calling customer service over the phone or gettoge any kind of service in person, people tend to call you by your last name.

I get that they wanted to be called by their preferred name but I also understand how he avoided this by calling them by their last name and remaining in neutral grounds.
There are no two sides here. Follow the rule, stop looking for a loophole to excuse your bigotry, keep your job. Easy peasy. He didn't remain in neutral ground at all, his intent was obvious and he has stated as much repeatedly.
 

stone616

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
1,429
Irrelevant when he openly states his intent in his own defense. Lol.
In the court of public opinion it might be but in a legal case will that stand? it's one thing to say I won't give you a job for that reason its entirely different to say I'll simply call you by your actual name for that reason. Probably depends on the type of lawyer he can afford. He'll likely get a right wing extremist to take the case Pro bono.

The best case from that is some type of payout and the guy just goes away because someone like that who can't even practice tolerance has no business being a teacher.
 

Cpt-GargameL

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,024
There are no two sides here. Follow the rule, stop looking for a loophole to excuse your bigotry, keep your job. Easy peasy. He didn't remain in neutral ground at all, his intent was obvious and he has stated as much repeatedly.

In regards to your last sentence, if it was on purpose then fck him.
 

duckroll

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,161
Singapore
In the court of public opinion it might be but in a legal case will that stand? it's one thing to say I won't give you a job for that reason its entirely different to say I'll simply call you by your actual name for that reason. Probably depends on the type of lawyer he can afford. He'll likely get a right wing extremist to take the case Pro bono.

The best case from that is some type of payout and the guy just goes away because someone like that who can't even practice tolerance has no business being a teacher.
The law is very much about intent. So, yes?
 

caliph95

Member
Oct 25, 2017
35,160
I always love how obvious it is in internet forums that no reads the op

It could take one minute and there would still be people who haven't read it
 

Addie

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,687
DFW
An important point, which some of us have raised, that it's one thing to be a crusty teacher that refers to everyone by their last name. Half of my law school professors did that. But I have never, not once and not ever, encountered a teacher who referred to someone as "Smith" and not "Ms. Smith."

In that case, he'd still intentionally misgender someone by using the wrong title.

But here, he straight up admitted that he had bigoted intent. You don't have to look any further than his own words. You don't need to infer anything. You don't need to put gloss on actions. (Even despite that, I think there's a pretty good chance that last year his students were "Mr. Jones" and "Ms. Johnson," not simply their last names.)

Look, I'm not the best with trans issues: there's a lot of nuance that I might not understand at first.

But calling someone by their preferred name is literally the fucking least you can do.
 

dusteatingbug

Member
Dec 1, 2017
1,393
"But where does it end? What if someone's preferred name is 'Poopyface Butthole?' In this clearly real scenario I will be made to look like a fool!"

Pretty spot on; Jordan Petetson's whole thing is literally "if they make me use their preferred pronouns we will all end up in Maoist death camps"
 

Sandstar

Member
Oct 28, 2017
7,739
You're right. If this was a different situation, it'd be a different situation.

A person made a comment, someone asked what they meant, i made an offhand remark, and suddenly everyone thinks I don't understand the situation, because I guess I'm the only one required to read anything. I know what the teacher did, i approve of what the school did, the "compelled speech" argument is total bullshit, and why is being forced to treat people with the bare minimum of human decency by using the name they asked you to use such a goddamn hard thing for transphobic assholes to do? Have I explained my view on the subject? I hope so.
 

Trickster

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,533
Yeah um, no pity from me on this one. Why would you be willing to call someone the name someone else gave them, but no the name they have choosen for themselves? Good grief what a dumb thing to get hung up over
 

Yayate

Banned
Feb 8, 2018
370
It's called deadnaming and it's seriously nauseating whenever it happens. There's really no excuse to do it and there's no way it isn't actively malicious.
 

Geirskogul

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,022
An important point, which some of us have raised, that it's one thing to be a crusty teacher that refers to everyone by their last name. Half of my law school professors did that. But I have never, not once and not ever, encountered a teacher who referred to someone as "Smith" and not "Ms. Smith."

In that case, he'd still intentionally misgender someone by using the wrong title.

But here, he straight up admitted that he had bigoted intent. You don't have to look any further than his own words. You don't need to infer anything. You don't need to put gloss on actions. (Even despite that, I think there's a pretty good chance that last year his students were "Mr. Jones" and "Ms. Johnson," not simply their last names.)

Look, I'm not the best with trans issues: there's a lot of nuance that I might not understand at first.

But calling someone by their preferred name is literally the fucking least you can do.

Yeah, I'd say there's a very high chance that he was misgendering the trans kid and that's why it became an issue.
 

Divvy

Teyvat Traveler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,904
Why even be a teacher if you're not willing to treat the kids you're supposed to be caring for with compassion.
 

Deleted member 1698

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,254
Meanwhile at religious schools all across the world.

"Can I use my first amendment right to discuss how gay marriage is ok?"
"No, do that and you are fired"
"..."
 

CDX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,476
Terrible, to go against school policy like that. What is so hard about using the name someone prefers?

I personally always disliked when teachers did the last name thing. I've always preferred my first name. But on the other hand I never cared enough to bring it up to any of the teachers either.


An important point, which some of us have raised, that it's one thing to be a crusty teacher that refers to everyone by their last name. Half of my law school professors did that. But I have never, not once and not ever, encountered a teacher who referred to someone as "Smith" and not "Ms. Smith."

In that case, he'd still intentionally misgender someone by using the wrong title.
Well not to defend it in anyway, but that is completely the opposite of my personal experience.

I'd say maybe a third of the male teachers I've had from middle school to high school all did exactly that. They all would refer to everyone in the class by their last name and last name only. So yes it would just be "Smith" and not "Mr. Smith" or "Ms. Smith" and that was the exact pattern for multiple teachers.

The one thing they all had in common was that they were all basketball/football coaches after school. So perhaps it was a sports coaching habit?

I personally wasn't regularly called "Mr." by teachers or professors until after high school.
 

Dark Cloud

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
61,087
I don't get this teacher at all. People had nicknames in school they wanted to go by when I was in school.
 

Aztechnology

Community Resettler
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
14,134
I don't get this teacher at all. People had nicknames in school they wanted to go by when I was in school.
Yea, so did I. The teachers very rarely if ever referred to them by it. They very often used our last names. That was extremely common.

Whatever the case, it was school policy. And they have the right to do what they want with a teacher that refuses to follow it.
 
Last edited:

rjinaz

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
28,394
Phoenix
Yea, so did I. The teachers very rarely if ever referred to them by it. They very often used our last names. That was extremely common. This sounds like it might have been something more. But it's hard to know. We don't have a lot of information.
Yes we do. He has already admitted to why he did what he did. We have all the information.
 

Green Mario

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,318
I don't understand. 9/10 teachers I had throughout my life would call your name on the first day of school and ask if there was something else you wanted to go by.
 

caliph95

Member
Oct 25, 2017
35,160
I don't understand. 9/10 teachers I had throughout my life would call your name on the first day of school and ask if there was something else you wanted to go by.
My school did that because a to be polite and we had both a diverse students and teachers in a western styled school so you have names thar are too long or teachers can't pronounce properly

University ask for preferred names too

But I bet both of our high ir middle schools were lacking in transgender students
 

rjinaz

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
28,394
Phoenix
I don't understand. 9/10 teachers I had throughout my life would call your name on the first day of school and ask if there was something else you wanted to go by.
The guy is a bigot. It's not about the name, it's about acknowledging something they are against. In this case, it's also about targeting a kid, I mean I'm sure everybody knew what the hell the teacher was doing.
 

caliph95

Member
Oct 25, 2017
35,160
The guy is a bigot. It's not about the name, it's about acknowledging something they are against. In this case, it's also about targeting a kid, I mean I'm sure everybody knew what the hell the teacher was doing.
I mean he admitted it

It would likely be obvious to the students too
 

CaviarMeths

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
10,655
Western Canada
Guy has no business being an educator if he considers treating his students with basic human dignity to be an impossible violation of his moral code. Fuck right out of here.
 

Xiaomi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,237
Yeah so part of being a teacher is being there to support kids as their bodies and minds grow to make sure they have a safe childhood that allows them to reach their potential before society gets the chance to bully them. This teacher was being a bully and has no place taking care of kids, as he cannot create the necessary environment for their growth.
 

rjinaz

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
28,394
Phoenix
Yeah so part of being a teacher is being there to support kids as their bodies and minds grow to make sure they have a safe childhood that allows them to reach their potential before society gets the chance to bully them. This teacher was being a bully and has no place taking care of kids, as he cannot create the necessary environment for their growth.
Sad thing is, I'm sure there are plenty of private schools and Christian schools that will welcome him with open arms. I doubt he'll be unemployed long. Not even sure why he wants to return honestly.
 

rjinaz

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
28,394
Phoenix
For what it's worth, about one in every three hundred people are trans by conservative estimates, so your schools probably did have some trans students even if they weren't out yet.
Thinking back to the schools I went to, if that math is right there would actually be more than there were Black students, I think that would extend to my small town in Illinois, and even a high school or two here in Phoenix.
 

caliph95

Member
Oct 25, 2017
35,160
For what it's worth, about one in every three hundred people are trans by conservative estimates, so your schools probably did have some trans students even if they weren't out yet.
I mean for what it's worth as well the country I was in school in doesn't have the best record with lgbt

Though I would agree it's possible they just wouldn't be out in the open in my school, I don't think there was openly gay students as well
 
Oct 30, 2017
707
User Banned (5 Days): Excuse and downplay transphobia.
I feel like using a transgendered person's last name is as close as you're going to get with a certain segment of the population, so in some cases you might as well just shrug your shoulders and take it for what it's worth. It's something you can't really fuck up - a last name is a last name is a last name, and isn't associated with gender identity at all. I can see someone using it as a diplomatic stop-gap measure.

Not that this was that, though.
 
Last edited: