This post could have easily been made without trying to really hit home the hyperbolic idea that it was "awful" multiple times.
I disagree, I think I really needed to know that
This post could have easily been made without trying to really hit home the hyperbolic idea that it was "awful" multiple times.
But I wanted to get across how awful I truly feel the movie was. While simultaneously stating my disgust for those who would attack individuals personally for being in a movie.This post could have easily been made without trying to really hit home the hyperbolic idea that it was "awful" multiple times.
But I wanted to get across how awful I truly feel the movie was. While simultaneously stating my disgust for those who would attack individuals personally for being in a movie.
I really didn't like the last Jedi. I truly think it was awful. It didn't even feel like a star wars movie. JJ is going to bring it with the next episode I'm very optimistic.
I'm glad that you made it clear that the most important thing about the harassment of Kelly Marie Tran is that The Last Jedi is an affront to humanity.
But I wanted to get across how awful I truly feel the movie was. While simultaneously stating my disgust for those who would attack individuals personally for being in a movie.
I really didn't like the last Jedi. I truly think it was awful. It didn't even feel like a star wars movie. JJ is going to bring it with the next episode I'm very optimistic.
If you believe the most important thing in this thread is the harrassment of KMT (and i agree that it is), why waste time focusing on that poster's distaste for the movie?I'm glad that you made it clear that the most important thing about the harassment of Kelly Marie Tran is that The Last Jedi is an affront to humanity.
I feel differently. I care to hear from people that they disliked the movie and are also condemning the assholes harrassing. I disagree with the boundaries you have set for this discussion — why not adhere to them yourself by focusing on what you and the other poster agree on - that the harassment is disgusting? Why spend so much time trying to police the parameters for discussion instead of focusing on the areas of agreement?Your opinion on The Last Jedi isn't important. This isn't the place for it. There are multiple threads on the film itself where you can state how "awful" it is over and over again. This discussion is about a woman being harassed to the point where she felt the need to delete her social media accounts. People have been pushed to suicide over situations like this. No one cares if you didn't like the new Star Wars film.
I often wonder does Mark get attack the same way that kelly or rian does on Twitter or do people excuse him by saying things like "well he's being paid by Disney soooo..."
I'd say more Kylo Ren. They'd wish they could've been married to Natalie Portman.Do you think these entitled bellends realise who they're acting like yet? Here's a hint:
I have to ask people who make posts like this: if you saw someone harassing Kelly in real life, would you try and stick up for her but making sure to add in, "That guy was a real jerk to you right now. I'm sorry about that. I hated the movie and your character but, I mean, that was too much."
No, probably not. Because most people realize that would be rude and insensitive. And that's ignoring the fact that obsessively speaking in hyperbolic terms such as "the film was an abomination" only adds to the toxic atmosphere that was created in the first place.
Your opinion on The Last Jedi isn't important. This isn't the place for it. There are multiple threads on the film itself where you can state how "awful" it is over and over again. This discussion is about a woman being harassed to the point where she felt the need to delete her social media accounts.
People have been pushed to suicide over situations like this. No one cares if you didn't like the new Star Wars film.
If you believe the most important thing in this thread is the harrassment of KMT (and i agree that it is), why waste time focusing on that poster's distaste for the movie?
Rather unlikely. If anything he's idolised and sympathised with.
Slight adjustment to your question: I would put it as "why is it prefaced with how much they didn't like her work or her character?" (i make this adjustment because anyone making a statement about not liking her as a person is just wrong at the outset because they don't know her). To answer your question, honestly i think it's because that's the vantage point from which they're entering into the conversation — they are people who didn't like the movie or the character, but who are rightfully disturbed or disgusted by the harassment by those who've taken their distaste and wrongly turned it into hate for a person. I can't object to that way of entering into the conversation because that's how I myself would enter into it. Others come into it from other starting points, providing insight into the experience of being harassed, etc., and that's even more important, but for those whose connection to the story is their experience with TLJ, i can't be upset so long as they rightfully condemn the harassment.I think the question is, when women suffer online abuse, why are responses to the abuse prefaced with how much they don't like the woman or her work?
Wait people actually did that??? Like what in the actual fuck!I'm getting flashbacks to when ppl just absolutely had to preface their sympathies towards Zak Snyder regarding his daughter's suicide with how much they hated BvS
You generally see it in circumstances where others are harassing / ridiculing or supporting the harassment / ridicule of someone whose work is disliked. If you're one of those people who dislike that work, it feels normal to come at it from the vantage point of "hey, i don't like this either but i don't support or condone this terrible behavior." Another example would be when someone who is a Christian does something terrible "in the name of Jesus" and other Christians come out and say "hey, I'm a Christian but this is totally wrong."I'm getting flashbacks to when ppl just absolutely had to preface their sympathies towards Zak Snyder regarding his daughter's suicide with how much they hated BvS or when ppl just needed to say how much they hated Ghostbusters 2016 when Leslie Jones had her nudes leaked and was getting harassed
just because people do it a lot doesn't mean it's good/ necessaryYou generally see it in circumstances where others are harassing / ridiculing or supporting the harassment / ridicule of someone whose work is disliked. If you're one of those people who dislike that work, it feels normal to come at it from the vantage point of "hey, i don't like this either but i don't support or condone this terrible behavior." Another example would be when someone who is a Christian does something terrible "in the name of Jesus" and other Christians come out and say "hey, I'm a Christian but this is totally wrong."
I'm saying that it's reasonable and that it doesn't necessarily signify some moral failing on their part.just because people do it a lot doesn't mean it's good/ necessary
You think it's reasonable for someone to preface that they don't like a man's movie when giving condolences for his daughter's suicide?I'm saying that it's reasonable and that it doesn't necessarily signify some moral failing on their part.
Kylo works too!I'd say more Kylo Ren. They'd wish they could've been married to Natalie Portman.
The point is, if you were actually trying to comfort that person in person, you'd skip that part for obvious reasons, so on some level, you know it doesn't add anything.I'm saying that it's reasonable and that it doesn't necessarily signify some moral failing on their part.
I often wonder does Mark get attack the same way that kelly or rian does on Twitter or do people excuse him by saying things like "well he's being paid by Disney soooo..."
Every time Mark says something the cretins just go "It's not what he really believes, Disney is forcing him to say it! FREE MARK!!!"
I feel differently. I care to hear from people that they disliked the movie and are also condemning the assholes harrassing. I disagree with the boundaries you have set for this discussion — why not adhere to them yourself by focusing on what you and the other poster agree on - that the harassment is disgusting? Why spend so much time trying to police the parameters for discussion instead of focusing on the areas of agreement?
Surprised Hannity hasn't done a special on itEvery time Mark says something the cretins just go "It's not what he really believes, Disney is forcing him to say it! FREE MARK!!!"
Yes, for the reasons I explained in this post: LinkYou think it's reasonable for someone to preface that they don't like a man's movie when giving condolences for his daughter's suicide?
I agree - if you're talking to the person being harassed or being treated callously, then you're exactly right. But on this forum we aren't speaking to the person being harrassed. We're discussing with each other our reactions to that person's harassment. And many people enter into this circumstance from the perspective of someone who didn't like the film or her character's role in the film, and so it's reasonable to me that their reaction would be to say, basically, I feel the same way those guys do about the movie, but even so, her harassment is unjustifiable and indefensible. It's a member of that "in group" (people who don't like the movie / her character) calling out "their own" for acting like assholes.The point is, if you were actually trying to comfort that person in person, you'd skip that part for obvious reasons, so on some level, you know it doesn't add anything.
Just like saying for Zack Snyder, "well, I don't like his movies, but I'll keep his family in my thoughts". That first part isn't necessary.
And anyone that would go "I thought you all hated her character, why do you care if the actress is being harassed" would be the obvious asshole.
Yeah, that's reasonable. I opted out of Star Wars threads in general shortly after seeing the movie because it didn't seem possible to have a good conversation about it without it getting heated, so I don't have that strong a reaction to people mentioning it in this thread. Here it seems reasonable to me because it has to do with an actor being harassed for their role in TLJ by people who disliked the movie / her character. It makes sense to me that those on this forum who disliked it would declare that as part of, essentially, calling out their own.Listen, you have to understand that by now everyone is sick and tired of hearing peoples opinions of TLJ. It's been talked about to death in dozens of threads.
We quite literally have a thread made every day about starwars and the conversation is always derailed by people talking about how much they hate TLJ, even when it's not the subject being discussed.
So excuse us when we get a little upset that people are still continuing this asinine pattern of derailment in a thread where a woman was harassed for playing a character in a movie.
Love the support she's getting on Twitter via the #FanArtForRose hashtag.
Also, Mark Hamill's tweet.
Yeah I think the best thing to do would be to go on twitter and retweet Mark Hamill's post or make your own encouraging note and use the hashtag.I didn't like the character at all, but harassing the actress over it is ridiculous. There's scumbags like this in every fandom, it seems.
I'm really not seeing how that's at all relevant.
Oh, you're right - it's about Tran's situation. Not applicable to Snyder (because I don't think anyone came out and said "good riddance!" or anything like that).I'm really not seeing how that's at all relevant.
I can see how the linked response could potentially be relevant to Tran's situation, but in the example I provided I simply don't see any reason why the extra context is relevant in the slightest.
Oh, have you not met the MCU and DCEU fans? Turns out this kind of toxicity seems to be common among a certain type of fan. They're all the same.Wait people actually did that??? Like what in the actual fuck!
One of the weirdest things I've noticed about this whole things is people saying that it's wrong to harass Kelly because it's not her fault but it is Rian Johnson's and KK's. Like, the thing to get from this is not that you shouldn't be an awful human who harasses people online over movies but that you need to harass the right targets.