because they obviously want to attract Pokémon Go players, and in Pokémon Go you do not battle before catching Pokémon, you just throw the PokéballWhy couldn't they just keep battles and add the capture mechanic then?
because they obviously want to attract Pokémon Go players, and in Pokémon Go you do not battle before catching Pokémon, you just throw the PokéballWhy couldn't they just keep battles and add the capture mechanic then?
I still think the 20M goal will be incredibly hard to achieve, given Labo's situation
I firmly believe Nintendo was counting on Labo for Switch to regain momentum on the first half of the year.
It never happened.
Pokémon and Smash can only do so much, and 20 million units isn't a small task, so we'll have to see.
With that said, I'm still waiting for Fortnite announcement. This game can completely change Swirch's holidays.
I still think the 20M goal will be incredibly hard to achieve, given Labo's situation
I firmly believe Nintendo was counting on Labo for Switch to regain momentum on the first half of the year.
It never happened.
Pokémon and Smash can only do so much, and 20 million units isn't a small task, so we'll have to see.
With that said, I'm still waiting for Fortnite announcement. This game can completely change Swirch's holidays.
I firmly believe Nintendo was counting on Labo for Switch to regain momentum on the first half of the year.
It never happened.
It's aggressively stupid to even entertain this idea. Literally not a single piece of hardware in the history of dedicated video game consoles has exploded out the gate just to completely fizzle out a year later.Not really. Sales could slow down and it could chug along at 5 million or so a year. That's hardly zero.
What about Labo ?
Pokemon and Smash can "only do so much"...but Fortnite which is already available on every other plattform for free will completly change the Switch holidays ? lol come on.
This is a really weird take on the Switch demand situation - it sold just fine last year without Labo...and now the systems overall performance depends on Labo ? I dont think im gonna convince otherwise but you might wanna look up the sales and importance of Smash/Pokemon on past Nintendo systems.Labo didn't take off and Fortnite is a cultural phenomenon. I'm expecting Nintendo to sell 17-18 million units this fiscal year.
I'll be honestly impressed if they can manage to pull their 20M goal.
Yeah, but since Pokemon games have always been casual and for children though, so what's the point of watering them down and removing important game mechanics when they were already for kids to begin with? Let's Go is just doing everything possible to ruin the experience for hardcore fans for literally no reason.
Nintendo is betting on Labo being a long-term product, with a particular focus on holiday performance. They're not going into this thinking it'll sell like a traditional game release.
This is a really weird take on the Switch demand situation - it sold just fine last year without Labo...and now the systems overall performance depends on Labo ? I dont think im gonna convince otherwise but you might wanna look up the sales and importance of Smash/Pokemon on past Nintendo systems.
So it will all of a sudden get outsold by the 3DS again lol? Like I said, terrible prediction.
So the argument for 40 million LTD is the Switch will only sell 5 million this year?
Wow, all these people saying it will sell 20-30 million it's second year sure are going to have egg on their face!
It's aggressively stupid to even entertain this idea. Literally not a single piece of hardware in the history of dedicated video game consoles has exploded out the gate just to completely fizzle out a year later.
And before you mention it, the Wii didn't either.
Labo didn't take off and Fortnite is a cultural phenomenon. I'm expecting Nintendo to sell 17-18 million units this fiscal year.
I'll be honestly impressed if they can manage to pull their 20M goal.
I don't think it's that people are upset, they're just pointing out how unrealistic your statement was. It could happen, anything is possible. The Switch may only sell 1 more unit for the rest of the year, it's just very very unlikely.Holy crap, I wasn't making any predictions. I was just pointing out how it could be possible and that it wouldn't need to sell zero units. I really don't give a shit if the Switch sells 20 or 20 million this year. Why does the possibility that the Switch doesn't sell as much as Nintendo predicts, upset some people so much? Stop worrying so much about sales and just enjoy the games.
Did they lose it though? Last time I checked those four games were still the main sales drivers. What they lost is the holiday momentum, not the momentum inherent in these games.I know them pretty well. As I was saying, it's all about momentum, which Nintendo had in droves last year with its lineup (from Splatoon 2 and Breath of the Wild to Mario Odyssey, Mario Kart 8 and being a new successful product on the market); and which they naturally lost at the begining of this year.
7nm part would reduce power consumption by a large margin so you could use a smaller battery and more compact cooling system.
Outside the Wii, Nintendo Home consoles have seen a cosistent decline in sales since the SNES. The hybrid factor alone is whats help pushing it over Wii U, GC and even N64 sales, but I still question if a hybrid system that isn't a true portable will be able to hit 3DS sales. Time will tell and to be fair this is a unique system, so anything can happen.
If the point is to start squeezing out as much power as I could on a console that is meant to be both a handheld and a console, then I'm not going to gimp the battery and risk reaching the same performance thresholds as previous iterations (especially as developers start to push the system as they become more and more familiar with it). Otherwise, what was the point? Additionally, the move to 7nm is pretty lofty too considering production just started a few months ago, and is unlikely to be cost-effective for Nintendo vs. other existing options like 12-14nm. 10nm appears to have issues making it to market so that also doesn't look realistic until the foreseeable future.
So Switch with all the shortages last year managed to sell ~18m in 12 months, and you think it will sell pretty much the same this year with no shortages and Pokemon, and Smash (and Fortnite) ?
Smash 4 sold 15 million!?!?!?!
On the Wii u?.
I didn't even think they sold 15 mill Wii Us
That's not the point. A portable-clocked only Switch would easily fit in that form factor. Even more so if they shrunk the X1 to 16nm at least (honestly, I dont think they even need to do that)that does not even run the same Chipset. Shield portable was a Tegra 4, that like 1-2 Gen behinds X1, it was mostly for streaming, not native gaming.
Pokemon Let's Go will outsell the Bible.
It's genius releasing a game tie-in that had exposure to nearly a billion people as a trojan horse for next year's core offering.
Switch will be at over 60 million by the end of next fiscal year. Book it.
I personally think they might do a $300 Switch + Pokémon bundle as a Black Friday and/or Christmas shopping promotion. That could push astronomical numbers.They have Smash, Pokémon and who knows what else, in addiction to the already good lineup of last year. A little price drops could also help sales. They'll do it.
Doesn't Switch get less than 3 hrs playing Zelda? I thought launch 3DS was at least 3.5 hrs.
I don't know if this is Nintendo's or ERA's conjuncture.
Even though, I'm not holding my breath for Labo's sales at black friday, Thanksgiving or Christmas.
But again, we'll have to see. I remain skeptical, though.
Pretty much. People can hold out hope for Christmas but Labo has already far underperformed retail expectations. It's not magically going to turn into a hot product. Especially at the price point it is at.
Based off Nintendo's comments about how Labo was a key product to hit the 20 million they were expecting it to sell more than it has.
Games are toys for kids, and Nintendo is a toy company, they have been since the 60's.Good, it'll make them realize they should just stick to making actual games instead of overpriced gimmick toys for kids.
I don't see Smash moving that many units. I would imagine most of the audience already have a switch.
Switch is 2.5-6 hours of battery. That is also the battery life of the OG 3DS, the Vita, and most other 3DS models.Doesn't Switch get less than 3 hrs playing Zelda? I thought launch 3DS was at least 3.5 hrs.
I've always found this the most ridiculous argument ever. "Outside of this one thing that proves me wrong, I'm right". Well, duh. Wii's existence disproves any "trend" that you are trying to extrapolate, and now, so does Switch's. You can try and make excuses for them all you like, but the end result is that there's no trend of the kind you are trying to establish.Outside the Wii, Nintendo Home consoles have seen a cosistent decline in sales since the SNES. The hybrid factor alone is whats help pushing it over Wii U, GC and even N64 sales, but I still question if a hybrid system that isn't a true portable will be able to hit 3DS sales. Time will tell and to be fair this is a unique system, so anything can happen.
I don't see Smash moving that many units. I would imagine most of the audience already have a switch.
... games are overpriced toys.Good, it'll make them realize they should just stick to making actual games instead of overpriced gimmick toys for kids.
I don't see Smash moving that many units. I would imagine most of the audience already have a switch.
But Pokemon will be huge. I would say 20m is about on the money.
No, no, first it will be 3DS+Wii U. Once those are passed, then we'll move on to Wii+DS.In before sales pass 70 million and the goalposts are moved to "must sell as much as Wii and DS combined to be a success because it replaced both the home and portable lines."
No, no, first it will be 3DS+Wii U. Once those are passed, then we'll move on to Wii+DS.
I personally know of at least 4 of my friends waiting for Smash.
No, the graphical capabilties would be unchanged. Not talking about a Switch Pro, just a Switch light. Even if they went to 12nm that is still pretty big gains in power efficiency over 20nm.
Lol, is this for real? This is GameFAQs tier trashYeah sure. Toys not solely meant for little kids then.
So sorry for hurting your feelings. You probably aren't between 5-11 yet you like em and try to justify your rationale...
Switch is 2.5-6 hours of battery. That is also the battery life of the OG 3DS, the Vita, and most other 3DS models.
Switch benefits from a far better sleep mode than 3DS as well.
I've always found this the most ridiculous argument ever. "Outside of this one thing that proves me wrong, I'm right". Well, duh. Wii's existence disproves any "trend" that you are trying to extrapolate, and now, so does Switch's. You can try and make excuses for them all you like, but the end result is that there's no trend of the kind you are trying to establish.
Yeah sure. Toys not solely meant for little kids then.
So sorry for hurting your feelings. You probably aren't between 5-11 yet you like em and try to justify your rationale...