I think I'm done with Kickstarter for now. Game looks interesting and I would love to play it. Would buy into early access.
People aren't calling it out for the basic premise, they're calling it out for blatantly copying elements, from the gameplay to certain visual style flair. Nobody said anything like that for Ooblets or any number of other monster collecting games because they don't bank on being copies but have their own unique style and identity on top of a similar basic premise.
I mean, you can be fine with this (so am I, whatever, I'm not really interested either way until it proves worthwhile at any rate), but it's pretty disingenuous to just claim other people are being dumb and calling them out for simply being in the same vague overall genre (like Doom-clones which was even just a way to describe a genre back then, not actually calling out the games by that term, the calling out would come in the review calling them derivative or crap or whatever other negative elements they possessed).
Like the way battles are presented, the tall grass stuff and even the enemy trainer intros are lifted straight from all/certain Pokemon games. I mean, what media did you watch if you missed those parts? They basically pimped them in your face exactly to entice Pokemon fans. Nobody said they're infringing on copyright (ok, a couple people asked about that, that's about it, you could just say "probably not" and that's the end of that) or that everyone should be drawing lines in the sand (lol) so I dunno what you're on about there. If it's too derivative for some that's fine, if it's not for you that's fine as I already said, playing dumb and saying they're just calling it out for the vague genre when other games "got a pass" as you say despite being in the same genre and premise is just that, playing dumb, there's no reason to do that when you can simply agree to disagree. If you're okay with calling those games you mention "Smash clones" (I dunno about that, I haven't researched them all, some might be exact clones, others look pretty unique in gameplay and visuals too, again as Ooblets does for the monster collecting game) how's it wrong others call this a Pokemon clone then? Clearly there are games who do something different enough to get a pass and others which as far as some people are concerned don't, when each game is different there obviously won't be a universal stance for all games ever, how's that weird and something to ponder over?I mean, Smash clones are a thing and they seem to get a pass. I don't get where the line is drawn. They're not infringing on IP. Gameplay shouldn't be something you can slap down a patent on. I guess I'd need to know more what you mean about visual style flair.
AddedYo Slamtastic could you put some more info regarding the financial situation of the studio and such in the OP? That would maybe help get rid of those stupid drive by posts :)
Don't support competition? I mean, this provides an alternative for those who like pokemon but wished they focused more on certain aspects.
Do you also have a problem with Icons?
I don't think there's anything wrong with developers trying to put their own spin on genres that Nintendo popularized. We've gotten a lot of amazing games that way. The similarities are striking but it's not like this is plagarism.
art style looks great but I feel some of their monster design choices would be stronger by being more animalistic
imo all platformers after the original Pitfall have been shameless ripoffs and we should all be ashamed for playing them instead of the original
Strong words but I don't entirely disagree, I also just don't care.Comparing this game to any of Pokemon's actual competition that did it the hard way is laughable. This game does not have a genuine bone in its body and you guys are encouraging a bad style of game developement.
You're supporting a bootleg Pokémon game. Period
This game is more like going to the swap meet and buying a purple power ranger called "Strength Patroler"
Like you guys know this is plainly infringing on core Pokemon features.
You're either playing dumb, bc you don't care and want the Pokémon game you drew on the back of your social studies book or you have a amoral concept of creative theft
I wouldn't go as far as calling this "a bootleg pokemon game", but trainer intros in battle, evolution sequences and the way wild pokemon encounters start look literally identical to their Sun and Moon counterparts, to the point it's obvious they copied them on purpose, for whatever reason.I mean, Smash clones are a thing and they seem to get a pass. I don't get where the line is drawn. They're not infringing on IP. Gameplay shouldn't be something you can slap down a patent on. I guess I'd need to know more what you mean about visual style flair.
Has an MMO ever successfully been crowd funded on these sites?
It's really odd that people are defensive about a popular IP, they don't need to be defended lol.
I rather have the development team take risks into creating their own thing.
Seems some people are only fine with passion projects as long as they're fan games, yet become upset when they're forced to stop due to DMCA takedowns
Comparing this game to any of Pokemon's actual competition that did it the hard way is laughable. This game does not have a genuine bone in its body and you guys are encouraging a bad style of game developement.
You're supporting a bootleg Pokémon game. Period
This game is more like going to the swap meet and buying a purple power ranger called "Strength Patroler"
Like you guys know this is plainly infringing on core Pokemon features.
You're either playing dumb, bc you don't care and want the Pokémon game you drew on the back of your social studies book or you have a amoral concept of creative theft
Comparing this game to any of Pokemon's actual competition that did it the hard way is laughable. This game does not have a genuine bone in its body and you guys are encouraging a bad style of game developement.
You're supporting a bootleg Pokémon game. Period
This game is more like going to the swap meet and buying a purple power ranger called "Strength Patroler"
Like you guys know this is plainly infringing on core Pokemon features.
You're either playing dumb, bc you don't care and want the Pokémon game you drew on the back of your social studies book or you have a amoral concept of creative theft
Can you really trust devs who are ripping off another game not to rip you off?
So like is every FPS considered a Doom clone? Is any game that utilizes Souls mechanics considered a bootleg souls game. Is Digimon, Yokai Watch and Dragon Quest Monsters considered bootleg Pokemon? I mean they have breeding, you're collecting monsters, you use them to fight against others. They're clearly infringing Pokemon features so that means they shouldn't be supported, right?Comparing this game to any of Pokemon's actual competition that did it the hard way is laughable. This game does not have a genuine bone in its body and you guys are encouraging a bad style of game developement.
You're supporting a bootleg Pokémon game. Period
This game is more like going to the swap meet and buying a purple power ranger called "Strength Patroler"
Like you guys know this is plainly infringing on core Pokemon features.
You're either playing dumb, bc you don't care and want the Pokémon game you drew on the back of your social studies book or you have a amoral concept of creative theft
This pushed me to back the game.
None of those examples you listed have animations and concepts that are basically 1:1 to the inspiration. Regardless of where you stand on the game it shouldn't be hard to see where people are coming from hereSo like is every FPS considered a Doom clone? Is any game that utilizes Souls mechanics considered a bootleg souls game. Is Digimon, Yokai Watch and Dragon Quest Monsters considered bootleg Pokemon? I mean they have breeding, you're collecting monsters, you use them to fight against others. They're clearly infringing Pokemon features so that means they shouldn't be supported, right?
That word doesn't mean what you think it means.
Comparing this game to any of Pokemon's actual competition that did it the hard way is laughable. This game does not have a genuine bone in its body and you guys are encouraging a bad style of game development.
You're supporting a bootleg Pokémon game. Period
Comparing this game to any of Pokemon's actual competition that did it the hard way is laughable. This game does not have a genuine bone in its body and you guys are encouraging a bad style of game developement.
You're supporting a bootleg Pokémon game. Period
This game is more like going to the swap meet and buying a purple power ranger called "Strength Patroler"
Like you guys know this is plainly infringing on core Pokemon features.
You're either playing dumb, bc you don't care and want the Pokémon game you drew on the back of your social studies book or you have a amoral concept of creative theft
Pokémon has been it's own thing with no real competition for quite some time, it's very uncommon. Every MOBA has ripped off of Dota, every multiplayer FPS has ripped off of Halo and Quake, every platforming game has borrowed something form Mario, etc etc. We need more games like TemTem to show there is a market for creature collection games so eventually we can get more unique ones out there.
Tempted to back the 30$ tier but i'm worried that the Switch goal won't be reached and i honestly feel like this game would only work (for me) on a handheld
It's got a campaign it's about as much an "MMO" as Destiny from the looks of it.