• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
53,298
Just like the tweet circulating in this thread any criticism of the BFV trailer leads to instantly being jumped on for being misogynist regardless of what you said. Just like that tweet everyone then ignores when the full conversation is shared and it turns out they're not. This has happened to me in other threads and many other posters and reporting this does nothing. My problem? I really don't appreciate being insulted over disliking a video game.
Because it all comes back to the absolutely disingenuousness of the "authenticity" argument. No matter what, it's a bad argument to make in the context of this series. There was never a time when BF was this super immersive authentic war simulator. It was always silly arcadey fun.
 

IIFloodyII

Member
Oct 26, 2017
23,952
The only thing I'm pointing out is when people are trying to bend the truth. Whether or not women playable characters in this game is fine or not is another discussion. I think it's entirely possible to disagree with the people crying about it without making up facts. I personally dislike the direction they went with in this game overall, but i agree that these dudes are being idiots.
I don't think anyone is arguing that women solider were a common thing in WW2, just that it's hardly the most inaccurate thing they've shown. And if that's the straw that broke the camels back and not all the other stuff, than I think their problem is with the women soldiers and not the historical inaccuracies, so they should stop hiding behind it, because women soldiers is on the lower end of them.
 

Chumley

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
4,651
It's a nice message, but I do think it's missing the mark.

Battlefield is late to the game as far as female representation comes - Overwatch, Titanfall, Call of Duty - half of every Rainbow Six Siege character expansion features a female character, and the base game wasn't devoid of them either.

The message should be something about history, and the perception of them deviating from it.

What?
 

Deleted member 14377

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
13,520
There were many women that took part in WW2 in supporting roles and contributed to the war in many ways, but barring some resistance fighters there were no boots on the ground women soldiers. And if there was there was less than .01%

Crazy that the .01% made it into this game. So it's pretty accurate is what you were saying?
 

TheBaldwin

Member
Feb 25, 2018
8,280
Good, i look forward to be able to play as a women and im gonna put prostethic atms on just to add a little more unique flair to my avatar.

Battlefields always been about taking a historical setting and equipment, slamming it together, and amping it up to 11.

Going to upgrade my pc over summer so i can play it without compromising graphics. Cannot wait
 

Deleted member 14377

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
13,520
It's a nice message, but I do think it's missing the mark.

Battlefield is late to the game as far as female representation comes - Overwatch, Titanfall, Call of Duty - half of every Rainbow Six Siege character expansion features a female character, and the base game wasn't devoid of them either.

The message should be something about history, and the perception of them deviating from it.

That doesn't make any sense. And just because someone is late to the party, doesn't mean they shouldn't show up at all. Better late than never and I hope everyone shows up to the party.
 

sleepInsom

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,569
Because it all comes back to the absolutely disingenuousness f the "authenticity" argument. No matter what, it's a bad argument to make.

Yep. Whether you're talking about the inclusion of women or complaining about the tone, any argument that has to do with "authenticity" is fucking stupid beyond all belief. It's dishonest, cowardly at best, and misogynistic at worst. You can dislike something without framing it with the disingenuous argument that it's not "authentic". Have the courage to say you simply don't like the tone or customization, or don't bother if the game offends you that much.
 

Goronmon

Member
Nov 9, 2017
639
They are discussing the micro transaction garbage not the genders. Seriously come on ResetEra we are better than this.
Not sure why you are being so defensive about people calling out all the whining that has been going on about the trailer. Not everyone's opinions are worth caring about.
 
Nov 3, 2017
250
User Banned (3 Days): Inflammatory False Equivalencies + Off-Topic Implications
Just like the tweet circulating in this thread any criticism of the BFV trailer leads to instantly being jumped on for being misogynist regardless of what you said. Just like that tweet everyone then ignores when the full conversation is shared and it turns out they're not. This has happened to me in other threads and many other posters and reporting this does nothing. My problem? I really don't appreciate being insulted over disliking a video game.

Sums up the political landscape of the last 5 years. Probably why Trump was elected and likely will be re-elected. Total and utter unwillingness for one side to listen and consider criticism. Misinterpreting legitimate criticism as some evil attacks. That tweet ecxhexch is perfect glimpse of the larger issue.
 

Alexious

Executive Editor for Games at Wccftech
Verified
Oct 26, 2017
909
Because it all comes back to the absolutely disingenuousness of the "authenticity" argument. No matter what, it's a bad argument to make in the context of this series. There was never a time when BF was this super immersive authentic war simulator. It was always silly arcadey fun.

I'd say it was always a middle ground between arcade and simulation shooters, all the way from the beginning. After all, Project Reality for Battlefield 2 specifically wanted to create a more realistic experience as that niche wasn't satisfied by the base game.
 

sleepInsom

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,569
Sums up the political landscape of the last 5 years. Probably why Trump was elected and likely will be re-elected. Total and utter unwillingness for one side to listen and consider criticism. Misinterpreting legitimate criticism as some evil attacks. That tweet ecxhexch is perfect glimpse of the larger issue.

"It's everyone else's fault we're vile manbabies"
 

s3ltz3r

Banned
Nov 12, 2017
1,149
What the hell was the controversy? It all sounds good to me. I think I'lll get BFV on XBX this year.
 

Odrion

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,148
It's worth bringing up and talking about. It's a fact that they opted out of female solders in the modern war games when their contemporaries were embracing them. And by playing catch-up while setting the game in WW2 they are consequently also white washing the institutional discrimination of the time. It's kinda a big tonal mess when you think about it! (Then again, they did also make BF: Hardline so there's a history of tone deafness.)

I think they should've set it in modern day, or made it in an alternative history. As player expression is one of the things I want most out of a Battlefield game and having the WW2 setting handicaps it.
 
Last edited:

Railgun

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,148
Australia
Not sure why you are being so defensive about people calling out all the whining that has been going on about the trailer. Not everyone's opinions are worth caring about.
You're not sure why I'm defensive about people being called misogynists and incels for not like the new tone and microtransaction cosmetics? Yes a lot of people are terrible human beings but there is plenty of us who didn't like the trailer for other reasons and a lot of users on this forum will jump on you for it. When you support the inclusion of being able to select your gender but are questioned every time you make a comment displaying your dislike for the trailer it's ridiculous.

ra2hfs6gd0011.jpg


Basically how earlier in the thread posters were cheering on this devs comments when it turned out when you saw the rest of the conversation it was actually not what it seemed.
 

Nimurai

Member
Oct 28, 2017
605
User Banned (1 Week): Dismissing arguments and concerns of including women in games
So in terms of Battlefield 1, it seems like you, me, and Dice all agree that realism was sacrificed for fun. And a great deal of realism, at that.

And it seems we agree that Battlefield 4 isn't trying to be realistic, either. No sniping enemy pilots isn't commonplace, but flying planes through buildings and canyons and shit like Will Smith in Independence Day is. It's a multiplayer that is 1) arcade-y first and 2) realistic second. It's a nice middle ground between cartoony MP games like Fortnite and actual immersive sim shooters that - as you said before - Battlefield doesn't try to emulate.

So the question becomes at what point is the balance of arcade and realism thrown way out of whack, enough to elicit pushback from the playerbase. And we're concluding that a reasonable line in a series where World War 1 was fought with machine guns is...face paint (that was actually used) and female soldiers and amputees fighting? Like, I get your point about there being few female soldiers and other points such as amputees being sent home instead of fighting. And I agree that the reason this is a thing is microtransactions (for hookhands, etc). But I don't feel like it's a reasonable hardline stance to take against the game, especially when such things as female soldiers were possible, however unlikely. Tanks shooting down jets is also possible, after all, however unlikely.
Thanks for a reasonable and well thought out response. I agree with you for the most part. I never took a hardline stance, and i will still buy the game. But it just pisses me off that people start to make up facts just to combat morons. We are better than that, or at least i thought we were. I guess I'm just disappointed in the level of discussion on this forum when it comes to this topic.

Just to give you an idea of where i (and i imagine many others) are coming from:

WW2 games holds a special place in my heart, growing up with the PS1 Medal of honor games, Allied Assault and later BF1942 and the early CoD. I was hoping this game would scratch that itch that those games did. Giving that Band of brothers feeling back, that has been missing for so long.
CoD WWII was absolute stinking garbage, so that didn't pan out. This was the last hope to get that feeling back, and it seems that they have gone in a completely different direction with this game, which is extremely disappointing. The female amputee soldier with facepaint is just part of that.

And no matter how many arguments could be made for why it should be included, female soldiers with bright facepaint ruins the WWII experience much more than any sniping from parachutes could ever do. Since you will see that all the time, in every game. It will be unavoidable. And to salt the wounds even more, they made the game much more "band of brothersy" in other ways by making other things much more realistic. So it will be like watching a WWII movie with Adam Sandler showing up in the middle of an intense scene.

And yes, in Medal of Honor Underground you play as a woman. That is very cool actually! Why? Because she is a French resistance fighter. And those actually existed, and did many of the things you do in that game.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
53,298
I'd say it was always a middle ground between arcade and simulation shooters, all the way from the beginning. After all, Project Reality for Battlefield 2 specifically wanted to create a more realistic experience as that niche wasn't satisfied by the base game.
If anything the trailer was a very perfect representation of the surface level seriousness and simultaneous wackiness of BF's MP.
 

Isee

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
6,235
Female characters; of course no problem with that.
Goofy weapons and skins that could be out of a dead rising game; no thank you.
Dice told us that Battlefront 2 had pay to win lootboxes because they didn't want to ruin the authenticity of Star Wars by adding cosmetics. Pink Darth Vader's were a no go, according to them.
But they don't care about WW2 at all. They suddenly value fun over authenticity; very fitting twist of attitude now that they have to sell cosmetics.
 

B00T

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,650
I love this response from DICE. Really looking forward to the game.
 

stumblebee

The Fallen
Jan 22, 2018
2,503
I think I've listened to this dumbass controversy for long enough that I can come up with a few bullet points that sum up my hopefully reasonable viewpoint.
  • There weren't many, if any, women soldiers in combat on the front line during WWII. The US Army doesn't even have women kicking down doors to this day (fact check this one pls I may be running off of old data).
  • This fact doesn't really mean much or matter at all in the context of Battlefield V because DICE can do whatever they want with their game.
  • People who don't want women soldiers in the game for historical reasons are missing the following point. They showed a multiplayer trailer of a video game featuring a level of customization that is a series first.
  • Battlefield has never really striven for ARMA levels of realism in their games, opting for a more arcade experience. See prototype WWI weapons in BF1.
  • The more reasonable complaint that many here are overlooking is that the high color saturation and types of customization showed off in the trailer could be seen as a direct play at the Fortnite audience, which is a major departure from the Battlefield norm and is a direction they are not comfortable with.
  • The trailer did not do a good job of showing off any of the gameplay improvements. It was a mistake to not show real gameplay along side this release trailer.
  • I think some of the memes are funny.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
53,298
But they don't care about WW2 at all. They suddenly value fun over authenticity
BF1 had us playing as knights in armor wielding lmgs that required 4 people to operate on top of riding on horses with swords. That's not even the worst of it when it comes to how BF1 portrayed WW1. You genuinely think that NOW they value fun over authenticity? Also, the workflow of BF and the workflow of Battlefront are two different things, Battlefield doesn't have Disney involved.
 

Keyouta

The Wise Ones
Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,193
Canada
Good response, I think the dumb criticism of the game (colours, women, etc) are just a vocal minority and the sales will be great.
 

Addleburg

The Fallen
Nov 16, 2017
5,062
But it is though, depending on the context. The fact that the Gaters are misogynist assholes doesn't change that fact. There were no female soldiers in the combat troops in the western armies. At the absolute most still less than 1%. Just because these guys sucks doesn't give us license to make up history.

But it does. They're the ones making the games. And the players are the ones who can decide to what degree they need authenticity when deciding whether to buy the game. The guy in the OP addressed that point with the 3-dudes-on-horseback-with-flamethrowers gif. If them taking creative license with the game is perceived as them "making up history," then I'm more alarmed by people looking to a videogame to be a historical text.

I'm not grouping you in this category, but there's a tendency for gamers to be selective with how much authenticity they want or need in a game. An expert gamer being able to take out 20 dudes without dying? Sure, authentic enough. But add a female character with a prospective limb and Woah - too far.

Battlefield games aren't documentaries or history books. Their goal first and foremost are to be fun. The developers can and should take license if it makes the game approachable to more people, while still balancing satisfying combat. The ability to play as and shoot a female character shouldn't affect your enjoyment of the game as long as the rest of the gameplay is tight and solid.
 

stumblebee

The Fallen
Jan 22, 2018
2,503
Also, last point, I'm already super tired of WWII again after like one, soon to be two major releases
 

RogerL

Member
Oct 30, 2017
606
I'm very interested in how they are going to solve the problem of being able to identify friendly vs. enemy forces. I could be missing something obvious, though. Even BF1 has this problem a little bit because the characters didn't have great identifiable silhouettes so you were just looking for the friendly icons over everyone head and those without and I've never been a fan of it.

With everyone wearing their own skins I could see an issue distinguishing that but I assume they've accounted for it.

I actually think this is a realistic problem! Every soldier of a certain class does NOT look the same IRL. You and your teammates are using kind of the same uniform, the opposition wears something quite like yours as their cloth was designed for the same purpose - hide you in the environment...
 

Heid

Member
Jan 7, 2018
1,807
I think I've listened to this dumbass controversy for long enough that I can come up with a few bullet points that sum up my hopefully reasonable viewpoint.
  • People who don't want women soldiers in the game for historical reasons are missing the following point. They showed a multiplayer trailer of a video game featuring a level of customization that is a series first.

I genuinely believe this is the source of this entire "controversy"

If they made it clear that you weren't looking at the singleplayer story/characters and these were just demonstrations of character customization... a whole lot of complaints would have gone away. Of course it would have helped a fuck load more if they just released a multiplayer gameplay montage trailer that showed off the cool new gameplay mechanics instead of this tightly scripted one shot type thing that looks like CG.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
53,298
there's a tendency for gamers to be selective with how much authenticity they want or need in a game. An expert gamer being able to take out 20 dudes without dying? Sure, authentic enough. But add a female character with a prospective limb and Woah - too far.
^^^

If they made it clear that you weren't looking at the singleplayer story/characters and these were just demonstrations of character customization... a whole lot of complaints would have gone away.
A)No they wouldn't have. The manbabies would still be crying.

B)The trailer has the same woman literally respawn die multiple times, which includes a moment where she very blatantly respawns on you. There a guy on the stairs screaming "medic help," immediately followed by another soldier saying "nope, sorry." Not the only quip in the trailer. Literally every kill is rewarded with points. Not sure how much more they could've telegraphed that it was an MP match.
 

GameChanger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,935
Please don't use red text as it is reversed for mods.
To all of those looking for historical accuracy, I got something to say that I have been wanting to say for a while now. I am going to write it in large font to make it pop out.

I do not think that DICE is going for historical accuracy here in every aspect of the game. I understand that they will end up over-representing women and racial/ethnic minorities by giving players the choice to choose their gender and race. But I do not think that DICE is trying to accurately represent those that fought in World War 2 in the multiplayer component of their game. I believe they are trying to give more customization options to their highly diverse player-base. They are letting us play as female soldiers and racial minorities in multiplayer to represent those portions of their player-base. Is this something you truly oppose for the sake of historical accuracy?
 
Last edited:
Oct 27, 2017
12,282
I actually think this is a realistic problem! Every soldier of a certain class does NOT look the same IRL. You and your teammates are using kind of the same uniform, the opposition wears something quite like yours as their cloth was designed for the same purpose - hide you in the environment...

I'm hoping the system kinda works out like this:

Race/Gender > Faction Template > Class Template > Customization items.

That way you get to have the customization options without sacrificing critical information. Ultimately it won't bother much either way.
 

Alienous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,598
[...]

I'm not grouping you in this category, but there's a tendency for gamers to be selective with how much authenticity they want or need in a game. An expert gamer being able to take out 20 dudes without dying? Sure, authentic enough. But add a female character with a prospective limb and Woah - too far.

[...]

There's no hypocrisy here. 'Authentic' presentation and realistic gameplay have always been seperate things. You can want an accurately modeled car in a racing game without wanting it to run out of gas.
 

Tranqueris

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,734
Not surprised people are still throwing out arguments like "but did you know that very few women fought and only in the Eastern front?" What the fuck does that have to do with a character creator that lets you play as a woman in a multiplayer portion of the game?
 

Araujo

Banned
Dec 5, 2017
2,196
  • The more reasonable complaint that many here are overlooking is that the high color saturation and types of customization showed off in the trailer could be seen as a direct play at the Fortnite audience, which is a major departure from the Battlefield norm and is a direction they are not comfortable with.

Battlefield 1 Gameplay Reveal




Battlefield V Trailer




Anybody crying out because of a bit more saturation deserves to be mocked. Openly. this is beyond silly.

And where the hell are we now in the Gaming industry where people will complaint about customization in a multiplayer game, but be ok with fucking Loot boxes... holy hell.
 

Andri

Member
Mar 20, 2018
6,017
Switzerland
There were many women that took part in WW2 in supporting roles and contributed to the war in many ways, but barring some resistance fighters there were no boots on the ground women soldiers. And if there was there was less than .01%

That 0.01% is still a infinite higher number than the number of Megalodons in WW1.

They existed, so saying its "inaccurate" is just wrong.

Even if there was exactly just one female soldier in the entire WW2, why could Dice not include exactly that person ?
 

sleepInsom

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,569
There's no hypocrisy here. 'Authentic' presentation and realistic gameplay have always been seperate things. You can want an accurately modeled car in a racing game without wanting it to run out of gas.

Yes, there is hypocrisy because the standards required for what is authentic is higher for women characters than male characters. You're not down for women being represented with prosthetic limbs on the basis that's not authentic but when you see male characters in positions where they do crazy shit that was never possible, either because of the acts themselves or because it doesn't make sense historically, you've got no complaints.
 

Addleburg

The Fallen
Nov 16, 2017
5,062
There's no hypocrisy here. 'Authentic' presentation and realistic gameplay have always been seperate things. You can want an accurately modeled car in a racing game without wanting it to run out of gas.

And likewise, you can want realistically modeled guns and tight gameplay without needing all the dudes you shoot to look like white guys. I'm sorry if it's hard for me to be empathetic to the argument against the inclusion of more ethnicities and female characters, but I just can't understand why people are upset that now they can shoot at people who aren't just white dudes.

If every Battlefield V player disagrees with the ability to choose non-white male characters, then theoretically everyone will customize themselves as a white dude and this will be a non-issue. But I can't abide by being upset at giving people the option to play as a character that looks more like themselves.
 
Last edited:

GameChanger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,935
Not surprised people are still throwing out arguments like "but did you know that very few women fought and only in the Eastern front?" What the fuck does that have to do with a character creator that lets you play as a woman in a multiplayer portion of the game?
I think some people, not all of them, just want some thematic consistency. All of them realize that battlefield games have never been historically accurate or realistic depictions of these conflicts but they want some authenticity in the art-style/theme of the game. It's understandable but I think they are missing the point.