I would give it the benefit of the doubt if i haven't played Indigo, Heavy and Beyond. Not anymore. Also, the same thing happened with every game released by this company and the press.
can't wait to hear what Alex Navarro says. The endings on yt seem... bad? but that doesn't mean people can't enjoy the game. I wonder how it would turn out as a movie with live actors and the same script
I would give it the benefit of the doubt if i haven't played Indigo, Heavy and Beyond. Not anymore. Also, the same thing happened with every game released by this company and the press.
A lot of people from major videogame publications are. Kotaku writers in particular are having a field day with Cage on Twitter and are even taking a celebratory tone of their site's negative review.
Statements like this don't take into account the homogeneity of games media. "Hey, all these white dudes thought it was perfectly fine."
I'm shocked.
These guys are basically doing a subtlety check and nothing else. How many of these reviews really dive into the game's ideas and how Cage and co. go about presenting them? How many of them do the work to couch the presentation of the ideas in American/world history? This is why games reviews are mostly garbage. Buy, Rent or Skip mentality to art criticism is useless.
I wasn't intending to take into account anything like that, it was simply a factual statement that there is no consensus that the game is badly written.
Though its kind of strange to blame a lack of consensus on homogeneity
Probably been covered befor so apologies if so but it's scored lower than Heavy Rain (87 versus 80 for Detroit). How does it seem like the best QD game yet?
No suprised at all at the score both positive and negative.
If you like this sort of thing you will like this thing
If you do not like this sort of thing you will not like this sort of thing
If you dont know if youll like this thing you might like this thing
I'm gonna say that what consider 'hostile/toxic to David Cage' is not what most people mean when they criticise gamers being 'toxic to developers'. Come on... devs get death threats/rape threats/doxxed daily but.... oh no! Someone criticised the writing in Detroit! They're literally being a critic of his work. It's their job.
This seems the kind of game where most "traditional" outlets just don't have te capability to analyze and review. Most game reviews aren't great but in a game that tackles a subject like this one more informed takes are definetly needed.
Curious what Austin Walker thinks of it. Navarro thinking it isn't good is not a good sign, curious to hear his reasoning.
Wtf? They rail against bozos who send devs DEATH THREATS and urge them to kill themselves— they're not coming for users who diss their creative efforts. False equivalency 101.
This seems the kind of game where most "traditional" outlets just don't have te capability to analyze and review. Most game reviews aren't great but in a game that tackles a subject like this one more informed takes are definetly needed.
Curious what Austin Walker thinks of it. Navarro thinking it isn't good is not a good sign, curious to hear his reasoning.
I'm gonna say that what consider 'hostile/toxic to David Cage' is not what most people mean when they criticise gamers being 'toxic to developers'. Come on... devs get death threats/rape threats/doxxed daily but.... oh no! Someone criticised the writing in Detroit! They're literally being a critic of his work. It's their job.
Probably been covered befor so apologies if so but it's scored lower than Heavy Rain (87 versus 80 for Detroit). How does it seem like the best QD game yet?
Man a lot of people really seem to hate Cage.
Personally I have no interest in all that stuff, I just care about the game and from all the good reviews, I'm looking forward to playing it.
As a Sci-Fi fan and really enjoying shows like Humans and movies like Blade Runner / Blade Runner 2049, Detroit is definitely something I'm going to enjoy.
Most of the reviews I've read / watched have no major issues with the writing, sure it's not perfect but no game is and the general score is really good, so that's good enough for me.
This seems the kind of game where most "traditional" outlets just don't have te capability to analyze and review. Most game reviews aren't great but in a game that tackles a subject like this one more informed takes are definetly needed.
Curious what Austin Walker thinks of it. Navarro thinking it isn't good is not a good sign, curious to hear his reasoning.
Austin's been mashing the retweet on that Mashable review today so fair to say he's found something to agree about. Or at least an interesting argument there. I love Austin and his thoughtful criticism. It's the best.
I'm gonna say that what consider 'hostile/toxic to David Cage' is not what most people mean when they criticise gamers being 'toxic to developers'. Come on... devs get death threats/rape threats/doxxed daily but.... oh no! Someone criticised the writing in Detroit! They're literally being a critic of his work. It's their job.
Making fun of someone is not a critique
And this is exactly what some of those "journalist" are doing. Not like I really care about them or Cage but I found it pretty hypocritical
It makes some interesting notions early on but gets messed up when the writer talks about the use of skin colour in the game.
The reviewer seems to imply that none of the androids should be white (because apparently white people have never oppressed and enslaved other white people in history before; and because apparently having white oppressed androids is an alagory for the alt-right's view of themselves (wtf, no it isnt)) and that
"The removal of skin colour"
is somehow the same as
making yourself "white"
when in reality its about shedding the fake likeness that makes you blend into the oppressors group and own your own individualities in your own group.
Like ffs, it feels like this review is the perfect example of anchoring and cognitive bias at its finest.
Must've missed the really hateful stuff. I've only seen criticism and, at most, playful poking at the images that came out of these threads. Maybe it's who I follow!
Some example please? I have zero interest in the game whatsoever, but I do remember David Cage having... issues with work place atmosphere, so he naturally attracts some flak, including from the more socially/politically aware members on this board.
If you see an offensive post we encourage you to use the report feature. If you have a complaint or concern regarding moderation please PM a moderator or administrator rather than potentially derailing the thread, thank you!
Mods, I feel like everyone who wants to derail the thread without real arguments about the game (but dont want to be punhished) keep saying "but but but its a David Cage game, this cant be a good game" and nobody do something about it.
It makes some interesting notions early on but gets messed up when the writer talks about the use of skin colour in the game.
The reviewer seems to imply that none of the androids should be white (because apparently white people have never oppressed and enslaved other white people in history before; and because apparently having white oppressed androids is an alagory for the alt-right's view of themselves (wtf, no it isnt)) and that
"The removal of skin colour"
is somehow the same as
making yourself "white"
when in reality its about shedding the fake likeness that makes you blend into the oppressors group and own your own individualities in your own group.
Like ffs, it feels like this review is the perfect example of anchoring and cognitive bias at its finest.
Making fun of someone is not a critique
And this is exactly what some of those "journalist" are doing. Not like I really care about them or Cage but I found it pretty hypocritical
can't wait to hear what Alex Navarro says. The endings on yt seem... bad? but that doesn't mean people can't enjoy the game. I wonder how it would turn out as a movie with live actors and the same script
Lol. Don't project your fanboy thoughts on other people
I was talking about some of them who are being assholes for no reason. Never said that any critique for this game is not true.
very very unsurprisingly, this thread turned out to be what i expected before i clicked. people thinking this game deserves more than the decent reviews it's getting (people who haven't played it btw, unlike reviewers) and assuming the reviewers have some sort of vendetta against cage/QD/sony.
Mods, I feel like everyone who wants to derail the thread without real arguments about the game (but dont want to be punhished) keep saying "but but but its a David Cage game, this cant be a good game" and nobody do something about it.
very very unsurprisingly, this thread turned out to be what i expected before i clicked. people thinking this game deserves more than the decent reviews it's getting and assuming the reviewers have some sort of vendetta against cage/QD/sony.
Not really seeing much of that at all actually. Most people are saying "ok great its reviewed pretty well, cant wait to try it" or "this particular review makes me not want to buy it". There were a few drive by posts earlier in the day, but I think that dried up when it was generally reviewing well... I think this place would have been a disaster had it been around the 60 mark this morning.
Less snark would be nice, but i guess you never try for less snark >~>
Also:
from the review said:
One cannot simply rewrite the rules of systemic power to portray privileged groups as experiencing equally unjust treatment or segregation. It's a slippery slope. And the image of white, Aryan-looking robots saying phrases like, "Our people deserve freedom," is a bit too close to home for comfort — and not in the good way.
Literally talks about how seeing a "white" character calling for an end to oppression being negative, implying that the problem is that they are white.
Lol. Don't project your fanboy thoughts on other people
I was talking about some of them who are being assholes for no reason. Never said that any critique for this game is not true.