Who gives a shit about your experience? This isn't about anyone other than Jessica Walter, an actress with 60-fucking-years of experience. If something is NOT NORMAL to her then it's not FUCKING NORMAL TO HER.
He is being dismissive of industry issues and the experience of a woman by suggesting that everyone else experiences it too and is therefore not important. He is doing the same thing Bateman is doing in the interview and deserves to be criticized for it.
Yeah, in the end Era's OT is just about as toxic as Gaf's was. I guess it's all the same users so it can't be helped, but it would be great if more people would at least try to take a step back and look at themselves.Ugh. Exactly what my earlier post was talking about. I guess it lifted already. Not sure if it was reversed or if a 1 day ban ends at midnight or something, because TDLink is unbanned now apparently.
But either way.
This board is shockingly unkind a lot of the time. Makes it hard to participate.
Well Jason Bateman did the right thing and apologize. It sounded sincere and also he didn't use the word "but" at any point in those tweets. However, part of me thinks if there wasn't an uproar about this, would he even acknowledge what he did was wrong? It goes to show you that you really can't keep tight lipped about all of the wrong doings if you want things to change.
The important thing is that I hoped he has apologized to Jessica about this personally, face to face.
I'm glad Bateman apologized and actually addressed some of the missteps, but this bit doesn't sit well (no pun intended) with me. It clearly was insensitive to her so saying that he isn't like that in general seems pretty stupid.
This is a brilliant post and perfectly -- and thoughtfully -- explains why rationalizing with "but this thing is normal in the entertainment business, really" is simply not good enough or warranted in this case.I know you're already responding to a lot of people, but let me suggest that the reason why your views are problematic is because it's complacent and contingent on allowing things to continue the way they are solely for the fact that - well, that's the way things are. One person being abused is not a legitimate reason for another person to be abused. You would never get away with saying you murdered someone, but it's okay because there are other people being murdered, too. Because it's normal. The reason why Walter has to say she would work with Tambor again is because of an imbalanced power dynamic where victims don't receive justice and have to cope with giving up a part of themselves to stay afloat. She shouldn't have to be a class act or anything, because a correct society would be tearing down Tambor as a perpetrator of harm.
This power dynamic is of a systematic nature, and it's one that allows incidents like Weinstein's scandals to occur, in the extreme. You saying that "it sucks to compartmentalize" is nothing more than downplaying the effects of abuse on another person. Not everyone will handle these situations with the same reaction, and just because you can set it aside doesn't mean others have to. It doesn't help that, psychologically speaking, compartmentalizing abuse in reality is just detrimental to mental health and will continue to drive further problems for victims. All of this is a lot of burden to place on a victim for simply being a victim. If abusers were handled as they should be, there would be no need to try to erase these kinds of acts from memory. You're doing a lot of assuming to support your own points and diminish the importance the event may have had on Walter. Whether or not she actually moves on, or forgives him, or would continue to be friends with him, she is really never given the choice to do so because in all honesty, your belief, widespread in our society, doesn't allow her to have justice as an alternative.
I know you're singing all these things about how the world isn't perfect and that we have to face reality, but what you're really just doing is, one, enabling those who already benefit from abusing power, and two, casting that problem off as something that can't be solved. If you truly believe that abuse in Hollywood is bad, the only solution is to be proactive and not dismissive. You seem to be defending yourself as someone who has dealt with verbal abuse in one way or another, and somehow rather than hoping that the problem can be better for everyone, you're coping by erasing it from existence. That's not how you make progress. Progress is hoping that everyone who comes after you will deal with less and less of that negativity, not wallowing and saying, "Well I had to deal with it, so you do, too!"
As people, even here on this forum, exercise that abuse towards you now, you shouldn't have to just recede out of the internet to escape them. That's what things like moderation is for - theoretically they should be stemming this abusive behavior. There is no justification for things to continue like that just because it's already happening.
After reading the entire thread, this can't be stressed enough.
That Bateman apology doesn't do it for me, sorry. Like jesus christ, the interview is just bad and the fact that his instincts led him to behave in that manner says more than the apology does
This is where I'm at too. I really disagree with the conclusion TDLink arrived at, but it sure is ridiculous if that's what got her banned.I know you're already responding to a lot of people, but let me suggest that the reason why your views are problematic is because it's complacent and contingent on allowing things to continue the way they are solely for the fact that - well, that's the way things are. One person being abused is not a legitimate reason for another person to be abused. You would never get away with saying you murdered someone, but it's okay because there are other people being murdered, too. Because it's normal. The reason why Walter has to say she would work with Tambor again is because of an imbalanced power dynamic where victims don't receive justice and have to cope with giving up a part of themselves to stay afloat. She shouldn't have to be a class act or anything, because a correct society would be tearing down Tambor as a perpetrator of harm.
This power dynamic is of a systematic nature, and it's one that allows incidents like Weinstein's scandals to occur, in the extreme. You saying that "it sucks to compartmentalize" is nothing more than downplaying the effects of abuse on another person. Not everyone will handle these situations with the same reaction, and just because you can set it aside doesn't mean others have to. It doesn't help that, psychologically speaking, compartmentalizing abuse in reality is just detrimental to mental health and will continue to drive further problems for victims. All of this is a lot of burden to place on a victim for simply being a victim. If abusers were handled as they should be, there would be no need to try to erase these kinds of acts from memory. You're doing a lot of assuming to support your own points and diminish the importance the event may have had on Walter. Whether or not she actually moves on, or forgives him, or would continue to be friends with him, she is really never given the choice to do so because in all honesty, your belief, widespread in our society, doesn't allow her to have justice as an alternative.
I know you're singing all these things about how the world isn't perfect and that we have to face reality, but what you're really just doing is, one, enabling those who already benefit from abusing power, and two, casting that problem off as something that can't be solved. If you truly believe that abuse in Hollywood is bad, the only solution is to be proactive and not dismissive. You seem to be defending yourself as someone who has dealt with verbal abuse in one way or another, and somehow rather than hoping that the problem can be better for everyone, you're coping by erasing it from existence. That's not how you make progress. Progress is hoping that everyone who comes after you will deal with less and less of that negativity, not wallowing and saying, "Well I had to deal with it, so you do, too!"
As people, even here on this forum, exercise that abuse towards you now, you shouldn't have to just recede out of the internet to escape them. That's what things like moderation is for - theoretically they should be stemming this abusive behavior. There is no justification for things to continue like that just because it's already happening.
Bateman was SO overt and really went out of his way to do what he did and I think that says a lot. This is all without even getting into the sexual harassment allegations, which they completely avoided, but it does make his vehement defense even more questionable.Yup. A good apology doesn't make it better, it just means you managed to not dig the hole any deeper with a bad apology.
Nobody that spends an entire interview making excuses for abuse and gaslighting the victim learns their lesson and changes overnight. I'm gonna need to see more than a nicely crafted apology before I believe he actually gives a shit about this beyond the effect on his own public image.
I think Bateman clearly fucked up and was right to apologize. However, I must say — and I am in no way making excuses for Bateman here — he has agency, he was clearly insensitive to Jessica Walter — but I couldn't help but wonder if the reason Bateman was so aggressively obtuse and insentive and also bizarrely fawning/overly diplomatic towards Tambor was because he was on eggshells about setting Tambor off. Like, maybe Tambor *hasn't* dealt with his shit and remains the active source of the problem. As a person with experience tiptoeing around raging alcoholics, something about all that felt unhappily familiar.Bateman sounded like he was in PR mode the entire interview and wasn't sure how to reckon that with Walter actually being honest and emotional. His apology is good but there was such an uproar about it that I don't think he had any other choice but to issue an apology.
I might be totally misremembering this, but I believe I've seen an interview with Batemen where he basically said Tambor is something of a father figure to him. I think the most likely explanation is he just likes the guy.I think Bateman clearly fucked up and was right to apologize. However, I must say — and I am in no way making excuses for Bateman here — he has agency, he was clearly insensitive to Jessica Walter — but I couldn't help but wonder if the reason Bateman was so aggressively obtuse and insentive and also fawning/overly diplomatic towards Tambor was because he was on eggshells about setting Tambor off. Like, maybe Tambor *hasn't* dealt with his shit and remains the active source of the problem. As a person with experience tiptoeing around raging alcoholics, something about all that felt unhappily familiar.
Fair enough. That is probably the most plausible explanation.I might be totally misremembering this, but I believe I've seen an interview with Batemen where he basically said Tambor is something of a father figure to him. I think the most likely explanation is he just likes the guy.
I have this suspicion that Tambor and Cross won't even comment about this publicly because of the way they are.
It is apparent that Tambor's friends and fellow cast members are excusing his behavior because they don't believe or support trans women in the same way they would if his accusers were cis women.
I guess the one day ban was either lifted or only lasted a few hours or something -- whatever the case, I think it's pretty ridiculous that I was banned for my posts in this topic. Unlike some other posters, I didn't personally attack anyone or try to dismiss their personal experiences. Just discuss the subject of the topic in a civilized manner using my own experiences to support my arguments.
But it's clear that the moderation team here doesn't want a real discussion with differing viewpoints to take place, just a dog pile of judgment.
Not bad as far as Twitter apologies go. Still lost a lot of respect for him tho.
I'm not really as surprised about Bateman. Dude starred in and directed Bad Words, after all. You know, that movie where he spends 90 minutes being an asshole to kids.
He sounds like one of those guys who'd deny that what he/they did was gaslighting until you pointed out that other people have noticed as well. Then he would either become silent or apologetic. It's kind of hard to tell if he's sincere when he originally showed lack of compassion and empathy for someone who had been abused.
Tambor himself brought it up first in the Hollywood Reporter piece not long ago.Is there any more information regarding the outburst Tambor had with Jessica Walter? This interview was the first time I had heard of it.