32 and not even close. That would be basically impossible to do and have any sort of quality of life while also having kids
I'm 35 and make roughly $125K a year. That would be a "no". A resounding no. I barely have $11K in savings
It still blows my mind that people are employed to throw a bunch of unfunny tweets by random fucking losers and call it journalism. Crazy times we wlive in. Anything to do with "Twitter reacts.." Gets closed immediately by me.Didn't we have a thread on this? Also, this has become a huge meme.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/kevinsmith...ry-saved-by-35?utm_term=.nr2RXv2lJ#.qcVe3kVxz
No it would be harder because you have less disposable income.
I guess it depends on whether or not we are counting investments, retirement accounts and property.
I've been fortunate and can say that I have more than double my salary saved, but the sacrifices I've had to make in order to hit that level might not have been worth it.
That said, I'm cognizant of the situations that have allowed me to hit that point. I'm aware that this really isn't a reality for most of my generation and the fact that someone can write an article like this and push it out without being aware of that is super strange.
The median retirement savings for a worker in their 30s was $45,000, according to Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, which looked at workers' retirement accounts including employer-sponsored accounts and individual retirement accounts.
Agreed. Although, it is more of a suggestion than a hard rule by Fidelity Investments. Also, it is talking about an ideal situation rather than reality.
Life, LOL. I like to buy shit. I also live in Arlington, VA where if you want anything decent you pay a shit load. I have a house that I rent out and i live in an apartment. I also invest like a motherfucker, so i DO have some money tied into that. I also like sneakers. I also still drive an 04' corolla. May get the 2019 one soon though.That's...a crap ton of money. Any reason why you haven't tucked more away? House? Kids?