• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

MortosDer

Member
Oct 27, 2017
602
I was wondering the same thing if they remove DRS zones and allow the car behind to use it anywhere on track as long as they are within 1 sec of the car they are following.

Not sure what difference it would make though as currently the DRS zones are probably already in the best areas of the tracks for overtaking.

If Project Cars is anything to go by. People would die at Eau Rouge with DRS on.
 

dubc

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,423
Seattle
Spa? Webbah?

BSXlhmeCMAAy63r.jpg
 

Kyougar

Cute Animal Whisperer
Member
Nov 3, 2017
9,354
The halos aren't THAT bad for seeing track action. 80 to 90% of it they are just overimposing the car and not the track.
 

RaySpencer

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,640
The halos aren't THAT bad for seeing track action. 80 to 90% of it they are just overimposing the car and not the track.

Yeah.

What they ARE bad for, is seeing who the fuck is driving the car from a lot of views, haha. Luckily there is enough other ways to tell, but it still sucks not being able to see their helmets as much.
 

FriskyCanuck

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,063
Toronto, Canada
Force India seems to be in a bad financial situation.

Bob Fernley:
"The next four weeks will decide if we will survive," Germany's Auto Bild quotes him as saying.

"I will have to raise a lot of money in a short amount of time."

Previously, Force India has been given a helping hand by getting an advance on its official F1 income.

Fernley said: "For that we always need the approval of the other teams, and this time Williams has put in the veto.

"I have a plan that could work in the next two to three weeks," he added.
 
OP
OP
Aiii

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,177
Yeah well, that shit is bound to happen when your boss is actively avoiding legal issues and gets his accounts frozen.

Merc will pick up the scraps.
 

AlsoZ

Member
Oct 29, 2017
3,003
So Williams probably put in a veto to destroy one of their direct rivals?
But yeah the Force India financial background was on shaky ground for a long time and I hope they can figure this out somehow, because that team has done wonders with that budget.
 

itsgreen

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
768
Sad for FI. It would look horrible for F1 if they go under.

Lol, Williams is salty. I've grown to hate them over the last few years.

If they go down, it would have been a double or nothing scenario. Which I appreciate. Sad though, but they will be picked up by someone.


Btw, it's Aston Martin, Red Bull will pick Honda everybody happy.
 

xrnzaaas

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,125
Man I was under the impression that Force India is doing good, they got a huge sponsorship from BWT and they've got plenty of other smaller sponsors. Or is it what Aiii mentioned and are Mallya's "legal problems" biting them in the ass?
 

Randdalf

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,167
Man I was under the impression that Force India is doing good, they got a huge sponsorship from BWT and they've got plenty of other smaller sponsors. Or is it what Aiii mentioned and are Mallya's "legal problems" biting them in the ass?

Read somewhere that the BWT sponsorship was only worth $8m, don't quote me on that though.
 

Dilly

Member
Oct 26, 2017
591
Says more than enough about the state of the sport that a team like Force India can not survive even with decent sponsorship deals and finishing fourth 2 years in a row. If they fold it would be a serious loss for the sport.
 

Deleted member 2254

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
21,467
Remember when Force India blocked Marussia's comeback? Now a Williams vote could effectively kill Force India.

What goes around comes around.
 
OP
OP
Aiii

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,177
Says more than enough about the state of the sport that a team like Force India can not survive even with decent sponsorship deals and finishing fourth 2 years in a row. If they fold it would be a serious loss for the sport.
How do you know those deals are decent? All you know is they have some sponsors on the car. I've always figured FI was dirt cheap given how many names are on that car compared to everybody else.
 

Staab

Member
Oct 28, 2017
538
That's really sad to hear, Force India has been a team that does a lot with fewer for a long time now.
It would suck to see them go, lose another two drivers and have the grid shrink again.

Should really be the opposite, more teams, more drivers, not a constant battle for survival...
Between Haas, Sauber, McLaren and Force India, you can see how much the sponsorships have dropped F1, less and less sponsors to be seen on cars, it's sad..
 

Dan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,950
I dont think Force India can be considered as a rookie team when their linage can be traced back 27 years :)
 

endlessflood

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
8,693
Australia (GMT+10)
Changing the car colour AND putting huge logos on for $8m is madness.
When you look at all of the empty space on F1 cars, clearly the price they're asking of sponsors is too high. I could understand if a team was light on sponsors one year because they couldn't come to an arrangement within a certain time frame, but with blank spaces on cars year after year, you have to say that the sponsorship market is sending a clear message.
 

Easy Rider

Member
Nov 2, 2017
926
How do you know those deals are decent? All you know is they have some sponsors on the car. I've always figured FI was dirt cheap given how many names are on that car compared to everybody else.

It's apparent every team that is not a manufacturer or has another business backing the F1 team like Red Bull Toro Rosso is struggling financially in this F1. It's reasonable to think the problem is the sport rather than assuming Force India, Williams, Sauber and to an extent McLaren and Haas are not capable of inking at least decent sponsorship deals.
 
OP
OP
Aiii

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,177
It's apparent every team that is not a manufacturer or has another business backing the F1 team like Red Bull Toro Rosso is struggling financially in this F1. It's reasonable to think the problem is the sport rather than assuming Force India, Williams, Sauber and to an extent McLaren and Haas are not capable of inking at least decent sponsorship deals.
Is it though?

Every other team has at least half the sponsors on the car than Force India. So that means one of two things. 1. Force India is somehow much better at getting sponsors than other teams, or is somehow much more appealing to sponsor than any other team on the grid. Or 2. Force India is cheaper to advertise on and as such a better choice than sponsoring one of the other teams.

And then there's the Mallya factor. A man with a questionable past as far as legitimate business deals go. Has tons of money, and bankrolls the entire team for years. Has his accounts frozen late last year, less than six months later -even though there have been no big shifts in the team income or the sponsors displayed on the car- Force India is suddenly in dire need of money to the point where they'll be bankrupt within a month if they don't find a lifeline.

I think in this case, blaming "the sport" for this would not be my default position.
 

Dan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,950
Yeah poor word choice on my part, I meant it more like a small team compared to the top three. :)

You're not wrong. Historically they've always managed to punch above their weight. Losing them in F1 would be a major loss.

The cynic inside me thinks Williams might be vetoing this to get a shot at another Merc engine discount..
 

Tempy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,333
Force India's prize money should be around $70M right?

Anyway, hopefully someone will pick them up.
 

Easy Rider

Member
Nov 2, 2017
926
Is it though?

Every other team has at least half the sponsors on the car than Force India. So that means one of two things. 1. Force India is somehow much better at getting sponsors than other teams, or is somehow much more appealing to sponsor than any other team on the grid. Or 2. Force India is cheaper to advertise on and as such a better choice than sponsoring one of the other teams.

And then there's the Mallya factor. A man with a questionable past as far as legitimate business deals go. Has tons of money, and bankrolls the entire team for years. Has his accounts frozen late last year, less than six months later -even though there have been no big shifts in the team income or the sponsors displayed on the car- Force India is suddenly in dire need of money to the point where they'll be bankrupt within a month if they don't find a lifeline.

I think in this case, blaming "the sport" for this would not be my default position.

I really don't think these two options you make up are as clear cut and I haven't seen a source with F1 sponsor revenues per team so we can't compare anything. What I was saying is a problem is that teams that are in the business of being only an F1 team struggle financially. FI is a rather successful team and they shouldn't be struggling. Sauber has become a bottom of the barrel team and is kept afloat as Alfa Romeo, Williams sold their souls to pay drivers to stay alive... Are they all missmanaged or there's a broader problem?

The sport needs to be sustainable, running teams has to be massively cheaper. Simplifying aero and engine design would do wonders for competition, spectacle, keeping teams in the sport and attracting new ones as well as sponsors.
 

Deleted member 2254

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
21,467
They're in direct competition with Force India and don't want them to suddenly get a $70m budget boost (or whatever the prize money was for their finish last year). It's pretty easy to see Williams' position.

And Force India pulled a similar trick to get some money from Marussia's failure. I'm sorry for the "low level" employees who may end their dream of working in Formula 1, but as for the managers and such... karma's a bitch.
 

Deleted member 11018

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,419
I haven't seen a source with F1 sponsor revenues per team so we can't compare anything.


edit, found the 2017 figures, details per team/sponsor/partner quoted for compaction
https://imgur.com/a/LCEux

in euros, sponsors then partners+price money(partners alone)
Mercedes : 112.5m + 385m (213m)
Ferrari: 216m + 257.5m (53.5m)
McLaren: 122m + 329.7m (217.7m)
RedBull: 220.5m + 209.1m (24.6m)
Renault: 54.2m + 216.95m (126.25m)
Williams: 39.1m + 150.2m (39.2m)
Force India: 50.6m + 94.45m (9.45m)
Toro Rosso: 56m + 68.3m (3.3m)
Haas: 50m + 67.8m (2.8m)
Sauber: 23.5m + 67.4m ( 10.8m)


old 2015 reference, published in 2016:

Team , Sponsors , Partners , FOM , Total
Red Bull Racing , €266m , €35.7m , €167m , €468.7m
Mercedes , €122m , €212.4m , €133m , €467.4m
McLaren Honda , €144.5m , €216.5m , €104m , €465m
Ferrari , €208.5 , €34.5m , €175m , €418m
Williams , €52.5m , €22.9m , €111m , €186.4m
Lotus , €69.5m , €13.6m , €56m , €139.1m
Toro Rosso , €68m , €9.4m , €60m , €137.4m
Force India , €49.5m , €12.2m , €68m , €129.7m
Sauber , €44m , €9.3m , €50m , €103.2m
Marussia , €500k , €32.5m , €50m , €83m
 
Last edited:

chuckddd

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,060
DZtiDEBV4AAJD-x.jpg


How does WEC's biggest star feel about this?

"I am disappointed to read this news," said McLaren F1 star Fernando Alonso, who will join Toyota's LMP1 program for the full 2018-2019 FIA WEC championship calendar.

"The decision to race [in the] LMP1 category was, for me, a chance to get the hell away from the Halo. Now, I feel very much like the damn thing is following me wherever I will go."

The perturbed Spaniard also spoke to the obvious question left unaddressed by the FIA WEC.

"Did anyone tell them the cars have windshields already?" he asked. "A Halo in front of the windshield ... it's ridiculous, no?"

I'm assuming this is an april fools joke.