• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Kvik

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
889
Downunder.
The sound design of the film is excellent. I'd definitely would like to get this on Blu-ray (Preferably 4K). I'll be recommending this to my sci-fi loving colleagues.
 

TyrantII

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,365
Boston
Some interesting thoughts but I dont think there is much sense in rationalizing or trying to rationalize things that deeply.

Like the crystal trees. I just assumed they were glass, considering they were on the beach and the alien uses whatever is around for its "creations". The same way the flowers grew into humans, the sand "grew" into trees.

Antenna, to cast the shimmer.
 

hordak

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,532
Anaheim, CA
i thought it was okay. i expected something deeper or maybe a plot twist. I guess there's two more books so maybe there will be more sequels?

I don't get how the Shimmer's been there for years. and no one knows about it. Why can't they send in drones to record video? or just use a boat to drop drones off the shore? Or give the motorcycles or gyrocopters.

Also this movie has one of my least favorite movie tropes - stupid scientist. Yes not all of them are scientists, and yes the Shimmer is making them add weird. but it's still annoying. Although not annoying as the Cloverfield Paradox.
 

Rhaknar

Member
Oct 26, 2017
42,444
i thought it was okay. i expected something deeper or maybe a plot twist. I guess there's two more books so maybe there will be more sequels?

I don't get how the Shimmer's been there for years. and no one knows about it. Why can't they send in drones to record video? or just use a boat to drop drones off the shore? Or give the motorcycles or gyrocopters.

Also this movie has one of my least favorite movie tropes - stupid scientist. Yes not all of them are scientists, and yes the Shimmer is making them add weird. but it's still annoying. Although not annoying as the Cloverfield Paradox.

They specifically said they sent drones and they specifically said nothing comes out.

And they specifically say that no radio or video gets transmitted out because of the "prism effect".
 

Adobe

Member
Oct 27, 2017
378
The movie was amazing, the soundtrack was even better. The alien soundtrack at the end was just mind blowing.
 

Markitron

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,510
Ireland
Watched it last night, really enjoyed it but I think I need to rewatch to absorb it all.

The sound design of the film is excellent. I'd definitely would like to get this on Blu-ray (Preferably 4K). I'll be recommending this to my sci-fi loving colleagues.
Yea this really bugged me, the shitty compressed sound really was an injustice to the film. I'd have waited for the UHD if there were any guarantees that it would be released any time soon.
 

MrConbon210

Member
Oct 31, 2017
7,646
Did the bear remind anyone else of Catching Fire with the Mockinjays that are mimicking the contestants loved ones being tortured? Honestly the YA movie might be more fucked up than this.
 

MarkMcLovin

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
670
What are peoples consensus with the ending?

The way I came away with it was that they will both duplicate and duplicate until the 'cancer' that they have become spreads and takes out humanity.

No idea if I've just made shit up but him all of a sudden becoming fine again and her asking if he was the clone, then embraces him gave me the Keymaster and Gatekeeper vibe.
 

Mr.Deadshot

Member
Oct 27, 2017
20,285
Fantastic movie. Not as good as Ex Machina but still very strong. A great mix between classic Sci-Fi-Horror (Alien, Bodysnatchers, The Thing ...) and avant-garde-cinema.
 
Oct 25, 2017
9,872
I like a movie that shows me something that I've never seen before. This one had a lot of that.

I wish I had seen it in theaters. I kind of feel like I missed a lot of the suspense watching it at home.
 

Fudgepuppy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,270
Only thing I didn't like about this, was the scene when Ventress evaporated. Would've been cooler if the effect was her vomiting up a liquid or something that had the shimmering effect, like oil or something. The shooting beams felt a bit too Indiana Jones and Marvel.

Fucking loved it overall though. Made me want a game about it. A roguelite game about getting deeper into the shimmer.
 

SimonChris

Member
Oct 27, 2017
363
Only thing I didn't like about this, was the scene when Ventress evaporated. Would've been cooler if the effect was her vomiting up a liquid or something that had the shimmering effect, like oil or something. The shooting beams felt a bit too Indiana Jones and Marvel.

Fucking loved it overall though. Made me want a game about it. A roguelite game about getting deeper into the shimmer.



There is a text adventure, originally made to promote the books.
 

SuperSplit

Banned
Nov 16, 2017
523
Seen this last night, cool movie, very trippy, not very realistic to send the team in that they did when like what? 4 black op teams had gone in before?...but I suppose that was ventress not thinking clearly or rationally since she was sick to begin with.
 

Lachdanan

Member
Oct 27, 2017
159
I really, really, really loved it. Did not want it to end :(

Updated fav sci-fi movies of all time:

1. Aliens
2. Annihilation
3. Interstellar
4. eXistenZ
5. Blade Runner 2049
6. The Thing
7. Gattaca
8. Under the Skin
 

Nemo

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
422
It was ok. Wasn't a fan of "just burn it all down to solve the problem". Felt like a cop-out after all the great buildup.
 

UnluckyKate

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,527
this movie really struck with me. I really found Ex Machina slow, unispired and painfully obvious and without any stakes...

But this... my god this is on a whole new level. The themes explored, visual, situations, the tension, the composition of so many glorious shots... Hard to walk out of this one unmoved
 

astro

Member
Oct 25, 2017
56,886
wtf did i just watch?

i dont understand anything about the ending, can someone explain in detail.

Also i prefer Ex Machina over this.

The Shimmer was changing the world around it but also being changed by it. When the Mimic copied Lena it also copied her self destructive properties that had been a theme throughout the film.

So when Lena set the mimic on fire, it self destructed much like Lena had.

And at the very end when Kane said he wasn't the same person and we saw the shimmer in Lena's eyes, we can see they're the same people on the outside but we know inside they're forever changed. Much like their trauma (flashbacks of infidelity) and how it had affected and changed them.

And questions: are they still the same person if they're a clone? Are they still the same person if their entire structure has been re-written but their thoughts remain?

There's more to it, and it's been explained better/in more detail earlier ITT, but that's the gist (at least how I took it).
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 18095

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
205
Watched it yesterday. Pretty cool I liked it. I didn't understand how Portman ends up being a duplicate of the alien entity. Anyone care to explain?
 
OP
OP
More_Badass

More_Badass

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,622
Watched it yesterday. Pretty cool I liked it. I didn't understand how Portman ends up being a duplicate of the alien entity. Anyone care to explain?
She doesn't. Remember her looking at her blood in the microscope and seeing her cells starting to be altered by the Shimmer? She was changed, Ship of Theseus-esque.
 

rsfour

Member
Oct 26, 2017
16,741
I'm going to watch Under the Skin again because I don't remember it being good. Or maybe I mixed it up with some other movie.
 

Twentieth

Member
Oct 26, 2017
373
Beautiful movie. Absolutely loved it. I interpreted the ending as a metaphor for their relationship (and the Shimmer, in general, as a metaphor for transformations in us set in motion by traumas or important events).
 
Watched it on a whim because someone made a thread here about a decent horror film and...wow. Not quite horror, and not what I expected, but thoroughly enjoyable. The ending was a bit mmmmm for impact, but thought provoking enough. I adored the bear and that uber unsettling 'copy' scene with Lena. Can't imagine how Kane's copy and Lena (Key and Lock?) are supposed to get out of quarantine, though (unless the copy and her own blood voodoo perfected outside of the shimmer?). And agree with your interpretation, Twentieth.
 
Last edited:

Alric

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,946
Watched it with the Wife last night and really enjoyed it. I'd of love to seen even more creatures as the bear was great. Was anyone else thinking about Last of Us, during certain scenes like in the pool in the base?
 

thenexus6

Member
Oct 26, 2017
7,305
UK
I just watched it, very impressed. Going to be thinking about this one for quite a while. It looked great, lots of The Last of Us vibes at times, I love the concept and creepiness / settlements of it all.
 

Deleted member 28474

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 31, 2017
6,162
I got more Stalker (movie or game I guess) than TLOU.

People who enjoyed this should definitely watch Stalker.
 

HStallion

Member
Oct 25, 2017
62,261
I got more Stalker (movie or game I guess) than TLOU.

People who enjoyed this should definitely watch Stalker.

It should be mentioned that Stalker is far more surreal, obtuse and impenetrable film than Annihilation by a large margin. Annihilation looks like a summer blockbuster movie in comparison to Stalker which is a meditative journey that almost borders on a tone poem. I consider it an absolute masterpiece of cinema and a work of art but people should just beware of what they will be getting into as its not an easy film to digest.
 

Budi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,883
Finland
The ending left me wondering a bit. I wasn't sure if I understood what happened, but quickly checking this thread I think I did. But I guess I fail at connecting all the pieces because I don't feel very satisfied by it. I did like the film very much though.
You know what sucks? This movie is the perfect example of how to make a movie with all female leads and doing it with taste, without screaming "LOOK AT ALL THOSE FEMALES". Is it because it's not AAA huge blockbuster that there are not as many articles praising the cast? You have to be Marvel or Sony blockbuster to get media attention? That's silly.
Yeeep. And this movie could use that kind of free marketing and praise. Or even more it would deserve it. I actually thought about the new Ghostbusters while watching this, with the shot from behind when they are walking to the shimmer with their gear on. And it reminded me of the controversy surrounding that movie.

Edit: Oh, there's a "details you missed" video on the previous page. I think I'll check that.
Edit 2: Well that was bunch of nothing.
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2017
11,953
Houston
I
What a disappointment...

So it opens with this intriguing premise and tags the audience along in a slow slow pace and at the end the explanation is a big nothing burger.
Also:
  • So this shimmer is probably the biggest discovery in humankind and they send in under equipped and untrained personal. That is so stupid and every time the unsuitable personal did something irrational it further reminded me how unrealistic and therefore stupid it is.
  • Also there is only this small facility outside the shimmer, with a fed up Psychologist with cancer in command? It makes no sense. There should of been a huge military and scientific presence and people in command with more enthusiasm and purpose.
However the movies good points are
  • The camera work, art direction and effects are all pretty cool, have me last of us mixed with alien covanent vibes.
  • The whole thing is rather creepy and disturbing.
  • The acting is good.
Its not bad but it aint great.

5.8/10
It's been around for awhile, they seem to ran out of doing the military option since no one ever came back out
 

LOLDSFAN

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,037
Interesting movie.

oOtT6aS.gif


Also I covered my eyes during the gross scene. ;~;
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
I fucking loved this... it's weird, it's creepy, it's beautiful, it's diverse with a phenomenal cast.

On a side note on representation: When Lena first meets Anya (side note her hairstyle was amazing) I looked at Anya and said to myself "fuck you know this is a character that could easily be a gay, like come on writer/director make this a supporting character who just happens to be gay, don't dwell on it but she's just the perfect character to just write in some queer representation"... and I am so used to not getting it I was already judging the creative team for failing... and then 3 minutes later she makes a pass at Lena as a means of starting the conversation about them going into the shimmer.... As small as that moment is I knew the movie was in sync with me on some level XD

But seeing like all these women just doing their thing without a major attention being made about it being an all women team was also inspiring.


I think what struck me most was that there was no villain in the picture and yet this movie was quite literally about the potential end of modern life on Earth... Yet it was not about the end of life... just what we'd define through our perspective of human existence and history. There was something zen about the idea that the shimmer was going to just spread and remix all life into something new, not because of some desire or drive, or evil plot but just because that's what that meteorite was going to do. Not different then the ones that potentially jump started Earth's life to begin with. It wasn't the end but a new beginning. We'd call it Annihilation because we define existence around what we know and the end of what all that we categorized is terrifying. At the same time there was no animus in the shimmer, no villainous plot, no attack, no drive or goal or want, it was just simply existing, the same way we are, and any violence came from interacting with our life forms, with the violent instincts of our existing planetary life, be it animal or human. At times I almost found myself feeling ok about the shimmer taking over, it offers the planet and life a fresh start and frankly it's far less of an "Annihilation" than what human beings are likely going to do via nuclear war, man made global warming, the destruction of our ozone layer and the depletion of our natural resources.

Actually to me the dread, came in not with the idea of the shimmer wholesale taking over and remixing life to start anew... but with it being so human by the end, in two bodies, that will likely spread and destroy humanity while maintaining human structure and thought, it will kill us and be us. It is another form of Annihilation but a slow and invisible one. The idea I got from the end is that Lena is dead on some level but her form will continue to live, continue to act and be human, and that this could theoretically spread to everyone else until the shimmer people essentially overtake the human race but continue to be the human race... killing us twice as they take over our world and our destructive direction that is bound to kill us anew and the planet with it. At least with the shimmer the planet would have replenished.




What are peoples consensus with the ending?

The way I came away with it was that they will both duplicate and duplicate until the 'cancer' that they have become spreads and takes out humanity.

No idea if I've just made shit up but him all of a sudden becoming fine again and her asking if he was the clone, then embraces him gave me the Keymaster and Gatekeeper vibe.

Oh so glad someone else thought this. As you can see above this is definitely my take to... that's Annihilation.... Destroying the shimmer just changed the form and means of it.
 
Last edited:

Gillben

Member
Oct 28, 2017
37
It changed a LOT from the book (as I'm sure others have pointed out), for the most part I was fine with it but the ending was silly and the lack of the inverted lighthouse and the priest-monster therein was a bummer (since I loved that part of the story). They definitely tried to make it more of a personal story with a nice wrap-it-all-up ending to better fit the usual audience, which is a shame. The constant explanations of what's happening ("alien", "refracting", etc.) were also clearly trying to simplify stuff, whereas the novel left things a LOT more open to interpretation and/or mystery (it's much more "Lovecraftian", there's even a cult involved in the 3rd book).

Some of the art design was beautiful though, it's just really sad we didn't get to see "the crawler" rendered in that style. I feel like I would have probably liked it more if I hadn't read the books, but the changes in tone, plot, and focus all seemed to be for the sake of making it a more standard sci-fi movie. I really loved the book (although 2&3 were mostly terrible, stop after the first if you read them), so I'm pretty let down. But again, very pretty and a competent movie on its own.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
A few thoughts/observations:
  • The meteor crash wasn't a crash. It was a landing. A real meteor crash of that size would have created a crater and destroyed the light house. The location (next to both water and land) wasn't random either.
  • The main reason of the alien visit was scientific research: to study, observe and interact with carbon based life forms
  • The alien is not a carbon based life form. The alien had never encountered complex carbon based life forms before coming to earth
  • The alien is similar to a game modder. But instead of computer code, the alien mods genetic code
  • The creatures and human mutations are results of these mods
  • The colorful growths on trees are failed attempts/experiments. Similar to cancer they are "bad code"
  • One reason of the wall is to limit exterior interference during the research
  • The lost memories might be memories erased by the alien. The alien might have experimented on and evaluated the new visitors during the first days.
  • The transparent "trees" next to the light house are not part of the genetic experiments. They are alien technology. Maybe communication devices to send back reports. Maybe interference devices. Maybe they were responsible for the "wall". They were destroyed on purpose at the end.
  • The "dance" at the end might have been a failed attempt to establish some kind of communication
  • The destruction at the end could have been avoided by the alien. It didn't because enough data had been collected.
  • There might have never been an alien on earth but only some kind of automated device (or AI) sent to earth by the alien to collect data
Thoughts?

I think the destruction of the shimmer was a false flag operation by the alien. Lena and Kane are clones to observe the rest of the intelligent life on earth.
But otherwise pretty spot-on, I think.

I think what I like about these is that while I disagree entirely I can see why folks would be drawn to interpreting it it that way. It's examining a completely foreign essence (personally I woudn't even call it a being) from a very human construct. As in you're needing a why, a conscious why... so you interpret the being as being an active agent... with conscious goals and desires and motives. Ie: It didn't crash, it landed, and a need to believe it is in itself acting like a scientist of sorts. That you feel drawn to the idea that it must be a conscious being with intentions rather than just say simply a force is fascinating to me, because I was drawn to it from the exact opposite. That this wasn't even necessarily a life form, that it was far me a force of nature but an intergalactic nature, that you can't look at is as having human concepts like: thought, drive, goals, plans, desires... no on its own anyway


IMO, Josie being converted into a person bush basically disproves their refraction theory. They make the refraction assumption because they think the human-shaped bushes means the plants were copying human structure, but we see later that that's not true and it was actually really people who had become plants, like Josie was.

I saw it as it could go both ways, I mean we saw very abnormal growths all over with the plans on the walls and stuff so it clearly influenced how plants grow so a human could be given plant properties and plants human properties and the results could sometimes end up identical regardless of their initial state.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
I recommend reading the plot summary on Wikipedia. Some of the big ones:

- At least in the first novel, there's way less understanding of how big Area X is, and the fact that it's expanding is a late reveal. There's also no concept of a center point. The Lighthouse is in the book, but it's not their ultimate destination and it's essentially a normal lighthouse that some of the previous teams used as a base of operations.
- The movie completely leaves out the "tower" that's probably the most important location in the book; it's essentially a giant hole in the ground forming an "inverted tower" of sorts, with a spiral staircase leading down. The team discovers writing formed by plant life all along the walls leading down into the pit, eventually deducing that it was "written" by some kind of entity that's now far below them. The climax of the book is The Biologist confronting this entity.
- There are also some plot points left out, for instance that The Psychologist has hypnotically implanted trigger phrases in each of the other team members; The Biologist becomes immune to these as Area X changes her. "Annihilation" is the trigger word to induce suicide.

Fascinating.... for book lovers I'm sure it's disappointing but for me reading these changes I can't help but be glad some were made. I wouldn't have liked an entity, I liked that here whatever it is feels, like I've said before, more of a force than a being.
 

Limit

Avenger
Oct 30, 2017
362
This is one of the best end of the world movies I have seen recently. I took the ending as the alien burning not because phosphorous was actually destructive but rather it mimicked Lena's mind, who herself yearned for self destruction. In the end all the struggle against the alien was all for naught because Lena and her husband have been both reborn into something else.
 
Oct 25, 2017
11,953
Houston
I think what I like about these is that while I disagree entirely I can see why folks would be drawn to interpreting it it that way. It's examining a completely foreign essence (personally I woudn't even call it a being) from a very human construct. As in you're needing a why, a conscious why... so you interpret the being as being an active agent... with conscious goals and desires and motives. Ie: It didn't crash, it landed, and a need to believe it is in itself acting like a scientist of sorts. That you feel drawn to the idea that it must be a conscious being with intentions rather than just say simply a force is fascinating to me, because I was drawn to it from the exact opposite. That this wasn't even necessarily a life form, that it was far me a force of nature but an intergalactic nature, that you can't look at is as having human concepts like: thought, drive, goals, plans, desires... no on its own anyway




I saw it as it could go both ways, I mean we saw very abnormal growths all over with the plans on the walls and stuff so it clearly influenced how plants grow so a human could be given plant properties and plants human properties and the results could sometimes end up identical regardless of their initial state.
i'd say the refraction lead to the multiple plants growing from the same branch. The Flower People before could easily be those plants were attacking them at one point like the bear mimicking
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
i'd say the refraction lead to the multiple plants growing from the same branch. The Flower People before could easily be those plants were attacking them at one point like the bear mimicking

I don't think attacking is the right word...

I still think human structure imprinted on some plants and plants imprinted on Josie.

It's funny to me outside the bear and gator (earth creatures, mutated yes but still acting like their original earth forms) I don't think of anything that happened in this film as violence or attacks.
 
Oct 25, 2017
11,953
Houston
I don't think attacking is the right word...

I still think human structure imprinted on some plants and plants imprinted on Josie.

It's funny to me outside the bear and gator (earth creatures, mutated yes but still acting like their original earth forms) I don't think of anything that happened in this film as violence or attacks.
i see it as like the end mirror clone. Maybe the military guys attacked the plants, cutting them to get through the forest or swampy area and it was a response.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
i see it as like the end mirror clone. Maybe the military guys attacked the plants, cutting them to get through the forest or swampy area and it was a response.

Each to their own...

I don't think the shimmer had thoughts or feelings or motives of violence... bits of it that merged with conscious beings perhaps started to (hence the confusion of the bear and Kane)...

The mirror clone for example wasn't trying to stop her it was merely just doing what she was doing so when Lena touched the door, it touched the door causing it close close when Lena pressed up against the door it pressed up against Lena completely oblivious that it was crashing her.
 

Einchy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
42,659
The Shimmer is best thought of, I think, like a malignant tumor that's growing on Earth. It's neither good or bad or really sentient in any capacity.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,316
The Shimmer is best thought of, I think, like a malignant tumor that's growing on Earth. It's neither good or bad or really sentient in any capacity.

Eh I find this even overly harsh.

It's not a disease, the planet wouldn't die if the shimmer took over it'd just be reshaped.. one some level arguably saved. That's the horror of the finale for me, the shimmer will take over but it will just be us, rather than be something new it'll just continue our march to self annihilation.