• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Lothars

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,765
so Sony never have the interest of pushing it all along? Damn, I almost fall for their attempt to revise the history. Thanks!
Sony absoutely has in the past, Revisiontist history is saying Xbox always has. Sony may be the one holding out now but Xbox is just as guilty of holding out in the past. It's not that they are innocent in this but some here want to pretend it's all be Sony's fault.
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
Sony absoutely has in the past, Revisiontist history is saying Xbox always has. Sony may be the one holding out now but Xbox is just as guilty of holding out in the past. It's not that they are innocent in this but some here want to pretend it's all be Sony's fault.

MS reluctance to crossplay seeped into this generation as well with Final Fantasy XIV. This is wholly new rhetoric not something they have been championing this entire gen. It only started with Rocket League release on Switch that it became the IT topic and even then didn't explode until now. Let's be real it's just the current hot topic issue. Lootboxes are old news.
 
Nov 12, 2017
2,877
Sony absoutely has in the past, Revisiontist history is saying Xbox always has. Sony may be the one holding out now but Xbox is just as guilty of holding out in the past. It's not that they are innocent in this but some here want to pretend it's all be Sony's fault.
Again was a third party dev asking to Ms not Sony
And we don't know if it would truly happen on Sony side if ms accepted...because Sony never said a word about it


Here we have Ms asking directly with dev support to Sony
 

Lothars

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,765
MS reluctance to crossplay seeped into this generation as well with Final Fantasy XIV. This is wholly new rhetoric not something they have been championing this entire gen. It only started with Rocket League release on Switch that it became the IT topic and even then didn't explode until now. Let's be real it's just the current hot topic issue. Lootboxes are old news.
yup I agree, it's just annoying that people are pretending that ms are the ones who have constantly pushed for it when it's far from the actual truth.
Again was a third party dev asking to Ms not Sony
And we don't know if it would truly happen on Sony side if ms accepted...because Sony never said a word about it
we know well enough when it is only third parties coming out about it and ms was against it. They may not be now and Sony may be against it now but nobody in the right mind can say ms was alway for cross play because that's far from reality.
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
Again was a third party dev asking to Ms not Sony
And we don't know if it would truly happen on Sony side if ms accepted

MS solely held it back at start of this gen.

http://m.ign.com/articles/2013/07/09/why-final-fantasy-xiv-isnt-coming-to-xbox-360-or-xbox-one

"The game director of Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn has explained the title won't be coming to Microsoft consoles as Xbox Live policies don't support cross-play with other platforms.

In an interview with RPGsite, Naoki Yoshida explained that while PS3, PS4 and PC players will be able to play with each other when the game launches on August 27, the fact Xbox users would require their own server turned the team off.

"The policy has not changed on Microsoft's side," he revealed. "The main reason from our side is that I don't want the community to be divided; to be split into two or more. For example, one player might be on the PC version, another might be on the PS4 version, and I'm playing the Xbox version - but we're not able to join the same game servers. That is just... I just don't like the idea. I disagree with it."

This is while Spencer was running things and was in active talks with SE and they wouldn't budge!
 
Nov 12, 2017
2,877
MS solely held it back at start of this gen.

http://m.ign.com/articles/2013/07/09/why-final-fantasy-xiv-isnt-coming-to-xbox-360-or-xbox-one

"The game director of Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn has explained the title won't be coming to Microsoft consoles as Xbox Live policies don't support cross-play with other platforms.

In an interview with RPGsite, Naoki Yoshida explained that while PS3, PS4 and PC players will be able to play with each other when the game launches on August 27, the fact Xbox users would require their own server turned the team off.

"The policy has not changed on Microsoft's side," he revealed. "The main reason from our side is that I don't want the community to be divided; to be split into two or more. For example, one player might be on the PC version, another might be on the PS4 version, and I'm playing the Xbox version - but we're not able to join the same game servers. That is just... I just don't like the idea. I disagree with it."

This is while Spencer was running things and was in active talks with SE and they wouldn't budge!

So where is Sony asking Ms to integrate Crossplay as a constant feature to every game?

From what I know there is Sony crossplaying with PC as same as they doing now and a third party dev dreaming of a brighter future ....from what I know Sony if ms accepted could also say no....
 

Synth

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,211
Go look at the last page, there is multiple.

I've read every page. People have been saying that Sony didn't actively push for crossplay last gen (which is true, in much the same way Nintendo isn't currently). People are NOT pretending MS was back then... That they were against it at the time was common knowledge.

Like I said quote the posts, if they're within the last page it should be easy.
 
Nov 12, 2017
2,877
yup I agree, it's just annoying that people are pretending that ms are the ones who have constantly pushed for it when it's far from the actual truth.
we know well enough when it is only third parties coming out about it and ms was against it. They may not be now and Sony may be against it now but nobody in the right mind can say ms was alway for cross play because that's far from reality.
I'm pretty sure that Sony never asked to Ms a Crossplay integration nor I think that Sony wanted one...or we would have games with PC Nintendo and Sony playing together like its happening now instead just like today is just PC and PlayStation.....this is just people building fantasies to defend Sony imho..so we can agree to disagree
 

IIFloodyII

Member
Oct 26, 2017
23,973
So where is Sony asking Ms to integrate Crossplay as a constant feature to every game?

From what I know there is Sony crossplaying with PC as same as they doing now and a third party dev dreaming of a brighter future ....from what I know Sony if ms accepted could also say no.....and a dev
They probably didn't care either way back then and just wanted FF14 on their platform, no matter what. MS refusing gave them one of the best MMOs on the market as a console exclusive, so they aren't going to say "we hope they reconsider".
 
Nov 12, 2017
2,877
They probably didn't care either way back then and just wanted FF14 on their platform, no matter what. MS refusing gave them one of the best MMOs on the market as an exclusive, so they aren't going to say "we hope they reconsider".
Ok but this is just another story and have nothing to do with Ms promoting Crossplay with Nintendo Pc and PlayStation ....
People have to stop mudding the water
Sony didn't change their position on Crossplay ... ever from what we know
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
So where is Sony asking Ms to integrate Crossplay?

Why should they? MS didn't want anything to do with Crossplay at the start of this generation. There's no olive branch being extended to Sony by MS when MS cut the tree down at the start of the generation.

Don't get me wrong I'd love crossplay but this whole thing is a PR thing that transcends logic and common sense from a business standpoint... I can speak from a consumer standpoint all day saying open platforms would benefit every consumer and customer but no business would ever do that...

Talk to me when MS tries to put Game Pass on PSN and is actually willing to do business with Sony other then being the odd man out in a business race between 3 companies and a future thats looming where you'll fall to third place against a console/hybrid what have you that released almost 3 years after your product... yes you'd be saying and doing anything to get all the good will and good press you can.

When MS wants to put Forza or Gears, or Gamepass on PSN and actively wants to do business with Sony in a meaningful way and let Sony disregard that or halt that... then you have them doing a diservice to us as gamers...

But for the time being while it's a bummer that we have had conflicting issues with crossplay for over a decade now. As someone who owns a Pro, Xbox One X, and a Switch... who put 150 hours into both PS4 and Xbox One Monster Hunter in order to play with two different sets of friends yes it blows at times. But I understand why, I can't fault Sony for why they are doing it just as I understood why MS did it all those years ago.

It's not changing at the flip of a switch and it's not changing when commercially it only reasons to hurt the company that being guilted into it. And benefits the company that is pushing it so strongly after being against it so fruitfully...

You ask me where is Sony to negotiate MS... and I would say with MS being so reluctant even to just a few years back is their reasoning for pushing it really for the gamers or because it's better for their business... do you really think we would have these Xbox heads championing it if the roles were reversed? We can say assuredly no from proof of the past. None of these companies are for or against crossplay for the benefit of us...
 

Fatal

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
586
User banned (1 month): Console wars, long history of similar behavior
Member when MS had Youtube, Netflix, etc behind Xbox Live Gold paywall? Pepperidge Farm members.

Now MS is the savior of gamers with Crossplay? How about removing Gold wall for f2p Microsoft, how about removing Gold completely - I'd come back! But we all know that ain't happening, cause we member what you stand for.
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
Member when MS had Youtube, Netflix, etc behind Xbox Live Gold paywall? Pepperidge Farm members.

Now MS is the savior of gamers with Crossplay? How about removing Gold wall for f2p Microsoft, how about removing Gold completely - I'd come back! But we all know that ain't happening, cause we member what you stand for.

Because Crossplay only helps their business which is why they push it, and the bad PR Sony gets helps as well! It's a perfect situation for MS. And Spencer and the other heads are wholly taking advantage of it. I mean all these tweets are solely to get people's attention... business isn't done over Twitter.
 

Synth

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,211
Why should they? MS didn't want anything to do with Crossplay at the start of this generation. There's no olive branch being extended to Sony by MS when MS cut the tree down at the start of the generation.

Don't get me wrong I'd love crossplay but this whole thing is a PR thing that transcends logic and common sense from a business standpoint... I can speak from a consumer standpoint all day saying open platforms would benefit every consumer and customer but no business would ever do that...

Talk to me when MS tries to put Game Pass on PSN and is actually willing to do business with Sony other then being the odd man out in a business race between 3 companies and a future thats looming where you'll fall to third place against a console/hybrid what have you that released almost 3 years after your product... yes you'd be saying and doing anything to get all the good will and good press you can.

When MS wants to put Forza or Gears, or Gamepass on PSN and actively wants to do business with Sony in a meaningful way and let Sony disregard that or halt that... then you have them doing a diservice to us as gamers...

But for the time being while it's a bummer that we have had conflicting issues with crossplay for over a decade now. As someone who owns a Pro, Xbox One X, and a Switch... who put 150 hours into both PS4 and Xbox One Monster Hunter in order to play with two different sets of friends yes it blows at times. But I understand why, I can't fault Sony for why they are doing it just as I understood why MS did it all those years ago.

It's not changing at the flip of a switch and it's not changing when commercially it only reasons to hurt the company that being guilted into it. And benefits the company that is pushing it so strongly after being against it so fruitfully...

You ask me where is Sony to negotiate MS... and I would say with MS being so reluctant even to just a few years back is their reasoning for pushing it really for the gamers or because it's better for their business... do you really think we would have these Xbox heads championing it if the roles were reversed? We can say assuredly no from proof of the past. None of these companies are for or against crossplay for the benefit of us...

Arguing that MS should put all their gaming output on Sony's console before crossplay should be handled is frankly ridiculous. You're happy to talk about Sony being willing last gen, but I'm sure you'd realise how stupid an argument of "Sony should have put Gran Turismo and Uncharted on Xbox if they were serious" would be.

Besides MS does directly do business with Sony/PlayStation via Minecraft, and even if they wanted to put Gamepass on PS4, it's extremely unlikely Sony would even let them (see EA Access).

This is all completely irrelevant to fucking crossplay though, so I don't even know why it's being brought up.
 

Terrell

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,624
Canada
All this talk of "what's in it for Sony when they're the biggest platform of the generation" shit really misses the point when Nintendo went ahead and did it for Rocket League and Minecraft, even when it was abundantly clear that it was on track to be one of their best-selling pieces of hardware ever. I mean, what's in it for them? It's not like people were going to stop buying Switches without cross-play, so how does it benefit Nintendo in a way that isn't also applicable to Sony?

The whole discussion here seems to hinge on Xbox and PlayStation being the only factors at play here.

And really, the biggest thing is that Sony holding out like this just makes consoles in general look like a poor investment for online multiplayer gaming in totality, so the short-term gains here don't outweigh the potential long-term consequences.
 

I KILL PXLS

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,536
Doesn't change the fact that they didn't purposely refused to do crossplay last gen.
Doesn't change the fact that the ball was in MS camp more than Sony last gen.
And this "no comment" add to the point that, if anything, Sony didn't want to be vocal or chasing crossplay anyway with Xbox last gen.
This is kind of what I'm getting at. MS says outright they're not going to play ball with console crossplay. Sony is asked to respond and they don't say anything because they don't have to. MS already put themselves out there with an answer and yes, effectively put the ball in their court. By saying nothing, Sony effectively leaves their stance up to interpretation and leaves the onus on MS because their position is irrelevant until MS relents. In your case, you've interpreted "no comment" to mean they didn't want t rock the boat and wanted cross console play all along when all it really means is "no comment". That's why I'm curious if there's a clearer quote from them.
 
Nov 12, 2017
2,877
Why should they? MS didn't want anything to do with Crossplay at the start of this generation. There's no olive branch being extended to Sony by MS when MS cut the tree down at the start of the generation.

Don't get me wrong I'd love crossplay but this whole thing is a PR thing that transcends logic and common sense from a business standpoint... I can speak from a consumer standpoint all day saying open platforms would benefit every consumer and customer but no business would ever do that...

Talk to me when MS tries to put Game Pass on PSN and is actually willing to do business with Sony other then being the odd man out in a business race between 3 companies and a future thats looming where you'll fall to third place against a console/hybrid what have you that released almost 3 years after your product... yes you'd be saying and doing anything to get all the good will and good press you can.

When MS wants to put Forza or Gears, or Gamepass on PSN and actively wants to do business with Sony in a meaningful way and let Sony disregard that or halt that... then you have them doing a diservice to us as gamers...

But for the time being while it's a bummer that we have had conflicting issues with crossplay for over a decade now. As someone who owns a Pro, Xbox One X, and a Switch... who put 150 hours into both PS4 and Xbox One Monster Hunter in order to play with two different sets of friends yes it blows at times. But I understand why, I can't fault Sony for why they are doing it just as I understood why MS did it all those years ago.

It's not changing at the flip of a switch and it's not changing when commercially it only reasons to hurt the company that being guilted into it. And benefits the company that is pushing it so strongly after being against it so fruitfully...

You ask me where is Sony to negotiate MS... and I would say with MS being so reluctant even to just a few years back is their reasoning for pushing it really for the gamers or because it's better for their business... do you really think we would have these Xbox heads championing it if the roles were reversed? We can say assuredly no from proof of the past. None of these companies are for or against crossplay for the benefit of us...

Ah so Ms should ask Sony if they can put their games on their platform to be trust? Why not uncharted on windows or Xbox? What type of argument is this ?
I think you are championing just a company and I never stop to saying I hope that people will be the same wise and understanding when Ms will utilize their marketshare strength and their two platforms pc and console as one over the rivals.
 

Arthands

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
8,039
Member when MS had Youtube, Netflix, etc behind Xbox Live Gold paywall? Pepperidge Farm members.

Now MS is the savior of gamers with Crossplay? How about removing Gold wall for f2p Microsoft, how about removing Gold completely - I'd come back! But we all know that ain't happening, cause we member what you stand for.

These has nothing to do with this topic.
 
Oct 25, 2017
12,319
Member when MS had Youtube, Netflix, etc behind Xbox Live Gold paywall? Pepperidge Farm members.

Now MS is the savior of gamers with Crossplay? How about removing Gold wall for f2p Microsoft, how about removing Gold completely - I'd come back! But we all know that ain't happening, cause we member what you stand for.
Does nuance not exist in your bubble
 

IIFloodyII

Member
Oct 26, 2017
23,973
Ok but this is just another story and have nothing to do with Ms promoting Crossplay with Nintendo Pc and PlayStation ....
People have to stop mudding the water
Sony didn't change their position on Crossplay ... ever from what we know
You're the one asking about where did Sony push for it, I just gave what their stance probably was back then. Which to me seems like it was "if we benefit, sure" outside of that what's there to muddy? Sony don't want it unless they benefit from it. So you're probably right that their stance hasn't changed. They benefited with FF14, they don't now.
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
Arguing that MS should put all their gaming output on Sony's console before crossplay should be handled is frankly ridiculous. You're happy to talk about Sony being willing last gen, but I'm sure you'd realise how stupid an argument of "Sony should have put Gran Turismo and Uncharted on Xbox if they were serious" would be.

Besides MS does directly do business with Sony/PlayStation via Minecraft, and even if they wanted to put Gamepass on PS4, it's extremely unlikely Sony would even let them (see EA Access).

This is all completely irrelevant to fucking crossplay though, so I don't even know why it's being brought up.

Only reason why I brought it up is because poster I was replying too was wanting to know when Sony tried to extend out to MS crossplay wise... and in this instance Sony would be stupid to do that it wouldn't help them at all in a business or financial way... MS needs to at least preposition Sony with actual business is the sole point I was trying to make... this whole Spencer tweeting wanting to play nice isn't doing business with Sony... in fact in any meaningful way it's doing the exact opposite in my eyes... why would Sony be any closer to playing nice when dealing with pandering tweets like that... as said below that's not how business is conducted...
 
Nov 12, 2017
2,877
You're the one asking about where did Sony push for it, I just gave what their stance probably was back then. Which to me seems like it was "if we benefit, sure" outside of that what's there to muddy? Sony don't want it unless they benefit from it. So you're probably right that their stance hasn't changed. They benefited with FF14, they don't now.
I don't think that Sony would accept a Crossplay with xbox with ff14...from what we know it was just a dev dream.
Probably Sony accepted the crossplay coz they know was just with PC.....like they accepting today
 

Garrett 2U

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,511
Member when MS had Youtube, Netflix, etc behind Xbox Live Gold paywall? Pepperidge Farm members.

Now MS is the savior of gamers with Crossplay? How about removing Gold wall for f2p Microsoft, how about removing Gold completely - I'd come back! But we all know that ain't happening, cause we member what you stand for.

Interesting straw man argument. You can both expect Xbox Live to allow any user to play F2P titles online as well as expect Sony to allow crossplay with other consoles.

Each service offers a different set of benefits. That is traditionally how competition works. For example:
Xbox offers unlimited cloud storage for every user.
Sony only offers limited cloud storage for PS Plus subscribers.
 

Doffen

Member
Oct 28, 2017
887
Member when MS had Youtube, Netflix, etc behind Xbox Live Gold paywall? Pepperidge Farm members.

Now MS is the savior of gamers with Crossplay? How about removing Gold wall for f2p Microsoft, how about removing Gold completely - I'd come back! But we all know that ain't happening, cause we member what you stand for.

Must really hurt that Microsoft changed for the better regarding cross-play and media paywall.
 

RedRum

Newbie Paper Plane Pilot
Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,365
All this talk of "what's in it for Sony when they're the biggest platform of the generation" shit really misses the point when Nintendo went ahead and did it for Rocket League and Minecraft, even when it was abundantly clear that it was on track to be one of their best-selling pieces of hardware ever. I mean, what's in it for them? It's not like people were going to stop buying Switches without cross-play, so how does it benefit Nintendo in a way that isn't also applicable to Sony?

The whole discussion here seems to hinge on Xbox and PlayStation being the only factors at play here.

And really, the biggest thing is that Sony holding out like this just makes consoles in general look like a poor investment for online multiplayer gaming in totality, so the short-term gains here don't outweigh the potential long-term consequences.

Great post. Unfortunately, it's going to get lost in all the haze here.
 

Fatal

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
586
Interesting straw man argument. You can both expect Xbox Live to allow any user to play F2P titles online as well as expect Sony to allow crossplay with other consoles.

Each service offers a different set of benefits. That is traditionally how competition works. For example:
Xbox offers unlimited cloud storage for every user.
Sony only offers limited cloud storage for PS Plus subscribers.

Don't get me started on Sony's cloud limitations. Had to switch off the notifications even with the 10gig or whatever Sony is kind enough to throw our way. They both suck, let be honest. Praising either one should not be on the cards. Critique is the only way to get things done.
 

Synth

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,211
Only reason why I brought it up is because poster I was replying too was wanting to know when Sony tried to extend out to MS crossplay wise... and in this instance Sony would be stupid to do that it wouldn't help them at all in a business or financial way... MS needs to at least preposition Sony with actual business is the sole point I was trying to make... this whole Spencer tweeting wanting to play nice isn't doing business with Sony... in fact in any meaningful way it's doing the exact opposite in my eyes... why would Sony be any closer to playing nice when dealing with pandering tweets like that... as said below that's not how business is conducted...

That doesn't make your post any less ridiculous/pointless. For crossplay to be meaningful it just needs to be allowed. This shouldn't be as a result of other platform holders essentially paying bribes, as that inherently limits the core princjple. So MS gives Sony a game on their platform and then what? What about Nintendo being included in the pool? It's fanboy nonsense to talk about having to provide the other platform with first-party software software and services just so third-parties can make a link between the platforms for their own games. MS were in the wrong for denying crossplay last gen, Sony wasn't wrong for not surrending shit to them to incentivise it, because that would then imply every platform should be paying bribe money to a single crossplay holdout.
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
Ah so Ms should ask Sony if they can put their games on their platform to be trust? Why not uncharted on windows or Xbox? What type of argument is this ?
I think you are championing just a company and I never stop to saying I hope that people will be the same wise and understanding when Ms will utilize their marketshare strength and their two platforms pc and console as one over the rivals.

I only brought that up because you asked when did Sony approach MS for crossplay... and they probably didn't and wouldn't.

Just like we will never see each platforms games on the other. It wasn't a serious notion... it was a notion that if you want Sony to "play ball" in crossplay a decision that while yes would be great for us gamers solely benefits MS from a business standpoint... so basically Sony accepting this would be basically goodwill for a rival competitor.. and the remark of other games on rivals was an extreme way of saying maybe before expecting Sony to make a change that doesn't benefit them maybe MS should try to do fair business with Sony in some way something meaningful that isn't PR slinging on Twitter into a guilt campaign.

But I mean cmon honestly It won't happen... but to completely fault Sony for this when MS is the sole one to gain from this while doing it in the most unprofessional way using twitter to create bad PR doesn't make sense this is just business are usual for MS and Sony is following suit IMO.
 
Nov 12, 2017
2,877
I think they would have back then, if saying no meant it'd be PC and Xbox only instead.
I do agree now they wouldn't though. Assuming MS and Square's never ending on-going talks come to a end.

But we can agree that there are not proof of evidence
If it would be like you say we would have lots of games with Nintendo Sony and PC playing together and Ms out from the bounce

Instead like at ff14 times we any talks from higher Sony manager about Crossplay...if not someone refusing "4 the childrens" at ms proposal

Btw sure Ms did wrong not accepting the crossplay with PC for ff14
 

I KILL PXLS

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,536
But I mean cmon honestly It won't happen... but to completely fault Sony for this when MS is the sole one to gain from this while doing it in the most unprofessional way using twitter to create bad PR doesn't make sense this is just business are usual for MS and Sony is following suit IMO.
Well...and Nintendo, and devs, and the user base of any platform included really.
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
That doesn't make your post any less ridiculous/pointless. For crossplay to be meaningful it just needs to be allowed. This shouldn't be as a result of other platform holders essentially paying bribes, as that inherently limits the core princjple. So MS gives Sony a game on their platform and then what? What about Nintendo being included in the pool? It's fanboy nonsense to talk about having to provide the other platform with first-party software software and services just so third-parties can make a link between the platforms for their own games. MS were in the wrong for denying crossplay last gen, Sony wasn't wrong for not surrending shit to them to incentivise it, because that would then imply every platform should be paying bribe money to a single crossplay holdout.

You totally missed the point... the whole games things wasn't my point I figured people would realize it would never happen and was using it as an extreme... my point was that MS is pushing this because it benefits them completely from a business standpoint and does nothing for Sony outside of goodwill... So why would Sony give goodwill to MS while yes it would benefit the consumer it is solely doing something beneficial for their competitor.

So before Sony does something that solely benefits them my whole point with the games thing was saying let's see MS try to extend an offer to Sony that benefits them both... hence why I brought up games... but that wasn't the point let's see MS try to do any kind of cross promotion or deal with Sony that just fair to both and then let's see if Sony is the same stick in the mud... then I'd fault them... then I'd scoff at for the players... my point was never about games it was about business...

MS isn't trying to do business with Sony trying to push for crossplay they are using Twitter and PR tactics to stir it up to see if they can come out the good guy/hero and come out with the business of crossplay... that's was the point I apologize if I maybe leaned on the games too much the games were just an open example for a deal... it wasn't anything about bribe or blackmail or anything like that... but I wanna see Sony refuse something fair that benefits both companies and gamers alike before I get all worked up.
 

IIFloodyII

Member
Oct 26, 2017
23,973
But we can agree that there are not proof of evidence
If it would be like you say we would have lots of games with Nintendo Sony and PC playing together and Ms out from the bounce

Instead like at ff14 times we any talks from higher Sony manager about Crossplay...if not someone refusing "4 the childrens" at ms proposal
I think MS saying no gave them what they wanted, if that's what you mean? But I do think Sony would have just bit their tongue back then if MS also did the same. Even if they didn't want cross-play and only wanted FF14.
It's very clear FF14 wouldn't have been on all platforms if it wasn't cross-play with all platforms, due to how it's set-up.
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
Well...and Nintendo, and devs, and the user base of any platform included really.

Speaking completely business wise... 100% as a owner of every platform console or handheld or hybrid and PC yes an open crossplay platform would be fantastic... I am purely commenting on logical business sense and common sense... if the PR truly went beyond twitter and some forums I'd think Sony had a bone to cave but from a business standpoint this doesn't hurt them at all IMO...
 

Deleted member 26746

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 30, 2017
1,161
#4theplayers is also keeping the comunity closed 'cause if you have the biggest piece of cake all you need to do is try and increase it offering first party exclusives and thanks to that power possition you also get third party (timed or not) exclusivities other way you won't have unless money hatting.

So sharing the userbase with cross-play isn't by any means profitable for sony 'cause other consoles will benefit from it's bigger userbase.

If a person is wiling to buy MS IP games... but thinks that CoD lacks userbase on XBO or all his friends are on PS4... and because of that ends with a PS4 and buys it from sony is the main reason cross-play won't happen unless sony have something to gain.
 

Synth

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,211
You totally missed the point... the whole games things wasn't my point I figured people would realize it would never happen and was using it as an extreme... my point was that MS is pushing this because it benefits them completely from a business standpoint and does nothing for Sony outside of goodwill... So why would Sony give goodwill to MS while yes it would benefit the consumer it is solely doing something beneficial for their competitor.

So before Sony does something that solely benefits them my whole point with the games thing was saying let's see MS try to extend an offer to Sony that benefits them both... hence why I brought up games... but that wasn't the point let's see MS try to do any kind of cross promotion or deal with Sony that just fair to both and then let's see if Sony is the same stick in the mud... then I'd fault them... then I'd scoff at for the players... my point was never about games it was about business...

MS isn't trying to do business with Sony trying to push for crossplay they are using Twitter and PR tactics to stir it up to see if they can come out the good guy/hero and come out with the business of crossplay... that's was the point I apologize if I maybe leaned on the games too much the games were just an open example for a deal... it wasn't anything about bribe or blackmail or anything like that... but I wanna see Sony refuse something fair that benefits both companies and gamers alike before I get all worked up.

Your entire post reads like you aren't aware that Minecraft and the proposed "Better Together" update exist.

MS have approached Sony with something that would benefit them both. Sony declined it, leaving their fanbase out in the cold for that game. Yet you still apparently don't fault, and quite honestly don't seem like you ever would.

Anything that MS (or any developer) tries to offer in regards to crossplay that isn't accepted you'd never hear about. You're only ever aware of their intentions if they post something to a public domain, such as the Twitter posts you're dismissing... and that'll never include details of business deals.
 

Terrell

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,624
Canada
Speaking completely business wise... 100% as a owner of every platform console or handheld or hybrid and PC yes an open crossplay platform would be fantastic... I am purely commenting on logical business sense and common sense... if the PR truly went beyond twitter and some forums I'd think Sony had a bone to cave but from a business standpoint this doesn't hurt them at all IMO...

See my post from earlier. If you can name a reason why Nintendo's hot-selling (read: on track to being #3 best-selling hardware ever) platform absolutely needed to do cross-play while Sony didn't, you might have something there. So you can't conveniently say "practical business sense" when another business that has equally less to gain went ahead and did it anyway. Until that's addressed, your point doesn't hold an ounce of fluid.
 

I KILL PXLS

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,536
Speaking completely business wise... 100% as a owner of every platform console or handheld or hybrid and PC yes an open crossplay platform would be fantastic... I am purely commenting on logical business sense and common sense... if the PR truly went beyond twitter and some forums I'd think Sony had a bone to cave but from a business standpoint this doesn't hurt them at all IMO...
I'd honestly imagine there have been some talks with Sony about this that we're just not privy to. I think Psyonix in particular confirmed they themselves have been in ongoing talks about it with Sony since this was all announced. I'm sure it's been brought up by Epic as well in relation to Fortnite and maybe more. Whether or not the tweets are hurting the situation is up for interpretation, but I doubt that's the extent of the conversation between the two.
 

Synth

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,211
See my post above. If you can name a reason why Nintendo's hot-selling (read: on track to being #3 best-selling hardware ever) platform absolutely needed to do cross-play while Sony didn't, you might have something there. So you can't conveniently say "practical business sense" when another business that has equally less to gain went ahead and did it anyway. Until that's addressed, your point doesn't hold an ounce of fluid.

It's not even just "another business"... It's EVERY other business from Steam to iOS that mysteriously doesn't have this issue.
 
Oct 29, 2017
810
we know well enough when it is only third parties coming out about it and ms was against it. They may not be now and Sony may be against it now but nobody in the right mind can say ms was alway for cross play because that's far from reality.

I think what ppl are saying is Sony could of always been against it as well . Seems like both were wrong and Xbox got new leadership and changed it's tune while Sony has the same stance
 
Nov 12, 2017
2,877
I think MS saying no gave them what they wanted, if that's what you mean? But I do think Sony would have just bit their tongue back then if MS also did the same. Even if they didn't want cross-play and only wanted FF14.
It's very clear FF14 wouldn't have been on all platforms if it wasn't cross-play with all platforms, due to how it's set-up.
Exactly...and well yeah maybe Sony would accept it for that game ..but honestly imho... that's it
 

Caliaztec

Member
Oct 27, 2017
854
Palm Desert,CA
Your entire post reads like you aren't aware that Minecraft and the proposed "Better Together" update exist.

MS have approached Sony with something that would benefit them both. Sony declined it, leaving their fanbase out in the cold for that game. Yet you still apparently don't fault, and quite honestly don't seem like you ever would.

Anything that MS (or any developer) tries to offer in regards to crossplay that isn't accepted you'd never hear about. You're only ever aware of their intentions if they post something to a public domain, such as the Twitter posts you're dismissing.

Honestly Minecraft is wholly off my radar... I have never owned it and not played a moment. I have nothing against it just never been a big Sim/Management/World building fan. Also style of the game doesn't interest me. (just a full disclosure)

And I'm not dismissing the twitter posts in the least but cmon they are more antagonizing then they are welcoming. Just saying if that's how I was being approached to agree to something that doesn't really benefit me I'd say "Sit on it"

Yes Sony should opt for it from a consumer standpoint, and there's tons of things that all platform owners do that really irks me... I have plenty of gripes with Sony be name changes, PS1 emulation, the way they handled the Vita, the ability to not communicate better with fans, terrible horrible customer support, and an inability to fund 1st party JRPGs for the last two console gens...

I just tend to comment from common sense and not what I'd like. There's a lot of things I'd like but I'm realistic and know what is and isn't really logical from a business standpoint...
 

IIFloodyII

Member
Oct 26, 2017
23,973
See my post from earlier. If you can name a reason why Nintendo's hot-selling (read: on track to being #3 best-selling hardware ever) platform absolutely needed to do cross-play while Sony didn't, you might have something there. So you can't conveniently say "practical business sense" when another business that has equally less to gain went ahead and did it anyway. Until that's addressed, your point doesn't hold an ounce of fluid.
It applies to Nintendo too, I guess it's a case of Nintendo just don't care and see the positives. Whereas Sony only see it as strengthing the rest.

The biggest head scratcher is why Sony don't care about sharing with everyone else, but consoles imo.
 

methane47

Member
Oct 28, 2017
879
See my post from earlier. If you can name a reason why Nintendo's hot-selling (read: on track to being #3 best-selling hardware ever) platform absolutely needed to do cross-play while Sony didn't, you might have something there. So you can't conveniently say "practical business sense" when another business that has equally less to gain went ahead and did it anyway. Until that's addressed, your point doesn't hold an ounce of fluid.

Because Nintendo and everyone else in the world knows that you dont buy a Nintendo Console to play cross platform games.
NES's are delivery systems for Nintendo software.
Playstations and Xboxs have less bankable 1st party games so they are more geared towards 3rd party support.

Soo Nintendo is ok with opening up the gates because basically the large selling point of Nintendo hardware is Nintendo Software.
Sony is not ok with opening up the gates because The popularity of the Console is because it is this generation's default Console. Your friends have one.. so it forces you to buy one if you want to play with friends. Cross Platform completely eliminates this need. And it would be impossible to stop the flood gates.. if you open up Xplay for one game.. it will have to be for all

Me personally.. I think this generation is done.. Sony has already won.. They should just open up the flood gates.. and they can force Xbox users to buy PSN+ if they want to get into the PSN network... or some other type of hurdle like that.
 

Starlatine

533.489 paid youtubers cant be wrong
Member
Oct 28, 2017
30,404

you mean letting people play a multiplat game with people on other platforms with the same multiplat game without having to lift a single finger to do anything (case in point - rocket league) isnt the same as putting uncharted on switch and god of war on xbox? surely you jest