• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

zeknurn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,269
You should probably put a nsfw tag on that because wow.


15744268147_7186425b52_o.jpg
 
Last edited:

Fredo

Member
Oct 30, 2017
1,033
I guess that is his nephew that he got shit for teasing about wearing a princess dress.
 
Oct 25, 2017
712
Honda's Yamamoto:

- Toro Rosso are easy to work with.

- They listen to suggestions and are interested in what we have to say about the PU and how it can be integrated into the chassis, they are respectful.

- James Key asked us to point out anything that could be improved on the chassis side and the relationship makes us want to contribute in this way, although at the moment its limited to discussions on radiator design.

- Would be willing to help on the chassis side in the future.

- One difficulty in the switch to Toro Rosso is that McLaren designed and supplied several components, including battery pack, wiring harness, MGU-H, bringing these in-house is a priority. McLaren sourced its batteries from European suppliers, these would have to be designed and built in Japan, this brings logistical problems as transporting large batteries is an issue.

- McLaren wanted us to work the way they do, would often ignore our opinions.

- Honda's operation is far smaller than Ferrari and Mercedes in terms of staff and budget.

- Brought in component design and production from suppliers to reduce development time, though we wouldn't turn down suppliers if they are quicker and better than doing it in-house.

- Toro Rosso is a little like Spirit F1, a team to develop the PU with and to showcase Honda with a view to moving on to a stronger partner in the future.


Marko:

- Honda is very active and has already found something.

- Had to compromise on the McLaren chassis specification. They could not develop freely and were pretty limited.

- Alonso has done everything to make the engine look bad
 

jey_16

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,329
I don't think it's likely but it would rule if Toro Rosso rolled up and owned

It would be hilarious if Honda turned up with a good engine, Alonso would probably self combust

In reality though, the sport needs Renault and Honda to be on the ball from day one because catching up on engine performance during the season is so difficult these days and it's only going to be worse with the 3 engine rule
 

zeknurn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,269
The last season of F1 on Channel 4 will look like this:

F1 2018 UK Live TV Broadcast Schedule

March 25: Australian GP - Sky Sports only

April 8: Bahrain GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4


April 15: Chinese GP - Sky Sports only

April 29: Azerbaijan GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4

May 13: Spanish GP - Sky Sports only


May 27: Monaco GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4

June 10: Canadian GP - Sky Sports only

June 24: French GP - Sky Sports only


July 1: Austrian GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4

July 8: British GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4

July 22: German GP - Sky Sports only

July 29: Hungarian GP - Sky Sports only

August 26: Belgian GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4

September 2: Italian GP - Sky Sports only

September 16: Singapore GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4

September 30: Russian GP - Sky Sports only

October 7: Japanese GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4

October 21: United States GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4

October 28: Mexican GP - Sky Sports only

November 11: Brazilian GP - Sky Sports only

November 25: Abu Dhabi GP - Sky Sports/Channel 4
 

Tygre

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,100
Chesire, UK
You should be blaming ITV and BBC for not being able to watching F1 on free TV. Not Sky.
Or you could blame the UK government for not legislating to ensure more sporting events are available on on Free to Air TV.

Or you could blame the F1 rights holders for putting short term monetary gain above long term audience stability when negotiating TV rights.

Or more generally, you could blame our capitalist society, which holds up deregulation and privatisation as virtues and values profit maximisation over sustainability.
 

Dan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,950
Or you could blame the UK government for not legislating to ensure more sporting events are available on on Free to Air TV.

Or you could blame the F1 rights holders for putting short term monetary gain above long term audience stability when negotiating TV rights.

Or more generally, you could blame our capitalist society, which holds up deregulation and privatisation as virtues and values profit maximisation over sustainability.

I think your points there might be stronger if 1) BBC (state controlled) hadn't thrown F1 rights away to cover sports "of their own demographic" and 2) if Sky hadn't held the rights for only the last 5 years.
 

DrM

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,076
Slovenia


We also have Renault F1 team car unveil date - 20th February, same day as Sauber
 
Last edited:

MrKlaw

Member
Oct 25, 2017
33,038
Wtf at that c4 schedule - is everything highlights only or a mix of live/highlights?

Sky sports way too expensive to add to my virgin media in HD so I either suffer SD or use NowTV to stream which is even worse quality. Fuck
 

DrM

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,076
Slovenia
Looks like that guys at Autosport managed to get the gamma up in the F-E teaser images

A wider nosecone leads down to an angled, single-plane front wing that extends round and covers the front wheels.

There is one simple wing element attached to either end of the main plane. Another picture reveals a striking rear diffuser and the edges of an angled rear wing that will succeed the standard component currently used.
 
Oct 25, 2017
200
Nope youre correct - tax payer funded I should have said.

It would have been frankly criminal of the BBC to continue paying £40m a year for F1 coverage after the government had crippled their funding and they were having to lay off thousands of people and close entire departments and services. To lay blame on them for not being able to watch F1 for free is laughable.
 

Dan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,950
It would have been frankly criminal of the BBC to continue paying £40m a year for F1 coverage after the government had crippled their funding and they were having to lay off thousands of people and close entire departments and services. To lay blame on them for not being able to watch F1 for free is laughable.

And yet they're still to this day paying the likes of Nicky Campbell £500k per year.
 

DBT85

Resident Thread Mechanic
Member
Oct 26, 2017
16,256
It would have been frankly criminal of the BBC to continue paying £40m a year for F1 coverage after the government had crippled their funding and they were having to lay off thousands of people and close entire departments and services. To lay blame on them for not being able to watch F1 for free is laughable.

Indeed.

Though wish there had been a way to let them keep it even if viewership needed to be paid for as an additional service. Not how the beeb works though.
 

Lima

Member
Oct 26, 2017
766
Safe to say Toyota will not get that win again. Not with cursed Alonso behind the wheel. Ah well there is always 2019 when they will be the only LMP1 team left running. Though I'm sure they would find a way to make sure a LMP2 car takes the win in that case.
 
OP
OP
Aiii

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,182
Yeah, I don't think that schedule and becoming or challenging for a WDC is very realistic. I guess Alonso doesn't believe in that McLaren anymore, either.
 

ODD

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,224
Damn, Buemi and Alonso sharing the same car... Now get rid of Nakajima and put Grosjean there to have the dream team of cunts.