• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

NepsKnight

Member
Nov 7, 2017
70
Planeptune
This reminds me...
How do you feel about smoking in pubs/bars/restaurants? Do you think people should have the freedom to smoke, regardless of the effect it has on non-smokers (who can just tale their business elsewhere, after all)? Or do you think smoking should be confined to a small, designated area, so that their habits don't bring discomfort on everyone else?

Making a game that doesn't appeal to X group has no negative impact on their health so this argument is flawed. I think if a pub wants to make a game to appeal to smaller group its their right to do so. Not all games have to be made for everyone, this is what diversity is, having more choice not less.
 

duckroll

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,415
Singapore
I just got a new rare blade in Xenoblade 2 and lol

Lol, I pulled this blade the other day too, and at first I was like "oh cool she's a badass design and she actually wears clothes!" but then the intro just continues on and she starts doing a pole dance routine with boob jiggle.

Don't be obtuse. You know what my point was.
I'm not obtuse, I'm asking someone not to be dismissive and rude when having a discussion about things. Everyone is a human being. I don't see how that's hard.
 

NepsKnight

Member
Nov 7, 2017
70
Planeptune
Lol you literally responded to someone else that you just vote with your wallet because it is the only thing they care about.

Yet my opinion and the opinions of the other people in this thread are causing self censorship. Come on dude at least get your internal logic straight.

If something doesn't get localized not sure how speaking with your wallet helps there when you never had a choice to begin with.
 

Twig

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,492
Yea and a game decides to appeal to certain audience that's horrible and it should be deleted from the world right? That's sure how people make it sound these days. If a pub chooses to make a game to appeal to everyone that's fine, but when they decide to go another way they should be able to do that without the fear of having to censor their art to appease the eternally triggered.
I dunno about deleting fanservice from the world but I sure wish you'd delete your account.
 

Dary

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,429
The English Wilderness
Making a game that doesn't appeal to X group has no negative impact on their health so this argument is flawed. I think if a pub wants to make a game to appeal to smaller group its their right to do so. Not all games have to be made for everyone, this is what diversity is, having more choice not less.

Except the objectification and sexualization of women is happening in lots of games, not just those designed for fanservice.

How many recent JRPGs can you name that don't feature some kind of otaku-pandering shite?
 

NepsKnight

Member
Nov 7, 2017
70
Planeptune
Except the objectification and sexualization of women is happening in lots of games, not just those designed for fanservice.

How many recent JRPGs can you name that don't feature some kind of otaku-pandering shite?
Because that is culture in Japan, that happens very rarely in the West these days. I thought we we're supposed to respect other cultures not to try to force them to be just like ours. The world would be a boring place if we were all the same.
 
Oct 27, 2017
488
Who else is going to splash the cash on novelty statuettes?
This is demographic data that's actually kind of interesting, generally speaking. As westerners and English speakers are concerned, a quick run of the numbers of the biggest enthusiast site dedicated to that practice would indicate a 58/42% split between men and women among those who chose to specify a binary gender (roughly 30% of the total accounts) within the category of normal users. Power users are closer to even at 51/49%, and the admin team is right down the middle. Age base ranges from 20-40 with a heavy leaning on the mid to late 20s.

So you're looking at an even split of men and women with a primary age demographic leaning of ~24-29.

This, of course, is the intersection between people at the age that they'd still be interested in anime merch and can also actually afford to collect expensive stuff. Which makes sense.

EDIT: And yes I got your point. It's still interesting data!
Yea and a game decides to appeal to certain audience that's horrible and it should be deleted from the world right? That's sure how people make it sound these days. If a pub chooses to make a game to appeal to everyone that's fine, but when they decide to go another way they should be able to do that without the fear of having to censor their art to appease the eternally triggered.
Please at least read the last couple pages, I'm begging you. Several active posters in this thread like the same things as I'm presuming you like and feel are under attack. I am one of them. You do not need to be in attack mode here.

I'm not going to quote this post because it's an extremely long mess of self quotes, but I compiled this just a few hours ago for someone who was unfortunately banned before they could address it. I am linking it to you now.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/wh...er-designs-read-op.4483/page-165#post-2520624

If you don't buy something and don't say why, they won't know. Speaking with your wallet works fine in the positive, it needs to be accompanied by communication why in the negative.
This is an extremely important distinction. Thank you for highlighting it again.
 
Oct 25, 2017
9,010
Canada
Do you also believe that exposure to violent games causes people to become more violent? If yes, do you advocate as fiercely against game violence as you do sexualization? If not, what do you feel that the distinction is?

Someone to talk about video game violence with!

Here was a notable distinction made earlier in the thread,
Violence does't really discriminate while objectification in games clearly does.
Games also tend not to focus on unscrupulous violence. Violence is usually directed at the Nazis/zombies/*insert baddie* in general. Objectification on the other hand tends to be unscrupulous while targeting women regardless of moral alignment.

But damn, if there was a thread where people were discussing the societal impact of the glorification of violence in media, I'd be super down to hear peoples thoughts, research and arguments on that. Unfortunately that thread would likely implode far quicker than the sexualisation topics we've seen.
 

Stantastic

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,493
Not really I learned a long time ago to speak with my wallet, that's all these pubs and devs really care about.

yeah see this really doesn't work, as your wallet is totally inarticulate.
devs and pubs cant distinguish what it is about about a product that got it too sell.

like just a few days ago i finally caved in and bought the season passes for Street Fighter V.
now i bought it because i really love fighting games that are fun to compete at with my friends, and more characters is always a good thing. not because Juri's new outfit is vacuum sucked to her entire body.
but how the hell is capcom supposed to know that if all im saying is "here's $12 for the new characters"

but if i go online and specifically say "this oufit is way too excessively sexualised" the message is a whole lot clearer, and i still get to play the game i really like.
 

duckroll

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,415
Singapore
Because that is culture in Japan, that happens very rarely in the West these days. I thought we we're supposed to respect other cultures not to try to force them to be just like ours. The world would be a boring place if we were all the same.
Lol that's not culture in Japan you disingenuous crap talker. Regular people in Japan are completely turned off by this sort of stuff. That's why the most hardcore pandering games sell super low numbers. Don't talk about a culture you know nothing about please.
 

Twig

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,492
Someone to talk about video game violence with!

Here was a notable distinction made earlier in the thread,
Violence does't really discriminate while objectification in games clearly does.


But damn, if there was a thread where people were discussing the societal impact of the glorification of violence in media, I'd be super down to hear peoples thoughts, research and arguments on that. Unfortunately that thread would likely implode far quicker than the sexualisation topics we've seen.
well maybe if you weren't literally jack thompson...?!

(I'd also like to see such a thread.)
 

LinLeigh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
193
Making a game that doesn't appeal to X group has no negative impact on their health so this argument is flawed. I think if a pub wants to make a game to appeal to smaller group its their right to do so. Not all games have to be made for everyone, this is what diversity is, having more choice not less.

Now here we almost agree.... Almost.

So here I am a 34 year old female gamer who has been playing games since she was 4.

I like a lot of genres but I'm getting really fed up with the portrayal of women in my favourite media format.

I love JRPGs but hate fanservice. Which games can I play?

I like fighting games but not the oversexualised characters Which games can I play?

I loved metal gear solid but quiet turned me off completely.

I loved the witcher 3 but I had my eyes rolling at Ciri her open shirt.

I love tomb raider but I hated lara croft being in a tank top in the snow. (luckily this was fixed for the sequel)

I loved mass effect but the close up on Miranda her butt and Ashley turning into a barbie made me less connected to the game.

Etc etc.

All I want is to be able to play a chunk of games without this crap. Luckily we got characters like Aloy this year but I pretty sure xenoblade will be my last jrpg. After 20+ years I just can't do it anymore.
 

Redcrayon

Patient hunter
On Break
Oct 27, 2017
12,713
UK
Some will do that, and some just won't release certain content due to backlash. DOA X3 is a good example of a game getting passed over due to potential backlash.
It seems a bit odd to rely on 'vote with your wallet', when a few posts you are bothered about a beach volleyball game (43% Metacritic) that is so niche in the West due to people doing exactly that, voting with their wallet and not buying it. Sure, the devs claim it's down to a backlash against buxom scantily-clad girls, but realistically it's never exactly been a massive hit overseas either, and could also just be a poor business decision to localise it with or without any infamy surrounding it. There are hundreds of games that never leave Japan.
 

NepsKnight

Member
Nov 7, 2017
70
Planeptune
It seems a bit odd to rely on 'vote with your wallet', when a few posts you are bothered about a beach volleyball game (43% Metacritic) that is so niche in the West due to people doing exactly that, voting with their wallet and not buying it. Sure, the devs claim it's down to a backlash against buxom scantily-clad girls, but realistically it's never exactly been a massive hit overseas either, and could also just be a poor business decision to localise it with or without any infamy surrounding it. There are hundreds of games that never leave Japan.
This was one of Play-Asia's biggest sellers ever, so someone must've wanted it and voted with their wallet.
 

Redcrayon

Patient hunter
On Break
Oct 27, 2017
12,713
UK
This was one of Play-Asia's biggest sellers ever, so someone must've wanted it and voted with their wallet.
By 'biggest sellers ever', exactly how many copies are we talking about? Honestly, niche games are a thin margin on localisation costs across the US, let alone Europe, I remember a few articles at the time looking into the financial viability.
 
Last edited:

Dary

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,429
The English Wilderness
Now here we almost agree.... Almost.

So here I am a 34 year old female gamer who has been playing games since she was 4.

I like a lot of genres but I'm getting really fed up with the portrayal of women in my favourite media format.

I love JRPGs but hate fanservice. Which games can I play?

I like fighting games but not the oversexualised characters Which games can I play?

I loved metal gear solid but quiet turned me off completely.

I loved the witcher 3 but I had my eyes rolling at Ciri her open shirt.

I love tomb raider but I hated lara croft being in a tank top in the snow. (luckily this was fixed for the sequel)

I loved mass effect but the close up on Miranda her butt and Ashley turning into a barbie made me less connected to the game.

Etc etc.

All I want is to be able to play a chunk of games without this crap. Luckily we got characters like Aloy this year but I pretty sure xenoblade will be my last jrpg. After 20+ years I just can't do it anymore.

See? This is it! People are literally being made to feel excluded from things they enjoy because of a toxic obsession with pandering to a minority of otaku whales.

And for anyone out there who can't enjoy a video game unless it has bouncing titties or ass shots: grow the fuck up.
 

A.J.

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,514
Do you also believe that exposure to violent games causes people to become more violent? If yes, do you advocate as fiercely against game violence as you do sexualization? If not, what do you feel that the distinction is?
I don't consider games as something that can make you violent at least not to a concerning degree. The distinction is that sex and violence have very different places in our society. It's easy to see why violence is bad, but I would say it's not as easy to see why the objectification that comes with alot of sexualized stuff is bad. I consider it sort of a Trojan horse issue where the sexy/sexualized content on the outside isn't bad, but the internal objectification that can come with is. It's important to perceive context and intent at all times when examining these sorts of things.
 

Twig

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,492
Plus if you really want porn of your video game characters, just check out this thing called the internet. And if 2D drawings aren't enough for you, the Source Film Maker community makes a LOT of porn using your favorite boobs.
 

Weltall Zero

Game Developer
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
19,343
Madrid
Do you also believe that exposure to violent games causes people to become more violent? If yes, do you advocate as fiercely against game violence as you do sexualization? If not, what do you feel that the distinction is?

This is dangerously close to a whataboutism and derail attempt. I for one think violence in video games causes people, not necessarily to become more violent, but almost certainly to be desensitivized and more tolerant of violence by others, over time. However, this is emphatically not the purpose of this thread; if you think a thread about it is needed, by all means make one.

Hey here's an idea: Don't bloody tone police. If she doesn't think the person who thinks "criticism = censorship" is arguing in good faith she has the right to say that.

Thanks a lot for this. Just to set the record straight, I'm a guy; not that it should change anything, but still.
 

bubbles

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
163
USA/Thailand
Someone to talk about video game violence with!

Here was a notable distinction made earlier in the thread,
Violence does't really discriminate while objectification in games clearly does.


But damn, if there was a thread where people were discussing the societal impact of the glorification of violence in media, I'd be super down to hear peoples thoughts, research and arguments on that. Unfortunately that thread would likely implode far quicker than the sexualisation topics we've seen.
I would be happy to discuss violence with you.
The problem with the reasoning you have given is that Many people are making the argument that it is not simply blatant sexualization that is harmful, but all sexualization, regardless of how prominent the characters in question are. If you were to apply that reasoning to violence— that even if you are just shooting a monster — it would follow that it is still having a negative impact on you.

Psychologically speaking, there is very little evidence of this being the case, except perhaps for with young children and teenagers. But even then it is, as with nearly all things, a confluence of environment and biology that leads people to become more violent.

On the topic of sexualization, there have been many studies done that show most people have little problem separating sexualized media, particularly porn, with reality. There was a recent study done showing the opposite, but that seems more likely to be an outlier or have been conducted poorly.

Because of this I have never felt there is much stock in the belief that sexualized media leads to misogynistic behavior or beliefs.
 

bubbles

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
163
USA/Thailand
This is dangerously close to a whataboutism and derail attempt. I for one think violence in video games causes people, not necessarily to become more violent, but almost certainly to be desensitivized and more tolerant of violence by others, over time. However, this is emphatically not the purpose of this thread; if you think a thread about it is needed, by all means make one.



Thanks a lot for this. Just to set the record straight, I'm a guy; not that it should change anything, but still.
That's ridiculous and you would be well served to understand what whataboutism really is, I feel. We cannot have a discussion or raise counterpoints if you are going to say that everything is being done in bad faith.
 

Weltall Zero

Game Developer
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
19,343
Madrid
I mean, that was an actual shit talker who just got banned for peddling nonsense. You don't see how that's different from being rude to someone who was actually participating in the thread, just because you didn't like their avatar?

Yes, of course. The difference is in who Duckroll deems to be worthy of aggression.

I'm done with your hypocrisy and ridiculous high horsing. You've literally contributed nothing to this thread but tone policing and shitting on others. Take your own advice and either engage in actual discussion or find somewhere else to get your internet holier-than-though highs. I don't care either way because I'm putting you on ignore as of right now.

That's ridiculous and you would be well served to understand what whataboutism really is, I feel. We cannot have a discussion or raise counterpoints if you are going to say that everything is being done in bad faith.

If you think "but what about violence in videogames" isn't a whataboutism, I don't know what to tell you. I'm not even saying you're doing it in bad faith, just that you're doing it.
 

bubbles

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
163
USA/Thailand
I don't consider games as something that can make you violent at least not to a concerning degree. The distinction is that sex and violence have very different places in our society. It's easy to see why violence is bad, but I would say it's not as easy to see why the objectification that comes with alot of sexualized stuff is bad. I consider it sort of a Trojan horse issue where the sexy/sexualized content on the outside isn't bad, but the internal objectification that can come with is. It's important to perceive context and intent at all times when examining these sorts of things.
I am glad that you responded back to me. Your belief that this is the case has been shown to be incorrect:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...y/201111/does-pornography-treat-women-objects

At most, as is the case with violent media, it seems that people who are predisposed toward violent or misogynistic tendencies could be exacerbated but the belief that it is akin like a cancerous low grade background radiation effect is not supported by most studies to date. That line of reasoning seems to come primarily out of social science academia as best I can tell.
 

Sanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,567
Plus if you really want porn of your video game characters, just check out this thing called the internet. And if 2D drawings aren't enough for you, the Source Film Maker community makes a LOT of porn using your favorite boobs.

Why does this keep coming up.

Like who has said they want fanservice in the game to masturbate to it instead of it simply being a bonus they enjoy when playing the game.

People enjoy fanservicy outfits for the same reasons others enjoy non fanservice outfits. They like the design
 

bubbles

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
163
USA/Thailand
Yes, of course. The difference is in who Duckroll deems to be worthy of aggression.

I'm done with your hypocrisy and ridiculous high horsing. You've literally contributed nothing to this thread but tone policing and shitting on others. Take your own advice and either engage in actual discussion or find somewhere else to get your internet holier-than-though highs. I don't care either way because I'm putting you on ignore as of right now.



If you think "but what about violence in videogames" isn't a whataboutism, I don't know what to tell you.
Perhaps you can tell me how I can raise a counterpoint without being told I am acting disingenuously? That would be far more productive than how you have acted so far.
 

duckroll

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,415
Singapore
Okay whatever, if you wanna be that way I'll just report posts in future instead of asking you not to be rude to people who don't deserve it. oMg IgNoRe LiSt So MaTuRe!!!!!!!
 

Twig

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,492
It keeps coming up because it's just as inane as people acting like they need fanservice in their games for those games to be enjoyable.

Of course it's absurd. So why do they keep doing it, anyway?
 

A.J.

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,514
I am glad that you responded back to me. Your belief that this is the case has been shown to be incorrect:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...y/201111/does-pornography-treat-women-objects

At most, as is the case with violent media, it seems that people who are predisposed toward violent or misogynistic tendencies could be exacerbated but the belief that it is akin like a cancerous low grade background radiation effect is not supported by most studies to date. That line of reasoning seems to come primarily out of social science academia as best I can tell.
Does the study show anything for cases of sexualization outside pornography?
 

Alexhex

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,881
Canada
That's ridiculous and you would be well served to understand what whataboutism really is, I feel. We cannot have a discussion or raise counterpoints if you are going to say that everything is being done in bad faith.
It kind of is though. It's possible that media could affect people's view on women, but not on violence, or the other way around. Research suggests it's both, but they are seperate topics and people usually like to bring up the violence thing to go all "but Jack Thompson." Wanting to roll every topic on the matter into a question of "well, DOES meadia affect people or doesn't it" just muddies the waters of this conversation.
 

Redcrayon

Patient hunter
On Break
Oct 27, 2017
12,713
UK
I would be happy to discuss violence with you.
The problem with the reasoning you have given is that Many people are making the argument that it is not simply blatant sexualization that is harmful, but all sexualization, regardless of how prominent the characters in question are. If you were to apply that reasoning to violence— that even if you are just shooting a monster — it would follow that it is still having a negative impact on you.

Psychologically speaking, there is very little evidence of this being the case, except perhaps for with young children and teenagers. But even then it is, as with nearly all things, a confluence of environment and biology that leads people to become more violent.

On the topic of sexualization, there have been many studies done that show most people have little problem separating sexualized media, particularly porn, with reality. There was a recent study done showing the opposite, but that seems more likely to be an outlier or have been conducted poorly.

Because of this I have never felt there is much stock in the belief that sexualized media leads to misogynistic behavior or beliefs.
If you don't think sexualised media leads to such beliefs towards others, do you think that sexualised depictions of women in games can affect someone's view of themselves? Plenty of women have posted in this thread about how it makes them feel, I think focusing on how or whether it affects a player's attitude towards others is only half the story if routine sexualisation makes some players feel crap.
 

Weltall Zero

Game Developer
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
19,343
Madrid
Perhaps you can tell me how I can raise a counterpoint without being told I am acting disingenuously? That would be far more productive than how you have acted so far.

By not conflating violence in videogames with sexism in videogames? What is even the need to lump both of them together if it isn't to debunk one with the intent of doing the same with the other by association?

Whether violence in fiction affects people or not, doesn't tell us if sexism in fiction affects people or not.
Whether sexism in fiction affects people or not, doesn't tell us if violence in fiction affects people or not.

They are two separate issues with little in common, which is why pretty much any serious study will tackle one or the other, not both. Bringing up the topic of violence in fiction has absolutely no logical bearing on the topic of sexism, and there is literally no legitimate reason to do so except to derail, deflect, or delegitimize by association.
 

Antiwhippy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
33,458
It keeps coming up because it's just as inane as people acting like they need fanservice in their games for those games to be enjoyable.

Of course it's absurd. So why do they keep doing it, anyway?

I mean to be fair it's totally possible for fanservice to be a reason for someone to play a game, but there are games that cater specifically to their taste, and it doesn't and shouldn't be as prominent in games that isn't specifically catering to that niche.
 

Sanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,567
It keeps coming up because it's just as inane as people acting like they need fanservice in their games for those games to be enjoyable.

Of course it's absurd. So why do they keep doing it, anyway?

No one needs it. People simple enjoy it and if you like something it being there will make you enjoy it more which goes for everything you like

If you like realistic designs is it crazy if you want more of those?
 
Last edited:

PtM

Banned
Dec 7, 2017
3,582
This is entirely just my conjecture, but I believe the blades (especially the humanoid ones) were designed with the philosophy of having to look exotic and as obviously distinct from regular humans as possible. People in-game immediately recognize Pyra as a blade because of her absurd appearance, for example. There are hundreds of other ways they could've approached the definition of "exotic" with their designs though, and a lot of them came out really alienating. They want that horny straight teenage boy market at the expense of everyone else which is sad because it's a great game.
I never played any Xenoblade games, but from an outsider's perspective it definitely seems like Monolith went progressively down the animu fanservice rabbit hole as the series progressed. The original Xenoblade Chronicles just seemed like your usual fantasy JRPG with (imo) overdesigned, but ultimately harmless characters. Xenoblade Chronicles X raised some eyebrows with the tiddy meters and the whole "little girls in swimsuits" thing. And from what I'm seeing on this thread, XC2 seems like it's trying to emulate as many tired tropes from mediocre fanservice anime as it possibly can. Like, it almost seems like they had bets going to see how many animu tropes they could cram in there. I wonder what the hell happened.
From what I've read of both games, it seems to me that XB2 tries to mimic Nier Automata's in-lore-sexualisation theme.
If you don't buy something and don't say why, they won't know. Speaking with your wallet works fine in the positive, it needs to be accompanied by communication why in the negative.
It's why I liken "voting with your wallet" to a raise of hands.
Why does this keep coming up.

Like who has said they want fanservice in the game to masturbate to it instead of it simply being a bonus they enjoy when playing the game.

People enjoy fanservicy outfits for the same reasons others enjoy non fanservice outfits. They like the design
That's only half the truth. One likes sexualised designs because they tickle your boner, not because of aesthetics.
 

Xaszatm

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,903
96923.gif

Man, I feel like this could have been posted for the past 3 pages given how surreal these arguments have gotten.
 

duckroll

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,415
Singapore
From what I've read of both games, it seems to me that XB2 tries to mimic Nier Automata's in-lore-sexualisation theme.
I wouldn't say this is accurate at all. Nier Automata has a lot to say about people, emotions, social construct, and perceptions. The design works hand in hand with what it wants to say, while also being sexy. Xenoblade 2 has a lot to say about other things that have very little to do with sexuality or anything to do with the actual designs of the characters really. Those are just flavor. I love Xenoblade 2, but it wouldn't be particularly different if the designs were less sexualized. On the other hand I cannot imagine Nier Automata with any other designs - it would be a very different game.

Source: I have played and finished almost everything in both games! :D
 

RPGam3r

Member
Oct 27, 2017
13,665
By not conflating violence in videogames with sexism in videogames? What is even the need to lump both of them together if it isn't to debunk one with the intent of doing the same with the other by association?

Whether violence in fiction affects people or not, doesn't tell us if sexism in fiction affects people or not.
Whether sexism in fiction affects people or not, doesn't tell us if violence in fiction affects people or not.

They are two separate issues with little in common, which is why pretty much any serious study will tackle one or the other, not both. Bringing up the topic of violence in fiction has absolutely no logical bearing on the topic of sexism, and there is literally no legitimate reason to do so except to derail, deflect, or delegitimize by association.

I see this said often and I just wanted to chime in that this may be a good topic for another thread. I feel it is naive at best to say that the way the brain digests negative fictional content isn't related in some way.

Stating it is not legitimate doesn't make it so, even if that means the battle against negative imagery becomes more difficult.
 

spider

CLANG
On Break
Oct 23, 2017
973
Australia
Whilst there are a lot of merits in discussing the relationship between gaming and violence, it occasionally feels as if certain topics are used as a shield to condone other issues being discussed.

Kinda makes me sad that we are at page 168 (50ppp) and still women have to fight tooth and nail to basically say that though we do enjoy gaming, we do find that there are a lot to be desired with some aspects of said media. Apparently stating that we would like to change some artistic contents is not as tolerable as asking to change framerate per second or additional weapons or balancing between existing classes. Because if the developer fixes balancing issues in any game, that's censorship, right?
 

Redcrayon

Patient hunter
On Break
Oct 27, 2017
12,713
UK
Over the last two months, aside from all the additions of indentations to brick walls, I do think there have been quite a few really elegant posts in this monster of a thread. When it runs out of steam, as they all do eventually, it seems a shame that they might be buried. I wonder if anyone is interested in archiving some of the better ones somehow for future reference?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.