Thinking this must have happened somewhere else, but please don't do this:
"6uts
Ty to ResetEra poster for early link for us youtube plebs ;P"
"6uts
Ty to ResetEra poster for early link for us youtube plebs ;P"
Thinking this must have happened somewhere else, but please don't do this:
"6uts
Ty to ResetEra poster for early link for us youtube plebs ;P"
No, this was in regards to our podcast. I found the post in the DMC 5 thread. Looks like it was a mistake.
No, this was in regards to our podcast. I found the post in the DMC 5 thread. Looks like it was a mistake.
I would say just wait and listen to it yourself when it becomes public tomorrow.Can someone please confirm whether the summary made earlier in this thread is accurate? Will pull my Patreon support for the coming month if accurate.
I would say just wait and listen to it yourself when it becomes public tomorrow.
Can someone please confirm whether the summary made earlier in this thread is accurate? Will pull my Patreon support for the coming month if it is.
Apologies in advance to the other Allies. If I could give a la carte, I would.
What if someone holds the "different view" that not all humans have equal value? Is than an opinion we should accept? If someone argues in a "good manner" that racism doesn't exist, is that okay with you?
Also, since when has Colin ever argued in a "good manner"? Even his staunchest defenders would agree he is a brash asshole, in fact that's pretty much his selling point, being a loud jerk.
Being all "kumbaya let's have a chat around the campfire and meet in the middle" is an outlandishly naive perspective for dealing with people like Colin.
Unfortunately today is the final day of the month, so payment will be coming out tomorrow if I don't unsub today.
We should accept that there is people in the world that thinks so and we shouldn't ignore them but we should engage them in dialogue.
We could and should be able to discuss and argue about everything, I personally don't thinkt it's okay that anyone doesn't acknowledge racism and we should enlighten them about it. Dialogue is always key.
The feedback probably wasn't unanimously "don't do it". I'd assume many were encouraging him to be a guest. And the feedback might have affected what they talked during the podcast. It's odd to think that only the feedback someone personally agrees with should be taken in consideration. That's not how feedback works, you can't please everyone and make changes/decisions based on every bit of invidual feedback since those can be conflicting.So he did the show anyway? What was he asking feedback for then? Probably would have been better just to do the show unannounced, and claim ignorance afterwards.
So the conversation wasn't even really about games but just the way for Colin to legitimize himself?
Fan-fucking-tastic.
They talked about other things too (according to Twitter), those weren't just included in the summary shared here.So the conversation wasn't even really about games but just a way for Colin to legitimize himself?
Fan-fucking-tastic.
The feedback probably wasn't unanimously "don't do it". I'd assume many were encouraging him to be a guest. And the feedback might have affected what they talked during the podcast. It's odd to think that only the feedback someone personally agrees with should be taken in consideration. That's not how feedback works, you can't please everyone and make changes/decisions based on every bit of invidual feedback since those can be conflicting.
Ofcourse it entirely fair and understandable to be disappointed that Brandon was his guest. And like he said, it's admirable when people take a hard stance like with dropping the Patreon pledge.
When people, non-hysterically, brought up many of the falsehoods and other concerns we had (usually with exact time-stamps), he took his ball and went home and called everyone names and swore us off.
I understand he does that but I think you might have just did the same thing, no? I believe he was receiving a lot more than just non hysterical dialogue.and then he cherrypicks what he finds is the most hostile or extreme reaction and lumps everyone together into that response
I highly recommend you do this, it's been doing wonders for my giggle meter!Hah, I'm about 55 episodes behind on Tabletop, might be time to catch up.
Sure, I don't know the percentage who were in favor or against. And many weren't even aware and didn't voice their opinion at all. I was aware but still didn't reach to Jones directly through Patreon or Twitter. Ofcourse it's possible that he went against the majority wishes.It was a bit more than a few individuals, also part of said feedback included undeniable facts about why Colin is not a good person and for a cherry on top bullied a member of the EZA community. I frankly don't care if the majority of online responses were in support of it ( a lot of which can come from Colin's camp), there were enough red flags for Jones to use better judgement.
The feedback probably wasn't unanimously "don't do it". I'd assume many were encouraging him to be a guest. And the feedback might have affected what they talked during the podcast. It's odd to think that only the feedback someone personally agrees with should be taken in consideration. That's not how feedback works, you can't please everyone and make changes/decisions based on every bit of invidual feedback since those can be conflicting.
Ofcourse it entirely fair and understandable to be disappointed that Brandon was his guest. And like he said, it's admirable when people take a hard stance like with dropping the Patreon pledge.
While I do agree it would have been better if he didn't go on there (because it would clearly hurt the community somewhat), it is somewhat weird to me that you say he shouldn't listen to the majority of people mainly because you think they were wrong.It was a bit more than a few individuals, also part of said feedback included undeniable facts about why Colin is not a good person and for a cherry on top bullied a member of the EZA community. I frankly don't care if the majority of online responses were in support of it ( a lot of which can come from Colin's camp), there were enough red flags for Jones to use better judgement.
Frankly with the evidence available, you shouldn't need a "vote" to determine whether or not you should appear on Colin's show. That and the fact that Colin likes to use his fanbase as a cudgel (and actually did in the case of one EZA member who had made a respectful message to Jones and didn't @ Colin) should have been enough.While I do agree it would have been better if he didn't go on there (because it would clearly hurt the community somewhat), it is somewhat weird to me that you say he shouldn't listen to the majority of people mainly because you think they were wrong.
See the patreon posts as some sort of investors-meeting (like Jones already said before). Even here a lot of people were mainly opposed to CM coming onto EZA stuff (until the whole harassment thing went on), plenty of people here said they wouldn't find it as bad if Jones went to that show.
I do agree, I wouldn't have gone myself, but I am not sure if that's "better judgement" or not. It is just my opinion and the opposite opinion is just as valid imho.
I understand why he went if the majority of people didn't react or weren't against him going on that show.
When this go up? I want to see how bad this was. If it literally is Jones just excusing this vile trash while also doing the dance of 'many sides' then I can see Tabletop being my last stream. :/
Yeah definitely watching Tabletop first then. This even being a thing just totally sucks. :(
And in my opinion "the right thing to do" is also an opinion that can be different for everybody. Not everybody believes that talking to a racist is not done (even though you they don't agree with them). That doesn't make that person a racist, you can talk to people even though you don't agree with them perfectly fine.My thing is if majority of people say they are fine with it, but a few people bring to light evidence that shows he is sexist and supports racists ideologies then the latter supercedes the former. And yes that does require one's own better judgement to make that call. The right thing to do is not always the popular thing.
I do agree that I was suspecting him to talk about video games and although I understand they both felt they had to address this whole thing, I am not sure if this was the smartest thing to do.Frankly with the evidence available, you shouldn't need a "vote" to determine whether or not you should appear on Colin's show. That and the fact that Colin likes to use his fanbase as a cudgel (and actually did in the case of one EZA member who had made a respectful message to Jones and didn't @ Colin) should have been enough.
I said earlier in the thread that I didn't like him going on, but as long as Colin wasn't in EZA content I'd be fine. That was under the assumption that Jones would go on and talk about games. I had no idea at all he would even consider talking about the actual controversy with Colin and that summary posted earlier paints a pretty bleak picture of the discussion. I'll wait until a better summary comes out or I might end up listening to it tomorrow, but this whole thing soured me far more than I initially expected. I'm not a current patron, but I subscribe to the twitch channel and contribute to the patreon on and off, I probably won't be doing that in the future. Maybe that summary was all wrong and tomorrow I'll change my mind, but as it stands I don't have much desire to continue supporting EZA (and by extension Brandon), which is a shame considering there are a lot of good shows there that I think are worth supporting.
Gang Beasts: 58
Space Channel 5 - Part 2: 53
Jeopardy!: 42
Mario Party 2: 37
Secret Hitler: 33
Hide & Seek: 30
A Finnish Night (medley night of Finnish games): 31
Diddy Kong Racing: 29
Mario Strikers: 29
The Sims - EZA Dream Studio: 26
I don't really agree with this at all. Sure, you can have a dialogue with someone who is racist or sexist and try to change their views, but just ignoring that aspect and acting like everything is okay is pretty abhorrent. Especially someone like Colin who has a platform he uses to spread that garbage.And in my opinion "the right thing to do" is also an opinion that can be different for everybody. Not everybody believes that talking to a racist is not done. That doesn't make that person a racist, you can talk to people even though you don't agree with them perfectly fine.
To judge this is something every person have to make out for themselves imo. What I have read from Colin is appalling and I hope nobody agrees with it (I certainly don't) , but to me that doesn't mean you can't talk to him anymore about other things.
I understand your point of view, it is a valid point of view. I don't see how mine isn't. I just don't see how you shouldn't talk to him because he is a racist asshole. I am sure the EZA community knows that the people in EZA aren't racist.
I haven't seen this weeks groupstream yet (I usually watch it during the weekend), but I have only heard good things about it (thanks for the "the mole" suggestion). That said, I want either gangbeasts or Space Channel 5 to win for weeks, so I will probably vote one of those if I have the chance.Not to derail current conversation, but LET'S GET A LOOK AT THE FRONTRUNNERS FOR NEXT WEEKS GROUP STREAM
Seeing quite a few other meta-concept streams in the mix (great stuff!) but none have yet built up the momentum to make the top 10. Gang Beasts peaks the polls once again, but in my personal opinion it's likely headin' straight into the Ineligibility Fridge™, unless it's recent PS4 release is enough to push it over the edge.
I actually think Space Channel 5 will suffer a similar fate as it is lacking a freshness in the top 4 that will make it look less exciting, I think the real race here will be between our likely lower bracket on Jeopardy! and Mario Party 2. Given the increased appetite for audience participation, I'm sticking my flag in the ground that next week's group stream will be Jeopardy!
Sure, I understand. I am not saying you are wrong. It's just that I don't believe there are too many people which are 100% bad and I usually don't want to ignore or attack people because they think or are different then I am (even though I do feel he is very wrong here and racism and sexism is appalling indeed).I don't really agree with this at all. Sure, you can have a dialogue with someone who is racist or sexist and try to change their views, but just ignoring that aspect and acting like everything is okay is pretty abhorrent. Especially someone like Colin who has a platform he uses to spread that garbage.
Whoa! Finnish night sounds awesome, not sure if I've voted before in this but now I will!Not to derail current conversation, but LET'S GET A LOOK AT THE FRONTRUNNERS FOR NEXT WEEKS GROUP STREAM
Seeing quite a few other meta-concept streams in the mix (great stuff!) but none have yet built up the momentum to make the top 10. Gang Beasts peaks the polls once again, but in my personal opinion it's likely headin' straight into the Ineligibility Fridge™, unless it's recent PS4 release is enough to push it over the edge.
I actually think Space Channel 5 will suffer a similar fate as it is lacking a freshness in the top 4 that will make it look less exciting, I think the real race here will be between our likely lower bracket on Jeopardy! and Mario Party 2. Given the increased appetite for audience participation, I'm sticking my flag in the ground that next week's group stream will be Jeopardy!
I understand he does that but I think you might have just did the same thing, no? I believe he was receiving a lot more than just non hysterical dialogue.
Whoa! Finnish night sounds awesome, not sure if I've voted before in this but now I will!
Edit: Oh right, we are turning 100. Yay!
Haha, thanks! If Allies don't end up celebrating us in the group stream, maybe I should have a celebration of my own. Kyle has mistaken Finnish product (sent by a fan) and also Finnish person as Danish twice already, so they absolutely should get to know us better =D I think Huber visited Helsinki at Remedy while they still were at GT. Nothing ever came out of it because they got shut down, I was hoping we would see dueling Sam Lakes with Huber's impression of him.
After some reflection...
The Easy Allies stance has been they are given money from Patreon to do whatever they want to do. That includes doing the podcasts with Colin Moriarity. We don't get a say in that. We can leave all the feedback we want. But that's all it is: feedback. It's also the reason many times controversies such as this are met by radio silence by the Allies. They hear us. They'll decide if they want to change their mind. But we don't get a say in any of that.
Cup of Jones is here to marginalize the controversies into one small corner of their programming so that it doesn't impact the bulk of their operations: Twitch Streams, Podcasts, etc. because that is how the majority of people consume their content. If the Colin Moriarity situation were to be brought up during a live stream, or a podcast, the "this isn't the time and place" crowd will be there to squash it, the same way people try and find the Colin Kaepernick's taking a knee so objectionable. Then it can be pushed behind a paywall "Cup of Jones" that most people don't watch and EZA's day can continue on as listed on EasyAllies.com. The truth is in the pudding that Brandon blatantly said, "I hear you." and the feedback did zero to affect his decision.
Honestly, I can't blame him. Most people aren't going to hear about this because this is relegated to a small community thread in a newborn forum. And for those that do hear it, they won't care because what drew them into EZA was the apolitical irreverent nature of their content and tone. It's been contained enough that it's not going to affect their Patreon, so why bother appeasing 50 people that are going to keep their pledges anyway, instead of just doing what makes them happy. It honestly does make sense. In retrospect, Brandon's just doing what EZA has always preached: He followed his heart. Can I really be down on a guy for that? I don't know.
Ian shared his thoughts on this, not to say you should agree with him. But he atleast spent some time thinking and typing it out. So I think it's worth a read. The link ofcourse only shows the first tweet. To those not so familiar with Twitter (like me) click the bird for more.Does love and respect only apply to the good guys, or do we love and respect everyone
Ian shared his thoughts on this, not to say you should agree with him. But he atleast spent some time thinking and typing it out. So I think it's worth a read. The link ofcourse only shows the first tweet. To those not so familiar with Twitter (like me) click the bird for more.
Punished Bets is reminding me of just how good of a game Captain Toad was. Man, they really gotta bring that to the Switch.
Does love and respect only apply to the good guys, or do we love and respect everyone