• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Oct 26, 2017
8,206


This is a great overview of how the films got made and how each added on and differentiated from the previous entry. Eight films. All of them good to great.

Mikey also did a whole video a while back on Prisoner of Azkaban that I'd recommend you give a watch:
 
Oct 30, 2017
15,278
Goblet of Fire was not good. It is by far the weakest in the series by a significant margin. The other 7 are good to great though (with 3 being the highlight)
 
OP
OP
UnpopularBlargh
Oct 26, 2017
8,206
Goblet of Fire was not good. It is by far the weakest in the series by a significant margin. The other 7 are good to great though (with 3 being the highlight)
Nah. It's pretty good. I liked seeing Harry act like total goofball teenager going through puberty. Also that whole last act is great with Harry meeting Voldemort face to face for the first time.
 
Last edited:

Seesaw15

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,819
Goblet of Fire, Half Blood Prince and Deathly Hallows pt 2 are all pretty terrible films.
 

Waffles

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
1,791
I have no trouble watching all of these films while recognizing that there were some baffling changes and omissions from the books that really hurt the films.

Can't wait to watch the video though. Mikey's stuff is fantastic.
 

Playco Armboy

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
3,406
Goblet of Fire, Order of the Phoenix, and Deathly Hallows Part 1 aren't good. I don't like Fantastic Beasts, actually.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
Goblet of Fire was not good. It is by far the weakest in the series by a significant margin. The other 7 are good to great though (with 3 being the highlight)

Nah. It's pretty good. I liked seeing Harry act like total goofball teenager going through puberty. Also that whole last act is great with Harry meeting Voldemort face to face for the first time.
It's my favorite book and I still find a lot of the decisions they made with the film questionable, but it's grown on me every time I watched it. The last hour or so is great, the pacing just feels very off in the first half of the movie in a way that I don't think affects any of the other movies (even though they're working with source material of a similar length).
 

Mcfrank

Member
Oct 28, 2017
15,219
Will watch this if I finish work early. I also would like to suggest Binge Mode Harry Potter. If you have any interest in the series and listen to podcasts, you should be listening to Binge Mode.
 
OP
OP
UnpopularBlargh
Oct 26, 2017
8,206
It's my favorite book and I still find a lot of the decisions they made with the film questionable, but it's grown on me every time I watched it. The last hour or so is great, the pacing just feels very off in the first half of the movie in a way that I don't think affects any of the other movies (even though they're working with source material of a similar length).
Yeah. It's my favourite book of the series too. I think the changes to the plot/script didn't bother me as much because Prisoner of Azkaban already broke much of that ground (which Mikey goes a bit into in the video). Also Brendan Gleeson as Moody was ace casting.
 

Vashetti

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,553
Hallows 2 falls apart when they carry Harry's 'body' back to the school. It's a mad rush to end the movie at that point, robbing the series of the fitting conclusion it deserves. There's no celebration of Voldemort's demise, no 'goodbyes' for the audience, the movie (and by extension the series) just ends on a whimper. It's baffling.
 
Oct 30, 2017
15,278
Half Blood Prince is achshually Yates's best HP film. Tons of emotional weight. The only bad part is the Ginny and Harry relationship
 
Oct 28, 2017
2,965
Hallows 2 falls apart when they carry Harry's 'body' back to the school. It's a mad rush to end the movie at that point, robbing the series of the fitting conclusion it deserves. There's no celebration of Voldemort's demise, no 'goodbyes' for the audience, the movie (and by extension the series) just ends on a whimper. It's baffling.

That's true for the book as well though.
 

DrForester

Mod of the Year 2006
Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,704
The movies just went downhill for me. While I didn't think any of them were terrible (other than Goblet of Fire), I really think Yates at his best only did things well, never great.
 

Wamb0wneD

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
18,735
Goblet of Fire, Half Blood Prince and Deathly Hallows pt 2 are all pretty terrible films.
Goblet wasn't that bad. Order was bound to be shit with how much they had to cut though. Should've gone 5/1 and 5/2 there already. Agreed on the other 2. How you can go from Deathly Hollows 1 to 2 I'll never get. The first had such a great tone to it. Still watch that one from time to time.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,287
wherever
Hallows 2 falls apart when they carry Harry's 'body' back to the school. It's a mad rush to end the movie at that point, robbing the series of the fitting conclusion it deserves. There's no celebration of Voldemort's demise, no 'goodbyes' for the audience, the movie (and by extension the series) just ends on a whimper. It's baffling.

Harry getting a big cheering crowd in the book during his final fight with Voldemort was always silly. In the movie, it's just Harry and Voldemort, alone. The way it should be.

Order has maybe the best opening of the series:


It certainly has the best montages

Yates is really good at montages

Anyways,

PoA > DH2 > CoS > HBP > DH1 > SS > OoTP > GoF > FB
 
Oct 28, 2017
2,965
The movies just went downhill for me. While I didn't think any of them were terrible (other than Goblet of Fire), I really think Yates at his best only did things well, never great.

Yeah, the Yates films all felt very by the books. They adapted most stuff well enough, but it felt like they lacked their own creative identity.

That's why Azkaban is still my favourite HP film. At first I didn't like it because of the changes and how details like Hogwarts' geography got completely reshuffled mid-series, but the atmosphere and tone are just really great

Still, after seeing Fantastic Beasts I have to say, for me that's the first film where the wizarding world really felt alive
 

DrForester

Mod of the Year 2006
Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,704
My problems with the Yates films is partly adaptation issues.

With the exception of Order of the Phoenix. Phoenix is my least favorite book because it's pretty much Harry sulking around for nearly the entire thing. Kickass climax in the Ministry though. I think the movie sped things along well.

With the 6th film, my issue was that they went all in with the teen romance angst and ditched nearly all the Voldemort backstory. It also has one of the few Rickman moments I don't like. That being when Harry confronts him as he's fleeing.

You know how everyone complains about Gambon being completely out of character for screaming at Harry when he's supposed to be calm? Well I feel the same way about Rickman in this scene. How he calmly tells Harry he's the Half Blood Prince.

In the book, Snape is screaming at Harry, he is pissed that this little shit he's been protecting is trying to fight him. He loses it. And none of that is conveyed in the scene in the film.

For the final two, I think they're mostly fine. I had a few issues with the final battle.

1. For Snapes memories, they leave out the scene of him calling Lilly a mudblood, which really fails to set up the whole thing.
2. I absolutely hate that the final confrontation between Harry and Voldemort was a CGI battle. The more subdued confrontation in the book where Harry taunts him for a few minutes, and then his spell rebounds, was so much more satisfying. Because Harry can not fight Voldemort. He found a way to outsmart him, and that was far better for me.

My other issue with Yates is just the aesthetics. I know the films and books age with the core audience, but it's just so... dull. It has that muted DC film look to it. I feel like, even though it's a serious story, it sucked the magic out of the fantasy world it's supposed to be set in. Dull, grey, nearly everyone is now in normal clothes rather than robes. It just doesn't feel like a fantasy world.


Definitely gonna watch this later.

Someone posted this in another Potter thread, but this article on the cinematography in Half-Blood Prince really changed how I saw the movie.
https://www.diyphotography.net/harry-potter-half-blood-prince-cinematography-bruno-delbonnel/


But it also has this...



Watch Slughorn's arm at about the 30 second mark...
 

Sub Boss

Banned
Nov 14, 2017
13,441
Yates was dull but at least an improvment over the GoF director, PoA is unique , the first two set up the rest of the series really well but they are more like typical 'children' movies
 

B-Dubs

That's some catch, that catch-22
On Break
Oct 25, 2017
32,776
It's my favorite book and I still find a lot of the decisions they made with the film questionable, but it's grown on me every time I watched it. The last hour or so is great, the pacing just feels very off in the first half of the movie in a way that I don't think affects any of the other movies (even though they're working with source material of a similar length).
The other books have more things you can skim over or just reference in passing without losing too much. Goblet of Fire, not so much.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
The other books have more things you can skim over or just reference in passing without losing too much. Goblet of Fire, not so much.
Yeah there's way too much plot-central stuff that was excised from the movie due to time. It's weird because they left some plot threads dangling like Hermione's vendetta against Rita Skeeter, though I suppose that's fine. More egregious is probably how oddly they handle Mr. Crouch being murdered. I don't think they ever even say what happened or who did it.

They were talking about splitting Goblet of Fire into two films, but I can see why they didn't - HP set the trend of film adaptations doing that in the first place with the seventh book being split into two, but by that point since it was the last film they didn't really have much to lose. Doing it halfway into the series and having it backfire could have killed the franchise. Even if it did well it'd set a really weird precedent where people would expect OOTP and HBP to be split up as well.
 

B-Dubs

That's some catch, that catch-22
On Break
Oct 25, 2017
32,776
Yeah there's way too much plot-central stuff that was excised from the movie due to time. It's weird because they left some plot threads dangling like Hermione's vendetta against Rita Skeeter, though I suppose that's fine. More egregious is probably how oddly they handle Mr. Crouch being murdered. I don't think they ever even say what happened or who did it.

They were talking about splitting Goblet of Fire into two films, but I can see why they didn't - HP set the trend of film adaptations doing that in the first place with the seventh book being split into two, but by that point since it was the last film they didn't really have much to lose. Doing it halfway into the series and having it backfire could have killed the franchise. Even if it did well it'd set a really weird precedent where people would expect OOTP and HBP to be split up as well.
Pretty much everything that happens in the book is almost mandatory for the whole thing to work and there's no real way to cut any of it down satisfactorily. I feel like the third movie also may have suffered from this a bit, but to a far lesser extent.

I do think Goblet of Fire needed to be a pair of films, like Deathly Hallows, but at the same time there's no good place to make that cut. So I get why they didn't do it.
 

Ryuelli

Member
Oct 26, 2017
15,209
2 > 1 > > > > 3 = 4 > 5 = 6 > 7

I think they're all watchable, some are quite clearly better than others, but overall I like Chris Columbus' vision of hogwarts and the wizarding world a lot more than the directors that came after.
 

halcali

Banned
Nov 7, 2017
6,317
Hong Kong SAR
Goblet of Fire was not good. It is by far the weakest in the series by a significant margin. The other 7 are good to great though (with 3 being the highlight)

Thank you! I agree 100%.
Harry Potter films are collectively my favourite films of all time, but there is a lot of awkward and mundane moments throughout.
Meanwhile, Azkaban took some creative liberties to make it an enjoyable film for non-Potter fans!

My favourites are the first 2 films and probably Order of the Phoenix.
 

TAJ

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
12,446
Harry getting a big cheering crowd in the book during his final fight with Voldemort was always silly. In the movie, it's just Harry and Voldemort, alone. The way it should be.

I loved the Kill Bill moment in the book.
The same part in the movie was just silly, nonsensical spectacle.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
Pretty much everything that happens in the book is almost mandatory for the whole thing to work and there's no real way to cut any of it down satisfactorily. I feel like the third movie also may have suffered from this a bit, but to a far lesser extent.

I do think Goblet of Fire needed to be a pair of films, like Deathly Hallows, but at the same time there's no good place to make that cut. So I get why they didn't do it.
Yeah, what I appreciate about Deathly Hallows is that even though it's obviously a Part 1, the first film still feels like it has a satisfactory climax with the battle at Malfoy Manor and Dobby's death. The ending of the film gives more of a "well shit, now what?" vibe rather than going for an obnoxious cliffhanger.

A draft of DH pt 1 leaked online and ended right when Harry is brought to the manor and it's like... god, I'm so glad they didn't go for that. It was pretty close to what ended up being in the final movie, so I'm guessing it was legit.
 

DrEvil

Developer
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
2,647
Canada
Movies with Mikey is my absolute favourite film series on youtube, I highly suggest starting from the beginning and watching them all.
 

Fat4all

Woke up, got a money tag, swears a lot
Member
Oct 25, 2017
92,906
here
im sad we never got to see Cuarón's take on Goblet of Fire
 

Masterz1337

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,802
I was a huge harry potter fan who thought each movie got worse and worse. Going to watch these later, but I think those movies were all pretty much trash.

Bring on the Harry Potter TV series on HBO or Netflix already!
 

Deleted member 2802

Community Resetter
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
33,729
giphy.gif

https://www.theringer.com/binge-mode
is doing it long form/deeeeeeeeeeeep dive in podcast style with all books/movies/cursed child/conventions over dozens of podcasts if you want a real timesink like 50+ hours
2-5 chapters/podcast
1 movie/podcast
~60-120 min/podcast

Top 10 Time Magazine Podcasts of the Year 2 years running (for whatever that's worth, I think they used to be a part of HBO a subsidiary of TimeWarner so . . . . )
http://time.com/5455070/best-podcasts-2018-2/