• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Deleted member 35077

Self-requested ban
Banned
Dec 1, 2017
3,999
How much below 17 and 18? Because here in the UK, where I'm guessing most of this happened, the legal age of consent is 16.
Yeah, even in the U.S.A its kinda shocking how different the age of consent laws are in each state. I always figured it was 18, but I guesd a big reason for that is that most Live Action shows are filmed here.
consent-map-646x400.png
 

Ginta

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
1,141
Congrats to the UK on their bad laws and congrats to you on your broken morality that privileges what is legal over what is good.
Nothing bad about allowing 16/17 year olds to have sex, it's fucking human to want that at that age. It's often legal/moral and good at the same time (in normal relationships of course).
 

Madison

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
8,388
Lima, Peru
How much below 17 and 18? Because here in the UK, where I'm guessing most of this happened, the legal age of consent is 16.
It could go from 16 to 14 iirc. Lori was 14-15 when she was raped by David.

I know a lot of people that would argue that girls below like 17 or 16 cannot consent due to being so much younger. Its not fair to them to get seduced by predators that are at least a decade older.
 

Vault

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,593
With the facism stuff he was living in Berlin those years and that was his stage persona.

He was also doing lots of drugs with Iggy Pop.
 
Oct 25, 2017
7,624
canada
It could go from 16 to 14 iirc. Lori was 14-15 when she was raped by David.

I know a lot of people that would argue that girls below like 17 or 16 cannot consent due to being so much younger. Its not fair to them to get seduced by predators that are at least a decade older.

Wasnt bowie like 5-6 years older at the time?

But yeah, that groupie culture was fucked. The rave orgy scenes from Devil Man arent far off from reality (if u forget the whole murder demons part)
 

Chemo

Member
Oct 28, 2017
849
The Thin White Duke was a character, just like Ziggy Stardust was a character. David Bowie was not a fascist.
 
Oct 25, 2017
7,624
canada
Yeah the fascist thing should be removed from the OP

Its like calling any actor whose played a nazi a literal nazi. TWD was a fascist persona made during Bowies darkest hour.

Similar to Roger Waters character in The Wall.
 

Musubi

Unshakable Resolve - Prophet of Truth
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
23,611
yeah really. I think Bowie's actions and attitude since then speak for themselves.

I think the key thing here is did he ever actually OWN that he said that shit or did he always just pass it off as "oh the drugs"

Cause at the end of the day one is responsible for ones own actions part of repentance is actually understanding what you did and owning that and not trying to shift blame to anything else.
 
Oct 25, 2017
8,354
Gordita Beach
I think the key thing here is did he ever actually OWN that he said that shit or did he always just pass it off as "oh the drugs"

Cause at the end of the day one is responsible for ones own actions part of repentance is actually understanding what you did and owning that and not trying to shift blame to anything else.
He did both.

It's honestly not as important as him banging teenagers anyway.
 

Deleted member 13859

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
387
Jimmy page and Eric Clapton

Hold up wait a minute. That was the lady who jimmy page was into. Surely here parents need to take some kind of responsibility she was 13 at the time ?

I don't get this wth?!?
 
Last edited:

Laura Palmer

Banned
Oct 24, 2018
4
User banned (permanent): Troll account
Nothing better than a "discussion" that starts with "we will ban you if you say something we disagree with".

Glad the mod got to say their FACTS though.
 

Kater

Member
Oct 25, 2017
639
I doubt he would have had much fun living under a fascist dictatorship. Sure, he probably would have gotten by since people always needed music but he would have been extremely limited in what he could sing about. Also, the Nazis hated everything deemed not Aryan, so the music he made would have never been allowed.

If it was said while he played a character, maybe he didn't make that clear enough? Even so it's mostly a very edgy thing to say and makes me cringe, as it probably made his left-leaning listeners and fans.
 
Oct 28, 2017
1,854
The underage stuff is worrying, especially in the sense that nobody really seems that bothered when this happens, and you just know it is still happening with young artists today (maybe they justify it to themselves because the age difference isn't so many years).

But it sounds like he was a potential fascist in the same way he was a potential astronaut.
 

King_Moc

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,126
Thin White Duke Bowie was a fascist in the same way that Ziggy Stardust Bowie was friends with spiders from mars.
 

Skelepuzzle

Member
Apr 17, 2018
6,119
Some Drugs can break your self imposed boundaries. It doesn t even have to be illegal... Some people can be violent and rape-bordering under alcohol while they are calm and composed when sober.
It can also cloud your analysis of the situation, 14 or 40 one could just see a mate to copulate with, and you wouldn t even remember it.

Age of consent is BS, kids can have all the fun among themselves, just let them explore without influencing them. It's so much more fun for them.

Hey look, I'm vomiting all over the floor! So glad that garbage like this is allowed here!
 

Wackamole

Member
Oct 27, 2017
16,931
When it comes to sex, i don't think Bowie had any rules. But i somehow can't imagine him being a fascist.
Then again, i don't know that much about that aspect of his life. I know his fascination for the Third Reich, when it comes to visual design.
And i can completely understand that. But no idea whether he really had fascist ideologies. He faked his way through life, always playing a part. Not fake in his talent for music but in his personalities.

Again, don't know him well enough but i keep hearing disappointing stuff about people i admired. It seem that the 70's entertainment-scene were both amazing as completely inhumane in some areas.

I mean, is being drugged out really an excuse?
No.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,956
Some Drugs can break your self imposed boundaries. It doesn t even have to be illegal... Some people can be violent and rape-bordering under alcohol while they are calm and composed when sober.
It can also cloud your analysis of the situation, 14 or 40 one could just see a mate to copulate with, and you wouldn t even remember it.

Age of consent is BS, kids can have all the fun among themselves, just let them explore without influencing them. It's so much more fun for them.

GROSS

GROSSSS

Like your logic is gross AND bad, because it's like

Who is influencing them? Is it not influencing them when adults have sex with kids? Like, holy shit my dude
 

FormatCompatible

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,071
Some Drugs can break your self imposed boundaries. It doesn t even have to be illegal... Some people can be violent and rape-bordering under alcohol while they are calm and composed when sober.
It can also cloud your analysis of the situation, 14 or 40 one could just see a mate to copulate with, and you wouldn t even remember it.

Age of consent is BS, kids can have all the fun among themselves, just let them explore without influencing them. It's so much more fun for them.
What in the fuck is this post. Age of consent is bs?
 

Jill Sandwich

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,945
Wow this thread went full NeoGAF for a second. At this point I'm just going to assume most of my heroes have some shady shit locked in a brown envelope somewhere, and that really sucks.
 

Sherlocked

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
562
User Banned (Permanent): Downplaying the sexualization of minors. This argument is not one that we are willing to entertain.
Most rock stars of the era could probably be classified as pedophiles if you sleeping with under-age girls is that. It's kinda fucked to think about, but I'm sure that happens more often than we ever thought. Still today.

No. If they are 14-16yr old groupies it isn't pedophilia. Pedophilia is being aroused or getting into sexual contact with children that don't have developed attractions. That is an important distinction.

I mean, a normal grown up would not get into contact with a 15yr old girl, but talking about pedophilia is really talking about children that didn't develop any attraction(non native, sorry - breasts and curves is what I mean) at all.
 

Deleted member 2474

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,318
the vast, vast majority of classic rockstars almost certainly banged teenage groupies. if you're a fan of pretty much any popular musician active prior to like, the 1990s-2000s (which isn't to say it isn't still happening even now, just not as much), go ahead and resign yourself to this fact.
 

Joeku

Member
Oct 26, 2017
23,475
No. If they are 14-16yr old groupies it isn't pedophilia. Pedophilia is being aroused or getting into sexual contact with children that don't have developed attractions. That is an important distinction.

I mean, a normal grown up would not get into contact with a 15yr old girl, but talking about pedophilia is really talking about children that didn't develop any attraction(non native, sorry - breasts and curves is what I mean) at all.
26430.jpg

tenor.gif
 

Sherlocked

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
562

Care to elaborate? A friend of mine was doing research in that topic. It's just that I know the criteria about what he told about the indicators. As I said, a normal grown up won't search contact with teens, but talking about pedophilia has indicators. A pedophile isn't aroused by 16year olds.
 

Wackamole

Member
Oct 27, 2017
16,931
No. If they are 14-16yr old groupies it isn't pedophilia. Pedophilia is being aroused or getting into sexual contact with children that don't have developed attractions. That is an important distinction.

I mean, a normal grown up would not get into contact with a 15yr old girl, but talking about pedophilia is really talking about children that didn't develop any attraction(non native, sorry - breasts and curves is what I mean) at all.
Ehh... you sure about that?
In definition you're right. But i hope you still have your doubts about a grown man having sex with a 14 to 15 year old.
 
Last edited:

Skelepuzzle

Member
Apr 17, 2018
6,119
No. If they are 14-16yr old groupies it isn't pedophilia. Pedophilia is being aroused or getting into sexual contact with children that don't have developed attractions. That is an important distinction.

I mean, a normal grown up would not get into contact with a 15yr old girl, but talking about pedophilia is really talking about children that didn't develop any attraction(non native, sorry - breasts and curves is what I mean) at all.

Fuck off into some dark corner of the earth you piece of shit.
 

Joeku

Member
Oct 26, 2017
23,475
Care to elaborate? A friend of mine was doing research in that topic. It's just that I know the criteria about what he told about the indicators. As I said, a normal grown up won't search contact with teens, but talking about pedophilia has indicators. A pedophile isn't aroused by 16year olds.
Saying that ephebophilia isn't necessarily pedophilia just isn't such a good look.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
No. If they are 14-16yr old groupies it isn't pedophilia. Pedophilia is being aroused or getting into sexual contact with children that don't have developed attractions. That is an important distinction.

I mean, a normal grown up would not get into contact with a 15yr old girl, but talking about pedophilia is really talking about children that didn't develop any attraction(non native, sorry - breasts and curves is what I mean) at all.

YIKES.

Here comes the hebephilia/ephebophilia defence.

Anything under the legal age of consent is paedophilia. If you are in a position of power and you take advantage of someone of the age of consent, you can still be arrested even if the person is 16 (UK age of consent). Such as a school teacher.
 

ThatWasAJoke

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,373
No. If they are 14-16yr old groupies it isn't pedophilia. Pedophilia is being aroused or getting into sexual contact with children that don't have developed attractions. That is an important distinction.

I mean, a normal grown up would not get into contact with a 15yr old girl, but talking about pedophilia is really talking about children that didn't develop any attraction(non native, sorry - breasts and curves is what I mean) at all.
Hey @FBI I might check this guy out
 
Oct 28, 2017
2,959
YIKES.

Here comes the hebephilia/ephebophilia defence.

Anything under the legal age of consent is paedophilia. If you are in a position of power and you take advantage of someone of the age of consent, you can still be arrested even if the person is 16 (UK age of consent). Such as a school teacher.

I don't think the poster was trying to defend anything. It's still an important distinction

A pedophile is attracted to prebubescent children. That's a disorder that we don't no any treatment for at this point. Actual pedophiles can only be part of society if they never, ever try to go after their sexual fantasies.

What we're talking about here is people with a 'normal' sexuality who think anyone who's gone through puberty is fair game. It's reprehensible because of the power imbalance (especially if we're talking about rockstars abusing their fame) and because mentally teenagers aren't fully developed at that point, so they can't be considered to give informed consent. But it's not pedophilia
 

Siggy-P

Avenger
Mar 18, 2018
11,865
Some Drugs can break your self imposed boundaries. It doesn t even have to be illegal... Some people can be violent and rape-bordering under alcohol while they are calm and composed when sober.
It can also cloud your analysis of the situation, 14 or 40 one could just see a mate to copulate with, and you wouldn t even remember it.

Age of consent is BS, kids can have all the fun among themselves, just let them explore without influencing them. It's so much more fun for them.
What the actual fucking fuck?



Edit: for some reason Resetera isn't let me edit out the final quote today. I just wanna be clear that I'm dismissing the post out of disgust rather than just quoting i
 
Last edited:

Wackamole

Member
Oct 27, 2017
16,931
I don't think the poster was trying to defend anything. It's still an important distinction

A pedophile is attracted to prebubescent children. That's a disorder that we don't no any treatment for at this point. Actual pedophiles can only be part of society if they never, ever try to go after their sexual fantasies.

What we're talking about here is people with a 'normal' sexuality who think anyone who's gone through puberty is fair game. It's reprehensible because of the power imbalance (especially if we're talking about rockstars abusing their fame) and because mentally teenagers aren't fully developed at that point, so they can't be considered to give informed consent. But it's not pedophilia
Yeah that's true in the definition.
I think we need to watch out with calling posters a pedo here just because he showed us the definition of what that word means. He never said it was okay to fuck a 15 year old. But the whole post kinda reads creepy. I was shocked by it at first.
 
Last edited:

Skelepuzzle

Member
Apr 17, 2018
6,119
I don't think the poster was trying to defend anything. It's still an important distinction

A pedophile is attracted to prebubescent children. That's a disorder that we don't no any treatment for at this point. Actual pedophiles can only be part of society if they never, ever try to go after their sexual fantasies.

What we're talking about here is people with a 'normal' sexuality who think anyone who's gone through puberty is fair game. It's reprehensible because of the power imbalance (especially if we're talking about rockstars abusing their fame) and because mentally teenagers aren't fully developed at that point, so they can't be considered to give informed consent. But it's not pedophilia

Fuck off.
 

darz1

Member
Dec 18, 2017
7,072
Thin White Duke Bowie was a fascist in the same way that Ziggy Stardust Bowie was friends with spiders from mars.
Not really since one of those is an entirely fictional concept while the other is very much a real thing
With the facism stuff he was living in Berlin those years and that was his stage persona.
I thought it was before he moved to Berlin. Also it was his off stage persona too.
Yeah the fascist thing should be removed from the OP

Its like calling any actor whose played a nazi a literal nazi. TWD was a fascist persona made during Bowies darkest hour.
Theres a difference between an actor playing a nazi during a performance and a person continuing to play a nazi off stage. I know we say he was in character but isn't it possible that character represented a part of him and his views at the time. I mean he created the character and lived it for 2 years. Im not saying those remained his views as he clearly denounced it later in life, but he presented himself that way, it came from him.
 

fanboi

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,702
Sweden

From a strict clinical point of view it is correct?

Pedophilia (alternatively spelled paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2] Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[4] A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.[4][5]