Of course it should, the whole point of the review is to discuss its value.
Value is subjective.
Reviewers should talk about the game itself
Not the prices
Of course it should, the whole point of the review is to discuss its value.
Huh reviews are subjectiveValue is subjective.
Reviewers should talk about the game itself
Not the prices
Its gonna be divisive as fuck , 68 Meta. (I want to be wrong on this one)
Do we have any confirmation that the game is structured like the first one? Seriously, of all the stuff they have shown about this game (which isn't a lot, from what I can recall), I still have no fucking clue as to what it is.
The biggest question I have is.
Is Fury going to have a horse just like the two other horseman? or does the world in Darksiders 3 not allow for it?
Lol. I can absolutely see that! This game probably isn't going to be a critical darling but I fully expect it to be a blast for those that are interested.
They'll also probably form the biggest marketing boost the game will have, so from the publisher's perspective, I understand why they keep the embargo up until the day before launch, so the time between reading reviews and the possibility to purchase the actual game is as small as possible.I'm not really interested in the scores, just hope I like it. Sucks that the reviews are so close to the release date, though.
Considering the hot topics of micro transactions, season pass, DLC, post launch support, pre-order incentives, "amount of content".....its fair to say the rest of the gaming community cares about value.I want to know if the game is good or bad
Not interested on what they think regarding the prices.
It's not up to them to judge that
I hope this doesn't turn into fucking mom of war, have had enough of the 'emotional' bullshit.That was a concern for me as I started playing but she grows as a character much more than War or Death. It's a nice shift in attitude throughout the play time.
I hope this doesn't turn into fucking mom of war, have had enough of the 'emotional' bullshit.
Literally EVERYTHING in a review aside from the hard data like name of game and date of release is subjective.Value is subjective.
Reviewers should talk about the game itself
Not the prices
Literally EVERYTHING in a review aside from the hard data like name of game and date of release is subjective.
Price is part of the value equation, and value matters. You're talking about how good the gameplay is, how good the story is...none of that really matters if the game releases at $299. Take a game that's pretty good, not really above the pack in any regard but a solid story and gameplay, release it at $60 and you'll get 'probably worth checking out for fans of [xxxx]' level recommendations. Same game at $30 gets the 'at this price you can't go wrong' recommendation instead.
That's also why people ask about game length so much.
That was a concern for me as I started playing but she grows as a character much more than War or Death. It's a nice shift in attitude throughout the play time.
I hope this doesn't turn into fucking mom of war, have had enough of the 'emotional' bullshit.
Lenght and replay value are overrated
It is not about how many hours you pour into one game. Doesn't matter if a game lasts 60h if you're not having fun, or if the story and characters are poorly written or if the gameplay is an absolute chore
I'd rather have a good slice of pizza than a bad 20" pizza
As for prices...
Take God of War and RDR 2. RDR 2 is the bigger and longer game by default. Both cost the same. Should God of War cost less than 60$ for being shorter and smaller in scope?
THQ allowed me to publish a boss fight as well as my first batch of screenshots running at 4k max settings.
I leave some here, but you can see dozens more and the graphics settings in the link: http://www.pcmrace.com/2018/11/21/n...de-darksiders-3-en-4k-con-detalles-al-maximo/
I already recorded the first hour of gameplay, other boss fights and captured more screenshots showing all forms and enviroments. I will publish them all on the 26.
Edit: Had to set the video on private due to embargo rules.
I disagree. I think reviews should absolutely takE price into account. For example, if the new Spider-Man game was priced at £20, clearly that would be a factor.Value is subjective.
Reviewers should talk about the game itself
Not the prices
Any shred of common sense should tell you its not going to be anywhere near 60 let alone lower than that
The biggest question I have is.
Is Fury going to have a horse just like the two other horseman? or does the world in Darksiders 3 not allow for it?
I take it you're playing it on PC (the website URL makes it obvious). Can you say anything about the performance? Have you run into any issues?THQ allowed me to publish a boss fight as well as my first batch of screenshots running at 4k max settings.
I leave some here, but you can see dozens more and the graphics settings in the link: http://www.pcmrace.com/2018/11/21/n...de-darksiders-3-en-4k-con-detalles-al-maximo/
I already recorded the first hour of gameplay, other boss fights and captured more screenshots showing all forms and enviroments. I will publish them all on the 26.
Edit: Had to set the video on private due to embargo rules.