• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

lidmat

Banned
Jun 18, 2018
502
The IEA published their WEO 2018, which contains their projections for energy use around the world. It shows that our primary energy mix will not change very much in 2040; slightly higher share of renewables and gas, and lower oil, while coal remains flat (again, in shares, not in absolute numbers).

It shows that nobody expects a material change to curb co2 emissions.
 

Mivey

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,826
Rainforests gone
Ocean heating
Insect population decimated
Yep, it's human time!
At least you won't need to worry about getting stung during summer time. Of course, it will also lead to a complete collapse of our biosphere if insects are gone, likely leading to huge fall in crop production and mass starvation on a global scale.
But at least you don't need to worry about mosquitos. So, yeah, you lose some, you gain some.
 

Dyno

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
13,318
Compare their international influence. Are you really arguing that China, Russia or Canada are in even the same ballpark as Argentinia?

And sorry folks, but excluding Russia from Europe on the "who did it" front is as silly as excluding China from the "who is doing it".

No I was just asking why they aren't mentioned. They're seemingly registering the same numbers on this scale.
 

Josh378

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,521
Baby Boomers: We'll be dead anyway before shit hits the fan...so fuck you, got mines!!!

Millenniums: Fuck you Baby Boomers...were in this mess because of you! I'll be either dead or really old when the planet starts to crap out on us.


So, is it me or should I not do my family any favors and not bring a child into the world to live with this crap?
 

真棒!

Banned
Nov 24, 2017
649
Honestly, when things get bad enough Canada will be absorbed by the United States. We will need the land and they will need the protection.


I know you're joking, but the UK's strategy before WW2 in the event of a war with the US was to basically just let them have/annex Canada.
 

hurlex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,143
This shit is so fucked. We need some massive event to spook people.

People can get behind environmental regulations. It just takes something tangible, like a nuclear power plant almost melting down.

This why, even though it isn't 100% true, tying hurricanes to climate change is a good idea.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 25709

User Requested Account Closure
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
1,046
This shit is so fucked. We need some massive event to spook people.

People can get behind environmental regulations. It just takes something tangible, like a nuclear power plant almost melting down.

This why, even though it isn't 100% true, tying hurricanes to climate change is a good idea.

A study in Nature from 3 days ago describes how extreme rainfall in hurricane Maria, Irma, and Katrina was intensified by climate change. It's expected that warming caused by humans will see a rise in rainfall and wind speed of tropical cyclones in the future.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0673-2
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2017
3,428
Is it talking about current climate policies or future?

I hope the Canadian carbon tax coming in 2019 will mitigate some of the worst excesses.
 

subrock

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,961
Earth
If only Alberta would shut up about their fucking pipeline and we could throw infinity trees back in the tar sands
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
I know you're joking, but the UK's strategy before WW2 in the event of a war with the US was to basically just let them have/annex Canada.
I'm, unfortunately, not actually joking.

Climate change has the potential to cause such a massive realignment of the environment and geopolitical situation of this planet that there will come a point where both the US and Canadian governments decide the only reasonable way forward is integration. Like I said, the US will need Canada's land, and Canada will need the US military to help protect it as the value of that land skyrockets. As Americans initially slowly move to Canada in the early stages of climate change (those who see the writing on the wall and emmigrate, not refuges at this point), support within Canada for such a move will (again slowly) grow as well.

To be clear, I don't view this as the result of a military invasion, rather a peaceful political integration. And I know that will be very difficult for many Canadians (and understandably so), but the introduction of Canada to the US (or under whatever flag this new nation flys) will lead to a Canada-zation of the entire country, what with the huge number of Canadian Senators and House members (or equivalent) and voters being added to the new-United States.
 

Min

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,073
The framing of this article seems misleading to me. It's saying "China leading world to 5.1C" change in temp by 2100, but the actual study is saying this would be the case if the rest of the world followed their policy, no?
 

Caz

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,055
Canada
Hey, i'm sure Canada will get a pretty good deal out of it. Maybe 8 states, 16 Senators. Not bad for a territory with less people than California.
Naw, we're good.

You should give those senators to, like, Puerto Rico, D.C. and the other territories America has or something if you have so many unopened Senators in a Can™ lying around.
 

Akira86

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,589
coincidence that cold as fuck Russia and cold and desolate as fuck Canada want a little warmer planet so they can expand a bit?
 

Scuffed

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,885
As a Canadian I find this hilarious considering all our big talk. We do that a lot here talk big on issues when we have plenty of skeletons in the closet. I have no authority on how to fully understand studies like this though.
 

Metallix87

User Requested Self-Ban
Banned
Nov 1, 2017
10,533
Like hell we will. Vive le Canada!
86b.jpg
 

Pandaman

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
1,710
lol so defensive

hold your government accountable for what it does
Lets not pretend that the specific metric used in this study isn't extremely generous to the US in particular. Some of the most wasteful industries are being ignored. US airline industry is larger then the rest of the top 5 combined and is absent from this study. The shipping industry is not included and freight transportation is the largest job force in the country. etc.
 

kswiston

Member
Oct 24, 2017
3,693
Canada doesn't make sense on there.

We don't have the best system in place yet for carbon emissions reductions, but we also can't produce nearly the same volume of carbon dioxide as other first world nations.

People are reading the article wrong (or not reading it).

The study doesn't say that Canada will personally cause that climate change. It says that if every nation on earth adopted Canada's carbon emission goals, temperatures would go up 5C. Canada itself emits less than it absorbs thanks to our very large forest area and low population. However energy per capita is one of the higher levels on earth, and we aren't doing enough to reduce it.
 

Dekuman

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,026
This is my issue with Climate change policies. The real instigators are in the third world, and they are autocratic unaccountable regimes.

In Canada's case, maybe it's time to reexamine where our actual wealth is from. I think it's going to be very much reduce fossil fuel emissions or reduce the cost of the welfare state. There is no two ways about it.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
BIT4TTM.gif

Even if your management changes in 2 years, there is no way we Canadians will ever forfeit our sovereignty.
Canada is, in all likelihood, not maintaining its sovereignty in a world transformed by global warming. It is too big with too much newly prime real estate with too few people, sounded by far more powerful neighbors.

A mutually agreed upon political union with the US is probably the least traumatic way that reality could be realized.

It's just another good reason to do whatever we can to keep that world from coming to pass.
 

Caz

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,055
Canada
Canada is, in all likelihood, not maintaining its sovereignty in a world transformed by global warming. It is too big with too much newly prime real estate with too few people, sounded by far more powerful neighbors.

A mutually agreed upon political union with the US is probably the least traumatic way that reality could be realized.

It's just another good reason to do whatever we can to keep that world from coming to pass.
Pretty sure the U.S. has one of, if not, the largest emissions per person which has the means to make a far bigger contribution to the overall reduction of said emissions that are causing global warming but whatever helps you have those sweet imperialist dreams at night.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
Pretty sure the U.S. has one of, if not, the largest emissions per person which has the means to make a far bigger contribution to the overall reduction of said emissions that are causing global warming but whatever helps you have those sweet imperialist dreams at night.
.............

I can't decide if you are purposefully misrepresenting my posts or just very confused, so I will err on the side of confused and explain again:

I have not said a single thing about who is to blame for global warming, I have said global warming will completely change the face of this planet, and that will have geopolitical repercussions, one of which will be a flight over the reduced habitat land. Canada would never be able to actually maintain their independence if challenged by the increasingly desperate governments of the United States, Russia, or China. In which case, creating a new Union with the US would be the best of a poor list of options.

The idea I'm excited for this future is, frankly, insulting. I am describing a dystopian world here.
 

Deleted member 3968

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
888
The sheer arrogance to openly suggest a country should just give all our shit to merica cuz you asked nice is fucking laughable. FOH.
 
Oct 25, 2017
7,624
canada
I'm, unfortunately, not actually joking.

Climate change has the potential to cause such a massive realignment of the environment and geopolitical situation of this planet that there will come a point where both the US and Canadian governments decide the only reasonable way forward is integration. Like I said, the US will need Canada's land, and Canada will need the US military to help protect it as the value of that land skyrockets. As Americans initially slowly move to Canada in the early stages of climate change (those who see the writing on the wall and emmigrate, not refuges at this point), support within Canada for such a move will (again slowly) grow as well.

To be clear, I don't view this as the result of a military invasion, rather a peaceful political integration. And I know that will be very difficult for many Canadians (and understandably so), but the introduction of Canada to the US (or under whatever flag this new nation flys) will lead to a Canada-zation of the entire country, what with the huge number of Canadian Senators and House members (or equivalent) and voters being added to the new-United States.

The US political set up is cancerous, and while Canada's federalism (which was designed with the US's federal systems problems in mind) is growing outdated we are still far superior to all of you.

We have worked tirelessly to prevent anglophones being americanized but more than that

Quebec and the Atlantic provinces will never become a part of America without war.

Edit: not to mention us just straight limiting how many americans are allowed in our country similar to the Chinese head tax
 

killerrin

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,238
Toronto
Meanwhile in Canada our Conservatives are still trying to skirt our responsibility by claiming nothing we do would make a difference... "Because China"
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
The US political set up is cancerous, and while Canada's federalism (which was designed with the US's federal systems problems in mind) is growing outdated we are still far superior to all of you.

We have worked tirelessly to prevent anglophones being americanized but more than that

Quebec and the Atlantic provinces will never become a part of America without war.
I disagree with that, but I also think if that's true...then it will just happen via war, with one power or another.

We are talking about a world devastated (or on the cusp of being devastated) globally by climate change. Mass famine, mass destruction by extreme weather, and mass human migration will negatively effect every single nation on this planet. The nations that are in the best position to adapt to this world because of their geographic location, such as Canada and Russia (who could also be an aggressor) will become targets for those who are more directly effected, but still have the military power to "move north," such as the United States and China.

Again, this is all a dystopian nightmare of a future that we are, unfortunately, on a path to. The situation I have described is but one of an incalculable number of fucking awful things climate change can cause.
 

nelsonroyale

Member
Oct 28, 2017
12,128
It's time: https://rebellion.earth/

In terms of giving, you can't give up if you haven't done much. It is the opposite, it is time for those who care to start taking the initiative. In terms of societies, there has never been a better cause.