Those same threads will have people still "waiting for the facts," or people concern-trolling about the fact that the video didn't start at the very beginning of an incident.
You think the guy only did it on the occasions when he tweeted about doing it? If you work in a service industry job, you remember faces of particular customers, good and bad, even if they are high traffic locations.
Bruh why you trying so hard to defend thieves and people generally just trying to cause shit?
Better than coming across as callous to social issues, assault, and racism by always giving the benefit of the doubt until hard facts prove otherwise, I guess?
Seriously, I am completely baffled as to how anyone could side with these guys at this point.
Do you really think just because someone is a PoC that they can't be racist to a PoC of a different race? Don't tell me you're that naive.
Lool, man was performing like this and he didn't delete his past tweets like this wouldn't have blown up.
This is a really weird thing to take a stand on. Company policy isn't going to cover every scenario and asking someone to pay first when they have a history of claiming not to have money after ordering is perfectly reasonable.
...how does that even matter? If anything she was giving them a second chance.
Corporate policy is usually as such that staff cannot intervene in outright theft. You say fuck corporate policy.
Yep once people had the full information, people rightfully turned on the thieves. It's not hard.
Yeah she is definitely could have handled that situation better. Although I will most likely get flustered too, especially when he was most likely gloating how he is recording them, etc. Guy seems like a professional troll and likes to get a rise out of people.
Asking them to leave/if you wanna get served you need to pay first. What's the difference?
Asking them to leave woukd have deescalated the situation faster.
Here we go. Watch, according to those fucks every incident before this didn't exist.
Agreed. I'm just saying incidents like this muddy the waters in some way.
Wouldn't the story and the response be "she shouldn't have refused them service" then?
What is the opposite?
I hate to say it but this probably would have played out exactly the same way except maybe the narrative would have been that the Chipotle doesn't serve black people.
This is a very weird stance to take. Honestly I would have done the same thing as a barista- not made them their drinks until they paid up. Otherwise I would have had to eat the cost of those drinks.
