• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Seeya

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,984
270M is now locked and Venom 2 is likely to be a billion dollar film. Spider-Man 3 (890M) in danger. 900M possible.

kswiston Enjoying the ride my man? :Venom emote:

raw

We gotta super impose Venom onto some of those Scarecrow scenes.
 
Last edited:

Prompto

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,982
People better start hoping Far From Home does a lot more than Homecoming. Otherwise Sony is just leaving money on the table not crossing over Tom Holland Spidey and Venom. Guess we'll see. I imagine Avengers 4 hype might help Far From Home significantly.
 

Seeya

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,984
People better start hoping Far From Home does a lot more than Homecoming. Otherwise Sony is just leaving money on the table not crossing over Tom Holland Spidey and Venom. Guess we'll see. I imagine Avengers 4 hype might help Far From Home significantly.

Let's not forget that Far From Home might get a bump from Sony Pictures Venom.

What a sentence.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,278
wherever
Fantastic Beasts 2 has a B+ Cinemascore and 39% on RT, far and away the worst recieved film in the franchise

Legs are going to be tragic
 

berzeli

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,384
$200m budget. If legs are as bad as they look, we may not get a third movie
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes Of Grindelwald took in $43M at the international box office on Friday, casting spells in 79 markets, 24 of which were added yesterday. The Warner Bros sequel/spinoff is currently running 14% higher than Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them at the same point in play and in like-for-likes. The offshore cume through Friday is $74.3M and while there's been an ease in domestic projections, the global running tally through yesterday is $100M.
You're getting a third movie.
 

Seeya

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,984
You're getting a third movie.

A third movie is still likely but it does depend on the legs. Upfront being slightly up are to be expected with the growth of international markets since the original. The movie like had a larger Marketing budget on top of the production budget. The more likely scenario would be a cut in initially proposed budget and reworks for the third film.
 

Border

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,859
$200m budget. If legs are as bad as they look, we may not get a third movie
I doubt they'd ever kill this franchise, that seems a little extreme.

They will cut back the budget though, and probably try to lean much harder into nostalgia. Which is a bummer because FB2 already felt like it was trying too hard with "Hey guys remember Hogwarts? Remember Dumbledore? Remember Nagini?"
 
Oct 27, 2017
6,467
I mean, I'm glad venom is making money, but the movie was still shit .Hopefully they'll get some real talent in the writing and directing department for the next one.
 

mjc

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
5,879
They'll do a third Beasts movie, put the series on ice for a few years, then look at doing a new HP movie. Book it.
 

Seeya

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,984
Last edited:

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,278
wherever
A third movie is still likely but it does depend on the legs. Upfront being slightly up are to be expected with the growth of international markets since the original. The movie like had a larger Marketing budget on top of the production budget. The more likely scenario would be a cut in initially proposed budget and reworks for the third film.

WB is going to have quite a headache on how to move forward with this franchise

It's the second film in their planned five film series and it's already underperforming domestically and in China with a disastrous critical reception on top of that
 

Border

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,859
They'll do a third Beasts movie, put the series on ice for a few years, then look at doing a new HP movie. Book it.
I can't believe they were planning on carrying the Grindelwald arc for 3 more movies. I hope this makes them consider wrapping up that story and moving on to something more compelling. If Johnny Depp isn't a draw like he used to be, then I really don't see the point.
 
OP
OP
kswiston

kswiston

Member
Oct 24, 2017
3,693
WB is going to have quite a headache on how to move forward with this franchise

It's the second film in their planned five film series and it's already underperforming domestically and in China with a disastrous critical reception on top of that

FB1 in China opened to $40M and made about $85M total. This one is looking like $36-38M opening weekend, and will probably top out at $55-60M total.

Fantastic Beasts 1 opened to around $75M domestic, and had a better than 3.1x OW multiplier here for a $234M finish. I am going to guess around a 2.7x opening weekend multiplier for Fantastic Beasts 2 given the word of mouth. Thanksgiving is going to boost legs, but I am not expecting it to last long into December. If you assume around $63M this weekend, that gives you roughly $170M domestic. That's is probably even on the optimistic end. Something closer to 2.5x OW ($158M total) wouldn't really surprise me either.

So roughly $320M for FB1 vs maybe $230M for FB2 in Domestic + China. Even if the rest of the world is around even, that's around a $100M drop from the first film. I am going to go out on a limb and say that international legs won't be as good either. So, sub 700M is likely. Maybe enough for them to do the third film, but they should start considering budget cuts.
 

Rvaan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,734
FB1 in China opened to $40M and made about $85M total. This one is looking like $36-38M opening weekend, and will probably top out at $55-60M total.

Fantastic Beasts 1 opened to around $75M domestic, and had a better than 3.1x OW multiplier here for a $234M finish. I am going to guess around a 2.7x opening weekend multiplier for Fantastic Beasts 2 given the word of mouth. If you assume around $63M this weekend, that gives you roughly $170M domestic.

So roughly $320M for FB1 vs maybe $230M for FB2 in Domestic + China. Even if the rest of the world is around even, that's around a $100M drop from the first film. I am going to go out on a limb and say that international legs won't be as good either. So, sub 700M is likely. Maybe enough for them to do the third film, but they should start considering budget cuts.
(Somewhat) Fantastic Beast(s) and Where to Find Them 3
 

Slayven

Never read a comic in his life
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
93,025
They should pay me to reboot the Harry potter universe
 

Chaos Legion

The Wise Ones
Member
Oct 30, 2017
16,904
There was a Forbes article I agreed with. Sony should have just kept on with TASM and Garfield.
Garfield and Hardy would have been beautiful.
 

Schlorgan

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,932
Salt Lake City, Utah
About to go see FB2 with my wife and her family, who are all crazy hardcore Harry Potter fans that loved the first movie (I thought it was alright). Hopefully it either surprises me and I like it or it's bad enough that none of them like it either, or things could get real awkward.
 
OP
OP
kswiston

kswiston

Member
Oct 24, 2017
3,693
About to go see FB2 with my wife and her family, who are all crazy hardcore Harry Potter fans that loved the first movie (I thought it was alright). Hopefully it either surprises me and I like it or it's bad enough that none of them like it either, or things could get real awkward.

I have heard that it was basically 2 hours of fanservice and convoluted plots. I get the impression that it's not bad enough for you to enjoy it as a trainwreck, but doesn't really offer much to viewers who not big fans.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,278
wherever
Maybe enough for them to do the third film, but they should start considering budget cuts.

Budget cuts, a second screenwriter, maybe even finding some new blood for the director's chair

I'm not even a Yates hater but he's done like 6 straight Potterverse movies, it'd be nice to get a filmmaker to mix things up a little a la Cuaron with PoA

There was a Forbes article I agreed with. Sony should have just kept on with TASM and Garfield.
Garfield and Hardy would have been beautiful.

Can't even imagine how poorly ASM3 would have performed
 

Border

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,859
There was a Forbes article I agreed with. Sony should have just kept on with TASM and Garfield.
Garfield and Hardy would have been beautiful.
Garfield couldn't have carried Spider Man any further I don't think.

It's crazy to think that even Spiderman Homecoming Starring Robert Downey Jr will be outperformed by Venom.
 

Schlorgan

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,932
Salt Lake City, Utah
I have heard that it was basically 2 hours of fanservice and convoluted plots. I get the impression that it's not bad enough for you to enjoy it as a trainwreck, but doesn't really offer much to viewers who not big fans.
I feel like hinging the franchise on Grindelwald was a huge mistake. It'd be like having a Middle Earth movie where the villain is Morgoth. People outside of the hardcore fans know who Voldemort and Sauron are, but you invoke the name Grindelwald it's like
giphy.gif


That first movie would have been significantly improved by just having Colin Ferrell be the villain and having no connection to any of that crap.
 

Rvaan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,734
Fantastic Beasts 3: Tom Riddle vs Harry Potter's grandpa who looks exactly like Harry and is played by Daniel Radcliffe: Please be Excited.
You joke but Harry's Great Grandfather was alive at this time, was pro muggle, and went by the name Harry.
About to go see FB2 with my wife and her family, who are all crazy hardcore Harry Potter fans that loved the first movie (I thought it was alright). Hopefully it either surprises me and I like it or it's bad enough that none of them like it either, or things could get real awkward.
High probability that it makes them mad. It's a poor movie that upends 20 years of canon.
 

Noobie

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
755
270M is now locked and Venom 2 is likely to be a billion dollar film. Spider-Man 3 (890M) in danger. 900M possible.

kswiston Enjoying the ride my man? :Venom emote:



We gotta super impose Venom onto some of those Scarecrow scenes.
What are your calculation for it to reach 900M?

US: 215M
China: 270M
ROW-China-US: 370M

Grand Total: 855M

Only market in which it still have any chance to grow is China.. But even if it hits 300M in China it will be 885M...
 

JaggedSac

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,988
Burbs of Atlanta
I have heard that it was basically 2 hours of fanservice and convoluted plots. I get the impression that it's not bad enough for you to enjoy it as a trainwreck, but doesn't really offer much to viewers who not big fans.

I'm not a big fan of the HP universe and I enjoyed it. Basically just a set up for a 3rd movie though. My wife who is a big HP fan, loved it.
 
OP
OP
kswiston

kswiston

Member
Oct 24, 2017
3,693
Does Venom even have any specific Chinese pandering in it or nah

Not really. The space ship holding the symbiotes crashes in Malaysia, and the bad one works its way to San Fran. It is possible that it stopped in China or Hong Kong or something, but I forget. If it did, it was a throwaway scene.
 

Helot_Azure

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
1,521
Disappointed to hear about FB2, I thought the trailers looked fantastic and I was really looking forward to it.

I'll probably check it out over Thanksgiving weekend. If its as bad as I'm hearing it to be I really hope they fix things for a third film.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.