I just watched the 1987 movie Dragnet with Tom Hanks and Dan Aykroyd. It was absolutely awful, and every woman in the movie was a disaster.
Which older films have you watched in recent years that really did not age well?
OG Star Wars has not aged well.
The never ending story has aged even worse
I'm not sure it's so much not aging well as having always been bad, but DeMille's The Ten Commandments.
My girlfriend watched it for the first time a few years ago, and was wondering why there was only one woman in the whole movie.OG Star Wars has not aged well.
The never ending story has aged even worse
Yeah noOG Star Wars has not aged well.
The never ending story has aged even worse
That film was terrible when it came out. To not age well, you have to start out at least decent.
Sixteen Candles, in which the main character has a foreign exchange student living with her named Long Duck Dong and she ends up with a total jerk at the end instead of her secret admirer best friend is criminal.
Of course, I think ol Johnny boy went back and retconned Ducky to be gay since any other explanation is inexplicable.
If it aged so well why did George Lucas have to go back and fix it? Checkmate.
I watched both The Never Ending Story and The Princess Bride for the first time a few years ago and neither movie has held up very well.
Yikes. I watched The Breakfast Club this year and watched Mollie Ringwald's character get sexually assaulted and abused for the whole movie, only to fall for the abuser in the last few minutes for no reason.Sixteen Candles, in which the main character has a foreign exchange student living with her named Long Duck Dong and she ends up with a total jerk at the end instead of her secret admirer best friend is criminal.
I strongly disagree with the Princess Bride. What aged about it?I watched both The Never Ending Story and The Princess Bride for the first time a few years ago and neither movie has held up very well.
Maybe it's one of those "you had to be there" things? I thought it was a bore.
ThatsBait.gif
I watched both The Never Ending Story and The Princess Bride for the first time a few years ago and neither movie has held up very well.
I was waiting for someone to make this joke.
If I remember correctly, the Land Before Time actually had a bunch of scenes cut out of it before it was released which is why it's so short. Might explain why it's less substantive than those other movies.The Land Before Time.
One of my favorite movies as a child. I had several of the toys hand puppets from Pizza Hut, wore out a VHS copy, etc. Decided to rewatch it as an adult when I was sick one day and wanted something comforting. Huge mistake. The movie just doesn't work. Its short runtime doesn't allow for much substance so the plot is paper thin, the characters that I loved as a kid I found annoying as an adult, and the animation isn't nearly as good or detailed as other films from that era. It's every bit as bad as the three dozen sequels that came after.
I've also rewatched An American Tale and The Secret of NIMH in recent years and both of those Don Bluth movies hold up much better and are still enjoyable as an adult.
I'm gonna be honest I think I agree with you. A New Hope is my least favorite of the original trilogy
You once enjoyed Birth of a Nation?Is Birth of a Nation cheating?
Dances With Wolves and Flashdance are also two films that are just absolutely horrendous when you watch them today.
And in like, 25% of the runtime too.I don't think The Ten Commandments aged well. The story meanders around, and visually it is rather unimpressive when compared to something like Ben-Hur, which came out only a few years after. Sure it was impressive at the time, but it very much shows its age.
Besides, Prince of Egypt does the same story better.
Horror movies are the fucking worst at this. No genre ages worse than them. Frankly, anything prior to, say, Martyrs in 2008 is just ridiculous by today's standards. Even classics like Romero movies or Rosemary's Baby are hard to watch. Although generally, horror movies that relied on atmosphere and tone over being scary, aged better on average.
Regardless of the content and how people feel about this movie today, it's ambition at the time it released was astounding. The thread isn't purely a question of how a movie has aged for us personally, just how it's aged over time.
yea, yes.
good for you?
whoa yea.
NOOOOOOOOIf it aged so we'll why did George Lucas have to go back and fix it? Checkmate.
Horror movies are the fucking worst at this. No genre ages worse than them. Frankly, anything prior to, say, Martyrs in 2008 is just ridiculous by today's standards. Even classics like Romero movies or Rosemary's Baby are hard to watch. Although generally speaking, horror movies that relied on atmosphere and tone over being scary, aged better on average.
was that a qualifier for the discussion?