Also all modern anime is more or less inferior to pre-digital animation. Digital allows them to cut more corners.
I don't think that this is true.
There's no shortage of cel-based anime with shoddy artwork and/or animation (e.g.
Trigun, Weiss Kreuz, Tekkaman Blade, Chargeman Ken, Dark Cat, Hell Target, Roots Search, Nora, Vampire Wars, Psychic Wars, Twinklr Nora Rock Me, Garzey's Wing). Watch any long-form shounen anime from the 80s or 90s—
Hokuto no Ken, Saint Seiya, Dragon Ball, Hell Teacher Nube, Yu Yu Hakusho, or Rurouni Kenshin, to name a few—and you'll notice that the quality of the storyboarding, artwork, and animation often fluctuates on a per-episode basis (depending on the studios and/or talents involved). This phenomenon doesn't just apply to shounen adaptations, either; it applies to a great deal of TV anime and some OVAs. Older anime were just as liable to errors as modern anime are.
Now, I have no idea how you can say that "all modern anime" are inferior to "pre-digital animation" when the last few years have given us productions like
Kekkai Sensen, Devilman Crybaby, Mob Psycho 100, One Punch Man, Garo: Honoo no Kokuin, Shingeki no Bahamut: Genesis, Gundam Thunderbolt, Gundam: The Origin, The Eccentric Family, Haikyuu, Ping Pong, Megalo Box, Kyousogiga, Yozakura Quartet: Hoshi no Umi, and Kujira no Kora wa Sajou ni Utau. Say what you will about their writing, but I don't think that the quality of their artwork and animation can be called "bad". Not for everyone, maybe, but not
bad.
In actuality, the vast majority of TV anime (and OVAs, for that matter) are pretty unremarkable in terms of artwork and animation. There are standout episodes here and there, but the nature of the anime production complex precludes every episode from being perfect in all aspects. TV anime like
Cowboy Bebop are anomalies; productions with their level of consistency are rare. OVAs like
Bubblegum Crisis and
Gunbuster were mired in a sea of mediocre OVAs produced with the bare minimum of quality. The medium has always been inconsistent in terms of quality; you can't just boil things down to "modern anime is inferior to old anime". Statements like this not only lack nuance, but are purely subjective.
Sometimes I wonder if the "older anime are better" crowd's sample size
only consists of popular/critically-acclaimed works and
absolutely nothing else (it feels that way, considering that most "old anime are better" discussions end up with people posting the same predictable examples ad nauseam). It's easy to believe that older anime are flawless when you've only seen the best examples, and it's easy to believe that modern anime is trash when you've convinced yourself that the industry died at the turn of the millennium.