That's fine, but you need to be aware of what that suspicion means. For him to be charged in this way, it means that one or both parties need to show injury, they need to be in a relationship, and police need to have the reasonable belief that he's responsible for those injuries.
It's clear the case has been co-opted by less savory people (including TMZ being the one to break the news). But like I noted, if you use that to disregard the actual facts (he was detained, charged, and released on $50K bail), you're saying that this woman is perpetrating a scam and committing a very serious crime in the process.
There's really not an alternative here (she would know whether he was the one to beat her or not). And that's not to say he's automatically guilty (for all we know, he could have been dosed with something working for some sketchy client and isn't responsible for his actions), but the facts we have now still need to be acknowledged as facts, rather than simply dismissing it all as conspiracy (not speaking directly to you).