really? only the biggest game of the year and he couldnt make room to do it in time? come on now...
Your purposely derailing now.
really? only the biggest game of the year and he couldnt make room to do it in time? come on now...
Biggest spoiler is probably a chapter 5 related spoiler. He hints at the ending too.For those who watched it:
From a scale of 1 to 10, how SPOILERY is it?
Thank you.
really? only the biggest game of the year and he couldnt make room to do it in time? come on now...
No, you're trying to make it seem like I am. I'm discussing my opinion
What's the point of him releasing so late? We all know about the game by now. This just wreaks of him wanting folks clicking it for revenue
His lowest ever score is a 6 or 5 iirc and that was only given out like twiceAngry Joe hates most things so for him to give anything a 9/10 is special
His lowest ever score is a 6 or 5 iirc and that was only given out like twice
Not on his site the last time I checked.
I'm pretty sure he gave Kane & Lynch 2 a 2/10 or a 3/10 too. If a game is short and buggy he's very harsh.Don't know about his site, but I've been watching his videos for a while and he's definitely given out low scores. One of his most popular reviews was of Ride to Hell :Retribution and I'm pretty sure he rated that a 1/10.
He's given a number of games a 9/10 including Spider-Man recently, and God of War a few months back.
His 10/10's thus far are:
Red Dead Redemption
Mass Effect 2
Skyrim
Guild Wars 2
The Last of Us
The Witcher 3
This is off-topic, but I can never understand how a buggy mess of a game got such high scores (this is assuming this is Skyrim when it first came out in 2011).
Well, the recent Mark Brown thread got closed specifically because the mod said that we should discuss it in the review thread.
What's the difference between Mark Brown and Angry Joe that the latter should be afforded a privilege of its own threads while the former is not?
Maybe JayC3 as the mod who closed that thread can give a clarification?
It's actually a valid question and I wish a mod or admin would clear it up.
Someone made a thread for the 30 minute Kotaku review of Dragon Quest XI -- which was pretty unique and getting press on its own -- but it was closed not by a mod, but but an admin, who noted that there was already a review thread.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/kotaku-dragon-quest-xi-review.66209/#post-12199484
Which I agreed with, to be fair, as I don't think one review should should be given spotlight threads over others.
Stop with the thread whining. If you have issues with the thread, feel free to report the thread or contact staff, but stop derailing the thread.
Skill Up ain't shit compared to Angry Joe.
I love Skill Up but that's just fact, they entirely different beast. Angry Joe has been here for nearly a decade and he has millions of fans.
So? What if we want to discuss a particular review? The official review thread is worthless for actual discussion.
What do you mean so?
I don't own this website, it's MOD's decision, not mine. I'm just saying that Angry Joe is much bigger and more influencing that Skill Up, which MAYBE why Skill Up's review thread was locked but not this.
Stop with the thread whining. If you have issues with the thread, feel free to report the thread or contact staff, but stop derailing the thread.
yes
if you just want to derail more, feel free
Highish production values, acting and comedy are usually what set apart an Angry Joe video from "Here's another 45 minute review of someone talking over gameplay footage".
Would be nice to get reasoning for why this review deserves its own and separate thread when other threads about individual reviews have been locked quite quickly and redirected back into main review thread.
Am I thread whining with this post? Not sure, I just would love some official word on why X deserves own separate thread where Y doesn't. Comes across as very arbitrary moderation policy.
Stop with the thread whining. If you have issues with the thread, feel free to report the thread or contact staff, but stop derailing the thread.
Would be nice to get reasoning for why this review deserves its own and separate thread when other threads about individual reviews have been locked quite quickly and redirected back into main review thread.
Am I thread whining with this post? Not sure, I just would love some official word on why X deserves own separate thread where Y doesn't. Comes across as very arbitrary moderation policy.
If anyone contacted staff or reported the thread, will anything actually change? because it seems to me that every time someone questions as to why joe or sterling get their own individual threads compared to other content creators out there, the standard response is to stop derailing the thread or contact a mod.
Find out. Not sure why you would want to change anything but you do you.If anyone contacted staff or reported the thread, will anything actually change? because it seems to me that every time someone questions as to why joe or sterling get their own individual threads compared to other content creators out there, the standard response is to stop derailing the thread or contact a mod.
What's the point of him releasing so late? We all know about the game by now. This just wreaks of him wanting folks clicking it for revenue