I think a lot of them are forgetting that Stephen Totilo is a person and Reggie is a person and sometimes people like to give others a hard time. Because it's funny.
That was a shit interview and Reggie derserved better then that crap.
Sakurai is clearly working his ass off on the next installment of Smash and this guy is using his platform/voice to push his dumbass narrative that the next installment isn't a new game. I hate sites like Kotaku.
I shouldn't have clicked on the thread.
People probably still think Splatoon 2 is a port too. It'll never go away
Hey all. I figured people would enjoy the banter.
I'm well aware of what is new in Smash Ultimate and talk about that in the article. The point was to hear his take on whether Nintendo is at all at a disadvantage this holiday season when putting out games that some may see as enhanced ports, even if they're technically a lot more than that happening with Smash and the Let's Go Pokemon games.
Since Smash isn't some full roster change with all-new stages or some radical revamping of the series, it's not as obviously brand-new to game consumers as, say, Breath of the Wild or Mario Odyssey would be. And as I pointed out in the piece, Nintendo can port a Wii U game with very few changes--Mario Kart 8--and do great numbers with it on Switch. Hence me wanting to see what he'd say.
Smash Wii U: No story mode to speak of.
Couldn't you say smash has a different story with world of light too?
You're objectively wrong though, it's the same V/O actors, engine, asset overlap, and gameplay most of the game is identical to the previous so a minor change to the story doesn't make it a new game. Next.It's primarily story and the story is different. The two situations are not alike. Next.
He had to make Ice Climbers so useless because after all these years he couldn't figure out how to just avoid creating an infinite.
These are the same people who doubled-down on the remark that Octopath Traveler is a ripoff at $60.I'm surprised Kotaku editors let this level of bad journalism through. Reggie is just taking about their holiday plans. Why you have to turn this into hot takes: the article?
Smash Ultimate has the same story as the previous?
Reggie: Omae Wa Mou Shindieru.Reggie teleports behind Stephen
"nothing personnel.....kid....."
But what then makes GTA V or RDR 2 viable as "new games"? They run on extremely similar technology, there is definitely nothing revolutionary or radically different in the gameplay compared to their predecessors. They are improved iterations of the previous titles, and I don't think anyone has ever argued that they shouldn't be seen as new games. Same thing with CoD, sports titles (okay you might have a point there), Assassin's Creed etc.Hey all. I figured people would enjoy the banter.
I'm well aware of what is new in Smash Ultimate and talk about that in the article. The point was to hear his take on whether Nintendo is at all at a disadvantage this holiday season when putting out games that some may see as enhanced ports, even if they're technically a lot more than that happening with Smash and the Let's Go Pokemon games.
Since Smash isn't some full roster change with all-new stages or some radical revamping of the series, it's not as obviously brand-new to game consumers as, say, Breath of the Wild or Mario Odyssey would be. And as I pointed out in the piece, Nintendo can port a Wii U game with very few changes--Mario Kart 8--and do great numbers with it on Switch. Hence me wanting to see what he'd say.
fixed that for you*Miyamoto comes out on stage* "I'd like to introduce our new game, Ocarina of Time"
"Technically" *Stephen Totilo pushes up his glasses* "it's built on the same engine as Super Mario 64. They just added stuff to it."
Come on 64 port on GC.
But who cares if Bob next door thinks Uncharted 2 is a port?
I think a lot of them are forgetting that Stephen Totilo is a person and Reggie is a person and sometimes people like to give others a hard time. Because it's funny.
Holy shit can anybody read? He doesn't say that Smash Ultimate isn't a new game just a hypothetical to address potential concerns among the general consumer. This is the some of the most misguided outrage I've seen here in a while.
Not sure that's enough to differentiate it as a new game. Smells like a port to me.
Took the words out of my mouth.
I think they only major fighting game franchise that still consistently starts from zero for each major mainline entry (2D-to-3D transition aside) is Street Fighter.Very few games are built from the ground up from nothing. It's such a bullshit standard to have
Did you?From the article "They're not fully brand new games." You reading the same thing or what?
Just out of curiosity, in the realm of fighting games, what IPs do you feel do this? The last one I can think of that fits your criteria is Street Fighter 3 and even that one couldn't be considered a radical revamping of the systems.