The similarities between Chloe and Lara are painstakingly apparent yet you have made it clear you are downplaying them because you admit she is your preferred protagonist. I mean please..... you are acting ridiculous focusing on subtle differences like Australian vs. British accent, that she is part Indian but would not be known by anyone unless Naughty Dog made it part of her story, and the fact that you cant see she has a similar hair style and clothing style to the latest Lara Croft.
I like Chloe too, same with Sam and Sully, but all of them fall short of being suitable to be the main focus of Uncharted PS5 for different reasons. And if you think about it, why would a new studio take on Uncharted if they have only the lesser characters to work with? It makes no sense really and is the exact opposite of what they have been doing with their franchises recently. God of War had Kratos transform into almost another character with the changes they made to him.
Wat, you're accusing me of downplaying the similarities because she's my preferred protagonist when it's pretty obvious the only reason you think they matter (or in some cases even exist) is because you don't want her to be the protagonist. To be clear, plenty of other posters have said they didn't want Chloe to be the protagonist on the next Uncharted game and I didn't reply to any of them. The only one I replied to was yours because you were stretching to ridiculous lengths to try and justify your opinion.
There is no "subtle" difference between British and Australian accents, WTF are you going on about? Are you even a Silverchair fan? They're completely different. Chloe has never been white, so it really doesn't matter when Naughty Dog made her Indian descent part of her story. They could've gone in a completely different direction and it wouldn't make a difference, she'd still be brown and look nothing like Lara. "Long dark hair" doesn't make character designs similar, especially when they don't wear it the same way. And as for the clothes, sure they both basically wear the same kind of clothes but at the same time, when those clothes basically amount to jeans/khakis and a form fitting shirt, it's hard to take you seriously. It's basically just the female equivalent of what Nathan Drake wears.
If you don't want Chloe to be the protagonist because you want them to have a fresh start, then say that. That's a valid opinion, even if I disagree. But stop with the "she looks like Lara and it'll be compared to Tomb Raider" bullshit, it's embarrassing.
Carrying on with Chloe makes perfect sense to me given how much The Lost Legacy fleshed her out and made her even more interesting than she was before. She isn't even remotely a "lesser" character and there's a shitload of directions they could go with her. Going with a completely fresh cast is a big risk and could possibly alienate fans if there's no ties at all to the old series, it'd be a hell of a lot easier to take what's familiar, introduce new characters and then branch off from that. Personally, I'd move in a Yakuza 4-esque direction where instead of just a single protagonist, they have an ensemble cast and switch between them at different parts in the story.
If you want to ask me what makes no sense, it's turning Cassie into a treasure hunter like some made for TV sequel. I thought it was lame when Mortal Kombat and Gears of War did it and I'd think it'd be lame if Uncharted did it too.
Looking at the Supermassive situation and circumstances, it feels like a situation where Sony would like to continue working with Supermassive, but at the same time the dev themselves are conscious in wanting to make a multiplatform release of their best-style of game ( Until Dawn style )
I feel like this is just a situation where Sony, in their want to continue working with those devs, but those devs also having different ambitions for certain projects and having different partner opportunities, meant that Sony has to queue up behind other publishers in terms of core project priority.
From and Supermassive are the two most likely developers, given that Sony has shown a continued interest to fund projects by those devs, but for some reason it's not a direct continuation of previous projects. ( Bloodborne, UD )
It depends whether we're going to see the Supermassive that produced Until Dawn or the Supermassive that produced Hidden Agenda, The Inpatient and Bravo Team. The fact Supermassive have said they want to release a new Dark Pictures Anthology game every six months makes me think those games are probably closer to Hidden Agenda in size and budget than an Until Dawn and that doesn't give me much faith in them or whatever they're working on with Sony.