This.Honest sincere, open question to the mods/ staff:
Generally speaking, if someone has a dissenting opinion of some kind, how do you recommend that person expressing it, without unintentionally coming off as "arguing in bad faith" or just being totally dismissive?
As a fellow editor: That's an absolutely terrible headline. Your painting the issue as if some internet mob calls a game as a whole "racist" because a single animation got called out. Its incredibly inflammatory, not a good representation of what's happening and only aimed at generating more clicks by making as many people mad as possible.Thanks for the reply, earnestly appreciate the criticism. Always a good moment to be introspective into my own standards.
That said, I'm not sure "The Internet Alleges Super Smash Bros. Ultimate of Unintentional Racism Due to Fire Attack Reference" is going to get much of a different response from either side of the aisle. Anyway, thanks for the read regardless.
Slightly dissapointed
I mean, i can understand that people can be offended by it and why, but the idea was to be faithful to the source material, that was always Mr.Game&Watch gimmick.
It's the strucutre. Start with the "facts": the action taken, reminder of context, reason why it's bad/removed. Then ends with the "opinion": the apology and future commitment.Good apology, I'm glad they didn't go the "sorry you were offended" route.
It has precedent, if you want to cling to referencing obscure older games, as it's faithful to its representation in the GBA (2002) version:Slightly dissapointed
I mean, i can understand that people can be offended by it and why, but the idea was to be faithful to the source material, that was always Mr.Game&Watch gimmick.
What is this supposed to mean?...
It has precedent, if you want to cling to it being a faithful reference to an older version on GBA:
But why is it desirable to be faithful to a source that's racist?I guess that would be valid. It's just i'm not usually too fond of these kind of edits when something is supposed to be faithful to the original source (I can understand the racial angle though)
I'm not going to give it more though anyway, Mr.G&W is a great character with or without feather, so it changes nothing in the end.
I think it's more than a lot of the public apologies given by people/companies lately have some sort of "sorry you were offended" subtext to them.
But why is it desirable to be faithful to a source that's racist?
This is especially a problem on etcetera. But not only are people sometimes banned for trying to explain a different view or other very minor things, many users actually call for bans and promote them. I may not agree with what some of them say, but hold yourself to the same standards you hold others. As long as they are civil and open for discussion there's nothing wrong. Big part of the reason I stopped visiting this site for a while, despite being very liberal and agreeing with most people here, is that many are still fairly intolerant and extreme in their views.This.
Everytime an user has a different opinion / political ideal, they are immediately banned/warned without being able to discuss or defend themselves.
Uggghhh this annoys me so much. The game is supposed to be set in Spain and yet everyone speaks with a Mexican accent and dialect. It's the equivalent to making a game set in the USA in where every single person speaks in a British accent with stereotypical British expressions while drinking tea at 5 PMIf Capcom released RE4 fixing the image they gave of the Spanish people it would bother me too(And that one is racist as fuck). It's not about the racism and, as i said, i understand that angle.
Uggghhh this annoys me so much. The game is supposed to be set in Spain and yet everyone speaks with a Mexican accent and dialect. It's the equivalent to making a game set in the USA in where every single person speaks in a British accent with stereotypical British expressions while drinking tea at 5 PM
Like it's the only big profile game set in my country that I know of but in practice it's set in Mexico :(
If your opinion is on the side of something racially insensitive, it will not be well received here.Honest sincere, open question to the mods/ staff:
Generally speaking, if someone has a dissenting opinion of some kind, how do you recommend that person expressing it, without unintentionally coming off as "arguing in bad faith" or just being totally dismissive?
Isn't the game set in the 90s or something? If so the pesetas thing is right. I believe people didn't start actually using euros here until like 2002And they are all overly relligious, archaic, sexist, without basic commodities and pay in pesetas.
And it would still bother me if capcom fixed it.
Isn't the game set in the 90s or something? If so the pesetas thing is right. I believe people didn't start actually using euros here until like 2002
The rest is terrible of course
This.
Everytime an user has a different opinion / political ideal, they are immediately banned/warned without being able to discuss or defend themselves.
BUT MUH ARTISTIC INTEGRITY!Too bad people in the comments are more upset about removing the animation then the Smash team were.
This.
Everytime an user has a different opinion / political ideal, they are immediately banned/warned without being able to discuss or defend themselves.
what the hell? why would you be disappointed or want it to remain in the japanese version? would be super fucked up if they issue an apology but keep it in if you select a specific language. who would they be trying to please with that decision?Personally disappointed that it's removed, bit I can understand it with the source material. Curious if it'll be removed entirely, or just with the English/non Japanese langue selected.
That went pretty well. They could have patched it out quietly, but instead they took responsibility and apologised. Relatively quick as well.
Great and quick response.
I'm not used to G&W series, which game does that sprite came from?
Mr G&W isn't being removed from the game.
Corporate business avoid speaking directly on why it's offensive, because if they explain why, some people who never thought or consider the issue before, then see the issue being dealt with, and now feel they wished to have the issue back, would be angered by the resolve.
It's weird that those kind of people even watch GameXplain considering how liberal all of the GX guys are.The comments on the gamexplain video are expected and disgusting as expected. "Resetera are npc sjw's", etc etc etc.
Corporate business avoid speaking directly on why it's offensive, because if they explain why, some people who never thought or consider the issue before, then see the issue being dealt with, and now feel they wished to have the issue back, would be angered by the resolve.
It is better and easier for them to speak about the matter in an objective way, putting the blame on other but also important factors, like miscommunications within the company (which would be considered an internal issue, by the way) and investors confidence (also important for trust on the businesses).
I seen some conversation in a few forums that claim they are Native and say they're not offend by this. This happen a few times with the whole Mario wearing Mexican clothing. Assuming that they are Native why is it that their not offend by how their nationality is shown?
I'm not even looking at themThe comments on the gamexplain video are expected and disgusting as expected. "Resetera are npc sjw's", etc etc etc.
What the hell is an NPC anyway? I've seen it being thrown around last few weeks, but god knows what the joke is that I missed...The comments on the gamexplain video are expected and disgusting as expected. "Resetera are npc sjw's", etc etc etc.
I can't speak directly for them, but I take it they don't see it as a (hurtful) stereotype or don't it as savage. I'd be interested if they'd elaborate more on their opinion/reason.I seen some conversation in a few forums that claim they are Native and say they're not offend by this. This happen a few times with the whole Mario wearing Mexican clothing. Assuming that they are Native why is it that their not offend by how their nationality is shown?