I would say you're downplaying GG tremendously - the post you're replying to has articles from one of the UK's major newspapers, and the Washington Post. Both papers (as well as the NYT, and other UK papers) have written about GG and gaming harassment a lot. From "It's about ethics in games journalism" to it being referenced in articles about gaming harassment (like the recent Riot social media controversy), GG is inescapable for many who play games, unless they're being wilfully ignorant.
Because car enthusiasts don't
define themselves by the term - they're (generally) well-rounded individuals who have wives, kids, friends outside their hobby, jobs, etc.
Contrast with the term "gamer", which saw a
number of articles about the death of the term (due in part because of GG and harassment), which shitty "gamers" then seized upon and harassed a couple of the writers about.
What this discussion is getting into, I think, is whether this:
Can still be a true statement, considering all that has happened since 2014.