• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 47076

User requested account closure
Banned
Aug 25, 2018
1,048
Most gamers in the world aren't associated with the bubble that is this specific part of the online gaming community. I agree that toxic behavior is bad but keep in mind that if you stepped outside of your house and spoke with a random person that had no problem identifying as a 'gamer' about your issues with the term, they'd probably be confused because internet drama has nothing to do with their gaming experience.
 

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,215
What Gamergate should have taught us about the 'alt-right'
If we took 'Gamergate' harassment seriously, 'Pizzagate' might never have happened

GG is also more and more being referenced as the "ground zero" for anti-diversity/alt-right tactics, both in entertainment and outside it - ComicsGate and Sad Puppies (though started in 2013) have both used similar tactics as GG and the alt-right in gaming. And as the alt-right in gaming and GG are intertwined, I think it's not unreasonable to argue that it's hard to say "gamer" without there being at least a double-take of "what do I mean and how will it be taken"?
You know this is a super inside baseball subject? Most gamers don't even know GG existed. Those who would know would be in the hardcore camp since it requires some interest in gaming beyond playing games--reading about games and gaming culture.

This is why this thing is so cognitive dissonant. Ok, I don't identify as a gamer, but I spend hours online discussing games, following gaming related social media, streams, and YT channels, buy most consoles at launch. It's all rather weird lol.

Again, I think anyone should identify as a gamer if they don't want too, but it's very hard to believe lol, especially in other contexts, outside of the internet bubble.

Moreover, in terms of marketing demographics, the stuff that really matters in our capitalists society, we are definitely gamers.

Personally, I just accept that gamers are people and are a diverse group of individuals. Some good, some bad, some horrendous. I'm sure there are car enthusiasts that are horrible bigots out there as well. I don't believe that would hinder other car enthusiasts from accepting the term.
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,744
What makes you think I don't? Because I post in this specific thread on era you think that gives you anything at all to go on in assessing what I do or not out there in the real world? What's next? Are gonna ask for receipts? See where I've volunteered, how much I donated, check if I support a child in Tibet?

The only thing you're really saying here is that some bad behaviour is excusable. I disagree. I call out shit when I see it, and I don't give a damn who you are, or where you come from. Just because you, or someone else, was hurt by someone who might fit under this gigantic umbrella called "gamer" doesn't give you the right to lash out on every other person that same umbrella might cover. It's asinine logic. But it's something that happens frequently here.

Just let people be, and fight harassment where you actually find it.
No, you don't care who has been hurt by gamers - it's always "small minority" , except it's not. It's happened again and again and again. Face the problem or don't, but don't have a go at people for daring to bring it up. It's real and calling something sexist or racist or homophobic or transphobic is not "bad behaviour". I will continue to bring up the problem with the giant umbrella of "gamers" til they actually do something about it.
 

tiesto

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,865
Long Island, NY
User Banned (3 weeks): Dismissing a hate movement, personally attacking other members
This is little phrase here says everything I need to know about you tbh.

Yet another defending the name while being outright dismissive and flippant about what actually was a big deal.

This downplaying of GG to defend the Gamer label only hurts your argument

And the fact you have 25,000 messages in a year says a lot about you. Maybe if you spent some time out in the real world (or even just some time chilling and enjoying games on their own merits) instead of the internet echo chamber, you'll realize stuff like IGN plagarizing reviews or big western AAA game nickel-and-diming isn't really all that a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Sorry if you find my attitude dismissive and flippant though, that wasn't my intention.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,328
And the fact you have 25,000 messages in a year says everything I need to know about you. Maybe if you spent some time out in the real world instead of the echo chamber, you'll realize stuff like IGN plagarizing reviews or big western AAA game nickel-and-diming isn't really all that a big deal in the grand scheme of things.

What's that have to do with you calling Gamergate the outrage of the day?

I can tell you that in the real world harassing women is a pretty big deal.
 

Hey Please

Avenger
Oct 31, 2017
22,824
Not America



"Why don't people wanna call themselves gamers? Just call yourself a gamer. "

original.png


Jesus f'ing christ, what a fucking train wreck that first video is. And people still fail to understand why some of us don't want to be associated with that term.
 

Xaszatm

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,903
And the fact you have 25,000 messages in a year says a lot about you. Maybe if you spent some time out in the real world (or even just some time chilling and enjoying games on their own merits) instead of the internet echo chamber, you'll realize stuff like IGN plagarizing reviews or big western AAA game nickel-and-diming isn't really all that a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Sorry if you find my attitude dismissive and flippant though, that wasn't my intention.

And here we have the classic "spend time in the real world" deflection which instead accuses the other person of being "out of touch" no matter what in an attempt to place moral superiority over the other without actually refuting their points. Also, you still haven't actually answered her questions and choose to dismiss them outright.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
53,397
I have never once heard any discussion about 'gamergate' or what have you outside of Reset (still to this day, I'm not sure what it is nor do I think the majority of people I'd ask around at a local gaming convention). It could be that I'm a bit older than the average Reset member, and am more interested in playing/reading up about the more niche games I'm into than I am about the latest outrage of the day. Of course, if asked, I'd consider myself a 'gamer'
Yea every word that came before that spelled that out pretty clearly there champ.
 

Deleted member 10060

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
959
No, you don't care who has been hurt by gamers - it's always "small minority" , except it's not. It's happened again and again and again. Face the problem or don't, but don't have a go at people for daring to bring it up. It's real and calling something sexist or racist or homophobic or transphobic is not "bad behaviour". I will continue to bring up the problem with the giant umbrella of "gamers" til they actually do something about it.

Of course it isn't, and I never said it was. I said that accusing a huge group of people of those things when it's just a small part that have done something, is bad behaviour.

Point the finger where it can actually hit a target. Gamers as a group won't do anything about it because gamers isn't a homogenous identifiable group outside of one common element: they play video games. Most gamers have no clue about any of this.

I'm gonna ignore your trip into projective identification here, but I'm not your enemy. I don't condone what shitry people do. I just don't generalize the many based on the actions of the few.
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,744
Of course it isn't, and I never said it was. I said that accusing a huge group of people of those things when it's just a small part that have done something, is bad behaviour.

Point the finger where it can actually hit a target. Gamers as a group won't do anything about it because gamers isn't a homogenous identifiable group outside of one common element: they play video games. Most gamers have no clue about any of this.

I'm gonna ignore your trip into projective identification here, but I'm not your enemy. I don't condone what shitry people do. I just don't generalize the many based on the actions of the few.
It's not a few.
 

Malovis

Member
Oct 27, 2017
767
This self loathing is basically the stereotype of nerds getting all uppity once the cool kids make fun of their more lame members.
 

Hoo-doo

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,292
The Netherlands
The word 'gamer' has long since turned into a word to describe the people in this hobby that are far too invested in this hobby. It also encompasses the gamer stereotype of sexist, racist and childish manchildren.

Gee wiz, why in the world would people not want to label themselves that? No. Fuck 'gamers'. The term is tainted. It's like the word 'Trekkies' that immediately conjures up images of kissless nerds at conventions doing the vulcan greeting with their hands. I did watch plenty of Star Trek but i'd never call myself a Trekkie.
 

NoName999

One Winged Slayer
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
5,906
And the fact you have 25,000 messages in a year says a lot about you. Maybe if you spent some time out in the real world (or even just some time chilling and enjoying games on their own merits) instead of the internet echo chamber, you'll realize stuff like IGN plagarizing reviews or big western AAA game nickel-and-diming isn't really all that a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Sorry if you find my attitude dismissive and flippant though, that wasn't my intention.

"I'm sorry that I'm dismissive. Let me show it by continuing being dismissive."
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,744
Math. 1000 alone is many, 1000 out of 10000000 is few. Why am I explaining this?
Why do you think you know the numbers?? It's always downplayed - if it really is a few, the big incidents wouldn't happen as the "majority" would kick them out. I'll say it again, most gamers are apathetic at best to minorities getting attacked, at worse are doing the attacking.
 

NoName999

One Winged Slayer
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
5,906
Fucking hell, the insensitivity from the "good" gamers just doesn't stop. Some of you guys are just real bastions of human maturity.

Gamers show more empathy to a racist because his dog apparently died that the racist's targets of his hatred.

Gamers shown more outrage towards a company censoring a 13 year old's bikini costume than they do about toxicity of gaming chat

#YesAllGamers
 
Oct 26, 2017
8,055
Appalachia
Math. 1000 alone is many, 1000 out of 10000000 is few. Why am I explaining this?
Why are you? That's not a relevant point if you don't have a real-life ratio, which I'm going to assume is only supposed to be in regards to GG anyway.

Look at the ways people think it's acceptable to react to a mobile Diablo game. On this very site. Which is part of a long trend of similar reactions that the people complaining will find any excuse to justify. Toward luxury consumer entertainment products made by for-profit corporations. Problems with entitlement and immaturity are rampant in this hobby, along with the bigotry that's already been well pointed out, and to try and paint the issues folks have as coming from "the few" is really diminishing things.
 

Nepenthe

When the music hits, you feel no pain.
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
20,720
The reason "the few" get away with behavior that ostracizes minorities is because the majority, both gamers and developers, are apathetic to it. Gaming was arbitrarily cultivated as a boys' club for lonely white nerds, for one, many of which had an axe to grind with their female peers for not hooking up with them or for not displaying interest in their hobby. Number two, online gaming launched without much in the way of tools or reinforcement techniques to truly dissuade harassment and bigoted language being strewn about and it in turn has become a hallmark, an expectation, "playful trash talking" that is endemic to the "appeal" of game culture. Critique of games from a lens beyond just measuring the effectiveness of 1s and 0s is seen as invasive, an insidious means to make games less fun by providing better avenues for storytelling and representation (and the fact that fun is inversely tied to respectful representation is the problem). Throw in the fact that gamers do not exist in a vacuum, but are also human beings inundated with the political, social, and cultural mores of wherever they live (and we currently live in a time of right-wing populist backlash), and you inevitably get shit like Gamergate which, I remind you, is a movement that gaming developers and publishers did fuck all to openly rebuke.

Harassment is not a once-in-a-blue-moon occurrence in gaming culture. It is an omnipresent systemic failure of both gamers and developers to make the space welcoming for minorities from the outset.

And trying to downplay this as just a few gamers only adds to the problem.
 

tiesto

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,865
Long Island, NY
What's that have to do with you calling Gamergate the outrage of the day?

I can tell you that in the real world harassing women is a pretty big deal.

I don't really know much about Gamergate apart from bits and pieces of it, and I was unaware it was still going on. But I was saying based on my anecdotal experience that most people I know in the local gaming community are unaware of it. Harassing women is obviously despicable in both the real and virtual world, and I'm lucky that my gaming groups tend to (mostly) be well adjusted adults who know better.
 

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,665
Math. 1000 alone is many, 1000 out of 10000000 is few. Why am I explaining this?
You could end it at 1000 is too many.
And the fact you have 25,000 messages in a year says a lot about you. Maybe if you spent some time out in the real world (or even just some time chilling and enjoying games on their own merits) instead of the internet echo chamber, you'll realize stuff like IGN plagarizing reviews or big western AAA game nickel-and-diming isn't really all that a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Sorry if you find my attitude dismissive and flippant though, that wasn't my intention.
Don't be an ass and presume to speak on someone you don't know just because they post often.
don't really know much about Gamergate apart from bits and pieces of it
And yet here you are speaking on it
 

Xaszatm

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,903
I don't really know much about Gamergate apart from bits and pieces of it, and I was unaware it was still going on. But I was saying based on my anecdotal experience that most people I know in the local gaming community are unaware of it. Harassing women is obviously despicable in both the real and virtual world, and I'm lucky that my gaming groups tend to (mostly) be well adjusted adults who know better.
Given how you choose to dismiss this person and tell her to "live in the real world" I'm doubting the validity of your last sentence.
 

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,215
ask any girl who games online what their experience is like

shit is on your front door if you bother to look
I don't any woman that games honestly. I barely know adult men that game. I think I can count 1 in a circle of plus 20 male friends and associates. And he's not on forums or anything like that. Nor does he play online. No one is really on forums these days. Forums are niche.
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,744
I don't any woman that games honestly. I barely know adult men that game. I think I can count 1 in a circle of plus 20 male friends and associates. And he's not on forums or anything like that. Nor does he play online. No one is really on forums these days. Forums are niche.
It's not hard to work out what women's experiences in gaming are - you have to be actively ignoring women not to hear it. Ignorance is just being apathetic at this point
 

Messofanego

Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,205
UK
It's not a few when you're part of the marginalised groups that are always attacked by gamers because you're a bit different.
I don't really know much about Gamergate apart from bits and pieces of it, and I was unaware it was still going on. But I was saying based on my anecdotal experience that most people I know in the local gaming community are unaware of it. Harassing women is obviously despicable in both the real and virtual world, and I'm lucky that my gaming groups tend to (mostly) be well adjusted adults who know better.
How about you educate yourself on gamergate then before dismissing others' reasoning based from it. I'll do the work for you and give you a primer.
 

Yamatake

Alt-account
Banned
Oct 8, 2018
62
Wouldn't it be easier and more sensible for people to refer to Gamergate supporters as "gamergaters" rather than gamers?

Its just that almost every time I see someone worked up about terrible and toxic gamers it's in some way related to Gamergate or the alt-right or incels etc.

So why does all of that shit need to get under the Gamer umbrella alongside kids who just like to play games or people who own a PS4 but don't have a Facebook or Twitter account.

My sister has 2 kids who are mad into Fortnite and Minecraft and she has referred to them as gamers.

I'd love to see some of you here telling her that her kids are alt-right, racist, sexist, gamer gate, incel, trolls. I can only imagine the fireworks that would follow.

Bottom line, most rational and normal people think a gamer is someone who is into video games. Good luck trying to get them to buy into your alternative definition.

Some of you maybe get a bit of perspective.
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,744
Wouldn't it be easier and more sensible for people to refer to Gamergate supporters as "gamergaters" rather than gamers?

Its just that almost every time I see someone worked up about terrible and toxic gamers it's in some way related to Gamergate or the alt-right or in else etc.

So why does all of that shit need to get under the Gamer umbrella alongside kids who just like to play games or people who own a PS4 but don't have a Facebook or Twitter account.

My sister has 2 kids who are mad into Fortnite and Minecraft and she has referred to them as gamers.

I'd love to see some of you here telling her that her kids are alt-right, racist, sexist, gamer gate, incel, trolls. I can only imagine the fireworks that would follow.

Bottom line, most rational and normal people think a gamer is someone who is into video games. Good luck trying to get them to buy into your alternative definition.

Some of you maybe get a bit of perspective.
Because it's not just Gamergaters?
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
53,397
Wouldn't it be easier and more sensible for people to refer to Gamergate supporters as "gamergaters" rather than gamers?

Its just that almost every time I see someone worked up about terrible and toxic gamers it's in some way related to Gamergate or the alt-right or in else etc.
The toxicity of the gaming community didn't start with gamergate fam.
 

tiesto

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,865
Long Island, NY
Then don't comment on how well known it is and educate yourself.

Well, I was commenting on anecdotal evidence, which is just that, anecdotal. A lot of people in this thread aren't getting that, and seem to be jumping on me rather than providing information - though admittedly it was dickish of me to call out Excelsior on their post count. Thanks for the link though, I'll check it out.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 10060

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
959
Why are you? That's not a relevant point if you don't have a real-life ratio, which I'm going to assume is only supposed to be in regards to GG anyway.

Look at the ways people think it's acceptable to react to a mobile Diablo game. On this very site. Which is part of a long trend of similar reactions that the people complaining will find any excuse to justify. Toward luxury consumer entertainment products made by for-profit corporations. Problems with entitlement and immaturity are rampant in this hobby, along with the bigotry that's already been well pointed out, and to try and paint the issues folks have as coming from "the few" is really diminishing things.

I think they're quite honestly rampant all over the place. Any commentary field on, well, any news article is full of vile shit. I've seen car enthusiasts and photographers act like children too. This kind of behaviour is everywhere, and yes, a lot of juvenile shit from gamers, but again, that doesn't mean gamers as a whole can be generalized like so many here seem to do. The difference between you and me is that I don't see this as a gamer related thing. It's just shitty behaviour and so many in all walks of life behave this way, sadly. I see equally bad behaviour in other online communities.

My numbers were just numbers to illustrate what I meant by few and many, it was not supposed to be taken literally.

You could end it at 1000 is too many.

I agree. I wish we could all just get along, but we can't. I try to stay civil here with people I strongly disagree with on the use of a word, and they tell me to grow up and various other snide remarks. Who does that help?
 

Yamatake

Alt-account
Banned
Oct 8, 2018
62
Because it's not just Gamergaters?

So instead of making specific distinctions we should just say it's all gamers?

I don't see a good solution here that works outside of this message board.

There are literally millions of people out there who's reaction is going to be "WTF are you on about stop talking shite" when presented with this "Gamers are racist" nonsense.

Fuck it. Waste of time.
 

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,215
It's not hard to work out what women's experiences in gaming are - you have to be actively ignoring women not to hear it. Ignorance is just being apathetic at this point

So we're talking about two things here. Gaming harrasment, which is rather big in online communities. The use of the racial epithets and so on. Sexual epithets and so on.

And connecting that Gamergate. Gamergate is continual harassment campaign. So I would say many are aware of the former. What I see that most chose to ignore it, either by not participating in those communities--toxic online game communities and sheltering themselves from it.

Additionally, gaming is an escapist hobby, so there will be many that are not simply concerned with the problematic elements.

Also, I'm only explaining the general gaming ignorance/apathy to the issues. I'm not saying if I think it's right or wrong. I do think that something needs to be done. But how does this translate the person buying RDR2 on launch day? That's all I'm saying. People may be generally aware that online communities are full of horrible people, but it's rather easy to ignore.

I'm sure tiesto is aware that horrible people exist in gaming communities. The more esoteric elements come to play when discussion of the term ''gamer'' and it's connection GG come from. That's way more nuanced for even the enthusiasts aware of gaming's problematic community elements. I'm not going expect launch day RDR2 buyers to even get or even be aware of that. They will be aware of bigots and sexists online, though.
 

Nepenthe

When the music hits, you feel no pain.
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
20,720
Wouldn't it be easier and more sensible for people to refer to Gamergate supporters as "gamergaters" rather than gamers?

Its just that almost every time I see someone worked up about terrible and toxic gamers it's in some way related to Gamergate or the alt-right or in else etc.

So why does all of that shit need to get under the Gamer umbrella alongside kids who just like to play games or people who own a PS4 but don't have a Facebook or Twitter account.
Because you can't separate the good and the bad from the subcultures you opt to partake in, and individual actions and thoughts don't address these on-going problems.

Good for the kids who aren't being primed to become incels and just play games after homework. What in the world does that do for all the racial minorities called slurs online everyday, or for the women who get ganged up on after getting onto voice chat, especially when they're competing against fragile men at the same or a higher level of play, or for LGBT people told that they're enforcing their SJW politics where they don't belong because they just want representation in certain games?

This is literally the gaming equivalent of saying "How can anyone be racist if they have a black friend?"
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,744
So instead of making specific distinctions we should just say it's all gamers?

I don't see a good solution here that works outside of this message board.

There are literally millions of people out there who's reaction is going to be "WTF are you on about stop talking shite" when presented with this "Gamers are racist" nonsense.

Fuck it. Waste of time.
Because it is the whole gaming community -it's part of it, if you don't want it to be part of it, do something about it, don't have a go at the people who point it out.
 

Yamatake

Alt-account
Banned
Oct 8, 2018
62
Because you can't separate the good and the bad from the subcultures you opt to partake in

Eh... Yes I can. It's actually really easy.

Kids just playing their games and enjoying them and minding their own business. Good Guys.

Gamergaters, entitled man-children, racists etc. Wankers.

See how easy it was.
 
Oct 26, 2017
8,055
Appalachia
The reason "the few" get away with behavior that ostracizes minorities is because the majority, both gamers and developers, are apathetic to it. Gaming was arbitrarily cultivated as a boys' club for lonely white nerds, for one, many of which had an axe to grind with their female peers for not hooking up with them or for not displaying interest in their hobby. Number two, online gaming launched without much in the way of tools or reinforcement techniques to truly dissuade harassment and bigoted language being strewn about and it in turn has become a hallmark, an expectation, "playful trash talking" that is endemic to the "appeal" of game culture. Critique of games from a lens beyond just measuring the effectiveness of 1s and 0s is seen as invasive, an insidious means to make games less fun by providing better avenues for storytelling and representation (and the fact that fun is inversely tied to respectful representation is the problem). Throw in the fact that gamers do not exist in a vacuum, but are also human beings inundated with the political, social, and cultural mores of wherever they live (and we currently live in a time of right-wing populist backlash), and you inevitably get shit like Gamergate which, I remind you, is a movement that gaming developers and publishers did fuck all to openly rebuke.

Harassment is not a once-in-a-blue-moon occurrence in gaming culture. It is an omnipresent systemic failure of both gamers and developers to make the space welcoming for minorities from the outset.

And trying to downplay this as just a few gamers only adds to the problem.
Yeah it cannot be stressed enough that these issues have existed well before GamerGate, which I would argue is a symptom of the subculture's probelms and not a root cause like people are seemingly trying to present it ITT by focusing the conversation around it. GG gained traction in part by how long this boys' club mentality has persisted. Seeing gaming becoming more openly inclusive (even if in baby steps) is shaking up the status quo and causing those white boys who were used to gaming being "their" thing to throw temper tantrums and ramp up their bigotry in a public way.
 

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,215
Eh... Yes I can. It's actually really easy.

Kids just playing their games and enjoying them and minding their own business. Good Guys.

Gamergaters, entitled man-children, racists etc. Wankers.

See how easy it was.
Yeah, I'm not getting that argument. You can say the same things about religious communities. Some are rather regressive and even downright lethal and abusive. While others are genuinely committed to helping the poor, oppressed and so on, even within the same religion.

But I do see people's point when they don't want associated with the word due to the toxic reputation from negative elements. I just don't think it's a rather strong argument. Moreover, self identification is a very personal.
 

Nepenthe

When the music hits, you feel no pain.
Administrator
Oct 25, 2017
20,720
Eh... Yes I can. It's actually really easy.

Kids just playing their games and enjoying them and minding their own business. Good Guys.

Gamergaters, entitled man-children, racists etc. Wankers.

See how easy it was.
Both of these things are part of gaming subculture. You take the good as a wholesale and say the bad is just this separate thing over there.
 
Oct 25, 2017
26,560
Eh... Yes I can. It's actually really easy.

Kids just playing their games and enjoying them and minding their own business. Good Guys.

Gamergaters, entitled man-children, racists etc. Wankers.

See how easy it was.
So people that ignore the issues and go on with their day are the good guys?

Thinking about the racial equivalent of this and yeah, that's pretty telling.
 

Yamatake

Alt-account
Banned
Oct 8, 2018
62
Because it is the whole gaming community -it's part of it, if you don't want it to be part of it, do something about it, don't have a go at the people who point it out.

Good point.

I herby declare that I am not a Gamer.

Enjoy your toxic gaming community, gamers, I'm not one of you any more so it's not my problem to solve.

It never occurred to me that by distancing myself from the problem it became no longer my problem.

No I can sit and moan about "gamers" while savouring that sweet sweet sense of superiority.

Cheers!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.