• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
I have no words... How can you even "fix" a country like this? Where do you start? Better education?

It's all about women. If extremists and religions control women, they control families, children, education, reproduction, finances, the home in general and so on. To even begin to progress forward the women have to be liberated, educated, have equal rights and generally be free to live without being controlled and dominated. Either directly or through emotional and manipulative reinforcement. Control over their reproduction is paramount. Religions are incredibly psychotic around women even simply having control over their reproduction. Religions want the kids and they want to indoctrinate. If you aren't spreading by the sword, you are spreading by the seed. Education, enlightenment and women's reproductive rights are a threat to religious dominance because they may lift women out of subservience and importantly allow them to control their reproduction.

Unfortunately, through any process, many women are going to be beaten, raped, jailed and even killed by lunatic men who want to control and dominate them. Men will resist with violence to stop women challenging them or toppling their dominance hierarchy over them.

Many of the countries that are the worst govern by religious law, and that means men controlling women at the highest systematic level, the Government and legal code.

Men with "balls" take on other men as Hitchens would





Unfortunately, some men these days are cowards and can't figure out if they are arguing "in good faith" in support of women, or if it's more progressive to argue religious dogmatism is actually a woman's choice and therefore stacks higher to gain "progressive points". These women choose to be oppressed and controlled! These women choose to live potentially miserable and restricted lives! We must tolerate intolerance because of culture! How about you stop acting like a fucking coward and challenge the men systematically indoctrinating and controlling women. No one says you need to victim blame, but you can sure all hell challenge the men. Lifting people out of poverty even starts with women's rights, especially over their reproductive systems.

Women will continue to protest and try to assemble in support groups but are routinely in grave danger doing this in countries with religious law. Therefore a lot of this rests on the shoulders of men to sort out other men and we often don't do a great job of it.
 
Last edited:

D65

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,862
Obviously, the protesters are men. This shit is so ingrained in their culture.

My otherwise extremely nice colleague turns into a giant misogynist when he sees a girl with a hijab and leggings.
 

N.Domixis

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
9,208
All this over a cup of water?
1520204991642.gif
 

cameron

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
23,814



BBC News: Asia Bibi: Lawyer flees Pakistan in fear of his life

The lawyer representing a Christian woman acquitted of blasphemy after eight years on death row has fled Pakistan in fear for his life.

Saif Mulook told news agency AFP he had to leave so he could continue to represent Asia Bibi, whose conviction was overturned by judges on Wednesday.

Officials have since agreed to bar Ms Bibi from leaving Pakistan in order to end violent protests over the ruling.

Campaigners blasted the deal as akin to signing her "death warrant".

Asia Bibi was convicted in 2010 of insulting the Prophet Muhammad during a row with neighbours, and many are calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty following her acquittal.

Mr Mulook told the BBC earlier this week she would need to move to a Western country for her own safety. A number of attempts have previously been made on her life.

Several countries have offered her asylum.
 

Ogami Itto

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,612
Why aren't they letting her leave? You obviously can't protect your citizen from a fucking murderous mob, so let her fucking leave.
 

Polygatari

Banned
Sep 29, 2018
217
Pakistan is full of medieval mentality people unfortunately. A lot of rural and village type people who live little lives.

The classical culture and upper culture of Pakistan (a lineage that goes back to the Muslim dynasties that ruled India) is beautiful and I admire it greatly. Great poetry, architecture, art, music etc.

Most food we know as Indian food is in fact just as much Pakistani food as it is Indian.

It's a shame that enough of that beautiful legacy isn't flowing through the cultural and memetic veins of society, and instead it's a Islamofacistic bigotry fuelled mess.
 

Aztechnology

Community Resettler
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
14,134
Also don't forget when she was on Death Row in 2011 a Governor who sided with her was assassinated because he said the blasphemy laws take advantage of mob rule.
Here he is with Aasia Bibi:
rSbaKnO.jpg

Gov. Salman Taseer was assassinated on January 4th, 2011 by his own bodyguard Mumtaz Qadri.
Qadri was then seen as a hero by Islamists after he was hung for assassinating the governor.
Here's the funeral of the Assassin:
JgMIO9M.jpg
Wooooooow
 

yumms

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,156
So other incidents where Muslims, in other countries, call for death of others for goofy reasons are also related to the Indian caste system?

Because craziness like this isn't exclusive to Pakistan.

Hard to believe that one aspect of the Indian culture affected Pakistan so much that they are willing to kill.
 

Sabretooth

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,052
India
So are Christians automatically put into the untouchable caste or something?

Because from my understanding caste are based on origins of the family or the socioeconomic standing of a person.

For instance those individuals involved in janitorial or sewer work are considered untouchables.

Asia Bibi seemed to be working the same job as the other women who claimed she committed blasphemy, and refused to drink water because she was Christian and they were Muslim.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/re...enced-to-death-in-Pakistan-for-blasphemy.html

The court heard she had been working as a farmhand in fields with other women, when she was asked to fetch drinking water.
Some of the other women – all Muslims – refused to drink the water as it had been brought by a Christian and was therefore "unclean", according to Mrs Bibi's evidence, sparking a row.
The incident was forgotten until a few days later when Mrs Bibi said she was set upon by a mob.

This is where you have to understand that the caste system has never been as straightforward as early European interpretations thought. There's also a chicken-and-egg thing going with caste most of the time. Is a janitor lower caste because he is a janitor? Or is he a janitor because he is lower caste? These things always depended on each circumstance.

There is of course, what DosaDaRaja said, where lower castes often converted to other religions to escape their caste restrictions (with various degrees of success). In these cases, upper caste opinions of them probably did not change at all.

In other cases, Muslims and Christians weren't considered to be of the untouchable caste, and were often more respect - but they were still considered impure and untouchable. What's important to understand here is that a lot of the times in South Asia, religious communities stick to their own communities. To get a grasp of how different these communities might be, read the full quote by Jinnah that I posted above:
It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam and Hinduism. They are not religions in the strict sense of the word, but are, in fact, different and distinct social orders, and it is a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality, and this misconception of one Indian nation has troubles and will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, litterateurs. They neither intermarry nor interdine together and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspect on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Mussalmans (Muslims) derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes, and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other and, likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built for the government of such a state.

Questionable as his decisions may be, Jinnah's observations of his time were right: 'religions' in India were virtually different nations that happened to share the same land. Inspired by the caste system, there was essentially an unspoken social contract that each religion will leave the other well alone (this obviously did not always happen, but that's a different story). So when my Hindu mother was advised not to drink at a Muslim family's house, it wasn't because my grandfather considered them to be of an untouchable caste, but of an untouchable community.

The whole concept of religions intermingling at a micro scale was only promulgated only be secular forces in the late 19th and 20th centuries.

These social norms were inherited by Muslims in India too (I would wager other religions too, but I honestly have never heard of any similar situations or cases with Christians or Sikhs), and have passed down to the Pakistan of today. That is why you end up with the water fetched by Bibi to be considered 'unclean', which you probably won't hear about in other Muslim countries.

Now as for those of you confused about how blasphemy comes in: the accusations levelled against Bibi are that she insulted Mohammed after the above incident played out. There are two completely different events involved. Only the first event, the whole water thing, is a South Asian cultural facet inherited from the caste system. The second, the whole blasphemy accusations, those can be found through a big chunk of the Islamic world.

So other incidents where Muslims, in other countries, call for death of others for goofy reasons are also related to the Indian caste system?

Because craziness like this isn't exclusive to Pakistan.

Hard to believe that one aspect of the Indian culture affected Pakistan so much that they are willing to kill.

A lot of people in this thread seem to be missing the fact that two separate things happened here. The first, in which the water that Asia Bibi fetched was considered unclean, that one is affected by the caste system. The second, in which Asia Bibi was then charged with blasphemy for insulting Mohammed and attacked by a mob for that same reason, is in line with the culture of some other Muslim countries.

What jeelybeans and I are trying to explain is that the first event, the whole water-is-impure thing, is inherited from the Indian caste system and is not found in other Islamic countries or cultures. To be clear Asia Bibi is not being targeted for offering water, she is being targeted for allegedly insulting Mohammed.
 
Last edited:

Buck Dancer

Member
Oct 27, 2017
382
User Warned: Inappropriate language
The fuck?
And I say it as 'low caste' Indian. Fuck off with this shit. It has nothing to do with caste system and everyth to do with islam. Stop blaming India for every ill Pakistan has.

To be honest, it has nothing to do with islam either. These people seem to be retards. End of that.

There is nothing in islam about drinking water from non Muslim and, as a Muslim, I cannot comprehend anything of that.

If these people just scratch on the surface, they would perhaps see that. There are hundreds of cases and examples during the life of the prophet where he and his companions interracted with Christians. One of the first things Muslims are taught is the migration to Ethiopia because of persecution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_to_Abyssinia
 

Deleted member 3010

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,974
Lol for a moment I thought they protesting to have a woman's acquital. I was like wow Pakistan, progress!

Then you read OP. Fuck this.
 

Sabretooth

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,052
India
I'm questioning why you need to point this out - in any case her persecution is real and obscene.
Because a lot of people in this thread don't seem to have their facts straight? I mean agree with you, it's a horrible situation what she's going through. But if you're going to analyse why it's happening at all, it's going to help to understand what actually happened instead of conflating all the details.
 

spineduke

Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
8,745
Because a lot of people in this thread don't seem to have their facts straight? I mean agree with you, it's a horrible situation what she's going through. But if you're going to analyse why it's happening at all, it's going to help to understand what actually happened instead of conflating all the details.

This is almost borderline victim blaming though - she was targeted out of her faith and minority status, not because she actually did something wrong.

The technicalities of her alleged wronging mean nothing in the context of a perverted justice system.
 

Mar Tuuk

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,566



BBC News: Asia Bibi: Lawyer flees Pakistan in fear of his life

The lawyer representing a Christian woman acquitted of blasphemy after eight years on death row has fled Pakistan in fear for his life.

Saif Mulook told news agency AFP he had to leave so he could continue to represent Asia Bibi, whose conviction was overturned by judges on Wednesday.

Officials have since agreed to bar Ms Bibi from leaving Pakistan in order to end violent protests over the ruling.

Campaigners blasted the deal as akin to signing her "death warrant".

Asia Bibi was convicted in 2010 of insulting the Prophet Muhammad during a row with neighbours, and many are calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty following her acquittal.

Mr Mulook told the BBC earlier this week she would need to move to a Western country for her own safety. A number of attempts have previously been made on her life.

Several countries have offered her asylum.


If she dies I hope people understand that her blood is fully on Imran Khan's hands. The government saying she can't leave anymore is basically a second death sentence.
 

Heshinsi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,091
Jews and Christians was still seen as heretics during the golden age

"Although tolerated, protected, and many of them well-to-do, Christians and Jews were not without complaints under Islamic rule. They lived under certain legal and social disabilities. They were considered subjects, not citizens on an equal level with Muslims. Muslims were first class, dhimmis second. Dhimmis could not bear arms or testify in a Muslim court against a Muslim. They could repair or rebuild existing churches but not build new ones on new sites. Christians could not proselytize. A Muslim could marry a Christian woman but a Christian could not marry a Muslim woman unless he converted. A Christian or a Jewish life cost less than a Muslim one in blood money. In their daily life dhimmis were expected to be respectful of Muslims and not to be offensive or provocative. Christians sometimes could not ring church bells. Certain Caliphs like Umar II (717–20) and al-Mutawakkil (847–61) enforced dress restrictions on dhimmis – "for protection," they claimed. Dhimmis were not supposed to ride horses either. The Fatimid Caliph al-Hakim, considered deranged by some, persecuted dhimmis and destroyed the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Balkan Christians in the Ottoman Empire were subject to the dev - shirme, a levy on rural Christian boys. Bright boys were educated and given jobs in the civil service, while others joined the Janissary Corps. Enforcement of the above disabilities was not uniform, varying from Caliph to Caliph and region to region."
Never said they weren't. I'm referring specifically to the behaviour of people like this mob. The treatment of Jews and Christians under Muslims then would constitute as oppression any which way you look at it. These protestors in Pakistan are even more batshit insane than those people in the past is what I'm saying.
 

Deleted member 8257

Oct 26, 2017
24,586
Because a lot of the people that are in the system are part of that mob.
That's not true. Imran Khan is failing his first test as PM. He always sort of sided with Islamists, but he also always held rule of law as Paramount. Which is why the corrupt officials are in tough spot in Pakistan since he got elected. Sadly, I think Imran Khan naively believes that the power of State is gonna protect her. He sees being unable to protect Aasia is failure of government on his part.
 

nu_faust

Member
Oct 27, 2017
300
Smt
I know the current state of things have A LOT to do with external powers fcking things up( british & kashmir, russian afghan occupation, american saudi holy war complex against godless ussr...) and I love my pakistani peeps but I still think creation of Pakistan was a mistake
 
Last edited:

Sabretooth

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,052
India
This is almost borderline victim blaming though - she was targeted out of her faith and minority status, not because she actually did something wrong.

The technicalities of her alleged wronging mean nothing in the context of a perverted justice system.

Stating the facts is not victim blaming. There is a thing that the religious fanatics believe she did, and they are targeting her for it. Are those charges false? Yes. Is the blasphemy law obscene and shitty to begin with? It is. But to say she is being targeted solely for being Christian is ignoring the fact that the majority of people accused of blasphemy in Pakistan are Muslim.
 

Prine

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,724
Why aren't they letting her leave? You obviously can't protect your citizen from a fucking murderous mob, so let her fucking leave.
I believe they said if they do that people will die, these extremist pieces of shit will start blocking roads, spreading misinformation about the courts and government being controlled by Christians and other conspiracy theory rubbish, and we know a simple what'sapp shared video can stoke up mob violence as we saw in India. The government is absolutely on this poor woman's side, and want to uphold the courts verdict, but feels like they're placating extremist leaders to calm people then send her to safety after the crowds have been subdued.

Plenty of Pakistani on her side, who see these extremist as a massive problem for the country .
 

JonnyDBrit

God and Anime
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,015
I believe they said if they do that people will die, these extremist pieces of shit will start blocking roads, spreading misinformation about the courts and government being controlled by Christians and other conspiracy theory rubbish, and we know a simple what'sapp shared video can stoke up mob violence as we saw in India. They're absolutely on this poor woman's side, but feels like they're placating them to calm people then send her to safety after the crowds have been subdued.

Plenty of Pakistani on her side, who see these extremist as a massive problem for the country .

Yep. The Information Minister explicitly said this:
Pakistani Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry told the BBC, "We had two options: either to use force, and when you use force people can be killed. That is not something a state should do... We tried negotiations and (in) negotiations you take something and you leave something."

He defended the agreement against allegations the government was capitulating to extremists:

"We need to take steps against extremism, we need to take steps against such kind of violent protesters and we need to come up with a permanent solution. Right now this is not a cure. This is firefighting, what we are doing. The cure is the real thing and our government is committed to the cure."

Now, whether or not their actions are well founded, particularly given they may further endanger Asia Bibi's life, is another matter. But they are open about the fact this is to keep the rioting from getting worse.
 

spineduke

Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
8,745
Stating the facts is not victim blaming. There is a thing that the religious fanatics believe she did, and they are targeting her for it. Are those charges false? Yes. Is the blasphemy law obscene and shitty to begin with? It is. But to say she is being targeted solely for being Christian is ignoring the fact that the majority of people accused of blasphemy in Pakistan are Muslim.

You're ignoring the fact that religious minorities are often targeted through blasphemy laws.

Stating the facts can very much be victim blaming if you're trying to establish a cause of death as some sort of reasonable expectation within the frameworks of the "law"

You're being disingenuous if you insist that this is relevant to the discussion.
 

StrapOnFetus

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,355
TX
Man this pisses me off. So backwards, I hope she gets asylum to a different country...then as she leaves and the reporters have the camera turned. She takes one look back and gives the bird.
 

Sabretooth

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,052
India
You're ignoring the fact that religious minorities are often targeted through blasphemy laws
Okay look, let me recount the conversation a bit.

Someone commented on the water-is-unclean thing, and blamed it on Islam. jeelybeans replied that this has nothing to do with Islam, and is actually derivative of the caste system. He then got dogpiled on by people who didn't seem to understand the situation well enough. I brought up evidence that he is right, and further elucidated what is going on in this case.

A lot of people in this thread seemed to be under the impression that drinking water from a Christian is somehow illegal, un-Islamic, or is why Asia Bibi was put on death row. I'm just clearing up that that's not the case.

If you want to shit on Pakistan, be my guest. But I'm not about to encourage the spread of misinformation if I can help it.
 

Dr. Ludwig

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,519
The fact that Imran Khan's government caved in to them is so fucked up.

I hoped he would be the one to push back on bullshit like this from Pakistan's fundementalists.
 

Camwi

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
6,375
Normally wouldn't say something like this, but if they want to sacrifice their lives for this, then they should go ahead and kill themselves. Bunch of ignorant assholes.
 

Malleymal

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,283
Fuck these backward ass people that are calling for her death. Who are you to say who lives and dies? They should be tied up and forced to watch people from all different religious beliefs share glasses of waters until they pass out.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,428
Looks like the PM got a taste of his own medicine with people now thinking shutting down the country over minor disagreements is a valid form of protest.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
Please do, that way everyone's happy.

Not really as these are the kinds of men who pursue martyrdom as their way out. Meaning it will inevitably involve taking down innocent life with them when they act.

I know most are quoting that statement as dissent to say byebitch.gif but just remember it's not as if they are going to suicide just themselves. They'll attack with vehicles, weapons or bombs and take down innocent lives around them.
 

Mona

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
26,151
Also don't forget when she was on Death Row in 2011 a Governor who sided with her was assassinated because he said the blasphemy laws take advantage of mob rule.
Here he is with Aasia Bibi:
rSbaKnO.jpg

Gov. Salman Taseer was assassinated on January 4th, 2011 by his own bodyguard Mumtaz Qadri.
Qadri was then seen as a hero by Islamists after he was hung for assassinating the governor.
Here's the funeral of the Assassin:
JgMIO9M.jpg

Et tu, Mumtaz?
 
OP
OP
AcademicSaucer
Oct 25, 2017
13,665
Not really as these are the kinds of men who pursue martyrdom as their way out. Meaning it will inevitably involve taking down innocent life with them when they act.

I know most are quoting that statement as dissent to say byebitch.gif but just remember it's not as if they are going to suicide just themselves. They'll attack with vehicles, weapons or bombs and take down innocent lives around them.
What a mad world we live in
 

Siggy-P

Avenger
Mar 18, 2018
11,865
Not really as these are the kinds of men who pursue martyrdom as their way out. Meaning it will inevitably involve taking down innocent life with them when they act.

I know most are quoting that statement as dissent to say byebitch.gif but just remember it's not as if they are going to suicide just themselves. They'll attack with vehicles, weapons or bombs and take down innocent lives around them.

Aye. They're most likely not willing to die, it's just an exuagration to show how committed they are.

Yep. The Information Minister explicitly said this:


Now, whether or not their actions are well founded, particularly given they may further endanger Asia Bibi's life, is another matter. But they are open about the fact this is to keep the rioting from getting worse.

They capitulated entirely against actual mob violence and threats. The cause has just been reinforced with a clean victory, their attitude and cause will only get worse from this.

This is where you have to understand that the caste system has never been as straightforward as early European interpretations thought. There's also a chicken-and-egg thing going with caste most of the time. Is a janitor lower caste because he is a janitor? Or is he a janitor because he is lower caste? These things always depended on each circumstance.

There is of course, what DosaDaRaja said, where lower castes often converted to other religions to escape their caste restrictions (with various degrees of success). In these cases, upper caste opinions of them probably did not change at all.

In other cases, Muslims and Christians weren't considered to be of the untouchable caste, and were often more respect - but they were still considered impure and untouchable. What's important to understand here is that a lot of the times in South Asia, religious communities stick to their own communities. To get a grasp of how different these communities might be, read the full quote by Jinnah that I posted above:


Questionable as his decisions may be, Jinnah's observations of his time were right: 'religions' in India were virtually different nations that happened to share the same land. Inspired by the caste system, there was essentially an unspoken social contract that each religion will leave the other well alone (this obviously did not always happen, but that's a different story). So when my Hindu mother was advised not to drink at a Muslim family's house, it wasn't because my grandfather considered them to be of an untouchable caste, but of an untouchable community.

The whole concept of religions intermingling at a micro scale was only promulgated only be secular forces in the late 19th and 20th centuries.

These social norms were inherited by Muslims in India too (I would wager other religions too, but I honestly have never heard of any similar situations or cases with Christians or Sikhs), and have passed down to the Pakistan of today. That is why you end up with the water fetched by Bibi to be considered 'unclean', which you probably won't hear about in other Muslim countries.

Now as for those of you confused about how blasphemy comes in: the accusations levelled against Bibi are that she insulted Mohammed after the above incident played out. There are two completely different events involved. Only the first event, the whole water thing, is a South Asian cultural facet inherited from the caste system. The second, the whole blasphemy accusations, those can be found through a big chunk of the Islamic world.



A lot of people in this thread seem to be missing the fact that two separate things happened here. The first, in which the water that Asia Bibi fetched was considered unclean, that one is affected by the caste system. The second, in which Asia Bibi was then charged with blasphemy for insulting Mohammed and attacked by a mob for that same reason, is in line with the culture of some other Muslim countries.

What jeelybeans and I are trying to explain is that the first event, the whole water-is-impure thing, is inherited from the Indian caste system and is not found in other Islamic countries or cultures. To be clear Asia Bibi is not being targeted for offering water, she is being targeted for allegedly insulting Mohammed.

For the record, I think this is an insightful post.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
Aye. They're most likely not willing to die, it's just an exuagration to show how committed they are.

Actually, it's the opposite, the perilous issue with martyrdom is you can find many men willing to die, as long as they manage to take others out. Take out the heretics. Spread your religion/beliefs by the sword.

Suicide is usually a grave sin within all religions, but martyrdom has been sold by extremists as your golden ticket to fame. So if you're a worthless cretin/excuse for a man, with no life prospects or decency around you, you can get your local or international fame, and approval in your Gods eyes, by being a martyr for the cause.

Many young men that get radicalized and think they have no prospects get allured to martyrdom. Some manage to follow through on it, because yes, even radicals can have their evolutionary roots attempt to resist them knowingly going to their death. So some might not follow through, but them spreading propaganda/rhetoric and radicalizing others is still a massive issue.

Most human beings don't want to die, hence why even many purposeful suicide attempts fail, as they can be calls out for help not truly wanting to die. But sell a grand tale of martyrdom, post-life fame, reward and so on, and you get what we have today. Lots of suicide attacks and people committing acts of terrorism they know if it's not death by suicide attack, at the end of it soldiers/cops/FBI or someone is still killing them.

The main goal here will be killing this one woman, so that could be attempted without a suicide attack. However, if anyone helps her/protests on her behalf it might escalate into larger scale attacks which often bring suicide bombings and what not.

When women are under the thumb as much as they are it really requires lots of men to protest and pushback too. Many men in patriarchal societies, especially theocracies, even if not always directly complicit, they still often sit back and do fuck all for change. Sure some might be scared, threatened or in danger too, but often men simply do not do enough. They might not be out killing/attacking random women, but they enjoy some of those other patriarchal "benefits" of suggesting/saying women are lesser than men, should obey men, should be segregated, should be covered up, etc.

edit: And before I get anyone saying #NotAllMen, yes, I know, many men around the world do protest and try to enact change. I'm simply saying the evidence shows often it's far from enough. And you can see yourself from the OP it's almost always exclusively men behaving in/leading these movements.
 
Last edited:

Dahbomb

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,616
Martyrdom also extends to your family when it's promised that your family will get taken care of if you do the deed. Of course that never actually happens and the men who die aren't actually alive to find out.
 

Morrigan

Spear of the Metal Church
Member
Oct 24, 2017
34,308



BBC News: Asia Bibi: Lawyer flees Pakistan in fear of his life

The lawyer representing a Christian woman acquitted of blasphemy after eight years on death row has fled Pakistan in fear for his life.

Saif Mulook told news agency AFP he had to leave so he could continue to represent Asia Bibi, whose conviction was overturned by judges on Wednesday.

Officials have since agreed to bar Ms Bibi from leaving Pakistan in order to end violent protests over the ruling.

Campaigners blasted the deal as akin to signing her "death warrant".

Asia Bibi was convicted in 2010 of insulting the Prophet Muhammad during a row with neighbours, and many are calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty following her acquittal.

Mr Mulook told the BBC earlier this week she would need to move to a Western country for her own safety. A number of attempts have previously been made on her life.


Several countries have offered her asylum.


This is awful. It sucks so bad that he's abandoning her. But if his own life is in danger.... I don't know if I can fully blame him. He has a responsibility to his client, but typically lawyers are not expected to be goddamn bodyguards who are ready to die for their clients either. Since she was already acquitted there was probably nothing else he can do for her anyway. :(
 

Dennis8K

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,161
This is awful. It sucks so bad that he's abandoning her. But if his own life is in danger.... I don't know if I can fully blame him. He has a responsibility to his client, but typically lawyers are not expected to be goddamn bodyguards who are ready to die for their clients either. Since she was already acquitted there was probably nothing else he can do for her anyway. :(
I don't blame him at all. Have you seen the mobs?

What is the lawyer going to do? He did his job in getting her acquitted of the ridiculous charge. He shouldn't he to lose his own life for it.