lmaoThis is the country people side with against Israel. Jesus Christ, at least there I won't be hanged for being a woman or gay.
lmaoThis is the country people side with against Israel. Jesus Christ, at least there I won't be hanged for being a woman or gay.
I have no words... How can you even "fix" a country like this? Where do you start? Better education?
This is like an every day occurence type thing that can happen in a household because it happened in the household of one of my family a while ago and this is in an affluent household, not some poor village.
WooooooowAlso don't forget when she was on Death Row in 2011 a Governor who sided with her was assassinated because he said the blasphemy laws take advantage of mob rule.
Here he is with Aasia Bibi:
Gov. Salman Taseer was assassinated on January 4th, 2011 by his own bodyguard Mumtaz Qadri.
Qadri was then seen as a hero by Islamists after he was hung for assassinating the governor.
Here's the funeral of the Assassin:
Because a lot of the people that are in the system are part of that mob.Why aren't they letting her leave? You obviously can't protect your citizen from a fucking murderous mob, so let her fucking leave.
So are Christians automatically put into the untouchable caste or something?
Because from my understanding caste are based on origins of the family or the socioeconomic standing of a person.
For instance those individuals involved in janitorial or sewer work are considered untouchables.
Asia Bibi seemed to be working the same job as the other women who claimed she committed blasphemy, and refused to drink water because she was Christian and they were Muslim.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/re...enced-to-death-in-Pakistan-for-blasphemy.html
The court heard she had been working as a farmhand in fields with other women, when she was asked to fetch drinking water.
Some of the other women – all Muslims – refused to drink the water as it had been brought by a Christian and was therefore "unclean", according to Mrs Bibi's evidence, sparking a row.
The incident was forgotten until a few days later when Mrs Bibi said she was set upon by a mob.
It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam and Hinduism. They are not religions in the strict sense of the word, but are, in fact, different and distinct social orders, and it is a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality, and this misconception of one Indian nation has troubles and will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, litterateurs. They neither intermarry nor interdine together and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspect on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Mussalmans (Muslims) derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes, and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other and, likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built for the government of such a state.
So other incidents where Muslims, in other countries, call for death of others for goofy reasons are also related to the Indian caste system?
Because craziness like this isn't exclusive to Pakistan.
Hard to believe that one aspect of the Indian culture affected Pakistan so much that they are willing to kill.
The fuck?
And I say it as 'low caste' Indian. Fuck off with this shit. It has nothing to do with caste system and everyth to do with islam. Stop blaming India for every ill Pakistan has.
To be clear Asia Bibi is not being targeted for offering water, she is being targeted for allegedly insulting Mohammed.
Because a lot of people in this thread don't seem to have their facts straight? I mean agree with you, it's a horrible situation what she's going through. But if you're going to analyse why it's happening at all, it's going to help to understand what actually happened instead of conflating all the details.I'm questioning why you need to point this out - in any case her persecution is real and obscene.
Because a lot of people in this thread don't seem to have their facts straight? I mean agree with you, it's a horrible situation what she's going through. But if you're going to analyse why it's happening at all, it's going to help to understand what actually happened instead of conflating all the details.
BBC News: Asia Bibi: Lawyer flees Pakistan in fear of his life
The lawyer representing a Christian woman acquitted of blasphemy after eight years on death row has fled Pakistan in fear for his life.
Saif Mulook told news agency AFP he had to leave so he could continue to represent Asia Bibi, whose conviction was overturned by judges on Wednesday.
Officials have since agreed to bar Ms Bibi from leaving Pakistan in order to end violent protests over the ruling.
Campaigners blasted the deal as akin to signing her "death warrant".
Asia Bibi was convicted in 2010 of insulting the Prophet Muhammad during a row with neighbours, and many are calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty following her acquittal.
Mr Mulook told the BBC earlier this week she would need to move to a Western country for her own safety. A number of attempts have previously been made on her life.
Several countries have offered her asylum.
Never said they weren't. I'm referring specifically to the behaviour of people like this mob. The treatment of Jews and Christians under Muslims then would constitute as oppression any which way you look at it. These protestors in Pakistan are even more batshit insane than those people in the past is what I'm saying.Jews and Christians was still seen as heretics during the golden age
"Although tolerated, protected, and many of them well-to-do, Christians and Jews were not without complaints under Islamic rule. They lived under certain legal and social disabilities. They were considered subjects, not citizens on an equal level with Muslims. Muslims were first class, dhimmis second. Dhimmis could not bear arms or testify in a Muslim court against a Muslim. They could repair or rebuild existing churches but not build new ones on new sites. Christians could not proselytize. A Muslim could marry a Christian woman but a Christian could not marry a Muslim woman unless he converted. A Christian or a Jewish life cost less than a Muslim one in blood money. In their daily life dhimmis were expected to be respectful of Muslims and not to be offensive or provocative. Christians sometimes could not ring church bells. Certain Caliphs like Umar II (717–20) and al-Mutawakkil (847–61) enforced dress restrictions on dhimmis – "for protection," they claimed. Dhimmis were not supposed to ride horses either. The Fatimid Caliph al-Hakim, considered deranged by some, persecuted dhimmis and destroyed the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Balkan Christians in the Ottoman Empire were subject to the dev - shirme, a levy on rural Christian boys. Bright boys were educated and given jobs in the civil service, while others joined the Janissary Corps. Enforcement of the above disabilities was not uniform, varying from Caliph to Caliph and region to region."
That's not true. Imran Khan is failing his first test as PM. He always sort of sided with Islamists, but he also always held rule of law as Paramount. Which is why the corrupt officials are in tough spot in Pakistan since he got elected. Sadly, I think Imran Khan naively believes that the power of State is gonna protect her. He sees being unable to protect Aasia is failure of government on his part.Because a lot of the people that are in the system are part of that mob.
This is only because of the leadership of the country does not care about the country.
This is almost borderline victim blaming though - she was targeted out of her faith and minority status, not because she actually did something wrong.
The technicalities of her alleged wronging mean nothing in the context of a perverted justice system.
I believe they said if they do that people will die, these extremist pieces of shit will start blocking roads, spreading misinformation about the courts and government being controlled by Christians and other conspiracy theory rubbish, and we know a simple what'sapp shared video can stoke up mob violence as we saw in India. The government is absolutely on this poor woman's side, and want to uphold the courts verdict, but feels like they're placating extremist leaders to calm people then send her to safety after the crowds have been subdued.Why aren't they letting her leave? You obviously can't protect your citizen from a fucking murderous mob, so let her fucking leave.
I believe they said if they do that people will die, these extremist pieces of shit will start blocking roads, spreading misinformation about the courts and government being controlled by Christians and other conspiracy theory rubbish, and we know a simple what'sapp shared video can stoke up mob violence as we saw in India. They're absolutely on this poor woman's side, but feels like they're placating them to calm people then send her to safety after the crowds have been subdued.
Plenty of Pakistani on her side, who see these extremist as a massive problem for the country .
Pakistani Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry told the BBC, "We had two options: either to use force, and when you use force people can be killed. That is not something a state should do... We tried negotiations and (in) negotiations you take something and you leave something."
He defended the agreement against allegations the government was capitulating to extremists:
"We need to take steps against extremism, we need to take steps against such kind of violent protesters and we need to come up with a permanent solution. Right now this is not a cure. This is firefighting, what we are doing. The cure is the real thing and our government is committed to the cure."
Stating the facts is not victim blaming. There is a thing that the religious fanatics believe she did, and they are targeting her for it. Are those charges false? Yes. Is the blasphemy law obscene and shitty to begin with? It is. But to say she is being targeted solely for being Christian is ignoring the fact that the majority of people accused of blasphemy in Pakistan are Muslim.
Okay look, let me recount the conversation a bit.You're ignoring the fact that religious minorities are often targeted through blasphemy laws
Please do, that way everyone's happy.
They call him Taliban khan for a reason.The fact that Imran Khan's government caved in to them is so fucked up.
I hoped he would be the one to push back on bullshit like this from Pakistan's fundementalists.
Also don't forget when she was on Death Row in 2011 a Governor who sided with her was assassinated because he said the blasphemy laws take advantage of mob rule.
Here he is with Aasia Bibi:
Gov. Salman Taseer was assassinated on January 4th, 2011 by his own bodyguard Mumtaz Qadri.
Qadri was then seen as a hero by Islamists after he was hung for assassinating the governor.
Here's the funeral of the Assassin:
What a mad world we live inNot really as these are the kinds of men who pursue martyrdom as their way out. Meaning it will inevitably involve taking down innocent life with them when they act.
I know most are quoting that statement as dissent to say byebitch.gif but just remember it's not as if they are going to suicide just themselves. They'll attack with vehicles, weapons or bombs and take down innocent lives around them.
Not really as these are the kinds of men who pursue martyrdom as their way out. Meaning it will inevitably involve taking down innocent life with them when they act.
I know most are quoting that statement as dissent to say byebitch.gif but just remember it's not as if they are going to suicide just themselves. They'll attack with vehicles, weapons or bombs and take down innocent lives around them.
Yep. The Information Minister explicitly said this:
Now, whether or not their actions are well founded, particularly given they may further endanger Asia Bibi's life, is another matter. But they are open about the fact this is to keep the rioting from getting worse.
This is where you have to understand that the caste system has never been as straightforward as early European interpretations thought. There's also a chicken-and-egg thing going with caste most of the time. Is a janitor lower caste because he is a janitor? Or is he a janitor because he is lower caste? These things always depended on each circumstance.
There is of course, what DosaDaRaja said, where lower castes often converted to other religions to escape their caste restrictions (with various degrees of success). In these cases, upper caste opinions of them probably did not change at all.
In other cases, Muslims and Christians weren't considered to be of the untouchable caste, and were often more respect - but they were still considered impure and untouchable. What's important to understand here is that a lot of the times in South Asia, religious communities stick to their own communities. To get a grasp of how different these communities might be, read the full quote by Jinnah that I posted above:
Questionable as his decisions may be, Jinnah's observations of his time were right: 'religions' in India were virtually different nations that happened to share the same land. Inspired by the caste system, there was essentially an unspoken social contract that each religion will leave the other well alone (this obviously did not always happen, but that's a different story). So when my Hindu mother was advised not to drink at a Muslim family's house, it wasn't because my grandfather considered them to be of an untouchable caste, but of an untouchable community.
The whole concept of religions intermingling at a micro scale was only promulgated only be secular forces in the late 19th and 20th centuries.
These social norms were inherited by Muslims in India too (I would wager other religions too, but I honestly have never heard of any similar situations or cases with Christians or Sikhs), and have passed down to the Pakistan of today. That is why you end up with the water fetched by Bibi to be considered 'unclean', which you probably won't hear about in other Muslim countries.
Now as for those of you confused about how blasphemy comes in: the accusations levelled against Bibi are that she insulted Mohammed after the above incident played out. There are two completely different events involved. Only the first event, the whole water thing, is a South Asian cultural facet inherited from the caste system. The second, the whole blasphemy accusations, those can be found through a big chunk of the Islamic world.
A lot of people in this thread seem to be missing the fact that two separate things happened here. The first, in which the water that Asia Bibi fetched was considered unclean, that one is affected by the caste system. The second, in which Asia Bibi was then charged with blasphemy for insulting Mohammed and attacked by a mob for that same reason, is in line with the culture of some other Muslim countries.
What jeelybeans and I are trying to explain is that the first event, the whole water-is-impure thing, is inherited from the Indian caste system and is not found in other Islamic countries or cultures. To be clear Asia Bibi is not being targeted for offering water, she is being targeted for allegedly insulting Mohammed.
Aye. They're most likely not willing to die, it's just an exuagration to show how committed they are.
BBC News: Asia Bibi: Lawyer flees Pakistan in fear of his life
The lawyer representing a Christian woman acquitted of blasphemy after eight years on death row has fled Pakistan in fear for his life.
Saif Mulook told news agency AFP he had to leave so he could continue to represent Asia Bibi, whose conviction was overturned by judges on Wednesday.
Officials have since agreed to bar Ms Bibi from leaving Pakistan in order to end violent protests over the ruling.
Campaigners blasted the deal as akin to signing her "death warrant".
Asia Bibi was convicted in 2010 of insulting the Prophet Muhammad during a row with neighbours, and many are calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty following her acquittal.
Mr Mulook told the BBC earlier this week she would need to move to a Western country for her own safety. A number of attempts have previously been made on her life.
Several countries have offered her asylum.
That gif is amazing. Thanks for the laugh
I don't blame him at all. Have you seen the mobs?This is awful. It sucks so bad that he's abandoning her. But if his own life is in danger.... I don't know if I can fully blame him. He has a responsibility to his client, but typically lawyers are not expected to be goddamn bodyguards who are ready to die for their clients either. Since she was already acquitted there was probably nothing else he can do for her anyway. :(
You're right. I do agree. I just feel really bad for Asia.I don't blame him at all. Have you seen the mobs?
What is the lawyer going to do? He did his job in getting her acquitted of the ridiculous charge. He shouldn't he to lose his own life for it.