you will find similar comments on any less than perfect review on any highly anticipated game. that doesn't tell you much about the source of the review.Question guys, I'm not familiar with Slant magazine, what is the general consensus on them? I stumbled upon the review itself and it didn't seem too bad but the comments..... man people were BIG mad.
Jeff's tastes are very particular. He can't stand Witcher 3, last of us, RDR, older splinter cell games, majority of horror games. But he loves stuff like saints row, assassin's Creeds, cods. Basically games that go for immersion and pseudo realism and the heavy narrative focus at the expense of tight controls and immediate rewards and gameplay loops are big no no from himThat's really why I can't get into Giant Bomb. Jeff is just indifferent to practically everything. Nothing ever excites him that I've ever seen, and he's just so cynical to the point that it's off-putting.
Watching Jeff Gerstman's indifference as Brad played live a while ago...lol. Not a fan.
Jeff has just never been into a Rockstar game period.
I also don't think he loves or really enjoys many singe player open world experiences. He literally couldn't care less about games like RDR2, GTAV, or Witcher 3.
That's what makes it better than GTA thoughThis game is making me wish I liked the last RDR just so I can look at the visuals. Lol. I kinda wish this series didn't take itself so seriously though tbh, kinda like gta, i'd be a lot more into it if it wasn't trying to be a cowboy sim I think.
So you'd rather have him fake interest? He wasn't a fan of the first game and this isn't changing things enough for his taste. I'd rather have a dude be authentic rather than fake it to try to fit what everyone else does.
Honestly I find it hilarious but it does get annoying when you love a game so much and they really don't care. Keep in mind they're all pretty jaded about the industry and have been doing this for decades (well not the younger staff and Dan)
I don't agree with that at all. I don't see why the game taking itself seriously is a bad thing, and I definitely don't think more GTA humor is needed in games other than GTAThis game is making me wish I liked the last RDR just so I can look at the visuals. Lol. I kinda wish this series didn't take itself so seriously though tbh, kinda like gta, i'd be a lot more into it if it wasn't trying to be a cowboy sim I think.
Yeah that's definitely part of it. And there's nothing wrong with that. It's just not what im lookin for in this medium.I think Jeff wants games to be games. Everything he's into is meant for short bursts (fighters, Hitman, CoD/PUBG, Windjammers, tapping games, etc), and I don't think he enjoys games with downtime.
I think Jeff wants games to be games. Everything he's into is meant for short bursts (fighters, Hitman, CoD/PUBG, Windjammers, tapping games, etc), and I don't think he enjoys games with downtime.
I think Jeff wants games to be games. Everything he's into is meant for short bursts (fighters, Hitman, CoD/PUBG, Windjammers, tapping games, etc), and I don't think he enjoys games with downtime.
It actually makes perfect sense. What you're seeing is simply the effect of PS4 being more popular, PS4 versions will always get more reviews. The way you're thinking means that they could remove the scores for Xbox, PC and Switch altogether because the version with the most reviews, PS4, will always show the most correct meta for all versions. I couldn't disagree more really.This still doesn't make sense. The PS4 version is the one most reviews so it got the correct meta, it's the same as GTA IV for Xbox 360.
Yeah but then he said that all stems from him hating playing Arthur because Arthur was a bad guy, it was almost insufferable to listen to.I really enjoyed hearing Greg Miller's thoughts on the game on Jared Petty's podcast. He expressed a lot of the same concerns I have going into the game (it takes itself too seriously to the point where it actual feels MORE video-gamey) and says he prefers Odyssey. I'm thinking it might be the same for me, Odyssey is my GOTY so far easily.
Question guys, I'm not familiar with Slant magazine, what is the general consensus on them? I stumbled upon the review itself and it didn't seem too bad but the comments..... man people were BIG mad.
That's really why I can't get into Giant Bomb. Jeff is just indifferent to practically everything. Nothing ever excites him that I've ever seen, and he's just so cynical to the point that it's off-putting.
Theres a digital foundry thread floating around. Your answer is there.
I'd like to think we're pretty balanced, though unafraid of extensively criticizing something. Reviews tend to be on the shorter side (I was allowed to go much longer on Red Dead than normal), with use of the entire 5-star scale.
We also have some wildly divergent opinions between different critics; I call out Breath of the Wild as what I think is one of the best open world games in the Red Dead review, for example, but the proper review on Slant from another critic came in with a 3 out of 5. A lot of us pay attention to a game's politics and themes, which tends to get us in trouble with a certain crowd.
The site is primarily known for the film coverage, but reviews run for all sorts of different media.
The majority of the angry comments are, I imagine, folks who clicked over from Metacritic rather than regular readers.
(I'm just freelance and have been writing pretty regular game reviews there for coming up on a year now, for the record).
I thought Jeff really dug GTA V
Yup: https://www.giantbomb.com/reviews/grand-theft-auto-v-review/1900-598/
I thought Jeff really dug GTA V
Yup: https://www.giantbomb.com/reviews/grand-theft-auto-v-review/1900-598/
Go over to the DF thread. The results have shocked nearly everyone, its pretty one sided. Native 4k/30 on X.
He loves eras fav type of games. The bayonettas, ninja gaidens and bloodbornes of the world.That's really why I can't get into Giant Bomb. Jeff is just indifferent to practically everything. Nothing ever excites him that I've ever seen, and he's just so cynical to the point that it's off-putting.
Well hey, they still make GTA at least.I couldn't disagree more. RDR was super boring to me. GTA at least felt like it had a pulse.
Yeah but then he said that all stems from him hating playing Arthur because Arthur was a bad guy, it was almost insufferable to listen to.
Blood in the Sand was fun though...Yeah I saw that after I followed the conversation backwards. Starting with your post just threw me off is all. Gave me a chuckle.
I stopped following GB after Davis died but yeah, that's just how Jeff is. He'll get excited for something dumb like 50 Cent Blood in the Sand and then poo poo something that's clearly good. Thankfully having other people around helps balance things out.
What's wrong with that?I mean, they gave, with his heavy influence, GOTY to PUBG. I just don't understand that.
There's a fair smattering of humour in it apparentlyThis game is making me wish I liked the last RDR just so I can look at the visuals. Lol. I kinda wish this series didn't take itself so seriously though tbh, kinda like gta, i'd be a lot more into it if it wasn't trying to be a cowboy sim I think.
He actually loves games, just not this game.That's really why I can't get into Giant Bomb. Jeff is just indifferent to practically everything. Nothing ever excites him that I've ever seen, and he's just so cynical to the point that it's off-putting.
Blood in the Sand was fun though...
The first 50 Cent game was not good
What's wrong with that?
I couldn't disagree more. RDR was super boring to me. GTA at least felt like it had a pulse.
He loves eras fav type of games. The bayonettas, ninja gaidens and bloodbornes of the world.
He's hated Souls for years and thought Bloodborne was okay. Can't remember his thoughts on Ninja Gaiden or Bayo though.He loves eras fav type of games. The bayonettas, ninja gaidens and bloodbornes of the world.
That's my exact worry about the game though, Arthur doesn't seem at all likeable to me.
I want to be able to play as a good guy, or at least a redeemable Arthur. The game is called Red Dead Redemption, after all.
Problem i find though is that people who love those types of games cannot fathom there being any other kind of gaming experience, or think games that try to do something slightly different are of less merit.
Be careful now. No one likes it when you call out cognitive dissonance on here.
Danny O'dwyer is obviously not racist (same as colin) but he's a liberal full on. Unlike Colin who would consider himself more of a conservative even though he leans liberal on social issues (LGBT/abortion etc.). Danny being a full liberal keeps him safe.
People only care about labels afterall.
High Plains Drifter. That is one nihilistic film.I love the first Red Dead and that's my main concern as well. I'm certain Arthur has some sympathetic qualities and I'm sure he's at least redeemable like you said. I can't think a single classic western where the protagonist isn't at least redeemable or show remorse or quilt towards past actions.
No, I mean, generally. He seems unenthusiastic about the art form to me, with very limited exceptions.
It wasn't a complete game at the time, for starters, but it's also just not a huge achievement in design or ambition. It's a game mode, and compared to some of the incredible achievements in 2017, just pales. It's also janky, glitchy, etc.
For me, I don't equate GOTY with the one I played the most, or what gave me the most fun. BOTW, Horizon, Mario, RE7...I just don't see PUBG measuring up.
He's hated Souls for years and thought Bloodborne was okay. Can't remember his thoughts on Ninja Gaiden or Bayo though.
That's really why I can't get into Giant Bomb. Jeff is just indifferent to practically everything. Nothing ever excites him that I've ever seen, and he's just so cynical to the point that it's off-putting.
I personally think if a GTA5, Mario Odyssey or BOTW can get a 97 or 98 then games like Witcher 3 and God of War deserve that kind of score as well.what are some recent games that you think deserved a 97 or 98 recently that didn't get there?
deserve may not be the right word maybe, since these scores are just an aggregate of personal opinion of reviewers, but i'm curious what games you think were snubbed from getting to those numbers.