• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

OrangeAtlas

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,109
20171010-pops.jpg-resize_then_crop-_frame_bg_color_FFF-h_1365-gravity_center-q_70-preserve_ratio_true-w_2048_.webp



????
 

jett

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,657
if pops is worth 50 billion and a payroller it's good for the art of cinema
Pops isn't gonna bankroll his baby indefinitely. The film division head was fired 10 days ago. The company president and the CFO left three months ago. Annapurna either gets a hit or that studio is done.
 

ViewtifulJC

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
21,020
We haven't made enough jokes about the Nun's PTA being a very sinister $666

Also I wanna applaud Annapurna because Megan Ellison is just a big cinephille, giving millions of dollars to Paul Thomas Anderson, Spike Jonze, Wong Kar-Wai, Todd Sondoz, Mike Mills, Barry Jenkins, Jacques Audiard, Coens, Linklater, etc. But a lot of those movies just dont make a lot of money vs what they cost to produce, and Annapurna expanding from production to distributor has only increased their sunk costs exponentially. Their marketing/advertising/distribution strategies are so tragic. Why the fuck is The Sisters Brothers in 1,000 theaters this weekend? Why does nobody know about it? Why did it cost almost $40 million??? Good movie, but c'mon now...
 

poptire

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
9,977
No one deserves success more than Judy Greer. She's one of my favorite actor/comedians ever so it's extra awesome to see Halloween doing so well.
 

Slayven

Never read a comic in his life
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
93,095
We haven't made enough jokes about the Nun's PTA being a very sinister $666

Also I wanna applaud Annapurna because Megan Ellison is just a big cinephille, giving millions of dollars to Paul Thomas Anderson, Spike Jonze, Wong Kar-Wai, Todd Sondoz, Mike Mills, Barry Jenkins, Jacques Audiard, Coens, Linklater, etc. But a lot of those movies just dont make a lot of money vs what they cost to produce, and Annapurna expanding from production to distributor has only increased their sunk costs exponentially. Their marketing/advertising/distribution strategies are so tragic. Why the fuck is The Sisters Brothers in 1,000 theaters this weekend? Why does nobody know about it? Why did it cost almost $40 million??? Good movie, but c'mon now...
Tell me, is Common a good actor and I am blind?
 

Leland Palmer

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
623
We haven't made enough jokes about the Nun's PTA being a very sinister $666

Also I wanna applaud Annapurna because Megan Ellison is just a big cinephille, giving millions of dollars to Paul Thomas Anderson, Spike Jonze, Wong Kar-Wai, Todd Sondoz, Mike Mills, Barry Jenkins, Jacques Audiard, Coens, Linklater, etc. But a lot of those movies just dont make a lot of money vs what they cost to produce, and Annapurna expanding from production to distributor has only increased their sunk costs exponentially. Their marketing/advertising/distribution strategies are so tragic. Why the fuck is The Sisters Brothers in 1,000 theaters this weekend? Why does nobody know about it? Why did it cost almost $40 million??? Good movie, but c'mon now...
They are good movies but the audience ain't in the same level. I will feel sad when annapurna stops being a thing.
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,351
If A24 would stop being scared of giving their films wide releases, they'd be a juggernaut right now.
 

Cosmo Kramer

Prophet of Regret - Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,180
México
Saw Halloween today, great movie and deserved hawl. I miss classic horror movies, everything has a gimick now and it sucks ass. Nothing simpler than a guy in a mask that just won't give up.
 
If A24 would stop being scared of giving their films wide releases, they'd be a juggernaut right now.
I don't think they're scared at all: just realistic about what can do well at the box office and what won't. Something like First Reformed was never going to be a box office draw, whereas something like Hereditary had both the kind of genre thrills that people look for in a horror movie while also boasting a lot of unusual qualities that critics look for.
 

hodayathink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,054
I don't think they're scared at all: just realistic about what can do well at the box office and what won't. Something like First Reformed was never going to be a box office draw, whereas something like Hereditary had both the kind of genre thrills that people look for in a horror movie while also boasting a lot of unusual qualities that critics look for.

That being said, A24 does screw up in either not releasing wide enough in the end, or not doing it fast enough a fair amount. For example, Disaster Artist last year should have opened wider than it did because the buzz was clearly there, and some of their indie releases they never push above 200-400 theaters even though the WoM/buzz seems to be there (I'm still annoyed I never got to see Florida Project until a plane ride this year).
 
That being said, A24 does screw up in either not releasing wide enough in the end, or not doing it fast enough a fair amount. For example, Disaster Artist last year should have opened wider than it did because the buzz was clearly there, and some of their indie releases they never push above 200-400 theaters even though the WoM/buzz seems to be there (I'm still annoyed I never got to see Florida Project until a plane ride this year).
I love The Florida Project to pieces and I'm glad I was able to catch it in a theater when I had the chance, but I don't think it would have ever had a chance in wide release with its slice-of-life approach to the storytelling and the difficulty of selling a movie that stars children and also carries an R-rating.
 

VinylCassette64

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
2,425


Annapurna sucks lmao

Beautiful Bomba numbers aint good either. Or Flop Man. Or Bomba Times at the El Royale.

(sorry not sorry)


Bomba 25? :v

(Likely not considering how recent Bond films have done, and Universal's covering the international release. But I do wonder if MGM(/EON) are getting cold feet on the co-distribution deal they've struck up with them last year...)

That Nutcracker movie comes out next week. Does anyone care?

Wait, what? I thought that was coming out in December. Did Disney do a stealth release date move?

It's going to be amazing if this somehow makes enough money to break even, instead of continuing Disney's bomba streak of expensive live-action non-remake/POTC films.
 
Last edited:

GoutPatrol

Member
Oct 30, 2017
1,695
The entire approach behind this film was giving Halloween the Force Awakens treatment.

'We're gonna give this franchise the respect it deserves, we're gonna make it feel like the original, none of the crap is canon anymore, we got the original star back as lead', etc. It all paid off big time for Blumhouse.

I mean, they did the same thing 20 years ago with H20. Don't you remember that marketing, Jamie Lee Curtis coming back, the bad movies being taken out of the canon...the same thing! And it worked again!
 

Seeya

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,984
What makes the new Halloween divisive? I've only seen glowing praise or outright dejection
 

VinylCassette64

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
2,425
I could see it doing ok during holiday season.

This early is pants on head dumb. It won't even stay in theaters long enough to last through holiday season.

It's also another example of Disney self-cannibalizing their own studio releases, they have WDAS's Ralph Breaks The Internet later in November and Mary Poppins Returns in December. Film's easily going to get lost in the shuffle, and that's not even counting the studio competition.
 

ElBoxy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,134
What makes the new Halloween divisive? I've only seen glowing praise or outright dejection
Certain tropes are outdated due to wanting to pay respects to the original, not all the characters are fleshed out, and the shifts between horror and comedy can be seen as too much. At the end of the day it's a competent modern slasher movie that doesn't elevate the genre but doesn't come off as a joke.
 
Last edited:

hodayathink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,054
I love The Florida Project to pieces and I'm glad I was able to catch it in a theater when I had the chance, but I don't think it would have ever had a chance in wide release with its slice-of-life approach to the storytelling and the difficulty of selling a movie that stars children and also carries an R-rating.

I'm not talking about a truly wide release, Florida Project never made it above 230 theaters. I could have expanded into the 400-800 theater range and done alright, but it never did. If you're positioning a movie as an Oscar contender (which they were, especially Dafoe for Supporting Actor), then you should at least try to truly play it more wide than that.
 
Oct 28, 2017
13,691
We haven't made enough jokes about the Nun's PTA being a very sinister $666

Also I wanna applaud Annapurna because Megan Ellison is just a big cinephille, giving millions of dollars to Paul Thomas Anderson, Spike Jonze, Wong Kar-Wai, Todd Sondoz, Mike Mills, Barry Jenkins, Jacques Audiard, Coens, Linklater, etc. But a lot of those movies just dont make a lot of money vs what they cost to produce, and Annapurna expanding from production to distributor has only increased their sunk costs exponentially. Their marketing/advertising/distribution strategies are so tragic. Why the fuck is The Sisters Brothers in 1,000 theaters this weekend? Why does nobody know about it? Why did it cost almost $40 million??? Good movie, but c'mon now...

Movie looks like shit. Trailer is awful. Surprised it's actually good
 

lazybones18

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
17,339
Pretty much forgot what the hell The Sisters Brothers was until I saw the poster on BOM. I'll go see it Wednesday night
 

NealMcCauley

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,501


At the moment the IMAX near me is only showing it once per day at 11:15pm. We'll see if more times are added.
 

Seeya

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,984
Venoms Monday is notably under what some of its contemporaries did (in raw dollars) at the time, it's possible that all of this competition is getting to it, though it still had a solid wow Monday drop.

In retrospect Sony cutting a deal with Tencent was a really under appreciated move at the time, Venom is being pushed hard on tencents popular social media and chat apps, and is going to hit in a sweet spot that marks a relative dry spell since the last Hollywood film came out (MI in early September).

Ok Predator comes out on Oct 26th but it's not expected to do much overall.

I'm pretty sure that Tencent having a 25% stake will end up being worth it for both parties, and position Venom strongly in China for an inevitable sequel.
 
Last edited:

Bronx-Man

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,351
I feel like January is the final key to determine if conventional scheduling really is dead. Almost no studio to this day would even consider releasing a blockbuster in that month.
 

Seeya

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,984
Also Halloween's Monday is down 71%. You can not overstate how successful it has been, but it doesn't seem like the film will have the legs stay close to Venom longer term. Still a massive massive success.
 

berzeli

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,384
So, I think all the Annapurna bashing in this thread w/r/t to Sisters Brothers is very unfair and not tethered to reality. Sure the budget for it was $38M, but so was the budget for True Grit. But more importantly, Annapurna only paid $9M for distribution rights so if we crunch the numbers... it's only a massive financial failure and not a crippling one. At least it made more money than the other Comedy-Western film from noted indie filmmakers we got this year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.