Got it. But you sure you didn't look up how many fluid ounces are in a pound :p
16.
I memorized kitchen measurements as a kid. And multiplication tables, soGot it. But you sure you didn't look up how many fluid ounces are in a pound :p
Not bad. But I still beat you. LolI memorized kitchen measurements as a kid. And multiplication tables, so
Seriously? 15,000A pints a pound the world around. 16*15 = 240oz. I have no fucking clue how many milliliters are in a kilogram.
That's a lot of work when you could just use the metric systemSimple. This is how I worked it out in my head.
16 oz in a pound
16 x 15 = ?
10 x 15 = 150
5 x 15 = 75
150 + 75 = 225
225 + 15 = 240
So 240
A pints a pound the world around. 16*15 = 240oz. I have no fucking clue how many milliliters are in a kilogram.
That's a lot of work when you could just use the metric system
I love that this thread pays so much attention to the metric vs imperial weekly debate that most everyone just glossed over a huge assumption.
Only if density is 1 g/cm3
That's a lot of work when you could just use her Majesty's imperial system of weights and measures.1ml = 1g; 1000g = 1kg; 15000g = 15kg; 15000ml = 15kg.
Wtf is fluid ounce??????
Lol, that you have to memorize the exact measurements or you couldn't do it without something to look it up with.That's a lot of work when you could just use her Majesty's imperial system of weights and measures.
Is the op talking about water?BTW, according to technology, it only takes 230.1 fluid ounces to have 15 pounds of water.
I love that this thread pays so much attention to the metric vs imperial weekly debate that most everyone just glossed over a huge assumption.
That seems to be what most everyone is assuming.