• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Clefargle

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,124
Limburg
Not really, less parts, smaller screen, probably built in controls, without dock, without HDMI cable, smaller package, smaller shipping costs...we probably talking around $100 difference compared to regular Switch.

Built-in controls and removal of the dock doesn't actually "switch" anymore though. What you're describing would split the userbase and is not simply a "cheaper switch"
 

Cuburger

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,975
It would be interesting if they are able to have a 1080p screen and basically have a version of the Switch that doesn't have to downgrade to run portably but does it just as an optional mode to save power. I don't know if that's feasible, but it seems like a way to slowly phase out the OG version while not having new hardware being as hampered by being compatible with a low power mode, at least in my mind.
 

Skittzo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
41,037
I'd wait for a bit before seeing when the other consoles launch, how the next-gen transition model is, and what support the Switch gets in 2019. For now we know about games like DOOM Eternal and Ark, those one is the most demanding game on hardware out there and the other won't be puny either. Let's wait until the 32GB cards come, and to see what's in store and then we can speculate about that part. I don't think next-gen only games will be a thing for a while, honestly. And that benefits the Switch.

Yeah I don't doubt that at all which is exactly why I don't think a pro revision is necessary this soon. They can release a pro model in 2021 or so which could compete a lot better than one released in 2019.

But anyway my point is, if the purpose of this new pro revision is to get next gen ports then those ports wouldn't be able to come to the base Switch at all. And like you said I don't know how true that is. Developers and insiders have said card costs and capacity are affecting ports more than processing power. That and ROI.

Nintendo has no rules like that currently, why force 3rd parties? Also, Nintendo is the only company to release a more powerful version of a platform and release exclusive games on it, "dsi ware" and new 3ds only games existed, they also planned to do something similar with the Snes CD and n64dd. This is nothing new for Nintendo.

That's true I guess. Doesn't make it any less shitty of them if they do it though.
 

Lizardus

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,276
I'd be more than happy with smaller bezels (resulting in slightly bigger screen) and enough extra juice for native undocked (720p) and 900p-1080p docked (both modes also offer better framerates and visual quality) for exclusives and first party games (games like DOOM and Wolf 2 can be 720p-900p with better framerate and visual quality). 2019 is too early for a Super Super Switch 2 (with full backwards compatibility).
 

mrmoose

Member
Nov 13, 2017
21,190
Complete system transfer functionality has been available on the Switch for ages. It's tucked away in the settings.


Hmm... but what about transferring one user? I wouldn't mind letting my daughter have this switch, but not having the ability to move all my (or her) saves over would be a hassle.
 

Deleted member 5159

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,704
So, i realize this thread is well past it's usefulness by now but it seems to me that nobody is actually reading the article sourced by the op. I'll take a deeper dive at this confusing piece that starts with a:

Sales of the Switch, introduced in March 2017, are still solid but are no longer delivering the favorable surprises that marked the machine's first year on the market.

Oh, you're not doing so well nintendo.


Between its introduction last year and June 30 of this year, Nintendo sold 19.7 million units of the Switch, a pace that compares favorably with Sony Corp.'s PlayStation 4, the most popular console among the current generation of videogame players.

But the switch is selling at "a pace that compares favorably" to the fastest selling console of all time...Which it means, it is doing very well, right?

So, ok, Nintendo may or may not be doing well but a revision is coming according to this piece, but what's changing?

Nintendo is still debating what new hardware and software features to include in the upgrade and weighing the cost of the features, people with knowledge of the discussions said.

Eh, is it even feasible that some months before a revision is made Nintendo hasnt decided on the hardware? Seems very very unlikely.

Thankfully someone has a clue

One option is improving the display, they said. The current Switch uses a lower-end liquid-crystal display without some technologies that are standard in more recent smartphone LCDs.

"People with knowledge of the discussion" said that the one thing nobody is complaining about (the screen) might be changed, or not, who knows.

Then, we have the most important part of the article

The upgraded Switch would likely share many features with the current version and be compatible with existing Switch game software.

Software makers and others in the industry are watching whether Nintendo will clarify the future of its hand-held 3DS videogame device when it decides on the next Switch.

So, why would an upgraded switch answer questions about the future of the 3ds, when the 3ds is known for being a cheaper product for a younger demographic, and an upgrade on the switch would surely result on a product at least as expensive as the one we have now.

An executive at one software maker said the 3DS was increasingly overshadowed by smartphones that are well-suited to portable games. He said he was waiting for a "clear message" from Nintendo about what it would do with the 3DS series when it puts out a new Switch.

At the same time, software makers seem to be expecting a cheaper and maybe smaller console, so, again, the article tells us fucking nothing, and that's it.

Seems to me like nobody actually knows (or atleast the person who wrote this article) nothing about the new switch revision, although it's likely it will happen cause apparently the wsj is legit when it comes to this things. I say meh, it'll be a switch lite for kids to play your animal crossing and pokemon on the go. Maybe Nintendo will shrink it, maybe not, but they'll cut costs somewhere and sell a cheaper sku for children, that's my take
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,618
Spain
Yeah I still don't think we're getting a "pro model" this soon. Even the PS4 Pro came out too soon for what it was. The One X and even New 3DS came out at least 3.5-4 years down the line. You think a more powerful version is coming out 2.5 years down the line? That's an insane proposition especially considering all consoles recently including Nintendo's own get an incremental first before something more substantial.

It's not happening. Stop it.
I didn't believe Nintendo would release a revision this soon, but with the technology that's already available it's actually a good idea to get it out of the way, get all the attention in 2019, and not get swallowed in 2020 by the release of the PS5 and the XBOX Scarlett.

Yeah I don't doubt that at all which is exactly why I don't think a pro revision is necessary this soon. They can release a pro model in 2021 or so which could compete a lot better than one released in 2019.

But anyway my point is, if the purpose of this new pro revision is to get next gen ports then those ports wouldn't be able to come to the base Switch at all. And like you said I don't know how true that is. Developers and insiders have said card costs and capacity are affecting ports more than processing power. That and ROI.



That's true I guess. Doesn't make it any less shitty of them if they do it though.
For a good while the former two will be more important than the latter. As long as that remains true, it's best to have a model that has genuinely good graphics in third party ports and a base model that makes them serviceable, and have it now to keep the momentum going.
 

Manwell

Member
Oct 25, 2017
392
USA
Nintendo has no rules like that currently, why force 3rd parties? Also, Nintendo is the only company to release a more powerful version of a platform and release exclusive games on it, "dsi ware" and new 3ds only games existed, they also planned to do something similar with the Snes CD and n64dd. This is nothing new for Nintendo.

These new more powerful versions were many years after the release of the original hardware (5+ years i think?). That's a big difference than releasing a new Switch revision similar to a N3DS or DSI only 2 and a half years after the original release. So yes it would be new for them (and dumb).

PS5 and Xbone are also coming out soon and would widen the power gap. If the switch gets a hybrid console with at least 1.3 TFLOPs GPU on paper with 8GB RAM and similar CPU and RAM, and bc compatible with the current switch, it could compete with base PS4 and xbone at least.

I welcome a Switch Pro in Q4 2019. The sooner the better with PS5 and XBtwo around the corner.. and then a stand alone console at least as powerful as PS4 Pro/xbone x a year later maybe

Why does the power gap even matter at this point? Its primarily a handheld system. Theres no possibility of it competing against the others regardless of what they release. Even if Nintendo did a Switch Pro, it would still lag far behind PS5/Next Xbox and wouldnt get AAA games anyway. It still wouldn't even get games out right now like AC or Tomb Raider etc.
 

Deleted member 6730

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
11,526
Jesus now we're talking about if it'll get exclusive games? It's a hardware revision, not a next-gen console.
 

mikehaggar

Developer at Pixel Arc Studios
Verified
Oct 26, 2017
1,379
Harrisburg, Pa
I didn't believe Nintendo would release a revision this soon, but with the technology that's already available it's actually a good idea to get it out of the way, get all the attention in 2019, and not get swallowed in 2020 by the release of the PS5 and the XBOX Scarlett.

Eh, Switch won't get swallowed by newer, more powerful machines. Xbox One, PS4, PS4 Pro, and Xbox One X are all already considerably more powerful. Switch's entire success is a result of the utility of the device (portability). They don't need to worry about how powerful these next round of machines are going to be, but they do need to be concerned about what Sony is going to do with PS5 to try and negate Nintendo's advantage regarding portability (I don't think Microsoft will bother).
 

Chalfonts

Banned
Apr 3, 2018
530
Next year looks very interesting for Nintendo
  • 64GB carts made available to developers
  • Japanese publishers like Capcom and Sega expected to start unveiling stuff that isn't complete shit
  • Take 2 and Blizzard coming on board
  • Probably the most insane first party lineup of any system ever
  • A hardware revision
Personally i hope the system is relatively powerful, it replaces the existing switch, and developers stop worrying so much about creating a good experience on the original switch going forwards
 

Based0ne

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
1,258
USA
maxresdefault.jpg
Dead
 

Deleted member 18161

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,805
I mean the hardware they're debating could even be the screen resolution for all we know. Or the size of the bezels, or the size of the battery.

I just think a pro model doesn't make business sense right now. Unless it's simply an upgraded screen resolution that can run in docked mode clocks while undocked I don't see them pushing developers into making a third (or even fourth) power target so soon. Power isn't the biggest hurdle in getting AAA games on the system, ROI and card costs/storage capacity currently are (seemingly according to some insiders and developers). So I don't see what they gain with a pro model so soon which disrupts development from their partners.

On the other hand a cheaper model is exactly what they desperately need right now. They've been trying essentially all year to get the kids/family market on board and it isn't working out like they expected (I assume, judging by Labo and general hardware sales). We'll see if that changes over the holiday season but $300 is just still a bit too big of a pill to swallow to really capture that 3DS market. A cheaper revision with a die shrink, without the fan, with a smaller battery, and maybe even without the dock can cost closer to $250 or even less next year, and really start having success in that handheld market.

I don't really claim to know all that much and I personally would probably rather have a beefier Switch but I just think we've seen this song and dance a lot and what usually ends up being the case is that Nintendo will do what is in their best interests to sell as much hardware and software as they can. I don't see a pro really making a big dent there but a cheaper model certainly would.

As much as I want a more powerful Switch I do think this will end up being a Switch with a smaller chip process which will mean docked clocks on the go allowing for a 1080p screen OR the smaller chip and increased battery will be used in a portable only Switch which will retail for $199 in time for Winter 2019 and the next big Pokemon game.

I think the second option is the likeliest allowing Nintendo to further expand the user base which means more software / DLC / Online subscription revenue. A Switch which boosts handheld and docked resolution or a dedicated console Switch which does 4k would be great but only appeal to a fraction of the people a dedicated handheld Switch would.
 

Deleted member 7572

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,041
I wouldn't mind something of a marginal upgrade that gets games like Xenoblade 2 running at full 720 in handheld.
 

xyla

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,386
Germany
Jesus now we're talking about if it'll get exclusive games? It's a hardware revision, not a next-gen console.

Depends on what angle you're coming from - handheld vise, there's almost always been a handful of exclusive games. Game Boy Color, DSi and n3DS all got their exclusive titles.
But I don't expect this to happen here.
 

Neoxon

Spotlighting Black Excellence - Diversity Analyst
Member
Oct 25, 2017
85,379
Houston, TX
Next year looks very interesting for Nintendo
  • 64GB carts made available to developers
  • Japanese publishers like Capcom and Sega expected to start unveiling stuff that isn't complete shit
  • Take 2 and Blizzard coming on board
  • Probably the most insane first party lineup of any system ever
  • A hardware revision
Personally i hope the system is relatively powerful, it replaces the existing switch, and developers stop worrying so much about creating a good experience on the original switch going forwards
I wouldn't get your hopes up too high. Games like Red Dead Redemption 2, Devil May Cry 5, & the Resident Evil 2 remake are likely far above what the Switch can handle, even considering with what we can reasonably expect for this new Switch model. Even with the 64GB carts, they're still gonna be hella expensive for third party publishers to utilize unless Nintendo eats a vast majority of the cost (if not all of the cost). Though on the Capcom side, I'd imagine that we'll get Ace Attorney 7 at some point alongside more ports of their older games (namely Resident Evil 4-6 & Ace Attorney 4-6). Not sure about Sega, unless they have another mainline Sonic game cooking in the oven right now.
 
Oct 26, 2017
7,981
Hm that's interesting. So in theory they'd be dumping the original model (with the 20nm chip) in favor of new models that have less leaky process nodes, maybe even with the exact same SoC. The flexibility of Tegra could let them use the same SoC on the low end device with far lower clocks to save on cooling and battery costs and higher clocks on the pro device.

Pretty much. I'm not ruling out that this leak could actually end up being about a clamshell device rather than a v2, as it would explain the requirement for a lower power, thinner screen a little better than the other options.
 

test_account

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,645
Next year looks very interesting for Nintendo
  • 64GB carts made available to developers
  • Japanese publishers like Capcom and Sega expected to start unveiling stuff that isn't complete shit
  • Take 2 and Blizzard coming on board
  • Probably the most insane first party lineup of any system ever
  • A hardware revision
Personally i hope the system is relatively powerful, it replaces the existing switch, and developers stop worrying so much about creating a good experience on the original switch going forwards
They wont replace the system after only ~2 years. It could worse/best (depends on how you look at it) case senario be exclusive games, but they're likely only to be a handful.
 

LewieP

Member
Oct 26, 2017
18,099
New 3DS was more of a hardware revision than a next gen console and it got exclusive games. It's a valid concern considering what Nintendo has done in the past.
It didn't really get exclusive games from Nintendo. It got ports.

There are no games that Nintendo could port to a hypothetical "New" Switch that wouldn't also be able to run on the current Switch.
 

KoopaSwitch

Banned
Jan 17, 2018
1,260
But it's not just a handheld...if I didn't have four more days to return I would be super pissed

But its a handheld. It goes placed. Being smaller/better battery/more efficient is worth an upgrade for a 2.5 year old console (if mid-late 2019)

Not even that, but Sony and MS both released multiple updates this gen.
 

BRSxIgnition

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,596
It will use an updated Tegra processor to improve battery efficiency and remove the current hacking vulnerabilities. It will also feature an improved screen to make use of that extra power efficiency. It will also feature a new kick stand, but otherwise be the same size as the current switch and use the same joycons.

Screenshot this.
 

fiendcode

Member
Oct 26, 2017
24,926
I wouldn't get your hopes up too high. Games like Red Dead Redemption 2, Devil May Cry 5, & the Resident Evil 2 remake are likely far above what the Switch can handle, even considering with what we can reasonably expect for this new Switch model. Even with the 64GB carts, they're still gonna be hella expensive for third party publishers to utilize unless Nintendo eats a vast majority of the cost (if not all of the cost). Though on the Capcom side, I'd imagine that we'll get Ace Attorney 7 at some point alongside more ports of their older games (namely Resident Evil 4-6 & Ace Attorney 4-6). Not sure about Sega, unless they have another mainline Sonic game cooking in the oven right now.
Capcom will do many more ports/remasters, more MT framework games (AA7, MHP5, MMX9, etc) and probably some more RE Engine Cloud releases for Japan and maybe they'll start testing them overseas. The system will continue missing out on native RE Engine games and MHW but it's going to get basically everything else.

Sega will have more Sonic, Puyo Puyo, Sakura Taisen, Football Manager and lots of Sega Ages. It'll just miss out on Yakuza really.

The best way for Nintendo to drive down card costs though is through scaling up production. Hopefully some of their huge titles like Smash Ultimate and Pokémon VIII start shipping on 32GB cards to help that along.
 

Neoxon

Spotlighting Black Excellence - Diversity Analyst
Member
Oct 25, 2017
85,379
Houston, TX
Capcom will do many more ports/remasters, more MT framework games (AA7, MHP5, MMX9, etc) and probably some more RE Engine Cloud releases for Japan and maybe they'll start testing them overseas. The system will continue missing out on native RE Engine games and MHW but it's going to get basically everything else.

Sega will have more Sonic, Puyo Puyo, Sakura Taisen, Football Manager and lots of Sega Ages. It'll just miss out on Yakuza really.

The best way for Nintendo to drive down card costs though is through scaling up production. Hopefully some of their huge titles like Smash Ultimate and Pokémon VIII start shipping on 32GB cards to help that along.
Isn't it said that Smash Ultimate will take up 16GB? You'd think that it'd be the one game that would need a 32GB cart. As for Pokémon Gen 8, I'm not sure if it'll need a 32GB cart.
 

Alandring

Banned
Feb 2, 2018
1,841
Switzerland
I would really love two new Switch. When I see this graphic:
nintendo_switch_utilisations.jpg


I think there is a market for an home console only (18%) and another for an handheld console only (30%). Nintendo would be dumb to not create a dedicated console for these markets.

For the future, they should have three devices:
  • An home console. No screen, but the most powerful console from Nintendo. All games can run at 1080p/60 FPS.
  • An hybrid: the current Switch.
  • An handheld console. The smallest and the cheapest console.
All Switch would have the same library and they could be used together.
 

Beamerball

Member
Jan 16, 2018
1,416
As long as GameStop does some sort of trade-in special with the current Switch model, I'm in day one.

Speaking of which, what's been Gamestop's history with trade-ins on console revisions? Are they pretty good with offering a nice deal when trading in the older model?
 

Clefargle

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,124
Limburg
I would really love two new Switch. When I see this graphic:
nintendo_switch_utilisations.jpg


I think there is a market for an home console only (18%) and another for an handheld console only (30%). Nintendo would be dumb to not create a dedicated console for these markets.

For the future, they should have three devices:
  • An home console. No screen, but the most powerful console from Nintendo. All games can run at 1080p/60 FPS.
  • An hybrid: the current Switch.
  • An handheld console. The smallest and the cheapest console.
All Switch would have the same library and they could be used together.

Can't share all the games between this many SKUs. Stuff like Labo, Mario party, and 1-2 Switch only work in certain modes and not others. You'd fragment the userbase this way
 
Status
Not open for further replies.