• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 26, 2017
7,981
The size and quality of the screen, within the confines of the existing body size.
The overall size isn't going to change because of the joy-cons. I don't see them making any size change unless they eventually do a cheap 2DS type model with non-removable controls.

I think with the rumours centring on the screen it could be a little bigger, a bit like the DSlite->DSi and 3DS->New 3DS, they could add ⅓ or ½ an inch without covering the entirety of the surface.
 

delete12345

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 17, 2017
19,656
Boston, MA
Right, I don't want to sound like a complete technology n00b here, but can someone clarify something for me.

The Tegra X2 chip... Hypothetically, if that was in the Switch 2/Pro, would it allow a game like Doom or XC2 go from 720p(ish) and 30FPS to 1080p and 60 FPS?

I'm not massively familiar with the technology in the X2...how big of a jump is it from the chip inside the OG Switch?
It depends on the VRAM (video memory), the clock rate (processing speed) and throughput (the bandwidth, or the max number of highway traffic lanes) of the chipset in the theoretical X2. If it's the same as the current spec, don't expect a lot of improvements (30FPS -> 60FPS).
 

Red

Member
Oct 26, 2017
11,629
Yeah, but DS Lite was just a change in aesthetics, right? The hardware inside was the same...
It was 3 years between PS4 and PS4 Pro, 2 years between Xbox One and Xbox One X iirc. I don't think it would be unusual to see Nintendo hasten their hardware cycles. Especially on a portable, which competes more directly with the constantly moving mobile space.
 

ILikeFeet

DF Deet Master
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
61,987
Right, I don't want to sound like a complete technology n00b here, but can someone clarify something for me.

The Tegra X2 chip... Hypothetically, if that was in the Switch 2/Pro, would it allow a game like Doom or XC2 go from 720p(ish) and 30FPS to 1080p and 60 FPS?

I'm not massively familiar with the technology in the X2...how big of a jump is it from the chip inside the OG Switch?
No, I 6dont think so anyway. At best, it'll play the games at the game's max resolution more
 

Deleted member 13364

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,984
I think with the rumours centring on the screen it could be a little bigger, a bit like the DSlite->DSi and 3DS->New 3DS, they could add ⅓ or ½ an inch without covering the entirety of the surface.
Yeah, that's what I'm expecting. And hopefully a bump to 1080p so alongside the spec bump, games can run at least as well as they currently do in docked mocked. Plus a new docked mode with a third tier of performance for the new Switch only, so there would be handheld mode (current Switch only), current docked mode (current Switch docked/New Switch undocked) and new docked (new Switch only).
 

Futureman

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,400
Drop current Switch to $200.

Switch Pro $300. Higher resolution screen/smaller bezels. Larger internal memory. Higher quality build materials/premium feel. Slightly faster processor/GPU similar to new 3DS so current games will get resolution bump and increased performance. Metroid Prime 4 reveal trailer taking full advantage of new power. Nintendo will mandate that all new games work on both original and new Switch. Current joy-cons will be compatible.
 

Hollywood Pescado

Self-requested ban
Banned
Apr 28, 2018
305
I know it's not a confirmation or anything, but I guess I'll just wait and see if the new Switch comes out. If so, I'll definitely buy one.

I'm in no hurry to buy a Switch. It already has a lot of games I want for it. Unfortunately I am broke, so it's not like I can buy one right now.
 

Bomblord

Self-requested ban
Banned
Jan 11, 2018
6,390
Right, I don't want to sound like a complete technology n00b here, but can someone clarify something for me.

The Tegra X2 chip... Hypothetically, if that was in the Switch 2/Pro, would it allow a game like Doom or XC2 go from 720p(ish) and 30FPS to 1080p and 60 FPS?

I'm not massively familiar with the technology in the X2...how big of a jump is it from the chip inside the OG Switch?

Absolutely not. The max performance gain you would see while maintaining the same power use is 2x. Which is not going to allow you to push 2.25x the pixels at double the framerate.

More realistically IF they use the newer tegra they will probably downlock it to the same performance threshold and just reap the massive battery life benefits. Although I would love to get 2x the performance.
 

Anth0ny

Member
Oct 25, 2017
46,805
wouldn't a cheaper switch make more sense to launch near pokemon?


though i supposed it could be a switch pro and they drop the price on the og switch + market it heavily near poke launch
 

Skittzo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
41,037
Well... the die shrink isn't something they would still be thinking about, this is almost certainly Mariko afterall, and since they have code for it, it's a real physical chip already at whatever process they picked, unless they built it at one process only to throw away 10s of millions to shrink it to another process... No, along with the 8GB leak and foxconn leak from before, I really think it's more likely we are looking at a pro. You also have to think of this outside of Nintendo's bubble, next year, new consoles will be announced, 3rd party devs have announced games and held off on more support too, we've heard rumors of plenty of games in the works for Switch but the rumors died off... A pro fits this story too well, and like Iwata said in the past, a solution that solves many things is the best solution. I think where there is this much smoke, we have to assume there is fire. I'll go with both, if they wanted to launch a mini alone, this holiday was the year to do it. Next year they need a Pro, because launching a Pro alongside the PS5 and XBnext isn't a good idea, 3rd parties won't be able to support it as readily as they would if it already had a large userbase and a year on the market.

I mean the hardware they're debating could even be the screen resolution for all we know. Or the size of the bezels, or the size of the battery.

I just think a pro model doesn't make business sense right now. Unless it's simply an upgraded screen resolution that can run in docked mode clocks while undocked I don't see them pushing developers into making a third (or even fourth) power target so soon. Power isn't the biggest hurdle in getting AAA games on the system, ROI and card costs/storage capacity currently are (seemingly according to some insiders and developers). So I don't see what they gain with a pro model so soon which disrupts development from their partners.

On the other hand a cheaper model is exactly what they desperately need right now. They've been trying essentially all year to get the kids/family market on board and it isn't working out like they expected (I assume, judging by Labo and general hardware sales). We'll see if that changes over the holiday season but $300 is just still a bit too big of a pill to swallow to really capture that 3DS market. A cheaper revision with a die shrink, without the fan, with a smaller battery, and maybe even without the dock can cost closer to $250 or even less next year, and really start having success in that handheld market.

I don't really claim to know all that much and I personally would probably rather have a beefier Switch but I just think we've seen this song and dance a lot and what usually ends up being the case is that Nintendo will do what is in their best interests to sell as much hardware and software as they can. I don't see a pro really making a big dent there but a cheaper model certainly would.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,127
London, UK
i have a question assuming they use a tegra x2

If this new switch has additional processing power as well as a better screen would older game automatically play better? like on mobile phones?

or would they need to be updated to take advantage like on ps4 pro?
 

Papaya

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,474
California
All I want is a better kickstand, chargers on top so I can charge my switch while it is kickstanded, and just better build quality overall. My switch has a dead pixel, and I feel like the touch screen sucks.
 

delete12345

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 17, 2017
19,656
Boston, MA
It will be compatible with the normal joycons same as the Switch is compatible with the pro controller, wirelessly. But the controllers it comes with will be built in, not detachable.
There will be pushbacks, because you lose a 2nd player controller out-of-the-box, and Nintendo is focusing on giving the game devs many options, not retracting 1/3 of all the options away from us.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,789
Case for Switch Lite:
  • Nintendo wants something cheaper to replace the 3DS for children and budget gamers
  • Potential cut could be the screen to have a stationary console
Case Against Switch Lite:
  • Not very much else they can cut. Joy-cons will almost certainly need to be compatible due to software and also just established accessory market. Bluetooth, Wifi, Storage are necessary.
  • Takes away a large advantage of the Switch
Case for Switch Pro:
  • Nintendo will want to keep hardware momentum
  • Perhaps possible to gracefully improve games using different profiles (undocked, docked and Pro)
  • Potential VR expansion
  • Retain the same basic shape for compatibility with Joy-Cons
Case Against Switch Pro:
  • Potentially costly
Case For Refresh:
  • Quick and Easy
  • Potential to reduce manufacture costs while improving product slightly
Case Against Refresh:
  • Potential missed opportunity for something bigger
 

KtSlime

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,910
Tokyo
It will be compatible with the normal joycons same as the Switch is compatible with the pro controller, wirelessly. But the controllers it comes with will be built in, not detachable.

I'm not sure you thought this through. Like I am asking practically. How and where do they fit the rail for the joycon to slide on and charge?
 

mikehaggar

Developer at Pixel Arc Studios
Verified
Oct 26, 2017
1,379
Harrisburg, Pa
It was 3 years between PS4 and PS4 Pro, 2 years between Xbox One and Xbox One X iirc. I don't think it would be unusual to see Nintendo hasten their hardware cycles. Especially on a portable, which competes more directly with the constantly moving mobile space.

3 years for PS4 -> PS4 Pro and 4 years for Xbox One -> Xbox One X. All I'm saying is that these companies are going to end up pissing customers off if they keep pushing out new hardware too quickly. I'm not saying it should be 6 years between new hardware, but I think there's definitely a sweet spot that you need to hit and being too aggressive will push past people's tolerance. 2 years seems a bit soon to me. I understand Nintendo has done it before on the handheld side of things, but those were sub-$200 devices. I think perception changes once you start getting into hardware that is $300 and above. Just my opinion, though.
 

Aroll

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
133
It will be compatible with the normal joycons same as the Switch is compatible with the pro controller, wirelessly. But the controllers it comes with will be built in, not detachable.

In other words, a souped up 3ds, not a switch. Non detachable controllers automatically makes it incompatible with some games and the idea of a handheld only switch literally defeats the switch concept.

I doubt they are just abandoning the hybrid because some want them too. It's what got switch to where it is. Expect a 1080p display and slightly beefed up hardware, more akin to a new Nintendo 3ds
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,618
Spain
Only the Xavier jenson board is made for automotive. here is the wording from Nvidia's own website for the X2 Jenson Board:

"This is an AI supercomputer on a module, powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture. Best of all, it packs this performance into a small, power-efficient form factor that's ideal for intelligent edge devices like robots, drones, smart cameras, and portable medical devices. It supports all the features of the Jetson TX1 module while enabling bigger, more complex deep neural networks."

and X1:

This AI supercomputer features NVIDIA Maxwell™ architecture, 256 NVIDIA CUDA® cores, 64-bit CPUs, and a power-efficient design. Plus, it includes the latest technology for deep learning, computer vision, GPU computing, and graphics—making it ideal for embedded AI computing.

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/autonomous-machines/embedded-systems-dev-kits-modules/

saying X1 was made for gaming or X2 is for automotive is just not true. these are SoC which can be made for multiple purposes.

To think a T214 will have 2019 (Xavier/Orin) Technologies is silly as the cost would be too high for Nintendo to sell at any reasonable price. also there is no chance this chip is made from the ground up for Nintendo as it would cost Nintendo too much again when the current chip is fine. The T214 is a die shrink, Hack fix and maybe if we are lucky a clock speed or Cuda core increase.
Just look at what Erista has and what Parker/Xavier have, and the kind of demos they used to show them and so forth.
And the "It can't have Xavier tech or beyond" is honestly nonsense. Assuming it uses one of the now new 12/10nm processes, the main factor that decides the cost is the size of the chip, and not the micro architecture it contains.
My question is, if all of this is possible in the $300 range. z0m3Ie is and others are saying that this upgrade could be in the Xbox One ballpark. I though that was impossible, but aparently not ?
In docked mode, it could perfectly be in the ballpark of XBOX One with a better CPU. In portable mode, not yet. If the chip were 7nm, then there would be somewhat of an extra, but 7nm is more far-fetched and somewhat unrealistic.
 

Skittzo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
41,037
i have a question assuming they use a tegra x2

If this new switch has additional processing power as well as a better screen would older game automatically play better? like on mobile phones?

or would they need to be updated to take advantage like on ps4 pro?

Many Switch games use dynamic resolution and those would see automatic gains, yes. Framerate performance would automatically improve too, though not above whatever the game was originally capped at.
 

Mr. Wonderful

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,289
If I got:

Docked performance in handheld mode.
Better battery life (for certain modes).
Better quality (720p) screen.
HDR in docked mode.

I would be over the moon.
 

Deleted member 11986

User requested account closure
Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,040
Taking something like Mario Odyssey and outputting it in 4k isn't splitting the userbase. Sony and Microsoft figured it out with Pro and Xbox One X. However I doubt this revision is going to get anywhere near 4k.
So you want a Switch upgrade to output 4k when Switch can (barely) output 720p with a consistent fps, how much powerful do you think Switch should be to be able to output "4k" compared to Xbox One and PS4 and their said "mid-gen upgrade"? How much of delusional are you folks. No, really?!

sypevcD.gif
 

lmx

Alt-Account
Banned
Aug 10, 2018
469
Ya'll are goona get a switch with a better screen, better battery life, a different look...


...and the dock and charger will be sold separately.
 

delete12345

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 17, 2017
19,656
Boston, MA
Case for Switch Lite:
  • Nintendo wants something cheaper to replace the 3DS for children and budget gamers
  • Potential cut could be the screen to have a stationary console
Case Against Switch Lite:
  • Not very much else they can cut. Joy-cons will almost certainly need to be compatible due to software and also just established accessory market. Bluetooth, Wifi, Storage are necessary.
  • Takes away a large advantage of the Switch
Case for Switch Pro:
  • Nintendo will want to keep hardware momentum
  • Perhaps possible to gracefully improve games using different profiles (undocked, docked and Pro)
  • Potential VR expansion
  • Retain the same basic shape for compatibility with Joy-Cons
Case Against Switch Pro:
  • Potentially costly
Case For Refresh:
  • Quick and Easy
  • Potential to reduce manufacture costs while improving product slightly
Case Against Refresh:
  • Potential missed opportunity for something bigger
This post proves it'll be hard to satisfy even the majority of the player base right now... It's so fragmented.
 

Deleted member 6730

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
11,526
Ugh. I wouldn't expect much difference at all. Maybe some QoL improvements? Better kickstand, brighter screen. Like this will be more of a Xbox One -> Xbox One S style improvement more than anything. That's how Nintendo revises their hardware, especially this early. I can even see it be called the Switch S or something like that. But expecting exclusive games or substantially more power? That ain't happening.
 

delete12345

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 17, 2017
19,656
Boston, MA
So you want a Switch upgrade to output 4k when Switch can (barely) output 720p with a consistent fps, how much powerful do you think Switch should be to be able to output "4k" compared to Xbox One and PS4 and their said "mid-gen upgrade"? How much of delusional are you folks. No, really?!

sypevcD.gif
People just wanted to escape the reality that we are in right now.
 

Minsc

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,116
Not sure why people think it can't come with smaller joycons? Can't all joycons be compatible with all switch revisions via bluetooth?

So the mini joycons could be use in tabletop mode or console mode on a regular switch?

When you think about it the possibilities are quite endless, there could very well be close to a dozen Switch revisions on the market at one time, if we assume 5-6 Switch SKUs (between regular/pocket/Pro/other variations) and another 5-6 Switch 2 models (regular/pocket/Pro/other again) down the road.
 

Deleted member 19218

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,323
****ing glad.

It was just a question of when and I have already decided to get the not-yet-announced-but-sure-to-be-made Animal Crossing Switch after I saw the Pokemon Go special edition.

When the new AC was announced I quickly thought to myself:

"Well if I am going to buy a new Nintendo Switch I sure do hope the revision is out by then".
 

Deleted member 2791

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,054
Ugh. I wouldn't expect much difference at all. Maybe some QoL improvements? Better kickstand, brighter screen. Like this will be more of a Xbox One -> Xbox One S style improvement more than anything. That's how Nintendo revises their hardware, especially this early. I can even see it be called the Switch S or something like that. But expecting exclusive games or substantially more power? That ain't happening.

I'm of the same opinion. Xbox One -> Xbox One S style of revision is a good point of comparison.
 

Bernd Lauert

Banned
May 27, 2018
1,812
Right, I don't want to sound like a complete technology n00b here, but can someone clarify something for me.

The Tegra X2 chip... Hypothetically, if that was in the Switch 2/Pro, would it allow a game like Doom or XC2 go from 720p(ish) and 30FPS to 1080p and 60 FPS?

I'm not massively familiar with the technology in the X2...how big of a jump is it from the chip inside the OG Switch?

Going from 720p30 to 1080p60 is over a 4x jump. The X2 is only 1.5x faster than the X1 though, at least at full speed. Now, if they could get proportionally more clock speed out of the X2 for the Switch compared to the X1 in the Switch, the increase in performance could be higher. But I wouldn't expect anything close to 4x.
 

Bomblord

Self-requested ban
Banned
Jan 11, 2018
6,390
Just look at what Erista has and what Parker/Xavier have, and the kind of demos they used to show them and so forth.
And the "It can't have Xavier tech or beyond" is honestly nonsense. Assuming it uses one of the now new 12/10nm processes, the main factor that decides the cost is the size of the chip, and not the micro architecture it contains.

In docked mode, it could perfectly be in the ballpark of XBOX One with a better CPU. In portable mode, not yet. If the chip were 7nm, then there would be somewhat of an extra, but 7nm is more far-fetched and somewhat unrealistic.

Ballpark being the key word. Max performance of known Tegra mobile chips is 756Gflops even assuming Nvidia has secretly been working on a custom Switch Pro chip I doubt it would exceed 1TF.

However same as the X1 theoretical performance was 500Gflops the actual chip ended up being ~400 docked so expect a similar decrease in order to maintain consistent performance in the thermal and power threshold required. A bigger upgrade would be changing to A72 CPU cores which would actually put it slightly above the PS4/X1 in single core perf (albeit with less cores assuming they maintain the same setup) while using less power.
 

Exit Music

Member
Nov 13, 2017
1,082
Not sure why people think it can't come with smaller joycons? Can't all joycons be compatible with all switch revisions via bluetooth?

So the mini joycons could be use in tabletop mode or console mode on a regular switch?

When you think about it the possibilities are quite endless, there could very well be close to a dozen Switch revisions on the market at one time, if we assume 5-6 Switch SKUs (between regular/pocket/Pro/other variations) and another 5-6 Switch 2 models (regular/pocket/Pro/other again) down the road.

Unless Nintendo is also going to start selling mini hands for people I don't see how joycons can get any smaller and still be comfortable to use.
 

mute

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 25, 2017
25,062
I'd put more money on a Lite than a Pro but there is still many features they could add to a would-be Lite that would appeal to me.

Question I would have is if they change the form factor would they do anything to try and make it backward compatible with existing docks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.