Was ~2 years between DS and DS Lite. Wouldn't be unprecedented for a Nintendo handheld.
Yeah, but DS Lite was just a change in aesthetics, right? The hardware inside was the same...
Was ~2 years between DS and DS Lite. Wouldn't be unprecedented for a Nintendo handheld.
The size and quality of the screen, within the confines of the existing body size.
The overall size isn't going to change because of the joy-cons. I don't see them making any size change unless they eventually do a cheap 2DS type model with non-removable controls.
It depends on the VRAM (video memory), the clock rate (processing speed) and throughput (the bandwidth, or the max number of highway traffic lanes) of the chipset in the theoretical X2. If it's the same as the current spec, don't expect a lot of improvements (30FPS -> 60FPS).Right, I don't want to sound like a complete technology n00b here, but can someone clarify something for me.
The Tegra X2 chip... Hypothetically, if that was in the Switch 2/Pro, would it allow a game like Doom or XC2 go from 720p(ish) and 30FPS to 1080p and 60 FPS?
I'm not massively familiar with the technology in the X2...how big of a jump is it from the chip inside the OG Switch?
It was 3 years between PS4 and PS4 Pro, 2 years between Xbox One and Xbox One X iirc. I don't think it would be unusual to see Nintendo hasten their hardware cycles. Especially on a portable, which competes more directly with the constantly moving mobile space.Yeah, but DS Lite was just a change in aesthetics, right? The hardware inside was the same...
No, I 6dont think so anyway. At best, it'll play the games at the game's max resolution moreRight, I don't want to sound like a complete technology n00b here, but can someone clarify something for me.
The Tegra X2 chip... Hypothetically, if that was in the Switch 2/Pro, would it allow a game like Doom or XC2 go from 720p(ish) and 30FPS to 1080p and 60 FPS?
I'm not massively familiar with the technology in the X2...how big of a jump is it from the chip inside the OG Switch?
Yeah, that's what I'm expecting. And hopefully a bump to 1080p so alongside the spec bump, games can run at least as well as they currently do in docked mocked. Plus a new docked mode with a third tier of performance for the new Switch only, so there would be handheld mode (current Switch only), current docked mode (current Switch docked/New Switch undocked) and new docked (new Switch only).I think with the rumours centring on the screen it could be a little bigger, a bit like the DSlite->DSi and 3DS->New 3DS, they could add ⅓ or ½ an inch without covering the entirety of the surface.
A 50 quid drop is more ideal than a 100 quid drop. You're talking about a $130 USD MSRP drop, which is nigh impossible for it to happen.launch this for same price as switch,. drop original switch price by £100
perfect
It will be compatible with the normal joycons same as the Switch is compatible with the pro controller, wirelessly. But the controllers it comes with will be built in, not detachable.So you guys wanting the miniature switch, how do you use the joycons?
Not getting all the games on it? Just saying I don't need a new one because it may not be moddable.
They are coming out with a new one right as I got the old one? The thing just released literally last year. I don't think I'm getting another Nintendo console after Switch. This doesn't sit right with me.
In a smaller envelope on top of that?16nm ff should be more than enough to get rid of the fan. Also the chip has lots of codecs and stuff that isn't used by Nintendo since it's not a custom chip. This will in all likelihood be custom and get rid off all unnecessary die area.
Right, I don't want to sound like a complete technology n00b here, but can someone clarify something for me.
The Tegra X2 chip... Hypothetically, if that was in the Switch 2/Pro, would it allow a game like Doom or XC2 go from 720p(ish) and 30FPS to 1080p and 60 FPS?
I'm not massively familiar with the technology in the X2...how big of a jump is it from the chip inside the OG Switch?
What phone do you have?They are coming out with a new one right as I got the old one? The thing just released literally last year. I don't think I'm getting another Nintendo console after Switch. This doesn't sit right with me.
Well... the die shrink isn't something they would still be thinking about, this is almost certainly Mariko afterall, and since they have code for it, it's a real physical chip already at whatever process they picked, unless they built it at one process only to throw away 10s of millions to shrink it to another process... No, along with the 8GB leak and foxconn leak from before, I really think it's more likely we are looking at a pro. You also have to think of this outside of Nintendo's bubble, next year, new consoles will be announced, 3rd party devs have announced games and held off on more support too, we've heard rumors of plenty of games in the works for Switch but the rumors died off... A pro fits this story too well, and like Iwata said in the past, a solution that solves many things is the best solution. I think where there is this much smoke, we have to assume there is fire. I'll go with both, if they wanted to launch a mini alone, this holiday was the year to do it. Next year they need a Pro, because launching a Pro alongside the PS5 and XBnext isn't a good idea, 3rd parties won't be able to support it as readily as they would if it already had a large userbase and a year on the market.
There will be pushbacks, because you lose a 2nd player controller out-of-the-box, and Nintendo is focusing on giving the game devs many options, not retracting 1/3 of all the options away from us.It will be compatible with the normal joycons same as the Switch is compatible with the pro controller, wirelessly. But the controllers it comes with will be built in, not detachable.
A 50 quid drop is more ideal than a 100 quid drop. You're talking about a $130 USD MSRP drop, which is nigh impossible for it to happen.
It will be compatible with the normal joycons same as the Switch is compatible with the pro controller, wirelessly. But the controllers it comes with will be built in, not detachable.
It was 3 years between PS4 and PS4 Pro, 2 years between Xbox One and Xbox One X iirc. I don't think it would be unusual to see Nintendo hasten their hardware cycles. Especially on a portable, which competes more directly with the constantly moving mobile space.
It will be compatible with the normal joycons same as the Switch is compatible with the pro controller, wirelessly. But the controllers it comes with will be built in, not detachable.
Yes, too much, considering the OG Switch is out for 2 years by then (March 3, 2019 is exactly 2 years old).i wonder if they would do a $100 drop? still to much isn't it?
Just look at what Erista has and what Parker/Xavier have, and the kind of demos they used to show them and so forth.Only the Xavier jenson board is made for automotive. here is the wording from Nvidia's own website for the X2 Jenson Board:
"This is an AI supercomputer on a module, powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture. Best of all, it packs this performance into a small, power-efficient form factor that's ideal for intelligent edge devices like robots, drones, smart cameras, and portable medical devices. It supports all the features of the Jetson TX1 module while enabling bigger, more complex deep neural networks."
and X1:
This AI supercomputer features NVIDIA Maxwell™ architecture, 256 NVIDIA CUDA® cores, 64-bit CPUs, and a power-efficient design. Plus, it includes the latest technology for deep learning, computer vision, GPU computing, and graphics—making it ideal for embedded AI computing.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/autonomous-machines/embedded-systems-dev-kits-modules/
saying X1 was made for gaming or X2 is for automotive is just not true. these are SoC which can be made for multiple purposes.
To think a T214 will have 2019 (Xavier/Orin) Technologies is silly as the cost would be too high for Nintendo to sell at any reasonable price. also there is no chance this chip is made from the ground up for Nintendo as it would cost Nintendo too much again when the current chip is fine. The T214 is a die shrink, Hack fix and maybe if we are lucky a clock speed or Cuda core increase.
In docked mode, it could perfectly be in the ballpark of XBOX One with a better CPU. In portable mode, not yet. If the chip were 7nm, then there would be somewhat of an extra, but 7nm is more far-fetched and somewhat unrealistic.My question is, if all of this is possible in the $300 range. z0m3Ie is and others are saying that this upgrade could be in the Xbox One ballpark. I though that was impossible, but aparently not ?
i have a question assuming they use a tegra x2
If this new switch has additional processing power as well as a better screen would older game automatically play better? like on mobile phones?
or would they need to be updated to take advantage like on ps4 pro?
So you want a Switch upgrade to output 4k when Switch can (barely) output 720p with a consistent fps, how much powerful do you think Switch should be to be able to output "4k" compared to Xbox One and PS4 and their said "mid-gen upgrade"? How much of delusional are you folks. No, really?!Taking something like Mario Odyssey and outputting it in 4k isn't splitting the userbase. Sony and Microsoft figured it out with Pro and Xbox One X. However I doubt this revision is going to get anywhere near 4k.
This post proves it'll be hard to satisfy even the majority of the player base right now... It's so fragmented.Case for Switch Lite:
Case Against Switch Lite:
- Nintendo wants something cheaper to replace the 3DS for children and budget gamers
- Potential cut could be the screen to have a stationary console
Case for Switch Pro:
- Not very much else they can cut. Joy-cons will almost certainly need to be compatible due to software and also just established accessory market. Bluetooth, Wifi, Storage are necessary.
- Takes away a large advantage of the Switch
Case Against Switch Pro:
- Nintendo will want to keep hardware momentum
- Perhaps possible to gracefully improve games using different profiles (undocked, docked and Pro)
- Potential VR expansion
- Retain the same basic shape for compatibility with Joy-Cons
Case For Refresh:
- Potentially costly
Case Against Refresh:
- Quick and Easy
- Potential to reduce manufacture costs while improving product slightly
- Potential missed opportunity for something bigger
Worst post of the thread so far.Can't read that damn article... can the Japanese please learn some fucking Kanji.
People just wanted to escape the reality that we are in right now.So you want a Switch upgrade to output 4k when Switch can (barely) output 720p with a consistent fps, how much powerful do you think Switch should be to be able to output "4k" compared to Xbox One and PS4 and their said "mid-gen upgrade"? How much of delusional are you folks. No, really?!
This is what I feel is going to happen too.launch this for same price as switch,. drop original switch price by £100
perfect
Ugh. I wouldn't expect much difference at all. Maybe some QoL improvements? Better kickstand, brighter screen. Like this will be more of a Xbox One -> Xbox One S style improvement more than anything. That's how Nintendo revises their hardware, especially this early. I can even see it be called the Switch S or something like that. But expecting exclusive games or substantially more power? That ain't happening.
launch this for same price as switch,. drop original switch price by £100
perfect
Right, I don't want to sound like a complete technology n00b here, but can someone clarify something for me.
The Tegra X2 chip... Hypothetically, if that was in the Switch 2/Pro, would it allow a game like Doom or XC2 go from 720p(ish) and 30FPS to 1080p and 60 FPS?
I'm not massively familiar with the technology in the X2...how big of a jump is it from the chip inside the OG Switch?
Just look at what Erista has and what Parker/Xavier have, and the kind of demos they used to show them and so forth.
And the "It can't have Xavier tech or beyond" is honestly nonsense. Assuming it uses one of the now new 12/10nm processes, the main factor that decides the cost is the size of the chip, and not the micro architecture it contains.
In docked mode, it could perfectly be in the ballpark of XBOX One with a better CPU. In portable mode, not yet. If the chip were 7nm, then there would be somewhat of an extra, but 7nm is more far-fetched and somewhat unrealistic.
Not sure why people think it can't come with smaller joycons? Can't all joycons be compatible with all switch revisions via bluetooth?
So the mini joycons could be use in tabletop mode or console mode on a regular switch?
When you think about it the possibilities are quite endless, there could very well be close to a dozen Switch revisions on the market at one time, if we assume 5-6 Switch SKUs (between regular/pocket/Pro/other variations) and another 5-6 Switch 2 models (regular/pocket/Pro/other again) down the road.