• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,963
In as much as it's true that there are plenty of victims of sexual assault who blame themselves, her position is valid, even if I disagree. People blame themselves all the time, and that is unfortunate.

But pivoting this into a defense of Kavanaugh and Trump (and, by extension, every man with credible assault claims that Trumps's unequivocally defended) doesn't sit right with me. Because underneath this defense seems to be an admission, that regardless of the actions of the person who assaulted you, it is ultimately your responsibility as the victim. That Kavanaugh and Trump are only "guilty" in as much as it was the actions of their victims that brought them there. And fuck that.
 

Francesco

Member
Nov 22, 2017
2,521
"Believe women" doesn't mean "believe women except for those who are bad people."
You can prove me wrong, but I actually think that's exactly what it should mean.
Bad people can lie about anything, no?
And I'm not talking about this case specifically. I'm sure she, as most women, was assaulted sometime in her life.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,798
I believe her, and if she doesn't want to talk more about her experience that's her prerogative.

I don't think she should use her experience to color other peoples' experience. But that's all I'll say on the matter.
 

Johnwess

Member
Nov 3, 2017
307
Nah I can point out both. You can keep the self righteous attitude to yourself. This women sole purpose is to go on tv and lie, spin the lie, and then used the lie to go on the attack.
 

Greg NYC3

Member
Oct 26, 2017
12,495
Miami
I think she says "but go blame the perpetrator" and goes on that the people who are for assault responsible are the ones who commit them. Basically saying that they are shifting the blame to other men who didn't commit the assault.
OK, that makes a lot more sense but only if you're of the belief that both Kavanaugh and Trump are innocent, which I'm not.
 

Mr. X

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,495
Could she by lying, yes. But I don't think it's appropriate to read the title and come into this thread saying she is telling a lie. You can be disgusted at the fact that what she's saying may be true and that's she using it to win political points.
I 100% agree. What she says about victims is something I expect from one of those old ass dudes. in Congress. Legit, anybody else I would say survivor's guilt or whatever the correct term is. I don't she is above lying about it.
 

viskod

Member
Nov 9, 2017
4,396
I don't believe her. All things are not equal and I'm sorry but you can't tell obvious and disgusting lies every single day for a career and then suddenly garner trust and sincerity.
 

collige

Member
Oct 31, 2017
12,772
I believe her, but that pivot into victim blaming means she either peak scumbag, has massive amounts of cognitive dissonance about it, or both (probably both).
 

Deleted member 13645

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
6,052
One of the worst parts of this is that there are undoubtedly some people who are going to hear her say that and take it to heart. Allowing people to divest themselves of responsibility for the horrible acts they commit on other people is super wrong. They'll think that saying something like "I sexually assaulted her but it's not my fault she was dressed like that!" is an acceptable stance.



Holy shit it's like someone transplanted a red piller into a woman's body. How can her perspective be so warped?
 

LosDaddie

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,622
Longwood, FL
OP
OP
ZeoVGM

ZeoVGM

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
76,219
Providence, RI
And I'm not talking about this case specifically. I'm sure she, as most women, was assaulted sometime in her life.

I mean, there you go.

That's exactly my point. We shouldn't be calling her a liar about the sexual assault claim given the actual statistics of women being assaulted.

It's fair game to call her garbage for her defending sexual assaulters, however. Two different things. She can both be garbage and be telling the truth about being assaulted -- which she likely is.
 

Zutroy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,592
Her (and other Republican's) deflection about Bill Clinton is so silly. They're basically saying it's unreasonable that the Democrats have evolved on how they handle sexual assault allegations over the last 20 years. The way they handled Al Franken shows that it's not just all talk on their side.
 

Mr. X

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,495
Her (and other Republican's) deflection about Bill Clinton is so silly. They're basically saying it's unreasonable that the Democrats have evolved on how they handle sexual assault allegations over the last 20 years. The way they handled Al Franken shows that it's not just all talk on their side.
GOP vs Bill Clinton

They haven't acted to give a fuck since
 

Squarehard

Member
Oct 27, 2017
25,895
In as much as it's true that there are plenty of victims of sexual assault who blame themselves, her position is valid, even if I disagree. People blame themselves all the time, and that is unfortunate.

But pivoting this into a defense of Kavanaugh and Trump (and, by extension, every man with credible assault claims that Trumps's unequivocally defended) doesn't sit right with me. Because underneath this defense seems to be an admission, that regardless of the actions of the person who assaulted you, it is ultimately your responsibility as the victim. That Kavanaugh and Trump are only "guilty" in as much as it was the actions of their victims that brought them there. And fuck that.
Well said.

Not well said.
 

chubigans

Vertigo Gaming Inc.
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
2,560
Is she seriously saying it's her fault she was assaulted?

A lot of sexual assault survivors do this. There's so many things survivors do to cope, whether it's a physical reaction of gaining a lot of weight after the assault, or blaming themselves, or a million other things.

I'm not defending what Conway has said or what she does. That's not the point here. The fact that so many of you call her out as a liar over this is incredibly stupid. We know zero facts about what happened to her, when, where, anything at all (nor do we need to know) and y'all are ready to dismiss her claims as lying propaganda. Maybe it is, maybe it's not, but when the entire point is to #believewomen you cannot pick and choose who best fits your idea of the ideal sexual assault victim. It could literally be anyone, and when they choose to talk about it, we need to listen.
 

Deleted member 19003

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,809
The reaction to sexual assault is not defined by political affliction. Wasn't that the whole point behind Al Franken stepping down? And what about Weiner being charged? And 'liberal' Hollywood going after their own? There are plenty more that I'm sure I can't remember off the top of my head. The point is, it happens on both sides of the political aisle and is not just demonized on one side. Kellyanne is just trying to spin shit, as always. It's gross that she's resorted to using even her own personal stories to prop up the bad behavior of this admin. SMH. She's like an anti-suffragette from the 1910's who worked to deny other women the right to vote. Keep hurting yourself and future women, Kellyanne.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
115,742
As a fellow assault survivor, I can sympathize with her for what happened to her, but my sympathy begins and ends there. Using her platform and her voice to denigrate OTHER victims and paper over their experiences in the same breath makes her into pure garbage.

America, you have BIG problems. God be with you.

The endless nightmare we're living in should make it fairly clear that there is no God. A loving creator would've intervened a long time ago.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
A lot of sexual assault survivors do this. There's so many things survivors do to cope, whether it's a physical reaction of gaining a lot of weight after the assault, or blaming themselves, or a million other things.

I'm not defending what Conway has said or what she does. That's not the point here. The fact that so many of you call her out as a liar over this is incredibly stupid. We know zero facts about what happened to her, when, where, anything at all (nor do we need to know) and y'all are ready to dismiss her claims as lying propaganda. Maybe it is, maybe it's not, but when the entire point is to #believewomen you cannot pick and choose who best fits your idea of the ideal sexual assault victim. It could literally be anyone, and when they choose to talk about it, we need to listen.

Ever hear of the boy who called wolf? Literally 95% off the words that come out of her mouth is a lie designed to gain political points. It's no surprise that many aren't willing to give the benefit of a doubt to someone who literally seems incapable of telling the truth.

What you're saying is basically a purity test. Most women don't have real reasons to disbelieve them. Someone who is literally a professional liar should have everything they say and do be seen through that lens.
 

HP_Wuvcraft

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,267
South of San Francisco
Ever hear of the boy who called wolf? Literally 95% off the words that come out of her mouth is a lie designed to gain political points. It's no surprise that many aren't willing to give the benefit of a doubt to someone who literally seems incapable of telling the truth.

What you're saying is basically a purity test. Most women don't have real reasons to disbelieve them. Someone who is literally a professional liar should have everything they say and do be seen through that lens.
That's not the point.

Why is "believe all women" not applicable in this case?

Is this a political stunt? Of course it fucking is. But she's also a woman living in America.
 

Holundrian

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,159
Sounds like a lie(especially when you consider past remarks in general as well), now I really hate assuming that given the stats tell me this isn't very likely but the other side of this would be accepting that even going through the hell these human dregs called republicans like to unleash on people personally isn't going to make them one bit more empathetic which is honestly just depressing.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
That's not the point.

Why is "believe all women" not applicable in this case?

Is this a political stunt? Of course it fucking is. But she's also a woman living in America.

Because she worked very hard to make sure no one believes her. She will literally do anything, hurt anyone to reach her goals. She is literally an evil woman and in no way or any situation deserves a neutral assessment. There are certain people where you can do that and she's one of them.
 

TarNaru33

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,045
She works in the fucking white house. I understand if we're talking about a paid contributor dipshit but our tax dollars are her salary and I'd like for these people to be held accountable. I'm tired with these cries from people about don't bring them on CNN. Have fun in your bubbles.

Them being aired so much is a huge contributor to why Trump is in office. Tax dollars or not, we do not win airing these people constantly, knowing that nothing is going to get through to them or the supporters they are reaching out for. In fact, I would say it does more harm than good.

So, I agree with that guy. Unless its either really important or at least a respectable institution, CNN really should be decreasing their exposure. Like Vox reported on, CNN thrive on these clickbait arguments, so we can't get true reporting anymore.
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459



This is my favorite response in the thread.

zgpT5V3.jpg
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
Progressives sometimes get too caught up in the idea of purity of argument. Exceptions to the rule exist in all things in all walks of life. It's ok to accept that reality.
 

TarNaru33

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,045
Because she worked very hard to make sure no one believes her. She will literally do anything, hurt anyone to reach her goals. She is literally an evil woman and in no way or any situation deserves a neutral assessment. There are certain people where you can do that and she's one of them.

I back this, right here.

She is still an awful person who would say anything to get what she wants, because of this, it significantly dilutes her claim. Now, I do not believe anyone who has a lot of public exposure should engage her on this claim at all, because she said it to be a double-edged sword.
 

GaimeGuy

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,092
She's a disgusting creature using her own victimhood to shame other victims about their own experiences, and that's assuming the best about her