• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

cLOUDo

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
2,188
I should clarify. They, as in the Republicans that control the Senate Judiciary absolutely COULD force him to testify, if they wanted to. They just are choosing not to use that power and pretending like he doesn't exist instead. They absolutely could force him to be there, that is a power they have, yes. They're just choosing to play pretend instead because it would likely be disastrous for them if he did testify. And of course as for Democrats, they have no power to do anything by themselves since they're in the minority. They absolutely need the cooperation of Republicans to do anything. And since Republicans don't want to there's unfortunately nothing they can do on that front.
So all this is pointless, isn't?
 

'3y Kingdom

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,496
Already happened after Merrick Garland.
That set a precedent for the process. In this case the nominee is, by any standard, nakedly partisan. Today's hearing was an unprecedented assertion of a nominee's privilege to act in a political manner.
The court has been politicized since I can remember. This idea that it isn't a political branch is a farce.
It has never been this openly affected and even directed by pure party adherence.
 

chubigans

Vertigo Gaming Inc.
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
2,560
This means he'll get confirmed.
Giving it a day to have the appearance of the undecided getting a chance to verify the documents, but scheduling it so shortly after the hearing means they have the votes
Not necessarily. Republicans want this done so if he doesn't get voted through they can fast track someone else immediately.
 

Dyle

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
30,113
Question - people talking about him getting impeached later - can he actually be impeached? Even if we get all Democrats in house and Senate, can he truly be impeached for this? Is there a statute of limitations on sexual assault?
Impeachment is a political process not a criminal one, so there isn't a statute of limitations or anything. Just the same as impeaching the president it requires 50% +1 of the House to start the process and 2/3 in the Senate to remove from office. Only 1 SCOTUS justice was impeached but he was not removed from office. Short of a Democratic supermajority in the Senate it will never happen
 

Jarate

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,614
They'll never believe a woman accuser, sure, but the Republicans I know (including my mother) are all concerned about Kavanaugh's obvious lack of honesty about his past. It's terrible, but I think what some Republicans are getting out of this isn't the idea that Kavanaugh shouldn't be appointed because he's been credibly accused of sexual assault by multiple people, but that his lack of honesty in dealing with these allegations is a damning character flaw for a Supreme Court judge.

Obviously this doesn't affect the view of the core base, but it might be enough to move the needle on the political calculations of the Senate swing votes. It seems ridiculously trivial in comparison to the greater issue here, but I think it's where Kavanaugh's Republican defenders are most vulnerable at the moment.
They don't care about the future. Republicans know they are fucked in the midterms and know that in 2 years, the idiots who vote in this country will forget about this farce and end up voting them back. Meanwhile, all those politicians who lost their job end up getting into the lobbying industry, where they will make a lot more money in a lot less stressful job.

this is to help their billionaire donors. That is the defining feature of their party is that they are united to help a very rich segment of the population. Inherently, they are all basically interchangeable and they know it.
 

BlackJace

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
5,478
This confirmation is like the last infinity stone the GOP needs on their infinity gauntlet of fuckery.

They're going to do everything in their power to move forward. It's not hopeless thinking that Kavanaugh gets axed, but I think a lot of us are overestimating the impact of Ford's testimony has on these dudes. We saw a panel of heartless people, man.
 

mjp2417

Member
Nov 2, 2017
9,365
I think GOP leadership knows they have no more time to waste on more testimony or investigations. They want him to fall or rise on a vote quickly and get it over with one way or another. It's on the shoulders of swing votes.
This is my reading as well. I don't think the existence of the vote in and of itself necessarily portends a result either way given the macro situation.
 
Oct 25, 2017
12,211
Whew a teenager going through their emo phase would be envious of the doom and gloom in this thread lol
Let me help ya out, I'm asking what does this mean.

You are basically comparing people in this thread to an emo teen because they understand that this SCOTUS justice is going to change the court for their lifetime. So edgy bro.
 

Cyanity

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,345
I have so much hate in my heart for Kavanaugh and the GOP right now. We're watching the death of democracy in realtime.
 

Luminish

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,508
Denver
People who don't think he's getting through don't comprehend what the republicans are trying to do

this is their biggest policy win they could ever have. A group of 5 partisan shills willing to destroy the sanctity of the supreme court so that they can push through their unpopular, 1 issue voter needs.

Ive studied a lot of American history, and this is easily one of the darkest moments for this democracy.
I would certainly agree if it 100% meant they were losing this seat. This is the decision between rapist and risking having to do it lame duck if they don't do well enough in midterms. Makes it a harder choice.
 
Oct 25, 2017
20,248
People who don't think he's getting through don't comprehend what the republicans are trying to do

this is their biggest policy win they could ever have. A group of 5 partisan shills willing to destroy the sanctity of the supreme court so that they can push through their unpopular, 1 issue voter needs.

Ive studied a lot of American history, and this is easily one of the darkest moments for this democracy.

Don't forget him being on record saying sitting presidents shouldn't be indicted or investigated
 

iksenpets

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,538
Dallas, TX
This is Mitch daring Collins and Murkowski to vote no.

The optimistic read is that with Manchin saying he, Collins, Murkowski, and Flake were all undecided, that at least two of those threes Republicans demanded additional investigation, and McConnell decided to call their bluff. Either they break, or Kavanaugh dies quickly, either of which is better than more investigation for him.

The pessimistic take is that any undecidedness was broken in the conference meeting and they're full steam forward on this.
 

Deleted member 36578

Dec 21, 2017
26,561
People who don't think he's getting through don't comprehend what the republicans are trying to do

this is their biggest policy win they could ever have. A group of 5 partisan shills willing to destroy the sanctity of the supreme court so that they can push through their unpopular, 1 issue voter needs.

Ive studied a lot of American history, and this is easily one of the darkest moments for this democracy.

Seriously needs to be shouted from the roof tops. This is why today was important to me at least. Our system is fucked.
 

Tahnit

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,965
If they confirm him i want there to be screaming and yelling by the democrats. Enough is a fucking nough. SO sick of this shit.
 

Deleted member 283

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,288
Question - people talking about him getting impeached later - can he actually be impeached? Even if we get all Democrats in house and Senate, can he truly be impeached for this? Is there a statute of limitations on sexual assault?
Someone can be impeached for basically whatever reason. It doesn't even have to be an actual crime. Just whatever the House/Senate decide is sufficient is enough. It's entirely arbitrary, so this could certainly qualify. There's no problem there.

The problem is, to actually be removed from the Senate requires a 2/3 vote in favor. And no way are Democrats getting anywhere close to 66 Senators anyone soon due to which elections in the Senate are happening when and no way will they ever fill the void with Republicans if they can't stop them from voting him in in the first place.

Impeachment is a non-starter due to the make-up of the Senate. If he votes were there they could do it absolutely, there's no problems with that in that particular situation at all. But there's just no way of getting that many votes should that be the way things go.
 

Deleted member 8257

Oct 26, 2017
24,586
I still think that the moderate darlings forming a holdout is a slight favorite if you're betting odds. Maybe by 5%.
 

Pooh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,849
The Hundred Acre Wood
This confirmation is like the last infinity stone the GOP needs on their infinity gauntlet of fuckery.

They're going to do everything in their power to move forward. It's not hopeless thinking that Kavanaugh gets axed, but I think a lot of us are overestimating the impact of Ford's testimony has on these dudes. We saw a panel of heartless people, man.

I don't think it has any impact on those dudes. What we have to hope is that it has rattled something loose in the women of the GOP, enough to where they start to fear that they might even be losing conservative women over this.

Unlikely as fuck but far more likely than thinking Grassley or Hatch are gonna turn a new leaf at whatever dinosaur age they are.
 

Anubis

User requested permanent ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,392
Honestly save for a few Dems, I wasn't happy with their questioning. Dems always play too nice and they have to recognize the double standards. If Avenatti was a Senator, you think he would've been coy?

Two issues they should've raised
A) the three witnesses saying they don't remember said incident doesn't preclude from it happening in the first place

B) the fact that BK openly displayed to the public that he is a partisan hack who is spiteful


The Dems need to get their act together because I don't think they even convinced independents. They need to fight fire with fire and enough with this they go low, we go high bs as it clearly doesn't work in today's climate.
 

Jarate

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,614
conservative women saw the current president say that he raped women and still voted for him over a women
 

Doof

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,434
Kentucky
Question - people talking about him getting impeached later - can he actually be impeached? Even if we get all Democrats in house and Senate, can he truly be impeached for this? Is there a statute of limitations on sexual assault?

It works the same way as impeachment for the Presidency does; simple majority in the House, 67 in the Senate.
 

Luminish

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,508
Denver
I just woke up, what's happened between ford's statement and now?
Kavanaugh had some moments of weird non-answers and pathological lies, and emotional outbursts, but nothing to completely change the course.

Republicans are meeting now about what to do. Flake, Murkowski, Collins, and Manchin met before that. Manchin says they're all still undecided.
 

CannonballB

Member
Oct 27, 2017
364
Pahonix
Can he be impeached? It's possible. Will he be convicted? No. But, there's a difference between the statute of limitations on crimes and the impeachment process: one can be impeached without a state (or the feds) bringing charges, and one can be the subject of a criminal investigation (or even convicted) without being impeached.

The interesting wild-card is if the State of Maryland, which does not have a statute of limitations on sexual assault for the alleged crime, opens an investigation into a sitting Supreme Court justice.

Edit: I take that back. Back in 1982, there was a statute of limitations, and Kav was a minor at the time too.

See this for more: https://wjla.com/news/nation-world/kavanaugh-says-he-wont-let-false-accusations-push-him-out.

Someone can be impeached for basically whatever reason. It doesn't even have to be an actual crime. Just whatever the House/Senate decide is sufficient is enough. It's entirely arbitrary, so this could certainly qualify. There's no problem there.

The problem is, to actually be removed from the Senate requires a 2/3 vote in favor. And no way are Democrats getting anywhere close to 66 Senators anyone soon due to which elections in the Senate are happening when and no way will they ever fill the void with Republicans if they can't stop them from voting him in in the first place.

Impeachment is a non-starter due to the make-up of the Senate. If he votes were there they could do it absolutely, there's no problems with that in that particular situation at all. But there's just no way of getting that many votes should that be the way things go.

Impeachment is a political process not a criminal one, so there isn't a statute of limitations or anything. Just the same as impeaching the president it requires 50% +1 of the House to start the process and 2/3 in the Senate to remove from office. Only 1 SCOTUS justice was impeached but he was not removed from office. Short of a Democratic supermajority in the Senate it will never happen

Thanks y'all. I just saw a lot of comments about impeachment and wasn't sure what, if anything, could come of it.

I have my fingers crossed for a no vote but have absolutely no faith in repugs. I wonder if Vegas is taking bets....
 

Jarate

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,614
It works the same way as impeachment for the Presidency does; simple majority in the House, 67 in the Senate.
It is physically an impossibility for the Democrats to get 67 Senate members.

If Kav is in, he's basically in unless he does something to piss off conservatives (like vote to give protections to poor people)
 

bdbdbd

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,912
Been catching up on today's proceedings, bits and pieces. When Kavanaugh couldn't even give a straight answer about how many beers is too many, I'd had enough. Guy wants to be a Supreme Court Justice and can't even give a straight answer about basic moderation? Get the efffff out of here.
 

RiPPn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,562
Phoenix
Myvtakesesy

If you are republican. He didnt do it

Anyone else. He did it.

Basically same place we were
There were some republican callers on the cspan call in that said they don't believe Kavanaugh and they were siding with him before this started. But I'm sure they will be swayed back over when they get their daily fox news brainwashing session.
 

etrain911

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,828
It is physically an impossibility for the Democrats to get 67 Senate members.

If Kav is in, he's basically in unless he does something to piss off conservatives (like vote to give protections to poor people)


If an investigation is done and there is evidence of this actually happening, you can force Rs to swallow the poison pill and support his ass again. That's enough to justify shooting for it.
 

Ponn

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
3,171
I would certainly agree if it 100% meant they were losing this seat. This is the decision between rapist and risking having to do it lame duck if they don't do well enough in midterms. Makes it a harder choice.

Look how many of them have announced their retirement. They already knew midterms were going to be rough. The thing is these fuckwads took power and they got almost everything they wanted. Even if Dems get the slight majority in midterms (which I'm not as confident as others, especially knowing there is a good chance Nelson may lose his seat here in Florida) the Republicans know they can't undue everything the Republicans have done. And who knows what the climate will be in 2 years. This is not a hard choice for them. The couple that give a shit about their shits including a fucking Democrat are in there flipping coins right now to see who will take the hit.

JFC people get it through your heads. They are going to fucking own the SCOTUS. This is not a hard choice for them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.