You can't put the genie back in the bottle. If Kavanaugh gets in, "objectivity" is dead in all three offices. They are all political grounds
I mean it was already kind of fucked given Obama was denied a pick.
You can't put the genie back in the bottle. If Kavanaugh gets in, "objectivity" is dead in all three offices. They are all political grounds
Not before the midterms and there is a slight non-zero chance that they might lose the senate (one can wish for unicorns).
So all this is pointless, isn't?I should clarify. They, as in the Republicans that control the Senate Judiciary absolutely COULD force him to testify, if they wanted to. They just are choosing not to use that power and pretending like he doesn't exist instead. They absolutely could force him to be there, that is a power they have, yes. They're just choosing to play pretend instead because it would likely be disastrous for them if he did testify. And of course as for Democrats, they have no power to do anything by themselves since they're in the minority. They absolutely need the cooperation of Republicans to do anything. And since Republicans don't want to there's unfortunately nothing they can do on that front.
That set a precedent for the process. In this case the nominee is, by any standard, nakedly partisan. Today's hearing was an unprecedented assertion of a nominee's privilege to act in a political manner.
It has never been this openly affected and even directed by pure party adherence.The court has been politicized since I can remember. This idea that it isn't a political branch is a farce.
Not necessarily. Republicans want this done so if he doesn't get voted through they can fast track someone else immediately.This means he'll get confirmed.
Giving it a day to have the appearance of the undecided getting a chance to verify the documents, but scheduling it so shortly after the hearing means they have the votes
Impeachment is a political process not a criminal one, so there isn't a statute of limitations or anything. Just the same as impeaching the president it requires 50% +1 of the House to start the process and 2/3 in the Senate to remove from office. Only 1 SCOTUS justice was impeached but he was not removed from office. Short of a Democratic supermajority in the Senate it will never happenQuestion - people talking about him getting impeached later - can he actually be impeached? Even if we get all Democrats in house and Senate, can he truly be impeached for this? Is there a statute of limitations on sexual assault?
They don't care about the future. Republicans know they are fucked in the midterms and know that in 2 years, the idiots who vote in this country will forget about this farce and end up voting them back. Meanwhile, all those politicians who lost their job end up getting into the lobbying industry, where they will make a lot more money in a lot less stressful job.They'll never believe a woman accuser, sure, but the Republicans I know (including my mother) are all concerned about Kavanaugh's obvious lack of honesty about his past. It's terrible, but I think what some Republicans are getting out of this isn't the idea that Kavanaugh shouldn't be appointed because he's been credibly accused of sexual assault by multiple people, but that his lack of honesty in dealing with these allegations is a damning character flaw for a Supreme Court judge.
Obviously this doesn't affect the view of the core base, but it might be enough to move the needle on the political calculations of the Senate swing votes. It seems ridiculously trivial in comparison to the greater issue here, but I think it's where Kavanaugh's Republican defenders are most vulnerable at the moment.
I mean it was already kind of fucked given Obama was denied a pick.
This is my reading as well. I don't think the existence of the vote in and of itself necessarily portends a result either way given the macro situation.I think GOP leadership knows they have no more time to waste on more testimony or investigations. They want him to fall or rise on a vote quickly and get it over with one way or another. It's on the shoulders of swing votes.
Let me help ya out, I'm asking what does this mean.Whew a teenager going through their emo phase would be envious of the doom and gloom in this thread lol
I would certainly agree if it 100% meant they were losing this seat. This is the decision between rapist and risking having to do it lame duck if they don't do well enough in midterms. Makes it a harder choice.People who don't think he's getting through don't comprehend what the republicans are trying to do
this is their biggest policy win they could ever have. A group of 5 partisan shills willing to destroy the sanctity of the supreme court so that they can push through their unpopular, 1 issue voter needs.
Ive studied a lot of American history, and this is easily one of the darkest moments for this democracy.
People who don't think he's getting through don't comprehend what the republicans are trying to do
this is their biggest policy win they could ever have. A group of 5 partisan shills willing to destroy the sanctity of the supreme court so that they can push through their unpopular, 1 issue voter needs.
Ive studied a lot of American history, and this is easily one of the darkest moments for this democracy.
People who don't think he's getting through don't comprehend what the republicans are trying to do
this is their biggest policy win they could ever have. A group of 5 partisan shills willing to destroy the sanctity of the supreme court so that they can push through their unpopular, 1 issue voter needs.
Ive studied a lot of American history, and this is easily one of the darkest moments for this democracy.
Someone can be impeached for basically whatever reason. It doesn't even have to be an actual crime. Just whatever the House/Senate decide is sufficient is enough. It's entirely arbitrary, so this could certainly qualify. There's no problem there.Question - people talking about him getting impeached later - can he actually be impeached? Even if we get all Democrats in house and Senate, can he truly be impeached for this? Is there a statute of limitations on sexual assault?
let loose the dogs of revolution. take the buildings by storm. your government is failing you.
This confirmation is like the last infinity stone the GOP needs on their infinity gauntlet of fuckery.
They're going to do everything in their power to move forward. It's not hopeless thinking that Kavanaugh gets axed, but I think a lot of us are overestimating the impact of Ford's testimony has on these dudes. We saw a panel of heartless people, man.
You do know you don't get civility from people who never had any in the first place.
Republicans circled the wagon, e.g. its done.I just woke up, what's happened between ford's statement and now?
Yep.conservative women saw the current president say that he raped women and still voted for him over a women
I just woke up, what's happened between ford's statement and now?
Question - people talking about him getting impeached later - can he actually be impeached? Even if we get all Democrats in house and Senate, can he truly be impeached for this? Is there a statute of limitations on sexual assault?
Kavanaugh had some moments of weird non-answers and pathological lies, and emotional outbursts, but nothing to completely change the course.I just woke up, what's happened between ford's statement and now?
Can he be impeached? It's possible. Will he be convicted? No. But, there's a difference between the statute of limitations on crimes and the impeachment process: one can be impeached without a state (or the feds) bringing charges, and one can be the subject of a criminal investigation (or even convicted) without being impeached.
The interesting wild-card is if the State of Maryland, which does not have a statute of limitations on sexual assault for the alleged crime, opens an investigation into a sitting Supreme Court justice.
Edit: I take that back. Back in 1982, there was a statute of limitations, and Kav was a minor at the time too.
See this for more: https://wjla.com/news/nation-world/kavanaugh-says-he-wont-let-false-accusations-push-him-out.
Someone can be impeached for basically whatever reason. It doesn't even have to be an actual crime. Just whatever the House/Senate decide is sufficient is enough. It's entirely arbitrary, so this could certainly qualify. There's no problem there.
The problem is, to actually be removed from the Senate requires a 2/3 vote in favor. And no way are Democrats getting anywhere close to 66 Senators anyone soon due to which elections in the Senate are happening when and no way will they ever fill the void with Republicans if they can't stop them from voting him in in the first place.
Impeachment is a non-starter due to the make-up of the Senate. If he votes were there they could do it absolutely, there's no problems with that in that particular situation at all. But there's just no way of getting that many votes should that be the way things go.
Impeachment is a political process not a criminal one, so there isn't a statute of limitations or anything. Just the same as impeaching the president it requires 50% +1 of the House to start the process and 2/3 in the Senate to remove from office. Only 1 SCOTUS justice was impeached but he was not removed from office. Short of a Democratic supermajority in the Senate it will never happen
If keeping kids in cages won't get people off their ass for mass riots than nothing will. The country should be on fire right now.
It is physically an impossibility for the Democrats to get 67 Senate members.It works the same way as impeachment for the Presidency does; simple majority in the House, 67 in the Senate.
Not before the midterms and there is a slight non-zero chance that they might lose the senate (one can wish for unicorns).
There were some republican callers on the cspan call in that said they don't believe Kavanaugh and they were siding with him before this started. But I'm sure they will be swayed back over when they get their daily fox news brainwashing session.Myvtakesesy
If you are republican. He didnt do it
Anyone else. He did it.
Basically same place we were
It is physically an impossibility for the Democrats to get 67 Senate members.
It is physically an impossibility for the Democrats to get 67 Senate members.
If Kav is in, he's basically in unless he does something to piss off conservatives (like vote to give protections to poor people)
I would certainly agree if it 100% meant they were losing this seat. This is the decision between rapist and risking having to do it lame duck if they don't do well enough in midterms. Makes it a harder choice.