• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Paxton25

Member
May 9, 2018
1,898
Just got ORI as it's only £8 at the moment and bloody hell its great! Was hooked after 2 minutes. It's damn beautiful.
 
Jul 13, 2018
469
Him not doing his tweet sprees is causing a lot of speculation in and of itself. It makes us believe he's too busy, but why? Typical VP duties? Perhaps. Or maybe Matt and him are both seeking out studios and great developers aggressively. Or maybe he's setting up an Xbox event in a couple months and along with that, he's trying to get as many announcements for it as he can. Or maybe..... you get the point.
Would you be able to fill me in briefly regarding the significance of Phil's tweet sprees? I'm sort of out of the loop since I don't have Twitter. Also, I'm hoping Microsoft will eventually expand their # of conferences per year as opposed to showing everything off during the summer events. I'm guessing when they gain more 1st party content, we may see another Xbox event added to the yearly schedule.

Microsoft
E3
Gamescom

Sony
E3
TGS
Paris Games Week
PSX
 

vorimenn

Banned
Jul 28, 2018
1,225
London, United Kingdom.
If Microsoft and Nintendo will get closer again through giving some Rare's characters to Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, so I would like to see Xbox Live support for this game as well. Especially with Achievements.

It's nice and a bit weird to see Achievements of Minecraft from Nintendo Switch on my Xbox One, so why not to see another games. And yes, I know that Minecraft property of Microsoft, and Super Smash Bros. Ultimate of Nintendo. But still, why not!
 

Rodeo Clown

Member
Dec 14, 2017
1,241
I honestly don't mind one franchise studios, as long as they can improve and not keep rehashing the same stuff (which is what The Coalition and 343 are doing).
I think the reason Gears of War 4 got the "good not great" reaction that it did is precisely that: it felt safe, it felt like more Gears. I know why they did it, with Rod wanting them to prove they could get it right, etc., but that Gears 5 trailer got me more excited than any of the pre-release stuff for 4 ever did. It really does, as you say, look like they know that the traditional Gears formula is getting a little long in the tooth and they have to try something to refresh the series. I love it. I'm so stoked for Gears 5.
 

Toumari

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,304
England
If Microsoft and Nintendo will get closer again through giving some Rare's characters to Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, so I would like to see Xbox Live support for this game as well. Especially with Achievements.

It's nice and a bit weird to see Achievements of Minecraft from Nintendo Switch on my Xbox One, so why not to see another games. And yes, I know that Minecraft property of Microsoft, and Super Smash Bros. Ultimate of Nintendo. But still, why not!
Why would Nintendo build in Xbox Live (a competitors online service) into their first-party title when they just launched their own paid online service a few days ago?
 

Paxton25

Member
May 9, 2018
1,898
I think the reason Gears of War 4 got the "good not great" reaction that it did is precisely that: it felt safe, it felt like more Gears. I know why they did it, with Rod wanting them to prove they could get it right, etc., but that Gears 5 trailer got me more excited than any of the pre-release stuff for 4 ever did. It really does, as you say, look like they know that the traditional Gears formula is getting a little long in the tooth and they have to try something to refresh the series. I love it. I'm so stoked for Gears 5.
I really liked gears 4, but I see what you're saying with 5! It looks great and I can't wait to see it on my X next year.
 

ParityBit

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,618
Sooooo. Between FH4 and RDR2, I put down 100 bucks on the GameStop Fallout White Xbox One X (10/15 release). I am going to trade in my original when I go pick it up! Some 4K goodness. I have a good PC but no 4K.
 

Ebtesam

Self-Requested Ban
Member
Apr 1, 2018
4,638
Can Someone find the Easter eggs in the Picture?

p_997jhip00.jpg



Tomb raider
fallout
Gears
Banjo-Kazooie

All exist in the service Now! So?
 
Last edited:

Camonna Tong

Member
Mar 2, 2018
1,449
I think the reason Gears of War 4 got the "good not great" reaction that it did is precisely that: it felt safe, it felt like more Gears. I know why they did it, with Rod wanting them to prove they could get it right, etc., but that Gears 5 trailer got me more excited than any of the pre-release stuff for 4 ever did. It really does, as you say, look like they know that the traditional Gears formula is getting a little long in the tooth and they have to try something to refresh the series. I love it. I'm so stoked for Gears 5.
Yup, Gears 4 was to prove they can make the classic Gears and they'd move on from there. It makes sense, but people use it against them (without knowing or wanting to know why).

Halo 5 was supposed to be something else from what we've heard, but something happened. I actually wouldn't be surprised if the engine is at fault for a lot of the issues. Game looks great, but it launched without quite a bit and was supposed to be open world. They might have lost a couple years because of those issues, and they put developers right then and there on the new engine.

I honestly don't know how Forza can get much better. I liked Sega GT 2002 a lot, and wouldn't mind some aspects modeled after that, but otherwise I don't know. PG keeps surprising me with the conditions, I wouldn't be surprised if it eventually allows for character movement in certain areas. Like walking around your house, certain activities, etc.
Would you be able to fill me in briefly regarding the significance of Phil's tweet sprees? I'm sort of out of the loop since I don't have Twitter. Also, I'm hoping Microsoft will eventually expand their # of conferences per year as opposed to showing everything off during the summer events. I'm guessing when they gain more 1st party content, we may see another Xbox event added to the yearly schedule.

Microsoft
E3
Gamescom

Sony
E3
TGS
Paris Games Week
PSX
I'm probably not the best one to talk about it because I hear more than see it. But it comes down to him tweeting a lot and he hasn't done for the last couple months much. All of us know it's because he's too busy (or he hates us), but why is the question. Could be more board meetings, talking to execs in general, scoping out studios/talent, asking for more ports, trying to get an event ready, etc.

I think Sony already has enough with what they have because there's 3 late-year events. Microsoft just needs something around November or December and they'll be fine. I would say early in the year would be good too, but E3 takes a lot of planning and needs a lot of announcements and so on that an event early in the year would ruin. If they get big enough where they easily go over 2 hours every E3, then perhaps, but I can't see that for several more years at least, and it would probably be bigger to just have Inside Xbox take over. Conventions can be expensive and digital is much easier.
 
Last edited:

daniel77733

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,639
disagree. Uncharted has 6 titles but are all very similar in the way they are structured. Halo on the other hand has traditional FPS titles and 2 RTS titles (not including the mobile games that got ported too). Gears of War has 5 traditional games not including Gears 5 since we havent played em, they also have Gears Tactics which looks like an XCom like title and they have that pops game whatever that is.

One thing is doing nothing different another is expending the franchises to tell new stories with new characters let alone with completely new styles.

I didn't count the spin offs or games that weren't developed by the core original developer. Gears Tactics is on my list but it's not being developed by The Coalition so while it's set in the Gears universe, it's a spin off that im not going to count. I don't count the Uncharted PSVita game because it's not a main game in the franchise, it's on a damn handheld and it wasn't developed by Naughty Dog. I'm just counting the main games.

I'm counting everything including spin-offs. And all three Platform holders have franchise studios/teams. Santa Monica has only ever internally developed the God of War series (there was Kinectica, but that was a game with no sequel), so they're a franchise factory. While ND has developed 2 franchises (counting the two still going on), Sony is setting up a franchise studio for Uncharted, and as far as we know, TLOU is going to be ND's franchise for awhile. Polyphony Digital is another franchise factory (though they've released two other games between certain games). Nintendo has Game Freak, as well as teams for Zelda, Mario, Fire Emblem, etc.

I honestly don't mind one franchise studios, as long as they can improve and not keep rehashing the same stuff (which is what The Coalition and 343 are doing). Games can take forever to develop, and with 2 - 3 franchises it is entirely possible for a franchise to skip a generation. As I've stated before about PG's second studio, I wouldn't mind them doing a second franchise. However, no more than that and have them make 2 Fable games before doing that. I can't see the first Fable being as high of quality as the second because the studio is still building up, and it's going to take several more years and triple the devs they have now to get the quality that 2 will likely have.

Yes, Microsoft was relying on their franchise teams more, but of necessity due to issues with budget in Microsoft. Plus, we really have no idea how many games they've tried to greenlight but fell through due to budget or other issues.

See above why I only the main games.

Naughty Dog is done with Uncharted. Highly unlikely that they develop another one. Franchise can still live on but Naughty Dog won't be developing it. Personally, I would love Lost Legacy 2 but if not, then I prefer the series to stay dead until PS6 if not beyond as im just sick of Drake, etc. I believe that TLOU will be a trilogy and done.

While God of War still exists, except for the name and Kratos, everything was changed and for the better in my opinion. While there will be a sequel, SSM will be working on a new IP with Barlog as the lead and before GOW 2018, SSM did have a game cancelled that had nothing to do with God of War. So while there will still be God of War, there will also be a new IP from SSM.

After recently playing Gears 1-3 after playing Gears 4 two years ago, im very happy that they added melee combat to Gears 5 as the series does in fact need to change and evolve. This is why im excited for Gears 5 because like with God of War, I think that the series can change for the better while still keeping it's legacy and history intact.

Yeah, PD only does Gran Turismo but Turn 10 only does FM so that evens out.

As for Playground, I would LOVE it if that studio becomes massive and has three big teams. That would be great. A Forza Horizon team. A Fable team. And a new IP team. Hell yeah!!!

Like Sony this generation, I do want to see Microsoft's internal studios to evolve and develop new IP's instead of only the main three. Everyone here knows that I heavily favor Sony but here's why - last gen, if it wasn't for Naughty Dog, I would have only ONE exclusive for PS3 that appealed to me (Dead Nation) and it wasn't even an internal owned studio.

This generation, not only do I still have Naughty Dog but I also have Guerrilla Games with Horizon to look forward to and while there's possibly going to be a new Killzone game which I don't have any interest in, it's going to be from the secondary team while the primary team stays with Horizon. Sucker Punch who developed Infamous which like Killzone, didn't appeal to me whatsoever is now developing Ghost of Tsushima which based on E3, im 100% all in. Bend Studio is giving me Days Gone after being non-existent for like a decade.

My point is that as hyped, excited and confident I am in Sony's studios, im not that way with Microsoft's and in order to feel that way, they have to get their internal studios to evolve and simply be fucking better. I don't have a problem with Halo Infinite as im actually interested in it and super hyped for Gears 5 but I would love for these studios to either A) have a secondary team that gives us a new IP or B) develop a new IP in between sequels of their one game franchise. Like Naughty Dog did with TLOU between Uncharted 3 and 4. Not only would this add a new IP, possible a new genre but also gives the current franchise a longer break which to be honest, at times, is the best thing for a franchise.

I simply believe that for Microsoft and the Xbox brand to truly be great and on a consistent basis, they can't just depending and relying on the big three over and over and over again. I won't count Turn 10 as I believe it's been said that the entire studio is all just about racing and cars but 343 and The Coalition have a good amount of talent and in my eyes, it just feels like it's either A) being wasted or B) not fulfilling the full potential that the studio has. And the only way to know that for sure is by giving them the opportunity to develop something new.

Nintendo for me despite owning a Switch is non-existent because it's the same fucking franchises since NES/SNES and it's like, do something new. Evolve. It's simply the same shit over and over and over. Granted, they will always sell a shit ton of copies which is why they will never change but for me personally, that's why they'll always be last in my eyes because all they do is depend on rely on the same shit every time.

Microsoft can have 343 and Coalition stay with Halo and Gears but I wish that they would give me a new IP in between. After Halo Infinite and Gears 5, to be perfectly honest, they should each create a new IP. As long as the monetary support is there, It can only make them and the brand better.

In summary, I would just like to see Microsoft's internal studios develop new IP's and games that appeal to me like Sony's internal studios have done this generation. I figure that Sony's internal studios have for the most part completely appealed to me this generation for PlayStation 4 and I would love to see the same thing from Microsoft and Xbox 4. That's pretty much it.
 

Deleted member 43077

User requested account closure
Banned
May 9, 2018
5,741
I didn't count the spin offs or games that weren't developed by the core original developer.
The Coalition and 343 do more than just develop the next main installment and help other in creating spin offs even if its only a bit but nothing Halo happens without 343 being involved. Even if you take off the spin offs which i dont think is right Halo just as en example has evolved a lot over 3 to 4 to 5 I mean seriously...the gameplay is so different, the focus on competitive play is way different and dun dun duuun its a different studio! . Do you not count Shadow of the Tomb Raider when talking TR13 trilogy because the majority was done by eidos instead? or like a sane person do you count it because its part of the franchise regardless who did or didnt work on it.
 

Camonna Tong

Member
Mar 2, 2018
1,449
See above why I only the main games.

Naughty Dog is done with Uncharted. Highly unlikely that they develop another one. Franchise can still live on but Naughty Dog won't be developing it. Personally, I would love Lost Legacy 2 but if not, then I prefer the series to stay dead until PS6 if not beyond as im just sick of Drake, etc. I believe that TLOU will be a trilogy and done.
Sony is making another studio to exclusively develop Uncharted as I mentioned before. They're situated in San Diego. It comes down to that being another studio that is a franchise studio. That is 3 franchise studios that Sony has.

While God of War still exists, except for the name and Kratos, everything was changed and for the better in my opinion. While there will be a sequel, SSM will be working on a new IP with Barlog as the lead and before GOW 2018, SSM did have a game cancelled that had nothing to do with God of War. So while there will still be God of War, there will also be a new IP from SSM.
I mean, it looks to be the same with Infinite too. Forza is really the only one, but I can't think of how to change that at all. For that, it would probably be better for Turn 10 to switch between PGR and if possible, have PG switch between Horizon and Crimson Skies (if they can handle it properly).

As for Playground, I would LOVE it if that studio becomes massive and has three big teams. That would be great. A Forza Horizon team. A Fable team. And a new IP team. Hell yeah!!!

Like Sony this generation, I do want to see Microsoft's internal studios to evolve and develop new IP's instead of only the main three. Everyone here knows that I heavily favor Sony but here's why - last gen, if it wasn't for Naughty Dog, I would have only ONE exclusive for PS3 that appealed to me (Dead Nation) and it wasn't even an internal owned studio.

This generation, not only do I still have Naughty Dog but I also have Guerrilla Games with Horizon to look forward to and while there's possibly going to be a new Killzone game which I don't have any interest in, it's going to be from the secondary team while the primary team stays with Horizon. Sucker Punch who developed Infamous which like Killzone, didn't appeal to me whatsoever is now developing Ghost of Tsushima which based on E3, im 100% all in. Bend Studio is giving me Days Gone after being non-existent for like a decade.

My point is that as hyped, excited and confident I am in Sony's studios, im not that way with Microsoft's and in order to feel that way, they have to get their internal studios to evolve and simply be fucking better. I don't have a problem with Halo Infinite as im actually interested in it and super hyped for Gears 5 but I would love for these studios to either A) have a secondary team that gives us a new IP or B) develop a new IP in between sequels of their one game franchise. Like Naughty Dog did with TLOU between Uncharted 3 and 4. Not only would this add a new IP, possible a new genre but also gives the current franchise a longer break which to be honest, at times, is the best thing for a franchise.
I wouldn't mind another studio for PG, but it's something they definitely need to wait for. Now is too soon.

Pretty sure there's no secondary team for Guerrilla and they're expanding to get games out faster, that's all. I can't imagine them working an another Killzone anytime soon.

Fortunately, Phil has things setting up in the right direction. Maybe not for you with franchise studios, but with Ninja Theory, Rare and the acquisitions they make in the future. Rare is easily one of Microsoft's best assets because they're an IP factory.

Games are getting bigger and bigger. It'll be hard for 343 to have a second team making things at the size of Halo: Infinite (we know people will expect them to), unless they practically double in size. It's much better for them to increase in size to make bigger games and release games faster, because it takes more developers and more time to create an AAA game every year.

For that last point, the new genres, while not being a new IP are something that Matt wants all of the franchise studios to do (actually I think they all have them), he calls them incubation teams. It'll be 5 years from Halo 5 to Halo Infinite and I think that is fine. It's when it's every 1 or 2 years that I have an issue.

Microsoft can have 343 and Coalition stay with Halo and Gears but I wish that they would give me a new IP in between. After Halo Infinite and Gears 5, to be perfectly honest, they should each create a new IP. As long as the monetary support is there, It can only make them and the brand better.

In summary, I would just like to see Microsoft's internal studios develop new IP's and games that appeal to me like Sony's internal studios have done this generation. I figure that Sony's internal studios have for the most part completely appealed to me this generation for PlayStation 4 and I would love to see the same thing from Microsoft and Xbox 4. That's pretty much it.
The biggest thing with 343 is they were started as a Halo developer and for that purpose only, just like the Uncharted studio that is starting up too. The Coalition might have another IP eventually, but who knows? They had the chance to work on a new IP, but chose Gears instead. Honestly, I think the franchise studios (save 343) have more freedom than people think, but they just prefer to stay with what they have. I wouldn't be surprised if Turn 10 wanted to do PGR and Microsoft allowed it.

Franchise Factories, like it or not, are very important. Games like Halo can sell an upper of 10 million, so Microsoft would want to bank on that. And if it's the same team with another IP, that will just take too long and a lot of people will complain. Heck, look at the Bethesda community, it was the middle of 2014 and people kept saying Fallout 4 will never happen. Just a few years wait will make people go insane.

Finally, I don't think a new team would necessarily be best for a studio like 343 like I mentioned before. That whole studio is built only for Halo, and nothing else. A decent percent of the team deal with the marketing and deals and only that. It's better to just make another separate studio. Having the same team do it will just make the wait for another horribly long.
 
Last edited:

AshWilliams

Alt-Account
Banned
Apr 22, 2018
7
I personally don't understand the fixation some people have now with studios doing new things.

The Coalition has made 1 new gears game, 343i has made 2 Halo games. What makes you even think these studios want to work on something new and not work on the franchises they have been given only relatively recently in game dev time?

My only thought is its because Gears and Halo do not interest these people, and while they see the ability these studios have they wish it was focused on something they personally would enjoy more?
 

Deleted member 19924

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
3,543
The Coalition is the only one that could maybe make a new IP out of the three. I don't ever see Turn 10 or 343i not doing Forza and Halo games. Only because TC was not set up like the other two, they were handed Gears out of the blue while making a new IP and not built specifically for its continuation.
 

Redesigned83

Member
Jul 9, 2018
761
I personally don't understand the fixation some people have now with studios doing new things.

The Coalition has made 1 new gears game, 343i has made 2 Halo games. What makes you even think these studios want to work on something new and not work on the franchises they have been given only relatively recently in game dev time?

My only thought is its because Gears and Halo do not interest these people, and while they see the ability these studios have they wish it was focused on something they personally would enjoy more?
As a Gears fan, my initial reason for wanting it was because at the time Microsoft only had like 5 studios and knowing already what 4 of them were working on kind of made me a little restless knowing we only had MSGP to bring new IP's (or revival of old IPs). Even with the new acquisitions I still have the same stance but mainly from a creative stand point, it's just more exciting knowing something 'new' is coming especially from talented devs.

I think Booty has the right idea with all of the studios having incubation teams but as I questioned earlier, I just wonder is that a creative refreshment exercise or something that they want each studio to take seriously as a potential IP the team would have to shift their focus to.
 

Vordan

Member
Aug 12, 2018
2,489
The problem is what happens if the sales continue to drop for Halo and Gears? Both of those franchises have been on a downward spiral sale-wise. Would MS let the studios try a new IP, or just take them out back? Gears in particular I'm skeptical of, that franchise just feels so last gen. Weren't the sales very ho-hum as well? Played through GOW4 recently and I was very bored throughout it. Didn't care about the new characters and I thought the not!Locust were dull as dishwater. Only fun part was the mechs at the end.

But I'm content with the new studios for now, although I hope Compulsion can step it up. We Happy Few was not very good imo.
 

Bradbatross

Member
Mar 17, 2018
14,216
The problem is what happens if the sales continue to drop for Halo and Gears? Both of those franchises have been on a downward spiral sale-wise. Would MS let the studios try a new IP, or just take them out back? Gears in particular I'm skeptical of, that franchise just feels so last gen. Weren't the sales very ho-hum as well? Played through GOW4 recently and I was very bored throughout it. Didn't care about the new characters and I thought the not!Locust were dull as dishwater. Only fun part was the mechs at the end.

But I'm content with the new studios for now, although I hope Compulsion can step it up. We Happy Few was not very good imo.
Gear is still one of the best TPS around and I don't think it'll take much for The Coalition to bring back some excitement to the franchise. I fully expect Gears 5 to put Gears back on top as the undisputed bet TPS.
 

Camonna Tong

Member
Mar 2, 2018
1,449
The problem is what happens if the sales continue to drop for Halo and Gears? Both of those franchises have been on a downward spiral sale-wise. Would MS let the studios try a new IP, or just take them out back? Gears in particular I'm skeptical of, that franchise just feels so last gen. Weren't the sales very ho-hum as well? Played through GOW4 recently and I was very bored throughout it. Didn't care about the new characters and I thought the not!Locust were dull as dishwater. Only fun part was the mechs at the end.

But I'm content with the new studios for now, although I hope Compulsion can step it up. We Happy Few was not very good imo.
Gears 4 was built that way on purpose, as they wanted to prove they can make a classic Gears game (making a new Gears that changes quite a bit, even for the better, would upset people, so they wanted to prove they can make a "safe" Gears). Gears 5 is where most/all the changes that Rod wants will come in. There was quite a bit of differences you could tell just in the gameplay trailer they showed.
 

matimeo

UI/UX Game Industry Veteran
Verified
Oct 26, 2017
979
I'm probably not the best one to talk about it because I hear more than see it. But it comes down to him tweeting a lot and he hasn't done for the last couple months much. All of us know it's because he's too busy (or he hates us), but why is the question. Could be more board meetings, talking to execs in general, scoping out studios/talent, asking for more ports, trying to get an event ready, etc.

He is busy. Busy time at the company overall.
 

Klobrille

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,360
Germany
Yup, Gears 4 was to prove they can make the classic Gears and they'd move on from there. It makes sense, but people use it against them (without knowing or wanting to know why).

Halo 5 was supposed to be something else from what we've heard, but something happened. I actually wouldn't be surprised if the engine is at fault for a lot of the issues. Game looks great, but it launched without quite a bit and was supposed to be open world. They might have lost a couple years because of those issues, and they put developers right then and there on the new engine.

I honestly don't know how Forza can get much better. I liked Sega GT 2002 a lot, and wouldn't mind some aspects modeled after that, but otherwise I don't know. PG keeps surprising me with the conditions, I wouldn't be surprised if it eventually allows for character movement in certain areas. Like walking around your house, certain activities, etc.

I'm probably not the best one to talk about it because I hear more than see it. But it comes down to him tweeting a lot and he hasn't done for the last couple months much. All of us know it's because he's too busy (or he hates us), but why is the question. Could be more board meetings, talking to execs in general, scoping out studios/talent, asking for more ports, trying to get an event ready, etc.

I think Sony already has enough with what they have because there's 3 late-year events. Microsoft just needs something around November or December and they'll be fine. I would say early in the year would be good too, but E3 takes a lot of planning and needs a lot of announcements and so on that an event early in the year would ruin. If they get big enough where they easily go over 2 hours every E3, then perhaps, but I can't see that for several more years at least, and it would probably be bigger to just have Inside Xbox take over. Conventions can be expensive and digital is much easier.
I vaguely tried multiple times already explaining that Xbox is in a really important phase for the future right now. It's about Microsoft Studios. It's about the next devices. It's about their general strategy moving forward. Phil is busy. It's probably as easy as that. He's also just a human like you and me who is happy as soon as he gets home :)
 

rrc1594

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,797
Damn seems like yesterday when people were saying MS passed on PG next game and it was going to be multiplatform
 

christocolus

Member
Oct 27, 2017
14,932
I think PG games will go all out for FH5. I believe the next horizon game will feature 3 areas from different countries. Japan , Dubai and ?
 

Deleted member 2254

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
21,467
I think PG games will go all out for FH5. I believe the next horizon game will feature 3 areas from different countries. Japan , Dubai and ?

With likely 3 years instead of 2 (assuming the next Xbox launches in 2020), a game made for a superior hardware and even more experience, I expect the next Horizon to be absolutely bonkers, probably bigger and of course it will look even better. If Microsoft has some shenanigans up its sleeve (cloud again?) you bet Forza Horizon will use it perfectly.
 

Dimple

Member
Jan 10, 2018
8,564
So I know we're talking about FH4 at the moment but Ive been binge watching the IGN unfiltered interviews (would recommend, some great insights into Xbox) and came across this again:



At the time I remember thinking what a unusual choice but after E3 it now makes a lot of sense, I'm so curious as to who they might acquire next (we know Matt Booty has said they're not done acquiring studios yet).
 

Klobrille

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,360
Germany
Its going to be dull even for forza fans. I can't wait to get my hands on Horizon. However, I have seen everything on the game already. I don't need to see more.
It makes no sense from a marketing perspective to talk about anything else besides FH4. Like I said, let them put all their focus on this game for the next few weeks. Just a nice talk and play stream.

After that, they can begin to look forward ... :)
 

Starlatine

533.489 paid youtubers cant be wrong
Member
Oct 28, 2017
30,413
It makes no sense from a marketing perspective to talk about anything else besides FH4. Like I said, let them put all their focus on this game for the next few weeks. Just a nice talk and play stream.

After that, they can begin to look forward ... :)

I believe FH4 is enough of a juggernaut to stand by its own at this point

Talking about nothing but FH4 alienates every Xbox owner who is not that crazy about FH4
 
Oct 26, 2017
8,992
It makes no sense from a marketing perspective to talk about anything else besides FH4. Like I said, let them put all their focus on this game for the next few weeks. Just a nice talk and play stream.

After that, they can begin to look forward ... :)

Exactly. With the game on game pass on day one and plenty of folks who bought it as well there really doesn't need to be a sole focus on it.
 

aember

Member
Oct 26, 2017
1,026
They've already said there is more than just FH4 in this episode, in the Xbox Wire article - they said full list of games being shown would be unveiled nearer to the time..
Hope so. I already know I'm getting FH4 as soon as it's up on game pass, the idea of tuning into Inside Xbox to watch more FH4 just makes me want to ignore the stream.
 

Klobrille

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,360
Germany
I would be fine with just a talk and play launch show for FH4. Everything else will be a bonus.

There are still 3 Inside Xbox Shows left for this year (4 with the one from today).
 

UraMallas

Member
Nov 1, 2017
18,914
United States
I am actually on a bit of a blackout on this game since I own Gamepass and know I am going to love this game. I want to just dive in when it comes out so I am a bit anxious on what will be shown.

I do hope they announce a Gamepass Ultimate add-on option today tho! Would buy immediately.
 

Deleted member 2254

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
21,467
I am actually on a bit of a blackout on this game since I own Gamepass and know I am going to love this game. I want to just dive in when it comes out so I am a bit anxious on what will be shown.

I do hope they announce a Gamepass Ultimate add-on option today tho! Would buy immediately.

This is where I'm at too. I watched about 15 minutes of the first seasons stream, then watched bits and pieces. Played the first 3 races or so of the demo, since then I've seen some photos from the photo thread and some slight pieces of video and thumbnails. I don't need to see more, I will play the game on Game Pass anyway. If they announce the add-ons bundle, I'll buy it even for like 50 Euros tbh, but paying 100 for the "full" package now seems silly when I get the game "free" anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.