It's a show. Why do people think otherwise?
Add fir the dress itself, it could lose the cape and head piece but yea it's pretty nice.
Lol. What?I don't think you'd be cool with a "Sexy Shuri" costume. Some IPs deserve respect is all anyone's saying.
There's a lot of ignorant motherfuckers in this thread.
And yikes. A dress that specifically identifies you on the show as cattle meant only for rape and abuse. Just watching the show makes me never want to have sex again let alone inspire me to be drawn to a costume like that. Yeesh.
You would think that at the very least the show would make people want to pick the book up and give it a shot. So odd to me.Equally depressing is the idea that you have to be in school to want to read :S As are all the responses talking about the Handmaid's Tale as if it were just a TV show and not, you know, an important piece of 20th Century literature...
This must be the most ridiculous post I have ever read on ERA. I am imagining you being married....and telling your wife you never ever want to have sex again because you watched a fictional TV show. I'm sure she'll be grateful.
Not that I actually think you are married...or in a relationship...because if you were you would have never written that dumb shit.
Do you like or have enough time to watch depressing stuff for hours and hours?
Damn.
The first season is amazing television, the second season never quite reaches those heights but is still really watchable. It strays from the source quite a bit in season 2.Sort of misses the whole point of the thing.
Tangentially related: Is the show worth a watch? I read the book years ago, but I am one of those people that really hate adaptions that stray from the source.
Dude, you are taking what I said way too seriously. The point is, I have never once conflated sexiness with the fucking handmaid's tale. I've never sat and watched it and been like "Oh man, if only Elizabeth Moss and all the other girls had a tight miniskirt on, that'd be so hot." Rather, I'm usually too revulsed and horrified by what's happening to be in that mindset, even after the show is over. The type of sexuality in that show is meant to be disgusting 90% of the time, so yeah, I'm sure a lot of people aren't exactly running out to bone right after watching it.
But you're right. I will literally never have sex again just because of the handmaid's tale. I am now effectively celibate. Yeesh.
The first season is amazing television, the second season never quite reaches those heights but is still really watchable. It strays from the source quite a bit in season 2.
I also never conflated sexiness with the Handmaid's tale, but I also never needed pathetic hyperboles to get that point across. so next time you want to make that clear. you might actually start out with what you just wrote instead of 'I never want to have sex again'. It's like you are trying to win the ERA award for most upset member. Yeesh.
This thread makes me wonder, is there a female presence on era?
Because it's a famous, Booker Prize-winning novel, often considered a pillar of dystopian fiction alongside Nineteen-Eighty-Four and Brave New World, that has been adapted multiple times to a variety of media.
What?
Of course there is but we dislike that any opinion we have is swept under the rug much like on GAF to follow whatever suits the world view of the male poster. I mean we clearly understand and experience these issues daily so taking offence at a vile costume shouldn't be something major but case in point:This thread makes me wonder, is there a female presence on era?
Here with have a man saying something on the surface seems rather pro women and not wholly negative. However it completely misses the point of many key issues that women face in society. For example being told how and how not to dress, his viewpoint that upping the sex appeal makes it empowering is completely out of touch. I would never consider wearing anything like this whilst yes I don't seek male approval for what I wear saying a sex slave outfit is empowering is disgusting.in real life this would qualify as a "hot take."
personally, i feel that we should let women wear what they want. i kind of like the twist of taking this outfit and turning it upside down as an expression of women's empowerment.
Here we have Morrigan stating quite rightly why this is an issue which shouldn't need explaining but apparently as in the case of this thread that is yet again proven wrong.Y'all really wondering what's wrong with a sexualized version of a costume that represents victims of institutionalized rape?
Really?
Yet again we have a man explain it's only just a costume with the hand waving a women explaining clearly the issue by basically using a not all women argument. The point isn't it being too sexy we can wear what we want where we want the issue is what it stands for.lol seriously who are you guys to tell women what they can and can't wear on halloween due to an outfit being "too sexy"?
do you really think the women who will go out wearing this on halloween out in a bar are doing it to declare their support for institutionalized rape? lmao what. maybe the costume will take on a different meaning for them, but i guess luckily we have resetera to tell people how to feel about their halloween costumes.
Of course there is but we dislike that any opinion we have is swept under the rug much like on GAF to follow whatever suits the world view of the male poster. I mean we clearly understand and experience these issues daily so taking offence at a vile costume shouldn't be something major but case in point:
Here with have a man saying something on the surface seems rather pro women and not wholly negative. However it completely misses the point of many key issues that women face in society. For example being told how and how not to dress, his viewpoint that upping the sex appeal makes it empowering is completely out of touch. I would never consider wearing anything like this whilst yes I don't seek male approval for what I wear saying a sex slave outfit is empowering is disgusting.
Here we have Morrigan stating quite rightly why this is an issue which shouldn't need explaining but apparently as in the case of this thread that is yet again proven wrong.
Yet again we have a man explain it's only just a costume with the hand waving a women explaining clearly the issue by basically using a not all women argument. The point isn't it being too sexy we can wear what we want where we want the issue is what it stands for.
So that's why there's very little female presence in the thread as we tell our viewpoint only to be shouted down by men with basic arguments that go nowhere. It was the exact same on GAF as well, because heaven forbid we have an opinion on why xyz is bad, and doesn't coddle you to your world view. If you think making a costume that represents institutionalised rape and extreme violence against women "sexy" it's not empowering it just suits your male gaze nothing more nothing less. Sure you could argue differently but who am I but a woman who apparently can't express a basic common sense viewpoint without men telling me I'm wrong.
No it is not the same thing that is simply stating basic facts. They are male are they not? It is not stating they can't take that position because they are male but stating that they shouldn't belittle us when we explain why it is actually bad. Is explaining why something viewed from the male gaze is not a viable option when it comes to an issue that profoundly affects women? Or would you prefer something else?People have different views about this, and you're free to express your view, and there are many others that agree with you.
But you complain about being shouted down, and yet you deem that not only is your view the only one that should be expressed, but that you claim a person cannot take a position because they are a man.
Not only that but you also attack the posters by saying 'here we have a man' or 'yet again we have a man'.
Aren't you are doing a similar thing that you claim is being done against women posting in the thread.
Equally depressing is the idea that you have to be in school to want to read :S As are all the responses talking about the Handmaid's Tale as if it were just a TV show and not, you know, an important piece of 20th Century literature...
i'm right here... you know you can refer to me directly.Here with have a man saying something on the surface seems rather pro women and not wholly negative.
However it completely misses the point of many key issues that women face in society. For example being told how and how not to dress, his viewpoint that upping the sex appeal makes it empowering is completely out of touch. I would never consider wearing anything like this whilst yes I don't seek male approval for what I wear saying a sex slave outfit is empowering is disgusting.
> Y'all really wondering what's wrong with a sexualized version of a costume that represents victims of institutionalized rape?
> Really?
Here we have Morrigan stating quite rightly why this is an issue which shouldn't need explaining but apparently as in the case of this thread that is yet again proven wrong.
Yet again we have a man explain it's only just a costume with the hand waving a women explaining clearly the issue by basically using a not all women argument.
you place great weight on what you believe the costume stands for. others place great weight on other things about the costume, and many likely don't believe the costume stands for what you're saying it stands for.The point isn't it being too sexy we can wear what we want where we want the issue is what it stands for.
well, sorry if you think i'm shouting all women down. i just think it's dumb to completely throw out everyones' arguments and pretend like yours is the only correct one that everyone else should agree with or be a terrible person.So that's why there's very little female presence in the thread as we tell our viewpoint only to be shouted down by men with basic arguments that go nowhere.
Sure you could argue differently but who am I but a woman who apparently can't express a basic common sense viewpoint without men telling me I'm wrong.
By the dress?????continued systemic oppression being excused or inspired by popularised fetishes in culture makes them more likely to suffer abuse, rape, forced marriage, being set on fire for rejecting men, being objectified, being denied equal job and lifestyle opportunities, having low self confidence, and not being given the benefit of the doubt on matters of justice.
There is. We're disgusted by this conduct in this thread and I personally reported posts in this thread.This thread makes me wonder, is there a female presence on era?
i'm right here... you know you can refer to me directly.
ok, i understand and respect that you feel that way.
since i'm not a guy, i can't really disagree with you because i've no idea what it's actually like to be a woman.
however, your view seems to be just one of many (nuanced) views on what seems to be a controversial topic. as a guy, it's not my place to tell women, or really anyone, what to wear and how to feel about things. i can, however, try and understand the reasons why people would feel the various ways they'd feel about this subject and not immediately vilify halloween costume wearers.
out of curiosity, i queried twitter to see how people feel about this issue... and it really hasn't been hard to find people with varying feelings. even beyond my original guess that maybe the costume was justifiable as the concrete image of a "revolt against oppression."
https://twitter.com/search?q=handmaids+tale+costume&ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^search
turns out "women" does not represent a monolith. also turns out that, while there are pro- and anti- sides, people seem to have different reasons for being on each side.
morrigan and you have a very strong view on the subject that clearly doesn't represent the way 100% of humanity feels. it's a completely valid view, but as i keep saying, others definitely have their own reasons for wearing this costume.
if someone wears this costume on halloween with the intent of trying to make institutionalized rape "sexy," then obviously that's fucked up. and there are totally some fucked up people in this world. but i would guess that most women who would've wanted to wear this costume have other reasons to wear this costume that are not to normalize and promote institutionalized rape. i think we're better off understanding their good intentions rather than trying to paint all supporters of this costume as supporters or facilitators of institutionalized rape.
this isn't a nazi costume. this is an image that has a lot of literature behind it. a lot of people who derive their own meanings out of the books or show based on their worldview and past experiences. literature's interpreted and extended many ways.
well, literally, not all women seem to have the same viewpoint on this issue.
you place great weight on what you believe the costume stands for. others place great weight on other things about the costume, and many likely don't believe the costume stands for what you're saying it stands for.
well, sorry if you think i'm shouting all women down. i just think it's dumb to completely throw out everyones' arguments and pretend like yours is the only correct one that everyone else should agree with or be a terrible person.
and literally nobody in this thread is disagreeing with anyone or anything on the basis that someone is a woman.
Is it really so bad to wear this ironically as a funny costume?
That is the whole crux of your response though that because other women disagree we are wrong. Of course we aren't a monolith that is common sense but to say that our viewpoint has no merit from a couple of tweets. You have said you are a man and can't possibly understand yet it is perfectly fine for you to disregard something when you can pluck viewpoints to suit your narrative. You could have basically gone "I don't understand but let me tell you how you we're wrong when talking about objectification".Literally nobody in this thread is disagreeing with anyone or anything on the basis that someone is a woman.
This thread makes me wonder, is there a female presence on era?